Bangladore..


As the the Red Mosque in Islamabad was stormed, President Pervez Musharraf must have been praying it would not end in the massacre of innocent women and children. But even before the shooting had stopped and the bodies counted, it was clear that this had been a pivotal action in Pakistan's internal ideological battle.
The storming of Lal Masjid has increased opposition to Gen Musharraf among those who are sympathetic towards the Taliban in Afghanistan and who oppose his backing of the US-led war on terror. Radical Islamists have been roused by what for them was an emblematic act of martyrdom.
advertisement
It is supposed to be election year in Pakistan and the big question is whether the debacle has helped or hindered Gen Musharraf's chances. From the beginning of the crisis, the general's critics have questioned the timing of the mosque drama and suggested that it was contrived to draw attention away from a domestic political crisis.
Gen Musharraf has been beleaguered since his attempted sacking of the chief justice. His standing has been dented by faltering American support and the killing of more than 40 people by his political allies in Karachi in May.
To some extent, Lal Masjid will have re-established his damaged credentials as a bulwark against terrorism. He has had to enforce, brutally, his policy of enlightened moderation. By storming the mosque, he has been drawn further into a battle he had hitherto tried to avoid.
Gen Musharraf has always striven to balance the demands of America, which has bankrolled his regime to the tune of $10 billion since 2001, and Islamic radicals.
This equilibrium has been underscored in blood in recent months, whereby every military action taken in Pakistan's tribal areas against pro-Taliban militants has been met with a series of suicide bomb attacks against soldiers and officials.
The murky relationship between jihadis, the mainstream military and Pakistan's military intelligence agencies is in flux. Many of the main jihadist groups that have fought in Indian-held Kashmir and Afghanistan, and that are suspected of infiltrating militants into Lal Masjid, were financed and trained by military intelligence.
The tens of thousands of jihadis were considered to be a "strategic asset" by Pakistani generals, but now high command is at a loss over how to decommission this "freelance" force.
The dark arts practised by the top brass over the past few years to control the radicals - fattening the established radical religious leaders with political power and cash -are losing their sway as a younger, more extreme generation of radicals has come to the fore.
Gen Musharraf's American backers may come to look at Lal Masjid as a metaphor for his record on controlling extremism. His drive since 2002 to reform madrassahs has failed because of opposition from hardline groups.
Pakistan saw a spectacular rise in madrassah numbers in the 1980s, when the schools, backed by funding from the West and Arab countries, became recruiting grounds for volunteers fighting Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Some madrassahs later supplied recruits for the Taliban.
Lal Masjid is a case in point. Critics noted that the Red Mosque first earned a reputation for militancy in the 1980s, under its founder, Maulana Abdullah, who used to work for Pakistan's military intelligence.
When he was assassinated, the mosque was taken over by his sons, Abdur Rashid Ghazi and Mohammed Abdul Aziz. Both were at one time in the pay of the government as civil servants.
That the Walter Mittyish revolutionary Ghazi has been transformed into an Islamist hero as result of Pakistan's anarchic governance is lamentable.
After he was accused of being involved in a Musharraf assassination plot, he boasted of how he merely lay low in Islamabad while the army scoured the country. The charges were later dropped.
When he was arrested after weapons were found in his car, again intelligence official ordered his release.
The Lal Masjid circus always had a contrived air of a deus ex machina, so when Ghazi declared yesterday, "My martyrdom is near", it was doubly tragic. He had his strings pulled by greater forces - either intelligence agencies or militant groups.
So what will Gen Musharraf's coalition backers make of Lal Masjid? He had planned to be re-elected by the existing assemblies. The US State Department disagrees. Last month, it issued a statement saying he would seek re-election from parliament after elections due later this year.
A State Department official said recently that Gen Musharraf had already pledged that, if he "continues in political life", he will "put aside the uniform". "We would expect him to follow through on his commitments," he said.
That points towards a scenario whereby he would jettison his uniform to preside over a broad-based secular coalition, possibly headed by the self-exiled former PM, Benazir Bhutto, whose previous governments were twice dismissed on charges of corruption.
Pakistan, in its 60th year, with its clownish antics and humiliating and resentful reliance on American money, has the aspect of a sorrowful, nuclear-armed circus.
The trail of terror leads to Pakistan
By DAVID WILLIAMS
Last updated at 23:42pm on 10th July 2007
The leaders of the 7/7 and 21/7 suicide plots are both thought to have planned their attacks in the foothills of the Hindu Kush mountain range on Pakistan's border with Afghanistan.
