Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Locked
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Muppalla »

mohan wrote: Cut taxes, boost spending, widen tax base - all three ideas have found implementation
Is it significant enough to put the economy on growth path. It is not clear yet.

What taxes are cut other than removing the nonsense called as Fringe benifit taxes and commodity transaction tax?

Other that the government schemes is there any stimulas to aum junta to go and freely spend? There are no reforms for large scale investments to retail industry. Are there any that you read?

Tax base widening - it is made as a statement? Do you have any specifics that included certain sections who were not taxed earlier?

This seems like a 1980s budget. All the reforms related stuff is in the form of statements with no specifics yet. Hopefully they may come later.

May be it is too early to judge either way. The detail may be in the fine print.
SwamyG
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16271
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 09:22

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by SwamyG »

Source: http://www.indlawnews.com/Newsdisplay.a ... 868cec2175
Union Budget 2009: Budget Highlights
7/6/2009
Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee has presented Budget 2009-10 in Parliament.

Beginning his Budget speech, Pranab first thanked the voters for reposing faith in the UPA government.

Here are the Budget highlights even as it’s presented in Parliament:

1. Total budget expenditure for 2009-10 will be Rs 10,28,032 cr
2. Plan expenditure, for both Centre and States, to go up by Rs 61,000 cr
3. Fiscal deficit in 2009-10 is proposed at 6.8 per cent of GDP
4. Higher public investment in infrastructure
5.Goods and Services Tax to be introduced from April 1, 2010
6. Defence outlay goes up
7. Total fiscal stimulus for 2008-09 amounts to Rs 1,86,000 cr
8. Strengthen the delivery mechanism for healthcare
9. Increase investment in infrastructure
10. Mandate for inclusive growth
11. Re-energise government and re institutionalise development
12. Challenege before UPA to return to 9 per cent growth
13. Aim to create 12 million jobs
14. Economic growth is a synergy of states and Centre
15. Integration of Indian economy with rest of the world
16. Significant hike in foreign capital
17. Govt took 3 stimulus packages to fight slowdown
18. Two worst quarters since September slowdown behind us
19. Signs of revival in the domestic industry
20. Fiscal stimulus gave economy a boost
21. New company IIFCL to look at infrastructure needs
22. IIFCL will also look at incremental lending by banks
23. GDP grew at 6.7 per cent
24. JNNURM allocation hiked by 87 per cent
25. Hike infrastructure investment to over 9% of GDP by 2014
26. Fund allocation for urban poor accommodation is 3,973,000 cr
27. Hike in allocation for Mumbai flood management
28. JNNURM allocation hiked by 87 per cent
29. NHAI allocation up by 23 per cent
30. IIFCL will also look at incremental lending by banks
31. New company IIFCL to look at infrastructure needs
32. Additional budget allocation to farmers
33. FIIs have returned to India in last few months
34. Target for agriculture credit raised to Rs 3,25,000 cr in 2009-10
35. Pranab Mukherjee quotes Kautilya in Budget speech
36. Export Credit Guarantee scheme extended till March 2010
37. Incentives in interest rates to farmers to pay back
38. An expert group will look into petroleum product pricing
39. Saral-II forms to simplify taxation process
40. Move towards energy security via Integrated Energy Act
41. Raise threshold for non-promoter public listed companies
42. Banking network to be expanded
43. NREGA gave employment opportunities to more than 4.479 cr households
44. Stimulus for print media extended till December 2009
45. Rs 39,100 crore allocation for NREGA
46. Indira Awaas Yojna hiked by 63% to Rs 8,883 cr, up 144 per cent
47. Rs 100 cr one-time grant to expand banks in 'unbanking' areas
48. Work on National Food Security scheme for subsidised food
49. Families below the poverty line will be entitled to 25 kg of rice or wheat per month at Rs 3 per kg
50. Rs 100 crore for pilot scheme for development of SC-dominated villages.
51. Aim to bring 50 per cent of all rural women under women’s self-help groups in five years and link them to banks.
52. Aim to reduce female illiteracy by half. The scheme will focus on the minorities, SCs, STs and other marginalised groups.
53. One rank, one pension for ex-servicemen from July 1
54. Interest subsidy for home loans up to Rs 1 lakh
55. Rs 2,000 cr for rural housing fund under National Housing Bank
56. Commonwealth Games allocation hiked to Rs 16,300 cr
57. Rs 2,113 cr for IITs and NITs
58. Pension of non-commissioned officers to be hiked
59. Rs 25 cr each for AMU campuses in Murshidabad and Mallapuram
60. Rs 1,000 cr for Aila rehabilitation programme to West Bengal
61. Funds for GSI to enhance exploration of minerals
62. IIFCL will refinance 60% of commercial bank loans in PPP
63. Housing allocation hiked under Rajiv Awaas Yojana
64. Trade in goods and services doubled in 2008

Indlaw
More highlights @
1) http://www.indiainfoline.com/news/inner ... 7193&lmn=1
2) http://in.reuters.com/article/businessN ... 9120090706
3) http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=49755
4) http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-200 ... 03741.html
5) http://yarnsandfibers.com/news/index_fu ... pe=General
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Muppalla »

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/Economy/Budget-lacks-flamboyance-but-not-substance/articleshow/4745507.cms

6 Jul 2009, 1845 hrs IST, T K Arun, ET Bureau

NEW DELHI: Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee's speech failed to sketch out the new UPA government's larger vision of reform and growth, and thus lost out on a major opportunity to energise the economy's flagging animal spirits. That said, the Budget is not the complete damp squib on growth and reform that the markets' nosedive would have us believe.

