Nice to see someone famous and sensible confirming what I have been saying all along

There is no room for proxy wars and game-playing with TSP for India. We know that TSP is a country with no discernible purpose other than being the agent of destruction for India and what it represents. Russia has a purpose in its own right--to achieve greatness commensurate with its potential. TSP doesn't.renukb wrote:A lot to learn from US-Russia ..... Though US-Russia are sworn enemies, the way they managed their relations is something to be learnt by Indians. They don't propogate hate between two nations, but they still fight proxy wars, the latest one being in Georgia... TSP haters, instead of propogating hatredness between India-Pakistan, learn diplomacy from US-Russia.
Clinton, Lavrov and the Russia Reset
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3409
renukb wrote:A lot to learn from US-Russia ..... Though US-Russia are sworn enemies, the way they managed their relations is something to be learnt by Indians. They don't propogate hate between two nations, but they still fight proxy wars, the latest one being in Georgia... TSP haters, instead of propogating hatredness between India-Pakistan, learn diplomacy from US-Russia.
Clinton, Lavrov and the Russia Reset
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3409
sum wrote:Small tit-bit i came across while reading Bharat Karnad's book(many BRFites might know already):
Apparently, the Russians offered India their top scientists during the Soviet meltdown in the late 80s/early 90s as the SU was unable to pay the salaries. The condition given was : a pay of Rs 10000 p.m in India + $200 hard cash p.m.
I can understand if India looked twice since it involved $ which India itself was short of at that time but apparently, the reason why India rejected the offer was:
The babus mentioned that the salary of these Russians would be higher than the highest paid civil servant and hence, not feasible.![]()
![]()
All the scientists were promptly snapped up by China.
Bart-ji,bart wrote: A Golden Retriever and a Black Labrador can be peaceful and perfectly nice to each other though they might snarl at each other and fight while competing for the same bone. It doesn't mean that you can 'learn' from it and apply your knowledge to pat the next Rattlesnake you come across on the head.
Russia has enough reserves of energy carriers to satisfy the needs of its own and those of European consumers for 100 years ahead, Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin stated.
“One may either have gas or may not have gas. Russia has it. The resources will be enough for Russia to satisfy our growing needs and the needs of our European consumers for at least 100 years ahead. I am absolutely responsible for what I am saying, and I rely on serious research works at this point,” Putin stated at a press conference after meeting with Prime Minister of Hungary Ferenc Gyurcsany in Moscow.
Russia and Hungary singed a package of documents in Moscow about the construction of the Hungarian section of the South Stream gas pipeline, as well as about the construction of gas-holding facilities in Hungary.
The underground gas-holding facility, which Russia’s Gazprom will build in cooperation with Hungary’s Mol, will be capable of storing over one billion cubic meters of natural gas. “This is a large amount that will guarantee the energy security and stability of the entire energy industry of Hungary,” Putin said.
Thanks RajeshA...RajeshA wrote:renukb,
welcome back!
I am not saying BRF is a place to convert people.... but people should mature with each passing day and grow up... I was surprised that While Islam is and can be discussed and condemned on BRF, a small and a very light comment on the western people's religion caused the stir...! Sad ... Very Sad... I was puzzled..."You have not converted a person because you have silenced him/her."
- John Morley
This doesn't mean that the 15 crore people living in Pakistan are ALL rattle snakes... If you are grown up, you will know how to deal / manage with some bunch of people who cause trouble.bart wrote:renukb wrote:A lot to learn from US-Russia ..... Though US-Russia are sworn enemies, the way they managed their relations is something to be learnt by Indians. They don't propogate hate between two nations, but they still fight proxy wars, the latest one being in Georgia... TSP haters, instead of propogating hatredness between India-Pakistan, learn diplomacy from US-Russia.
Clinton, Lavrov and the Russia Reset
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3409![]()
A Golden Retriever and a Black Labrador can be peaceful and perfectly nice to each other though they might snarl at each other and fight while competing for the same bone. It doesn't mean that you can 'learn' from it and apply your knowledge to pat the next Rattlesnake you come across on the head.
Current scenerio shows that the justice was not served in 1947 with the partition. We need to address the problem and resolve it."Charity begins at home and justice begins next door."