Links between the terror gangs have always been played down by the security services in London but their counterparts in Pakistan talk of a connection.
They cite 'intelligence' that the suicide missions were conceived at the same remote terror camp near Peshawar attended by July 7 leader Mohammad Sidique Khan and July 21 boss Muktar Said Ibrahim.
The claim comes from Pakistan's Inter- Services Intelligence, which co-ordinates foreign, domestic and military intelligence and has in the past been accused of helping to train Taliban and foreign fighters.
The ISI is said to have a unique insight into the camps over which it takes little action. Officially, British investigators praise their 'partner' in the war on terror.
Unofficially, they are frustrated about Pakistan withholding potentially-crucial leads.
The ISI says intelligence points to Khan and Ibrahim being together or in contact with other Britons and Al Qaeda-linked radicals both in the jihadi training camps of Warizistan, in Dhamial, near the sprawling city of Rawalpindi, and in Lahore.
Captured militants apparently told SIS agents that both men were in a camp in North Warizistan, a tribal area where senior Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders are thought to be hiding.
Ibrahim has been linked directly or indirectly to at least six terror cells of homegrown Muslim extremists planning attacks in Britain.
Key members of these plots all travelled to Pakistan for training. Khan and Ibrahim are said by the ISI to have been separately tutored by the same Afghan bomb maker, experimenting in carrying out explosions by grinding and mixing different household materials.
The bombs eventually used by both terror gangs were similar and of a kind not seen before in Britain.
The main charge was made from hydrogen peroxide and mixed with an organic material.
Scientist Clifford Todd told Ibrahim's trial: "The only two occasions on which the authorities in this country had ever come across an improvised explosive device made from hydrogen peroxide and an organic substance were the 7th of July and the 21st of July."
The tutor for both men, Pakistan's investigators believe, was Dolat Khan. The electronics specialist had fled the city of Jalalabad in Afghanistan following the overthrow of the Taliban.
Three years ago, he was arrested and held for three months by intelligence officers in connection with a bombing but was released and has vanished. Under questioning, he admitted knowledge of remote-controlled bombs.
Khan and Ibrahim had already received terror training before their possible encounter in Pakistan – Khan in Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan and Ibrahim in Sudan.
Both men were in Pakistan at the same time for eight weeks between December 2004 and February 2005.
According to a senior investigator of the ISI, Khan and Ibrahim are believed to have had 'direct or indirect' contact in Rawalpindi and Lahore.
Who put the two men in touch is unclear – no evidence brings them together in the UK – but investigators say the plots were the work of an Al Qaeda-linked planner.
Ibrahim was well connected with fundamentalists and one of his associates is a preacher currently awaiting trial for a UK based bombing plot.
Salahuddin warns of attacks inside India
By Tariq Naqash
MUZAFFARABAD, July 3: Chairman of Kashmir’s United Jihad Council Syed Salahuddin has warned that freedom fighters could resort to attacks inside India if cases involving excesses against women and other human rights abuses by the Indian forces continue to take place in occupied Kashmir.
In a statement issued the other day, he expressed concerns over the incidents of rape and molestation in Kupwara and Kunnan Bandipura. He said that it had become a daily practice of Indian forces to arrest the people, particularly the family members of freedom fighters. Families of those people who had been killed by the forces were harassed, he added.
Syed Salahuddin criticised the pro-India politicians for ignoring such violations of human rights.
He also expressed concern over the foreign visits of some Kashmiri leaders in the name of resolving the Kashmir issue. Instead of visiting New Delhi or western countries, the leaders should work for strengthening the Kashmiris, he said, adding that their visits and talk of some options and roadmaps were creating confusion among the people.
Criticising the attitude of some Hurriyat leaders, he said that if they would not bury their differences, history would not forgive them. He asked them to counter the Indian oppressive policies with unity of thought.
Syed Salahuddin urged the Kashmiri people to reject any electoral exercise under the Indian constitution and said armed struggle would continue till the complete withdrawal of Indian troops from the occupied Kashmir.
Who are these militants?
By Our Special Correspondent
ISLAMABAD, July 8: The stiff resistance coming from inside the Lal Masjid-Jamia Hafsa complex, with the heavily-armed militants refusing to surrender has continued to raise questions about the identity of those holed up there, as well as about the quality and quantity of weapons and ammunition they have stocked to take on the state’s military might.