In a global scenario where the major economies continue to contract, even if more slowly than before, there is no way the government could have taken the pedal off fiscal expansion, to keep India’s growth momentum going. Thus, the largest ever fiscal deficit, measuring 6.8% of GDP for 2009-10 and a tax burden on the economy that is lower, proportionate to GDP, than in the last fiscal, is a plus, rather than a negative.

In fact, 6.8% of GDP is the Centre’s deficit alone. Take into account the states’ deficit of nearly 4% of GDP and likely, albeit unstated, off-budget borrowings to finance fertiliser and food subsidies, the combined government borrowing requirement would be a little under 12% of GDP. That is a huge piece of fiscal stimulus.

To avert the risk of this huge borrowing requirement pushing up interest rates and choking off growth, the government should proactively announce an intention to raise a sizeable part of it outside the country. That should settle domestic jitters over a liquidity crunch.

An unheralded medium term fiscal policy statement put up on the Finmin web site targets a fiscal deficit of 5.5% of GDP next year and 4% of GDP in the year after. It is surprising that Mr Mukherjee failed to flag this off.

Then there is the infrastructure agenda. The government’s direct spending on roads and railways is slated to go up sharply. Financial engineering is on the cards - take-out finance and refinancing by IIFCL - to ensure that enough credit would be available for infrastructure projects. The government continues to swear by public-private partnership.

For all their flaws, PPP projects are enhancing India’s infrastructure right now. And there are sufficient mechanisms outside the Budget for one to hope that future PPP projects would be better designed and less vulnerable to post-contract abuse.

Many people tend to dismiss the entire inclusion, rural development and empowerment agenda as so much political fluff. On the contrary, this is the core of lasting reform.

To appreciate this, one must have clarity on what constitutes reform. Reform is ultimately about freeing up the creative energies of the people at large. Not just of people who are entrepreneurs and would-be entrepreneurs now. But also of the hundreds of millions of those who currently focus just on subsistence.

Financial sector, tax and administrative reforms are means to this end. True, India has a demographic dividend to reap even with existing levels of output per worker. But imagine the bounty if one billion plus Indians can afford to think beyond subsistence, think creatively. For that to happen, we need not only the kind of inclusive policies being pursued by the government but also complementary political mobilisation to empower people. That, of course, goes beyond the Budget.

The reiterated commitment to stick to the April 1, 2010 deadline for switching over to a Goods and Services Tax is a plus. The Budget asks the citizens to await further action in eight areas, pending reports by expert committee or finalisation of law or action plan: building a natural gas grid, offering relief to farmers who are indebted to moneylenders rather than to banks, operationalising food security, freeing up petroleum product prices, addressing the concerns of private investors, a direct tax code to streamline all direct taxes, a scheme to overhaul fertiliser subsidy and fiscal consolidation, a roadmap to which would be unveiled by the 13th Finance Commission headed by Vijay Kelkar, whose report is due in October. On some of these, we have already had many committees. The implicit dialatoriness disappoints. At the same time, the retention of this reform agenda is reassuring. On the whole, the Budget marks continuity of slow reform in the right direction, even if it fails to release adrenaline in our market bulls.
Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Katare »

First impression ->> it is a politically safe budget. :mrgreen:

Policy matters have been left out of budget to ensure there is little for opposition to bark at. Budget should actually be for an account of expected expenditure and revenue receipt not a platform for major policy making which is a job for the cabinet and the parliament.

Deft and low-key political management of economic reforms is key for sustaining them.

SwamyG,

Stimulus was needed and it may not have much to do with what west did. Stimulus are considered anti-capitalistic by most purist conservatives so it is more of a socialist/eastern philosophy anyhow. In absence of reassuring govt expenditure and tax cuts private profits, investments and demands would have plummeted which would have cost govt same amount of money, if not more, in lost tax revenues. Stimulus, IMO, more than money provides a "time span" in the panic situation to private sector/markets for getting their acts together and recharting the course.
Last edited by Katare on 06 Jul 2009 23:16, edited 1 time in total.
Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Katare »

dipak wrote:
IndraD wrote:can some one please explain the new tax structure, also why money only for IIT, NIIT, don;t we need AIIMS like hospitals all over India, we should have many of them.
Very true. IIRC, there was some announcement last year regarding establishing AIIMS like hospitals all over India - however, its not clear or mentioned any thing till now in this budget. Let's wait for the full-text.
Health Budget up by Rs 4K, 6 new AIIMS
derkonig
BRFite
Posts: 951
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 00:51
Location: Jeering sekular forces bhile Furiously malishing my mijjile @ Led Lips Mijjile Malish Palish Parloul

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by derkonig »

aargh..its NITs(National Institute of Technologys) & not NIITs...
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

Interesting budget. A bunch of random thoughts:

* I like the increased allocation to roads and the JNNURM projects. Kamal Nath is already quite focussed on the task, after the poor performance of the surface transport ministry during the last administration. I hope to see major progress on this front, particularly intra-city road development, not just intercity.
* The lack of significant sops to exporters is not such a bad deal . The current world economic scene is still problematic, and secondly, we must diversify our export basket. The lack of diversification and valued-added manufacturing/assembling work is showing in our export data, since we instead export a lot of raw material (ores) and intermediate goods (chemicals, refined petroleum). The fall in economic activity elsewhere hits these exports. Giving sops would arguably be throwing good money after bad, and it would be better to provide greater incentives to export-oriented manufacturing investment (which was indeed the case in this budget).
* The term 'stimulus' is much abused in recent times. GoI remains the largest spending economic entity in the country (the total budget expenditure is around $220 billion), and spending on public works in a deficit is a Keynesian response to increase domestic demand and purchasing power. In that regard, GoI is acting meaningfully. Running a deficit is a problem, but it has been a chronic concern for GoI. I'm less concerned about running a deficit today, as not doing more during good times, which the previous UPA did not do. As vina has repeated till his head turned blue, GoI today would have much more leeway to spend, had it not spent profligately during the good times (2005-08), and failed to essentially wipe out the deficit by 2008.
* The increase in the defence budget is heartening. I strongly support significant (e.g. 25-30%) annual defence budget increases for the next decade or two, but in conjunction with procurement reform to bolster acquisition of locally made armaments. I think a strong military-industrial complex is a necessity in any major power - it feeds a range of research and development, provides employment and enhances industrialization.
* I disagree with the suggestions that the budget lacks high profile announcements, or is not 'dream budget' material. I don't want a budget to be like that. It should be a properly organized statement of revenue generation and expenditure, without absurd and distortionary levies or provisions. We're not going to get economic development through budget jugaad alone. We need legislative support to properly implement planned activities. For example, E Sreedharan gave a recent interview about why GoI must change the manner of implementing infrastructure projects, in order to achieve the same efficiency that the Delhi Metro building work has done. I'd find some action on implementing his recommendations to be *far* more worthwhile than mere budget pronouncements about hiking allocation to sectors.
* That brings me to my major issue with general GoI functioning - the lack of efficiency at execution. Today, money can be found for almost anything (generally speaking). What is sorely lacking is the ability to properly execute. For example, I would accept a deal where GoI said 'we're going to spend $X billions on a rural employment program so it helps us politically', if this program is effectively executed, with significant improvement in rural infrastructure and fixed capital stock as a result. But I've yet to see such well-quantified results from NREGA. Instead, there were (until recently) absurd provisions in NREGA work projects prohibiting the use of mechanization 'because it removes the need for manual labour'.
* I am glad that GST is still on track for its originally scheduled implementation at the start of fiscal 2010-11 . Having VAT and GST would significantly improve interstate commerce. Indian companies pay a significant cost borne out of tariff barriers between states affecting their ability to maintain effective supply chains, and requiring them to inefficiently localize and fragment their production.
More later...
Chinmayanand
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2585
Joined: 05 Oct 2008 16:01
Location: Mansarovar
Contact:

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Chinmayanand »

India looks to cut out the middlemen on gold

National Spot Exchange Ltd, controlled by markets firm Financial Technologies India Ltd, has set up a new electronic system that looks to guarantee gold bullion prices and quality.

"What we're trying to do is to create a market so that Indians can sell gold by way of converting into gold bars or gold coins and sell it on," said National Spot Exchange's managing director and chief executive Anjani Sinha.

India is the world's biggest consumer of gold, importing between 700 and 800 tonnes of the metal every year or 20 percent of global demand.

Even so, Indian households are still believed to have a massive 20,000 to 25,000 tonnes of gold stashed away. :eek:
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19339
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by NRao »

ashish raval
BRFite
Posts: 1389
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 00:49
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by ashish raval »

durgesh wrote:India looks to cut out the middlemen on gold

Even so, Indian households are still believed to have a massive 20,000 to 25,000 tonnes of gold stashed away. :eek:
Does this mean that India has 750 Billion $$ worth of Gold stashed away in households !! That is 3 times our national debt !! :eek:
Kakkaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3915
Joined: 23 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Kakkaji »

Site requires registration. Can you please post the interesting excerpts from the article?

TIA
AjayKK
BRFite
Posts: 1520
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 10:27

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by AjayKK »

^ clear cookies and try :

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dc1a9462-6b1c ... ftcamp=rss
For India, I conclude that even sustaining recent performance is going to be really hard. The era when the country could prosper just by stopping government from getting in the way is ending. India now requires efficient, service-providing government by competent technocrats and honest politicians.
Hitesh
BRFite
Posts: 792
Joined: 04 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Hitesh »

durgesh wrote:India looks to cut out the middlemen on gold


Even so, Indian households are still believed to have a massive 20,000 to 25,000 tonnes of gold stashed away. :eek:
That is still less than what US currently holds in its treasury. Estimates are around 1 trillion dollars worth of gold stashed in its treasuries and citizens' holdings.
vsudhir
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2173
Joined: 19 Jan 2006 03:44
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by vsudhir »

OT
deleted.
Last edited by vsudhir on 09 Jul 2009 03:47, edited 1 time in total.
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

What does either the amount of gold in Fort Knox or 'US has more gold in Fort Knox than Indian housewives do' have to do with this thread ?