- Charles Dickens
"Laws control the lesser man. Right conduct controls the greater one." - Mark Twain
Russia will create by 2020 a group of forces to protect its political and economic interests in the Arctic, but does not plan to militarize the region, a spokesman for the Russian Security Council said on Friday.
He said the council had recently posted on its website a document, "The fundamentals of Russian state policy in the Arctic up to 2020 and beyond," which outlines the country's strategy in the region, including the deployment of military, border and coastal guard units "to guarantee Russia's military security in diverse military and political circumstances."
"However, it does not mean that we are planning to militarize the Arctic. We are focusing on the creation of an effective system of coastal security, the development of arctic border infrastructure, and the presence of military units of an adequate strength," the official said.
Another goal of the new strategy is to "optimize the system of the comprehensive monitoring of the situation in the Arctic," including border control at checkpoints in Russia's arctic regions, coastal waters and airspace, the spokesman said.
The document also prioritizes the delineation of the Arctic shelf "with respect to Russia's national interests."
High Arctic territories, seen as key to huge untapped natural resources, have increasingly been at the center of mounting disputes between the United States, Russia, Canada, Norway, and Denmark in recent years as rising temperatures lead to a reduction in sea ice.
Medvedev also said the Arctic shelf is a guarantee of Russia's energy security and that the Arctic should become the resource base for Russia this century, adding that "about 20% of Russia's GDP and 22% of Russian exports are produced" in the area.
Russia has undertaken two Arctic expeditions - to the Mendeleyev underwater chain in 2005 and to the Lomonosov ridge in the summer of 2007 - to support its territorial claims in the region. Moscow pledged to submit documentary evidence to the UN on the external boundaries of Russia's territorial shelf by 2010.
Indeed.prabir wrote:If Russia really aspires to be a super power, it has to be increase its population. A lot of hungry chinese are waiting to come into Siberia
Russia’s National Antiterrorism Committee could discuss ceasing the counter-terrorism operation in Chechnya at its meeting on March 31, the initiative proposed by Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov and supported by State Duma Speaker Boris Gryzlov.
Any sane person in Russia should know that they have to fight a war with China in future. At the same time, India and Russia are not going to fight a war. China till it is a communist country cannot be trusted by anyonekittoo wrote:Indeed.prabir wrote:If Russia really aspires to be a super power, it has to be increase its population. A lot of hungry chinese are waiting to come into Siberia
Do you people here think that howsoever the ties improve between Russia and China, Russia will be ,at some level, looking at the Chinese rise suspiciously and making some policies about 'what if China attacks Russia or does something along the lines'?
so they have a rightful claim over itSince 1937 the whole Arctic region was extensively explored by the Soviet and Russian manned drifting ice stations. Scientific settlements that were established on the drift ice were carried thousands of kilometers by the ice flow
The Russian authorities have confirmed a prominent opponent of the pro-Kremlin Chechen President, Ramzan Kadyrov, was shot dead in Dubai on Saturday.
Mr Yamadayev became commander of the elite Vostok security forces battalion, a unit of former rebels who have helped quell separatist resistance. In 2005, he was named a Hero of Russia, the top national honour. But last year, he was dismissed after falling out with Mr Kadyrov and later fled to the United Arab Emirates.
Damn, when will we start emulating the Russians and strike fear in all the dons sitting and relaxing in the ME?The Russian authorities have confirmed a prominent opponent of the pro-Kremlin Chechen President, Ramzan Kadyrov, was shot dead in Dubai on Saturday
We only politely ask the UAE authority and put red corner notices , the UAE folks catch them at the airport , and send them back to Pakistan on the next possible flight.sum wrote:The Russians had done the same thing two years back in Oman though two FSB guys got caught for the car bombing of a Chechan leader. The Russians arm-twisted the Omanis and got their men released after some time in jail.
Bingo! ha-ha-ha...RajeshA wrote: If Mikhail Saakashvili's has such masseuses, no wonder there is no blood left in the brain for cool thinking on national security!