For the sixth consecutive day, the militant supporters of Maulana Abdul Rasheed Ghazi responded with automatic fire from inside the mosque-madressah complex, showing little sign of fatigue or shortage of ammunition. And the manner in
which the gunmen targeted an SSG group on Saturday night, killing their commanding officer and injuring a number of others, also demonstrate how well trained some of them are, both in combat actions and sniper firing.
Maulana Ghazi may well be a victim of his own big-mouth and adventurism, as otherwise he is not even half as radical as his elder brother Maulana Aziz, who was captured while trying to escape wearing a burqa. In fact, Maulana Aziz’s wife, Umme Hassan, who is still inside the complex, is believed to have more radical views. Some people even suggest that she may well be the real source
of inspiration for the militants’ so-called suicide squad. Whoever is their leader in the given circumstances, one thing is clear: the 30- or 40-odd militants holed up there have been indoctrinated to a degree that they may prefer to die than surrender.
This is precisely what is preventing the security forces from going for a kill, i.e., storming the huge complex to flush out the armed militants. Their assessment is that such a move could result in a collateral damage of unimaginable proportion because hundreds of women and men who, despite having their deep religious association
with the Mosque-Madressah clerics, have nothing to do with the militants or their ulterior motives.
Again the big question is: who are these militants?
Some of the premier intelligence agencies, having worked closely with Jihadis in the past, particularly when Islamic militancy was an essential tool of the country’s regional policy, may have a better idea about the identity or affiliations of many of those inside the complex. But as the events have continued to unfold, others are also getting some idea about who the armed men are, and how this mosque-madressah complex was being used as a hide-out for various militant organisations.
On day two of the conflict when over 40 radicals were captured as they tried to escape by scaling the complex wall, the authorities discovered that at least five of them were affiliated with Jamaat ud Dawa, formerly known as Lashkar-i-Tayyaba. The presence of these men showed that the doors of the complex were never closed for those fighting for a ‘common cause’.
Later, it was also suggested that a few of the militants were also affiliated with the now defunct Harkat-i-Jihad-i-Islami of the controversial Jihadi leader Qari Saifullah, who is believed to be in the custody of the authorities.
However, the way the events have shaped up over the past few days also indicate that the biggest grouping of militants belongs to the banned Jaish-i-Mohammed. The complex always had close affiliation with Jaish, but the first sign of its physical presence came when on the third day of the conflict the militants handed over the body of a man described as a journalist from a local newspaper. It was later revealed that he had been carrying a fake identity card and was identified as Maqsoodul Mehmood, who used to work for a Jasih-i-Mohammed publication and was cousin of the banned outfit’s supreme leader Maulana Masood Azhar.
By now it has also become quite clear that the person who ideologically controls these militants is Masood Azahr’s brother, Mufti Abdur Rauf.Some-time back, he was accidentally arrested by the local police, and somehow managed to get himself released. Shortly before the start of the operation, he had managed to slip out of the Lal Masjid, and is presently said to be in hiding.
Another militant leader, Qari Naveed Masood Hashmi, is also believed to be quite active, and some say he has been acting as the link between the militant organisations and those holed up inside the mosque-madressah complex.
It’s not clear how long it may take for the security forces for put an end to this saga, but because of the complexity of the situation, and the role some of the militants played in the officially sanctioned Jihad in the past, the mystery about the manner in which this complex was allowed to work as a major sanctuary for militants from Jaish and many other radical organisations may never be revealed.
However, President Gen Pervez Musharraf may like to find out from his aides and intelligence people regarding their earlier assessment of the reaction from other madressahs which, according to him, was one of the reasons for delaying such an operation. At one point, the president had told journalists that the reasons such an operation was being delayed was because there was a fear that radical students from 18 of Islamabad’s madressahs may join the Lal Masjid brigade to create havoc in the capital. No such thing happened, and even when the security forces walked into E-7’s Jamia Fareedia, there was no resistance. Some even go to the extent of saying that the Lal Masjid crisis is nothing but an intelligence fiasco.
How ironic. The Puki "victims" of the Samjhauta Express blasts (which occurred after the 7/11 train blasts and were engineered by the Puki-trained saboteurs) have been fully compensated by GoI. Goes to show where the GoI priorities are.bala wrote:Time to remember the innocent 7/11 blast victims trapped in railcars of Mumbai railway who are yet to be compensated, while TSP's Herr maximus leader Musharraf cools his heel swilling expensive British whisky with PUSsy (PakUS) aid of F-16s, overflowing swiss bank money, bailed out shortcut economy, ethan allen chairs and sofa sets, flanked by his terrorist ISI thugs and scantily clad chinese masseuses..