Please keep the discussion on track.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Prem »

Just imagine the black money / Swiss money and Gold invested properly in India . Within a single decade , such investment can do wonder to the life of many millions of Indian sans Sahard Pawar etc. We will jump to top 5 economies in the world with one leap.
Dileep
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5891
Joined: 04 Apr 2005 08:17
Location: Dera Mahab Ali धरा महाबलिस्याः درا مهاب الي

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Dileep »

The gold in Indian households doesn't count. Try getting some from your SHQ!! :twisted: When ultimately she is willing to let it go, nobody will be in a position/interest to buy it.

An asset is something you are willing to liquidate. Gold of SHQ ain't.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »

Dileep wrote:The gold in Indian households doesn't count. Try getting some from your SHQ!! :twisted: When ultimately she is willing to let it go, nobody will be in a position/interest to buy it.

An asset is something you are willing to liquidate. Gold of SHQ ain't.
Gold is a sink in India.
It has been like this for 2000 years.

Hence there is no direct means to monitize house hold gold and trade it in the Indian market
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Singha »

however if Judgement Day dawns and Skynet goes er..ballistic...precious metals like gold and silver will be the only things to hold value in barter deals.

that way we are insulated against a horrific event that takes out most of The System.

moreover there's 1 billion of us. some will survive to lord over the ruins.
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

Sometime back there were questions about how much India's merchandise and services trade figures were. The latter in particular, was never clearly quantified. The current RBI balance of payments data provides a more detailed breakdown of invisibles (see sheet Statement II US$ million):
RBI Balance of Payments Data June 30 2009 (Excel spreadsheet)
2008-09 Trade
Merchandise exports: $175.184 billion
Services exports: $162.556 billion
Total exports: $337.740 billion

Merchandise imports: $294.587 billion
Services imports: $72.970 billion
Total imports: $367.557 billion

Total trade: $705.297 billion
Current Account Surplus(-Deficit): -$29.817 billion

As you can see, the current account has grown dramatically in recent years; just over five years ago, our total trade was about $150 billion. The above is important information with regard to India's economic integration with the world, and the question of how trade dependent we are, measured using the metric of trade/GDP or exports/GDP. Soon, we'll have an annual trade volume in excess of $1 trillion.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Prem »

Hi Suraj,
Thanks for the trade data. It looks good, Trillion is not that far but 2Trilion will actually give us huge levarage in new world economic system. :D
Akshut
BRFite
Posts: 353
Joined: 25 Dec 2008 15:06

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Akshut »

What is good is the reduction in the Trade Gap, which stands at 30 billion dollars=4.2% of total trade.
.
IIRC it was nearly 80 billion dollars=20% of 400 billion dollar trade. :!:
.
What is clearly needed now is the improvement in manufacturing industry, firstly to meet home demand thereby reducing imports, and then upgrading it for the world market.
Rishirishi
BRFite
Posts: 1409
Joined: 12 Mar 2005 02:30

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Rishirishi »

Suraj wrote:Sometime back there were questions about how much India's merchandise and services trade figures were. The latter in particular, was never clearly quantified. The current RBI balance of payments data provides a more detailed breakdown of invisibles (see sheet Statement II US$ million):
RBI Balance of Payments Data June 30 2009 (Excel spreadsheet)
2008-09 Trade
Merchandise exports: $175.184 billion
Services exports: $162.556 billion
Total exports: $337.740 billion

Merchandise imports: $294.587 billion
Services imports: $72.970 billion
Total imports: $367.557 billion

Total trade: $705.297 billion
Current Account Surplus(-Deficit): -$29.817 billion

As you can see, the current account has grown dramatically in recent years; just over five years ago, our total trade was about $150 billion. The above is important information with regard to India's economic integration with the world, and the question of how trade dependent we are, measured using the metric of trade/GDP or exports/GDP. Soon, we'll have an annual trade volume in excess of $1 trillion.
India's trade deficit comes from 2 sources. 1 the oil imports (cost depending on oil price) and trade deficit with China. Alternative energy must be developed and stop importing shoes, toys, trousers, toilets, etc from China. The actual imports from China are far greater, then the statistics show. All trade is subject to a black payment contan. The importer reduces the value of imports to save import and sales taxes. The Importer then pays the Chinease manufacturar in black money. Indian manufacturing units are going bankrupt becasue they have to pay sales, bribes and other taxes.
Hitesh
BRFite
Posts: 792
Joined: 04 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Hitesh »

Why are we allowing so much exports from china when China doesn't really allow exports from India? We should tell China to fvck off if they don't play ball.
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

India Inc's capex up 21.6% despite slowing profit
India Inc’s appetite for growth continues unabated, but at a slower pace, with spending on capital expansion and investments rising a healthy 21.6 per cent in the financial year 2008-09, compared with 38.5 per cent in 2007-08. In absolute terms, capex spending has risen by Rs 228,000 crore ($48 billion), despite declining profits and a 37 per cent decline in fund flow from financial markets in 2008-09.

The capital-intensive sectors of India Inc do not find the current environment a deterrent to push ongoing expansion and so they continue with capex plans. The study looks at 323 listed companies whose capex spending data for 2008-09 is available. The sample is reasonably representative, as it accounts for half of the capex spent by the corporate sector in 2007-08.