This particular killing was not a Russian counter-terrorist operation, just the usual gangsterish Chechen politics.sum wrote:Damn, when will we start emulating the Russians and strike fear in all the dons sitting and relaxing in the ME?The Russian authorities have confirmed a prominent opponent of the pro-Kremlin Chechen President, Ramzan Kadyrov, was shot dead in Dubai on Saturday
The Russians had done the same thing two years back in Oman though two FSB guys got caught for the car bombing of a Chechan leader. The Russians arm-twisted the Omanis and got their men released after some time in jail.
Russian gals are awesome, man..Igorr wrote:The follow story about the above girl with the gun
1) Putin's poster girl
2) Masha: political star or PR flop?
It's the same girlkidoman wrote:Russian gals are awesome, man..Igorr wrote:The follow story about the above girl with the gun
1) Putin's poster girl
2) Masha: political star or PR flop?
Of course, she is in "United Russia' pro-Putin political party and the member of the 'Young Guard' organisation leadership - the party's youth wing. She is also an editor of its main Internet site .Keshav wrote:Igorr -
Is she in the party, does she endorse Putin, or is she just a PR stunt?
Российская газета, Russia
It Cannot Be Said that
They Don’t Love Us
By Andrey Shitov
Translated By Natasha Moody
22 April 2009
Edited by Robin Silberman
http://www.rg.ru/2009/04/22/usa-russia.html
Russia - Российская газета - Original Article (Russian)
American Attitude Toward Russia is Not "Stuck on Negative"
Andrey Shitov, Washington.
American researcher and consultant William Dunkerley compared the fluctuation of public opinion in the United States toward Russia to fortune telling with daisy petals: "They loves Russia. They love Russia not."
He analyzed the results of Gallup's sociological surveys on this topic and combined them into a single graphic table with his own comments about possible reasons for dramatic drops in numbers.
It turned out to be really visual. Goodwill towards Russia embraced two-thirds of the US population twice: August 8-11, 1991, when, as Dunkerley reminds us, the collapse of the Soviet bloc was happening; and in February 2002, soon after Moscow gave a helping hand to Washington after the tragic acts of terrorism of 2001.
It is significant that during the coup in August 19, 1991, the number of Americans expressing positive opinions about Russia immediately decreased by 30 percent to approximately 36 percent. According to the table, there had not been any other changes in public sentiment toward Russia that dramatic for the last two decades. The reason is reflected in a comment: "Coup against Gorbachev". A week later the level of goodwill toward Russia came back to the 60 percent point.
Dunkerley explains other reasons for the drop of Russia’s "positive ratings" to 40 percent and lower, by reminding us of certain coinciding events. These are: the beginning of the war in Kosovo in 1999 (back then the Russian government was warning about the possibility of a "World War"); the second war in Chechnya and Gusinsky's PR campaign a year later; with the beginning of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, (Russia, as is known, was against that risky venture); and finally, with the "Georgian War" in 2009.
It is doubtful whether these statistics need additional comment. Except that it's worth pointing out Dunkerley’s certainty that, in a number of cases, negative attitudes toward Russia increased as a result of "organized PR campaigns." Besides the situation with Vladimir Gusinsky, who was successful enough to pass himself off as the victim of "attacks on freedom of the press," Dunkerley brings up issues such as the "deaths of journalist Anna Politkovskaya, and reputed spy Alexander Litvinenko," as well as the debates around energy supplies and the Georgian War mentioned above.
The main conclusion that the author of the research makes out of the work done is quietly optimistic. "American public opinion about Russia is not stuck on negative,” he writes. “It is malleable.” “Constructive and cooperative engagement" can, Dunkerley believes, move the situation in a positive direction; but threatening political tones or deliberately denigrating and deceptive "PR campaigns" have a negative influence on it.
Certain grounds for optimism are found, apparently, in the demographic information gleaned from the whole picture. Dunkerley was trying to find the breakdown of overall goodwill towards Russia as it relates to age groups. Gallop's service was missing that data, but Dunkerley found one-shot research results of another authoritative sociology firm - the Pew Research Center - from 2007. Back then, twice as many people over the age of 50 held negative opinions about Russia than those aged 30 and younger. "That's quite a difference!"- Dunkerley highlights. He also reminds us, by the way, that in the distant year 1954, only 5 percent of the US population had a positive attitude toward Russia.