7/11 train blasts: 200 victims yet to be compensated
A year after the dreaded Mumbai 7/11 train blasts, sadly, the dependents and victims of the explosions caused by TSP terrorists have found little solace to rebuild their shattered lives. The police have filed charges against 10 Pakistanis who are said to be on the run.
The leaders of the 7/7 and 21/7 suicide plots are both thought to have planned their attacks in the foothills of the Hindu Kush mountain range on Pakistan's border with Afghanistan.
Links between the terror gangs have always been played down by the security services in London but their counterparts in Pakistan talk of a connection.
They cite 'intelligence' that the suicide missions were conceived at the same remote terror camp near Peshawar attended by July 7 leader Mohammad Sidique Khan and July 21 boss Muktar Said Ibrahim.
The claim comes from Pakistan's Inter- Services Intelligence, which co-ordinates foreign, domestic and military intelligence and has in the past been accused of helping to train Taliban and foreign fighters.
The ISI is said to have a unique insight into the camps over which it takes little action. Officially, British investigators praise their 'partner' in the war on terror.
Unofficially, they are frustrated about Pakistan withholding potentially-crucial leads.
The ISI says intelligence points to Khan and Ibrahim being together or in contact with other Britons and Al Qaeda-linked radicals both in the jihadi training camps of Warizistan, in Dhamial, near the sprawling city of Rawalpindi, and in Lahore.
Captured militants apparently told SIS agents that both men were in a camp in North Warizistan, a tribal area where senior Taliban and Al Qaeda leaders are thought to be hiding.
Ibrahim has been linked directly or indirectly to at least six terror cells of homegrown Muslim extremists planning attacks in Britain.
Key members of these plots all travelled to Pakistan for training. Khan and Ibrahim are said by the ISI to have been separately tutored by the same Afghan bomb maker, experimenting in carrying out explosions by grinding and mixing different household materials.
The bombs eventually used by both terror gangs were similar and of a kind not seen before in Britain.
The main charge was made from hydrogen peroxide and mixed with an organic material.
Scientist Clifford Todd told Ibrahim's trial: "The only two occasions on which the authorities in this country had ever come across an improvised explosive device made from hydrogen peroxide and an organic substance were the 7th of July and the 21st of July."
The tutor for both men, Pakistan's investigators believe, was Dolat Khan. The electronics specialist had fled the city of Jalalabad in Afghanistan following the overthrow of the Taliban.
Three years ago, he was arrested and held for three months by intelligence officers in connection with a bombing but was released and has vanished. Under questioning, he admitted knowledge of remote-controlled bombs.
Khan and Ibrahim had already received terror training before their possible encounter in Pakistan – Khan in Kashmir, Pakistan and Afghanistan and Ibrahim in Sudan.
Both men were in Pakistan at the same time for eight weeks between December 2004 and February 2005.
According to a senior investigator of the ISI, Khan and Ibrahim are believed to have had 'direct or indirect' contact in Rawalpindi and Lahore.
Who put the two men in touch is unclear – no evidence brings them together in the UK – but investigators say the plots were the work of an Al Qaeda-linked planner.
Ibrahim was well connected with fundamentalists and one of his associates is a preacher currently awaiting trial for a UK based bombing plot.
Tubelights flickering on or a false alarm?Tilak wrote:Storming the mosque humiliated Pakistan![]()
By Isambard Wilkinson in Islamabad
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 11/07/2007
Pakistan, in its 60th year, with its clownish antics and humiliating and resentful reliance on American money, has the aspect of a sorrowful, nuclear-armed circus.
Note that this guy was seen DRIVING WITH A PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT MINISTER IN ISLAMABAD.Printed from
The Times of India -Breaking news, views. reviews, cricket from across India
HuM chief Khalil spotted in Pak, India asks for handover
12 Jul 2007, 1325 hrs IST,TNN
SMS NEWS to 8888 for latest updates
NEW DELHI: Fazalur Rehman Khalil, a militant leader who figures in India's list of 'most wanted' terrorists, was reportedly spotted in Pakistan along with a prominent Minister there. Sources say that Indian government has asked for his handover.
Khalil is the chief of banned outfit Harqat-ul-Mujahideen.
Khalil was detained by the Pakistani government several years back and remained in custody for six months. In 2004, he was released despite Indian government's requests.
TV reports quoted sources as saying that that the investigators in UK had exchanged information about Khalil with the Indian government.
Indian authorities then demanded that Khalil be handed over
TV reports further suggest that India had asked for his custody as a part of its Joint Terror Mechanism (JTM) with Pakistan, to which the neighbouring country is yet to revert.