The capex boom of the past three years has been a bit different from the mid-90s expansion. The mid-90s capex cycle was driven largely by domestic capacity creation, this time capital was spent on a combination of domestic capacity creation and domestic and overseas acquisitions. In fact, mergers and overseas acquisitions hit record levels in 2007-08.
PSUs seek govt support for capital expansion
The share of government support to public sector enterprises, according to the latest Budget documents, is projected to increase sharply by 6 percentage points in the current fiscal (2009-10).

This is because profits of public sector units are hit by economic downturn, thus hampering their ability to fund future projects through internal resource generation. Also, an illiquid credit market, characterised by high cost of borrowing, is cited as another reason for the increase in seeking state support.

Internal and Extra Budgetary Resources (IEBR) now account for only 46 per cent in the central plan outlay for the current fiscal, compared with 52 per cent in previous financial year.

The government’s plan expenditure consists of direct budgetary support and IEBR, which constitutes resources raised by public sector undertakings (PSUs) through profits, loans and equities.
Govt clears Michelin's Rs 11,000-cr ($2.3 billion) investment proposal
The Foreign Investments Promotion Board (FIPB) had cleared the proposal under which Compagnie Financiere Michelin (CFM) plans to set up a wholly-owned subsidiary to make radial tyres, tubes and ancillary tyre related products at the plant, according to an official release.

The company has proposed an investment of Rs 4,000 crore over a period of seven years and intends to make a further infusion of Rs 7,000 crore over a period of three years, after the completion of the initial funding depending on the progress of the project and demand of the tyre market.

A Michelin spokesperson said the facility will go on stream within the next three years.
Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2579
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Katare »

Hitesh wrote:Why are we allowing so much exports from china when China doesn't really allow exports from India? We should tell China to fvck off if they don't play ball.
We have to play by WTO rule, you can't signal out a country. Competition is good in long term.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »


India in My Rear-View Mirror

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1247204 ... :b26305168


By PETER WONACOTT

In China's Southwest Sichuan province, the road to enlightenment is a superhighway.

In about 90 minutes, the highway zips travelers 180 kilometers from the provincial capital of Chengdu to the former farming hamlet of Leshan, home to a sitting Buddha that is more than 230-feet tall and 1,200 years old. Luxury busses, new model Buicks and Toyota sedans disgorge Chinese and foreign tourists into a city that has popped up in a matter of years, thanks largely to a road system that links Leshan to refurbished rail stations and international airports now just hours away.
[Peter Wonacott]

Two decades ago, on my first visit to Leshan, the Big Buddha looked out across a river to rice paddies. The same view today is glass, steel and concrete of high rise buildings. Leshan's economy is now both light and heavy industry, in addition to tourism.Not as idyllic as it once was, to be sure. But Leshan represents a small part of what has been Chinese government's ambitious road build-out, a bet that massive state spending will yield greater returns in private investment, new jobs and stronger consumer demand. The bet has paid off so far.

Goldman Sachs predicts that, by 2041, China's economy will be the largest in the world, out-sizing even the U.S. Similarly, Goldman forecasts India's economy to surpass Japan by 2032.

But there's a crucial difference that's surfaced between the two imminent economic superpowers, China and India. China has shown that its central and local governments are capable of building road infrastructure to deliver current and future economic growth. India's drive to do the same has sputtered, and the consequences of this torpid pace are clear for those who have recently spent time outside the big cities of both countries.

“Some new highways aren't on the latest Chinese maps or GPS-aided Google maps.”

Although India's rural areas have been resilient during the global economic crisis, the relatively fast growth has come mainly from a very low base – by virtue of being poor for so long. Shoddy infrastructure has sealed India's rural communities and constrained investment and consumer demand. Even with the nascent development taking place now, swaths of India remain beholden to benign weather and welfare handouts, such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, which offers 100 days of paid work to supplement farm incomes.

India's total investment in infrastructure in 2006-2007 was estimated to be around 5% of gross domestic product, according to the latest figures from the Planning Commission.

By comparison, China's infrastructure spending has been about 12-13% of GDP in the last few years.

If it's to develop the same strong economic arteries, India must close this gap quickly. The Indian government appears to realize this, and on Monday, announced that its budget contained a 23% increase for highway construction. Foreign investors have been cautious about entering India's infrastructure sector, so a previously announced $500 billion road revamp has been slow to materialize.

It's sorely needed, as veterans of Indian road travel can attest.

A recent 300-kilometer trip from Delhi to the lakeside tourist town of Nainital in Uttarakhand was a full-day affair. We dodged large craters in the road and rattled over smaller holes; We swerved around cars going the wrong way and meandered by squatter villages built around half-constructed flyovers; We braked to avoid cows, goats, limping dogs, and one large, dead pig.

In China, road travel presents a different set of challenges. Superhighways spin out from the main cities, delivering one into a bewildering web of freshly-constructed roads crisscrossing the country. Some new highways aren't on the latest Chinese maps or GPS-aided Google maps. The best navigational advice frequently comes from the tollbooth operator.

China's road building has even outpaced the service infrastructure. On the newest highways, rest-stops advertised on billboards often weren't there yet; many exits are sealed from unfinished off-ramps; petrol pumps are few and far between. On one pristine stretch of asphalt running beside acres of corn, five hours from Beijing, we ran out of gas. A police jeep buzzed past our pleading waves. My brother scooted down the flyover and hitched a short ride to a gas station and returned with enough fuel to get us to the next city.

