k prasad wrote:Ajay K wrote:Bottom line is that LoC is porous. IA, BSF needs to device a strategy to make them more secure other wise it will like any Jehadi can just walk past LoC and join others already entrenched in the valley. Of the 400+ active rats already in the valley how many are being engaged and eliminated. Is there a plan in place to act for the RR or SFs?
Ray Sahib, during non-active (infiltration lulls) spells do the RR & SF engage them based on intelligence?
What you're forgetting is for the terrain, we've created a pretty ironclad border, complete with detecting radars, HHTIs, extensive manning, constant patrolling, fencing, mining, etc etc... something that i guess no other border has, except maybe the Noko-Soko line, or the Israel-Gaza border, and both of these are on relatively easier terrain and climate.
What you're also forgetting is that with all of these, the level of infilitration has plummeted - if today, pigs are havign to infiltrate into J&K and India via Bangladesh, that should tell us something.
Also, you forgot that these guys were constantly under surveillance, which means that we actually let them in with a purpose, as we have with pigs before them. There is a reason why Srinagar and other interior cities face almost no terrorist violence now, and why the terrorists are killed in small villages or forests less than a day away from the LoC - it is because we are letting them in (to prevent them from escaping back) and killing them at our choosing.
So before you talk about porous borders, think a bit about why exactly they are porous - its because we have deliberately and selectively made it so.
Ray sir, please correct me if I am wrong.
I am not forgetting anything (at least I hope so!)
I have patrolled not only the LC, but also such horrible spines like Raja Ram di Lari (I am mentioning this since it was the most horrid feeling I got and I can't forget it) where we sat on our bottoms to move, lest we fell off. And in that time there was deep snow and so you did not know where the spine (ridge was) and the whole of the Pir Panjal (Long Range Patrolling)!
There is nothing like an ironclad border! Cameras, sensors, fencing (mines have been there from 1947 and it run all along without a break and in many layers!) all help, but there is nothing like ironclad. If it were the terrorists would not be able to infiltrate and in such numbers as reported!
One has to see and walk the terrain in J&K to realise it.
The infiltration has gone down because of many reasons. One is that Afghanistan is hot again, two, there is a better understanding between India and Pakistan govt (CBMs), three, because of the fencing and the other force multipliers. Patrolling and ambushes are as would be in any defence as was always, even when there was no infiltration.
I am not aware that we are letting them in to only have the opportunity to kill them. I wonder if that is true. After all, the more we kill, we would be playing into the hands of the international media, human rights and people like Milliband. I saw an AFP report here on this forum which called the terrorists as 'rebels'! Such people will spin any story to make India look bad and so if we lure people in just to kill, then these types would have a field day and thank India for their daily bread. That is why, I wonder. I have during the various stages of my service been in the frontlines to stop, in the depth to chase the terrorists and also in tolerably in high post to know the policy. I have not heard of such a policy of luring to kill.
I would not like to discuss the modus operandi of the terrorist on an open forum but it would suffice it to say, there is a method in the madness to establish camp in forests and in high mountain areas!
There was also views that we should use air, artillery, napalm and the like on these terrorists. Napalm cannot be used against civilians and Geneva Convention is still to clarify as to what is the status of terrorists. By not using artillery or air, we are avoiding serious collateral damage. While the Coalition forces have no qualm to use them since the people are not of their country, we do consider that Kashmiris are Indians and have an equal right to live, even if some of their kith and kin are mislead into the wrong path.
Would in Delhi, the police raze down a house just because they have seen a thief entering the home of his kith and kin? What has the kith and kin done wrong to have their house burnt down?!
I appreciate the anger that you all have. They are very genuine and understandable. However, in such knotty issues, the requirement for calm and clear thoughts and orders are very essential. It is not that we are beyond anger. But we have a task to do and do it in a way that it helps the govt.