Printed from
The Times of India
Doubts over Kafeel's college certificates
10 Jul 2007, ..
DAVANAGERE: Records of Kafeel Ahmed, the engineer brother of doctor Sabeel, available at the University BDT College of Engineering in Davanagere (where he was a student from 1996 to October 2000) give room for some doubt. Several entries are incomplete or appear overwritten.
Firstly, a domicile certificate issued by the tahsildar of Bangalore South taluk on July 23, 1996, does not contain Kafeel Ahmed’s name. It has the name of Maqbool Ahmed as candidate and his father's name as Khader Ahmed.
The certificate has some overwriting in the number of years of stay in Bangalore - first written as 1943 to 1971. But it has been struck off and written as "since ten years" above it.
In black ink and in different handwriting, entries pertaining to residential address in the domicile certificate also give room for suspicion.
The transfer certificate (TC) issued by National College, Basavanagudi in Bangalore, on the other hand, has no information on Kafeel's nationality or religion.
The marks statement issued by CBSE, dated May 31, 1994, does not contain the name of the school where he studied Class 10. It doesn't contain any rubber stamp (seal of the institute) indicating the school from where he completed his matriculation, casting a doubt as to where he studied. The serial number of the marks statement: 0069765 and his roll number: 4110414.
The photocopy of this statement, attested by one Dr Ifthikharuddin, MD (OSM), professor, Government Unani College, Bangalore, was submitted to the UBDT College by Kafeel during admission, said principal Suresh Chandramohan.
The college admission ledger indicates that Kafeel is a Hindu, a clerical error as explained by the principal![]()
. But Kafeel himself had clearly filled in 'Islam' as his religion, Sunni under the caste, nationality as Indian and his mother tongue as Urdu.
This is atrocious. How can India, the victim of dozens of massive terror attacks from TSPians, not take these missing denizens of the Land of the Pure seriously ? TSPians should have been hunted like cockroaches.bala wrote:Bangalore Police traces six missing Pak nationals
It’s only after the failed UK terror plot and its suspected Bangalore connection that the police have taken up the case seriously.
Reassess. Some U.S. officials are also reassessing Musharraf's performance. U.S. intelligence agencies warn that al Qaeda and the Taliban have reconstituted safe havens in the badlands of western Pakistan. "I haven't seen anything since 9/11 that suggests this guy will do stuff of his own volition that's in our interests," says a U.S. official. "He always does the bare minimum." For example, despite Musharraf's pledges to crack down on radical religious schools, U.S.and British officials have had to point out specific madrasahs that were producing graduates primed for jihadist acts.
Excerpt from Q & A session:…….. The NIE notes the al Qaeda and its affiliates have sought safe haven in the federally administrated tribal areas of Pakistan and replaced senior leaders and operational commanders that have been captured or killed.
Al Qaeda continues to attempt to create global terrorist alliances, raise resources, and recruit and indoctrinate operatives, including for homeland attacks. Importantly, the NIE assesses that al Qaeda has protected or regenerated three of four key elements in planning an attack on the homeland: a safe haven in Pakistan, operational lieutenants, and top leadership. …………..
we continue to work with President Musharraf and the Pakistani government to capture key al Qaeda operatives and pressure al Qaeda and the Taliban in the federally administrated tribal areas. Al Qaeda has made several attempts to assassinate President Musharraf, and the Pakistanis understand the threat that al Qaeda and violent Islamic extremism pose to their country. We will continue to press them to take action to ensure that no part of Pakistan remains a safe haven for terrorists. ………
Q Fran, why has the administration continued to say things as the President said in 2005, we have put the enemy on the run and now they spend their days avoiding capture, given that they have now regenerated elements of their homeland attack capability and they have safe haven in Pakistan? How can the administration have said these things?
MS. TOWNSEND: Well, they're not inconsistent, Martha. Actually, we have kept them on the run. They do seek to avoid capture every single day. The fact is, look, you're looking at a developing -- …………..
Q My second question, if I could -- for the citizen watching this and hearing that in Pakistan there is a safe haven, why should that American citizen not say, well, why don't we go into Pakistan and deal with it that way?
MS. TOWNSEND: There's no question the President has made perfectly clear if we had actionable targets anywhere in the world, putting aside whether it was Pakistan or anyplace else, we would pursue those targets. There's a number -- but it's hard for me to say to you, what is the target, what is the opportunity, what is the likelihood of success, what is our confidence in the intelligence. You'd have to know all those things for me to accurately sort of predict for you, and that's one of those things you're only going to know when all those factors come together.