One hundred kilometers and an hour later, the port city of Qingdao came into view. The four-lane highway delivered us to the heart of city, a former down-at-the-heels German colony transformed from my last visit a decade ago.
—Peter Wonacott is a WSJ reporter based in New Delhi
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »

http://maxkapital.blogspot.com/2009/07/ ... al_08.html
The Primary Trend

India is in the early stage of an urban revolution. The demographic profile in the country also points towards a new and growing class of youthful consumers. The demand potential exists; as the rural population migrates to urban centers, the demand potential will rise. Demand potential is the desire to possess an article; when the desire is backed by the ability and willingness to pay, then, there is actual demand. With rapid economic growth, income levels are rising; with this potential demand can be converted into actual demand.

Is this a primary trend? I have no doubt that the answer is yes.

The Misconception or Misrepresentation

What then is the misconception?

Misconception 1:

The World Bank estimates that over 40% of India's populace live below the poverty line; that is $1.25 per person per day. During August 2007, Reuters carried an article claiming that 77% (836 million people) in India live on less than 20 Rupees a day; this information is contained in the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) report presented to the Prime Minister during 2007. Then there is another large section of the population who lives in poverty; not abject poverty, but poverty nonetheless; these people earn less than 200,000 Rupees per year. Then we have the so called middle class; there are approximately 50 million people earning between 200,000 Rupees and 1,000,000 Rupees per year. Add to this perhaps another 2 million, who earn over 1,000,000 Rupees per year and we are done.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »

Far Eastern Economic Review
Indians Deserve Better Governance

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1245133 ... :b25373790

By SALIL TRIPATHI

Even for the most jaded cynic, the image of serpentine queues of smiling men and women waiting patiently in the harsh heat of Indian summer to cast their votes, cannot fail to inspire. Also impressive is that India regularly carries out this logistical miracle almost flawlessly, given the scale -- some 714 million voters this time, of whom 420 million voted, making the elections the world's largest expression of democracy.

Transfers of power in India are peaceful and orderly, and when change occurs it does not lead to the kind of anxiety that greets change elsewhere in the developing world, in particular, its own volatile neighborhood. Indian winners are gracious and don't go about jailing their opponents. Parliamentary debates are robust; the press is free; and the judiciary is often impartial.

But all is not right with the world. The democratic roots are deep, but the Indian system has fundamental flaws and weaknesses. Its parliament has too many politicians with criminal charges pending against them. Its judges are overwhelmed by the load of pending cases. Its press often fails to hold politicians to account. And its bureaucrats are not under much pressure to perform. The result is staggering underperformance: India has the world's largest number of illiterate people, tens of millions of people live on less than a dollar a day, easily preventable diseases are widely prevalent and discrimination remains rampant. Unless India requires its pillars of governance to do better, it will continue to perform well below its potential.

Take the Parliament. The bounce the stock market experienced in India after election results were announced was because the markets had feared instability. Most analysts had expected an indecisive verdict, which is why they have called the Congress's victory as resounding. But a closer look at the numbers shows that the support for national parties has dropped. As columnist Devangshu Datta points out in the Business Standard, the combined vote of the two national parties -- the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party -- actually fell to 47.4% in 2009 from 48.7% in 2004. But the votes smaller, or regional, parties have gained is divided among 369 parties this year, as against 215 in 2004. In this fragmented field, the Congress's share rose 2.1 percentage points to 28.6%, giving it 206 seats, still 66 short of majority. It gained 51 more seats this time, just as the BJP lost 22 seats (to finish at 116), its vote share falling to 18.8% from 22.2%.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »

Image
* JUNE 17, 2009

Young CEO Vows to Fix India Exchange

By ERIC BELLMAN
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1245175 ... :b25472656

MUMBAI -- When Madhu Kannan worked for the New York Stock Exchange, he saw its dominant position trading blue-chip stocks get destroyed by aggressive new competitors. As the new head of the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd., Mr. Kannan is bringing the lessons he learned to another struggling exchange.
[Madhu Kannan] Eric Bellman/The Wall Street Journal

BSE CEO Madhu Kannan

The 36-year-old is the youngest chief executive in the history of Asia's oldest exchange. He plans to revitalize the market with better service, new technology and original products, just the strategy that ultimately halted the slide at the NYSE.

The Bombay Stock Exchange has been around for 133 years. With more than 4,000 listings, it has one of the largest roster of companies in the world. And India's markets have been on a tear in recent years, with unprecedented amounts of overseas and domestic money trying to tap into the country's emergence as a commercial power.

While its Sensitive Index, or Sensex, is still the country's stock bellwether, the BSE has failed to capitalize on its position: Its share of Indian stock trading has plunged to less than 25% today from more than 80% 15 years ago. Its younger, high-tech rival, the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., has grabbed most of its customers.

The BSE is now girding for a fight of survival, Mr. Kannan said. "The NYSE then was not as tough as what we are dealing with out here," he said in an interview.

