Please listen to this heartfelt plea from this humble mujahid...
Can you please merge the Cheeni Gareeb kona and BJ-Kutty's threads started by comrade Loo Bega ?
thank you saar.ramana wrote:Kobe Start a news thread called that and see if it matures.
I second that..and also, would it be possible to block non-registered users from accessing the Military threads? I've read on a few Pak deaf and dumb fora that their members routinely sift through our discussions, something BRF could do without.namit k wrote:dear Admins/mods
can you change the forum software to display the countries from where the members post or were registered, i think there are some puki members also posting here and extracting information by some means
Oh no, please dont do that. This will reduce the detergent budget in Pakistani homes, where the wimmen will no more need to remove piss and yellow stains from the Birather's pajamas. Also, if there is a backlash (i.e. Indians are barred from deaf & dumb), we will loose some much needed comic relief in these economically difficult times.Kartik wrote:I second that..and also, would it be possible to block non-registered users from accessing the Military threads? I've read on a few Pak deaf and dumb fora that their members routinely sift through our discussions, something BRF could do without.namit k wrote:dear Admins/mods
can you change the forum software to display the countries from where the members post or were registered, i think there are some puki members also posting here and extracting information by some means
I have bitter memories, with this thing.shiv wrote: Not an issue - but I was surprised to find people on the forum think that they were not supposed to start or renew threads.
Most of these people are newer members who do not know the history behind this. The idea of changing the thread when it reached 340 posts was yours because any thread changes to page 10 after 340 posts.
One of the things that I wanted to experiment with (for continuity) was to wait for the thread to reach 339 posts or even page 10 and then split off the last page or half page as the new thread. The old thread then automatically goes to the trashcan where people can look for it - while the new thread has half a page of posts that serve as continuity. This reduces the break in continuity that occurs when threads are changed. It also reduces admin workload because you don't have to find the url of the last page in the trashcan archive and put it on the first page of the new thread you have created.
One often finds that threads with an animated discussion suddenly goes dead when it is renewed. That can be prevented by allowing it to reach 335 plus posts (well into page 9, or even early page 10) and then splitting off the bottom 5-10 posts as the new thread.
But only admins can do that. That of course does not mean that members should not start a new thread which they can if it has not received due admin attention.
Dont worry about the money, it is safe - we can vouch for it.sombhat wrote:Does BR Mods/ Admins have any control over Anveshan.com. They are yet to deliver an order I placed on 5th March. The site says it delivers in 2-5 business days while placing an order. Also, not replying to emails. Did my money go down the drain??
Thanks
That is yindoo indi-genius stealth technology!Hiten wrote:some pictures missing in the Marut page
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Histo ... arut1.html
niceAdityaM wrote:That is yindoo indi-genius stealth technology!Hiten wrote:some pictures missing in the Marut page
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Histo ... arut1.html
Sir, please explain to me how its draconian ?KrishnaMu wrote:I am long time lurker, as you can see from my post counts not much contributed. Anywho, in BR there is strange thing it is not going anywhere
Why this "Sir" attribute?? addressing the fellow sr posters or posters?? I feel its draconian. Am i the only one ???
Krishna,KrishnaMu wrote:I am long time lurker, as you can see from my post counts not much contributed. Anywho, in BR there is strange thing it is not going anywhere
Why this "Sir" attribute?? addressing the fellow sr posters or posters?? I feel its draconian. Am i the only one ???
KrishnaMu wrote:I am long time lurker, as you can see from my post counts not much contributed. Anywho, in BR there is strange thing it is not going anywhere
Why this "Sir" attribute?? addressing the fellow sr posters or posters?? I feel its draconian. Am i the only one ???
Rakesh,
in marathi, we refer to our elders as "tumi" instead of "tu"..the difference is in the way the sentence would be framed..to someone younger or your age, you'd ask "tu kasa aahes?" (How are you?)but to an older person, you'd say "tumi kasa aahenth?". but because there is no such word as "tumi" in hindi, those who're not exposed to North Indian hindi, just say "tum".RayC wrote:You can also say, "You are a bloody fool, sir"! as I have heard being said by a Sir (Knight), who was a General of the British Army visiting India on a whirlwind tour to understand counter insurgency. He said it to his ADC!
Actually, it matters not.
For instance, my troops who were Maharastrians, while speaking used the tum instead of Aap, without meaning any disrepect! North Indian officers wondered if there is Aap in Marathi!
I remember a Bengali getting wild that the Punjabis used 'Tussi' and not Aap!