But there's no question President Musharraf is taking on extremism. He gave a speech after the seizure of the Red Mosque and said, we're going to battle extremism in every nook of Pakistan and we are going to rid Pakistan, all of Pakistan, of extremism. So he's clearly committed to taking it on.
In the last -- just this month, they've lost upwards of 80 soldiers in the fight. So there should be no question that Pakistan takes it seriously for their own reasons. And we're working with them to encourage them to deny Pakistan as a safe haven. They don't want Pakistan as a safe haven, themselves. ……………
Q Madam, well, credit goes to the law enforcement authorities, as far as any deaths have not taken place here in this country. But also there is a report that U.S. is fighting this war outside the U.S. My question is that now you are confirming that Osama bin Laden, which we have not been talking about for some time, is now alive and he is the head of the al Qaeda, and most of the attacks taking place under his leadership. And I'm sure somebody knows where he's hiding, and also you confirm that al Qaeda are not taking safe haven in Pakistan. Pakistani government has told the U.S. that they will not allow under any circumstances anybody to enter that area where al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is. So where do we stand? What is the future catching Osama bin Laden and all those hiding in safe haven in Pakistan?
MS. TOWNSEND: Well, there is no question -- and when we talk about Pakistan and bin Laden, we're talking about the federally administrated tribal areas. As you know, President Musharraf, in an effort to extend the writ of the Pakistani government in a way that has never been before, entered into this agreement with tribal leaders in the area. It hasn't worked for Pakistan. It hasn't worked for the United States. It's clear that President Musharraf is serious about taking action in the tribal areas. We've seen a whole spate of activity over the course of the last several weeks. And I think it is fair to say President Musharraf is committed to the fact that he will not permit that to be a safe haven. And we will work with him to ensure that safe haven is denied to them.
Q -- as President Karzai of Afghanistan is coming to meet with President Bush -- he has been complaining that al Qaeda is coming across the border from Pakistan into Afghanistan. His government is in trouble also because they want to destabilize the freedom -- the democracy in Afghanistan. Where do we stand as far as dealing with al Qaeda in Afghanistan?
MS. TOWNSEND: As you know, when both President Karzai and President Musharraf were here with the President, the President encouraged greater intelligence and cooperation across the board. We had tried to assist in facilitating that cooperation. We have seen greater cooperation. I think the President looks forward to getting a sense from President Karzai of his take on it.
Q Fran, is it a fair reading of the key judgments that you released today that the federally administered tribal areas you discussed is, in fact, the central front in the war on terrorism, to use the President's phrase? And, if so, tell us how, if at all, you have renegotiated your own operational arrangements with General Musharraf, President Musharraf, so that we would have greater access in there.
MS. TOWNSEND: Okay. Well, to use the President's phrase, Iraq is the central front in the war on terror. And --
Q Is that supported by the key judgments, then?
MS. TOWNSEND: There is no question, based on the statements of bin Laden, himself, not to mention others and al Qaeda, that they regard Iraq as the central front in the war on terror.
The other piece to this -- you asked me about arrangements with President Musharraf. It is no secret there have been a series of very senior-level U.S. government officials to engage with President Musharraf and address this very issue, beginning with the Vice President. And, obviously, there are conversations between the President and President Musharraf. Secretary Gates has been out, Deputy Secretary Negroponte, and a raft of senior intelligence officials.
We will continue to work with the Pakistani government to address the threat that comes from the tribal area. It is a serious one, but it's not only a serious threat to us, it's also a serious threat to the stability of Pakistan. I'm obviously not going to go into the details of it, because I'm not going to put our people, or Pakistani officials, at risk. In the last two weeks they've had nearly 80 killed, and I'm not going to do that. ……………
Q Is it shorthanding it too much to say that General Musharraf, through his efforts in the tribal areas there against al Qaeda, is the key person, the point man in protecting the United States, and whether he has success there or not is the whole ball game?
MS. TOWNSEND: No, it is not accurate, because we work together as a partner. We work jointly, whether it's with his intelligence service, his military, our military. We work together as partners. To suggest that it's kind of all on his shoulders, I just don't think is -- I don't think it's fair and I don't think it's accurate.
Q Does he give us all the operational capability the United States would like to have?
MS. TOWNSEND: You know, it's funny -- I'm glad you asked me that, because frequently when people ask me about our counterterrorism cooperation and our allies around the world, the suggestion is, do they give you everything you want. That is almost never the case. And you know what? If I only cooperated with those who gave me a hundred percent of what I thought I needed or wanted, I wouldn't have a whole lot of allies around the world.