"Old is great, but let's figure out a way to become more than that," he said. "We were effectively a monopoly and now it is hypercompetitive. That requires a cultural shift."
[Dwindling share chart]

When the exchange was started in 1875 it still was called the Native Share & Broker Association. For most of its history it was the dominant exchange, although there were many small regional bourses. With a near monopoly in the 1980s, it was able to build its 29-story headquarters with 360-degree views of the city decades before billions of dollars of foreign investment flowed into the country.

The near monopoly also made the exchange complacent, analysts said, and it wasn't ready when the National Stock Exchange of India set up shop in 1995. The NSE used the latest technology to allow more and faster trades. It also had a national network, while the BSE still was limited to trading around Mumbai. The NSE saw the importance of futures and quickly dominated that market as well, and the BSE's share dwindled further.
Mumbai traders said it may have more to do with luck. They are notoriously superstitious. Some had asked the exchange to remove the replica of the Wall Street district's famous bronze bull at its entrance because stocks hadn't been able to reach highs since the sculpture was installed in 2008.

So far, Mr. Kannan's arrival has been auspicious for the market. The Sensex has surged more than 25% since the day he started.

"I've brought the good luck," he said. "They didn't need to take the bull out, they got me."
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

Rs.100,000 crore ($22 billion) investment in roads this year
“We are committed to the new target of laying 20 kilometres of roads per day, and to achieve this target there needs to be a quantum jump in construction activity across the country,” Nath told reporters after addressing the ‘Build India- Road infrastrcture’ summit here.

Citing land acquisition as a major hurdle to speedy construction of roads, the minister said henceforth projects would have to acquire 80 per cent of the required land before bids were allotted.

Nath also said he wanted state governments to play a more proacive role in road projects. “States must be stakeholders in these projects. If we do not get satisfactory participation from them, we are ready to abandon these projects.”

The minister said the government was looking at various innovative financing instruments to fund road projects and attract both the domestic and foreign investors. Also, the government was planning to involve pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, equity funds, besides other available investment channels like banks, to fund the road projects, which would require an investment of over Rs 2 lakh crore from the private sector over the next five years, he said.

Priority would be given to tolled roads and 60 per cent of projects this year will be on the toll-based revenue model and the remaining on annuity and engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contract models.

According to Nath, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has adequate resources at the moment and has no plans to borrow funds for the current year.
IIP rises 2.7% in May on domestic demand
India’s industrial output expanded 2.7 per cent in May this year, the most since September last year, on the back of strong consumer demand in the domestic market. This is significantly more than the downwardly revised 1.2 per cent in April and betters forecasts of a 1.4 per cent rise.

With 10 out of 17 sectors in the Index of Industrial Production, or IIP, registering growth in May, Finance Secretary Ashok Chawla said the government expected the positive momentum to continue in the coming months.

Output had fallen in December, February and March as Asia's third-largest economy was hit hard by a sudden liquidity crunch and the global downturn.

“We do believe that the worst is over, but there is a difference between the worst being over and getting back to robust growth,” said Montek Singh Ahluwalia, deputy chairman of the Planning Commission.

The manufacturing sector, which has nearly 80 per cent weight in the index, increased by 2.5 per cent as producers are believed to be increasing output to meet anticipated demand.

“Producers in India may have run down inventories during the early stage of the global turmoil, meaning that the decline in production was steeper than the fall in orders, and the recent rise in production could be a result of businesses rebuilding inventories,” Moody’s Economy.com analyst Sherman Chan wrote in a research note.
DIPP wants to relax FDI rules for small constructions
To encourage the flow of foreign direct investment (FDI) in smaller construction projects — integrated townships and hospitality projects — the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) has recommended changes to the Press Note 2 of 2005. These recomendations have been sent to the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs.

The department has asked for a reduction in the minimum area to be developed under each project from 25 acres to 10 acres for development of serviced housing plots. It has also asked for reduction in the minimum built-up area for construction development projects to 10,000 sq m.

DIPP feels that in smaller cities and towns, developing serviced plots or built-up areas according to guidelines prescribed in Press Note 2 is not economically viable. The minimum area requirement is viewed as a deterrent infusing FDI into companies desirous of undertaking small-size construction projects.

Foreign investment brought into such projects will be subject to a lock-in period from the date of infusion. The lock-in would also hold for three years after project completion.

To promote infrastructure development in tourism, DIPP has recommended that 100 per cent FDI be allowed in mixed development projects. The FDI policy permits foreign investment up to 100 percent through the automatic route in tourism-related industry, hotels and hospitals when they are standalone activities. There are an estimated 1.2 million hotel rooms in the country. The country needs to double its hotel rooms to 2.9 million by 2010, to meet the demand during the Commonwealth Games.
Kakkaji
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3915
Joined: 23 Oct 2002 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Kakkaji »

Swapan Dasgupta in this week's column on dailypioneer.com:

Ironic euphemism for brazen betrayal
Swapan Dasgupta

Take the battle of figures involving Minister for Railways Mamata Banerjee and her predecessor Lalu Prasad Yadav. In her intervention in the Lok Sabha on July 9, Mamata revealed that Lalu’s claim that the Indian Railways was in the pink of health with a cash surplus of Rs 90,000 crore was worse than an eyewash — it was a fudge. “One cannot talk about the income and skip the expenditure part,” Mamata told the House, “after spending Rs 28,200 crore on account of the Sixth Pay Commission award for two years, we are left with a cash surplus of Rs 8,361 crore.”