Every ally is important. Every ally comes to the table in the fight against terrorism through the lens of their own national interest: What do they need to get in the fight? What's a threat to their own international security or the security of their own people? And so we always work to strengthen those alliances, we always work to find more common ground so that we're more closely aligned. But it doesn't mean that we get everything we want. But we also can't walk away from people just because we don't get everything we want when we want it.
Q What kind of percentage do we get from Musharraf?
MS. TOWNSEND: I'm not going to -- I'm not -- it's really a tempting invitation; I'm not going to do it. ……………………
Q Fran, I think a lot of Americans watching this will have two very simple questions: Where is Osama bin Laden? And why, nearly six years after the President said we would get him, dead or alive, do we not have him? How has he possibly eluded our grasp?
MS. TOWNSEND: Well, there is no question that we have put extraordinary resources against finding him. If I could answer directly, with a pinpoint on a map where he was, he wouldn't be there. So the question is, does he -- it presumes, frankly, that he sits in a single place with an address, a street address and a phone number, so it should be easy for us to go and get him. I wish, Sheryl, that it were that easy. It's not.
You can assume, just based on sort of operational security behavior, that he's moving around, he doesn't make it easy, he doesn't have a lot of contact, and he is in a very remote area that is not easily accessed certainly by Americans, and frankly, by the Pakistanis, themselves.
And so the President has made perfectly clear, we will be relentless. He will be captured or killed. And it is a huge priority for us, for our intelligence and military. And we will continue until we're successful. ………………….
The national intelligence estimate warned that a resurgent al Qaeda has "regenerated" a comfortable safe haven in the northwestern tribal regions of Pakistan—a country that also happens to be one of Bush's most frequently praised allies in the struggle against terrorism.
The upshot is tough. Not only has al Qaeda survived a six-year "war on terrorism," but it has also harnessed the invasion and occupation of Iraq to fuel its own growth, managed to rebuild its operational leadership, and resumed plotting ambitious attacks on the United States, all from inside a nation that has received as much as $10 billion in U.S. aid since 2001.
So, given that a key plank in Bush's counterterrorism strategy is to deny terrorists sanctuary, the NIE puts pressure on the Bush administration to take direct action to eliminate this new safe haven. After all, if al Qaeda does manage to pull off an attack in the coming months that is traced back to Pakistan, Bush administration officials will not be able to claim that they had no warning.
Prices of imported beef from India increases $355/t
KARACHI: The price of Indian frozen beef has gone up due to its surging demand, which has resulted in a decline in exports of the commodity to Pakistan. The prices of Indian frozen beef increased $355 per tonne or 27.30 percent to $1,655 per tonne from $ 1,300 per tonne, resulting in the shortage of imports by 560 tonnes during June. According to the importers, around 70 containers, that is, 1,960 per tonne of red meat are imported from India in a month to cater the demand, which has declined to 1,400 tonnes during June. Meat importers said the surging Indian consumption of beef is behind the shortage of import to Karachi, which also increased the wholesale prices.
There are around 12 Karachi-based importers of the Indian buffalo’s meat, which is supplied particularly to hotels, restaurants and catering centres, while there are importers who supplied Indian meat to other cities of the country. The prices of this beef have also surged by Rs 10-15 per kg reaching to Rs 110-115 per kg from 100 kg in the domestic wholesale market. A leading importer of frozen Abdul Aziz Maniya said the wholesale prices would come down again by August, as the supply of red meat is expected to improve from India. He said the local consumption of imported frozen beef has been increasing as it is getting popularity amongst the cooking centres and hotels. staff report
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/ ... 79,00.htmlMusharraf on the Brink in Pakistan?
Meantime, in a telling twist, the spate of suicide bombings in Pakistan seems to have cooled the immediate sense of crisis in Afghanistan. Word on the streets of Kabul is that the suicide bombers from Pakistan's tribal areas who until recently headed west into Afghanistan to train Afghan militants or carry out attacks themselves, are now heading east into the cities of Pakistan, where they have new motives and better targets to attack. "Normally the Pakistanis come to Afghanistan, but now they are busier in Pakistan," says Waheed Muzhda, an Afghan political analyst who worked for the foreign ministry during the Taliban regime.
One of Britain's most dangerous terrorists, Dhiren Barot, was released from hospital today after receiving treatment in secret for severe injuries inflicted in prison.
Police requested a news blackout to protect medical staff from possible attack while the 35-year-old, who was jailed for life last year after plotting to blow up New York, was treated at Newcastle's Royal Victoria Infirmary.
Police would not release details of his identity or how he was injured, but he was understood to have been scalded in Frankland Prison, Durham, more than a week ago.
Police mounted a 24-hour armed operation to protect hospital staff and patients, as well as the terrorist himself, from possible attack.
Northumbria police would not confirm Barot's identity due to "Ministry of Justice procedures".
It said the jail attack was now the subject of an investigation by Durham Police and the prison authorities.
The force would not explain the nature of his injuries, but it is understood he was scalded and taken to the RVI for specialist treatment to his burns.
He was kept in isolation away from other patients.
Barot was initially examined at the infirmary on Monday and returned to prison that evening.
He was brought back the next day for prolonged treatment to his burns.
He returned to the prison at lunchtime today and any further treatment will take place in the prison hospital.
Northumbria police could not estimate the cost of the security operation, which included armed police in the hospital and the Air Support Unit.
The force said not all category A prisoners would receive such high security.
Superintendent Jo Farrell, who led the security operation, said: "It is often the case that Northumbria police is asked to assist the prison service with the security of prisoners needing medical treatment outside the prison."
"Security measures are always proportionate to the assessed level of risk, and maintaining public safety is paramount at all times."
"I must thank the hospital staff, prison staff, patients, members of the public and the media for their cooperation and assistance which allowed this sensitive operation to pass off without incident."
Barot, 35, was sentenced to life, with a minimum term of 30 years, for planning to plant radioactive, chemical or toxic gas bombs and pack limousines with nails and explosives in the UK and America.
The al Qaida mastermind had been moved to Frankland from Belmarsh jail, south east London, after fears for his safety.
Barot was arrested in August 2004 and accused of conspiracy to murder.
He admitted planning to bomb several targets including the New York Stock Exchange, the International Monetary Fund HQ, and the World Bank.
Barot, who recruited other bomb plotters, was sentenced to life in prison last November. It was recommended he serve 40 years but that was cut to 30 years on appeal in May.
Barot was born in India then moved to Kenya with his family.
They came to England in 1973 and his banker father had to work in a factory to support them.
Hindu Barot converted to Islam aged 20. He later travelled to Pakistan for al Qaida training and funding.
Copyright - Press Association 2007
Don't miss the 24dash.com audio bulletins for the latest news and information - http://www.24dash.com/podcasts
………TONY JONES: At the same time that you say this is an extremely rare event. We see time after time links going back from actual terrorist plots or terrorist events in Britain, in Canada, even in Australia back to individuals who trained in madrasahs in Pakistan. What is happening?
If you say there is no political indoctrination, no terrorism happening in these madrasahs, why do these terrorists keep appearing from them?
IJAZ UL-HAQ: See, the problem is that for a long time in Pakistan since the jihad, what we call a jihad and to me it was a jihad against the Soviets when they invaded, there were a lot of organisations which have been banned by the Government of Pakistan now who were involved in such activities, some of them were in war in Kashmir previously and otherwise people tend to think that these banned organisations are also linked to these madrasahs somehow or other, but they're not. They're two separate things, the banned organisations which were involved in such activities and the madrasahs.
There may have been some recruitment from the madrasahs during the 1980s and late 70s but there were also recruitments from the universities all over the world. People came to contest in their jihad, people came from the Arab world, from Europe and everywhere. Americans and the Western countries were all allies in the war against the Soviets at that time.
TONY JONES: Well, I mean, for example Lashkar e-Toiba is meant to be a banned organisation in Pakistan. The madrasah has stopped working but they still openly operate?
IJAZ UL-HAQ: Well listen, you may be correct in asking me this question, Lashkar e-Toiba is a banned organisation. There is no doubt about it. They may be operating under another name, people allegedly say. They may be having one or two mosques that they are looking after. Absolutely they have no madrasah, they have nothing to do with the madrasahs, the people of the madrasahs, there are 15,000, 16,000, 17,000 madrasahs in Pakistan. They don't agree with them, their strategy, their concept, their philosophy. Lashkar e-Toiba is operating, I think, somebody has to go and tell them and stop them from doing so.
I'm here to streamline the madrasahs, bring them into the mainstream in Pakistan, the education we are working with them. And we were almost close to introducing modern education in all madrasahs across the board in Pakistan from class one to class 12 and they are the ones who agreed with us. But you know this thing of the mosque came in and it has been delayed for a little while. …………..
LINK