It is a misfortune that the significance of this scandalous revelation by the Railways Minister has, by and large, escaped the political class. What Mamata was alluding to wasn’t a minor miscalculation or an accountant’s error. She was suggesting that her predecessor wilfully misled both Parliament and the nation. Worse, her revelation of the true state of railway finances pointed to the fact that the Budget has lost its sanctity and that official statistics are fudged.

The significance of the fudge is awesome. Less than a year ago, the corporate sector was shaken by the disclosure that Satyam Computer had misled its shareholders about the true state of the company’s finances. The company has been charged with criminal conspiracy, its auditors have been sacked and its chairman is behind bars and may well receive a stiff prison sentence. If Lalu is guilty of concealment and misrepresentation, it follows that his offence is no less severe than that of the hapless Ramalinga Raju. If Raju is prosecuted for playing havoc with the money of investors and banks, does Lalu and, for that matter, the Railway Board get away by fudging the accounts of a corporation funded by the taxpayer? There cannot be different sets of laws for the private and public sector.

Nor does the buck stop here. Lalu was a member of Manmohan Singh’s Government and was repeatedly praised by the Prime Minister for his remarkable performance. Surely the Prime Minister now owes the country an explanation? So far he has been silent.

Fudging, it would seem, is fast becoming a national preoccupation. In suggesting that the fiscal deficit of India stood at some 6.8 per cent of the GDP, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee need not be charged with Laluism, but he was certainly guilty of inexactitude. The figure, as he well knows and as do economists, is only a partial representation of the true state of public finances. If non-Budget items such as the deficit of States, oil bonds and fertiliser subsidy are added to the list, the real fiscal deficit is likely to approximate between 12 and 13 per cent of a falling GDP.

The implications of this are staggering. It means that the Government is bequeathing to the country a debt burden that will haunt the present and the future. Yes, there is a law enacted in 2003 that makes it obligatory for a Government to pursue the path of fiscal responsibility. But the Government has unilaterally waived its own responsibility for following the law — on the ground that exceptional situations warrant exceptional remedies. This means that there is very little faith in the Government actually carrying out its commitment to lower the fiscal deficit in the next two years. If the monsoons don’t come up to expectations, the profligacy with public finances will continue merrily and be justified.

The issue is not so much whether or not the Government has a right to pursue voodoo economics. That privilege cannot be taken away from an elected Government. The more important question is the ethics of selective revelation, bordering on concealment, what in everyday parlance is called fudging. If you doubt what I am saying, just correlate the official claim of a negative rate of inflation with the soaring consumer price index.

At one time, particularly after smooth public relations professionals started regulating the flow of information, many Western Governments were charged with being a hostage to spin. In India, the quality of non-cricket spin is still amateurish. But we have moved to a higher level of political management. We are now a nation driven by fudge.

What a shame, it isn’t the real thing.
harbans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4883
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 05:01
Location: Dehradun

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by harbans »

Some of these China-India comparisons when they say India is far behind Cina, seem to miss out one thing: China was the same size as India today somewhere in 2002. How did China grow 4 times in 7 or 8 years? By the same logic what prevents India being a 4 trillion USD economy in the next 8? India is setting up a good export bases in knowledge based sectors, pharma, automobiles etc. Wih new oil/ gas fields coming into production we should also be able to save for ex and strengthen the Rupee further. Power and infrastructural investment must shoot up in the next few years asnd that is an opportunity this Govt must not miss. Or is India not doing something that China did in the last 7 years?
Hitesh
BRFite
Posts: 792
Joined: 04 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Hitesh »

Harbans,

it could be the strengthening of the reminibi, the usual Chinese method of misreporting of numbers, the underassessment of India's performance indicators, and the fact that China has a larger growth percentage than India.
harbans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4883
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 05:01
Location: Dehradun

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by harbans »

Hiteshji, even if we agree with the inflated figures, another thing amiss about the reporting on China/ India: China in 2002 was a place with a larger population than India in 2009. It was also the same economic size India is in 2009. I don't remember articles talking about millions of poor in China, considering that logically the per capita income would be lower than that of Indias today. Was their development that time more equitable than India of today? China was not just getting a rosy press in 2002, it was getting a rosy press even 5 years before that. Comparisons with US were made all the time by experts. Thats why i find talk about India no catching up wih China in the nex few decades somewhat shaky. We have to also sell ourselves better. Australia, UK, US were sucking upto China in 2002 and before.
Suraj
Forum Moderator
Posts: 15188
Joined: 20 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Suraj »

Besides higher nominal GDP growth, China also revised it's GDP base year twice during the period, significantly revising its economic data collection policies. India has not significantly revised it's base year for 16 years now; the current 1999-00 base year counts for little since multiple significant components of the GDP data (e.g. industrial production) still use 1993-94 as base year. Whining about that is fairly pointless - it was something we got worked up about on this thread maybe 2-3 years ago.

Therefore, when Indian and Chinese GDPs are reported, the comparisons are not quite an apples-apples one. The problem with these GDP comparisons is the presumption that they're always comparing the same thing. But that is not the case; just because Chinese GDP was around $1 trillion in 1999-00 doesn't mean it adds up the same way when we measure it.

Sure, it's nice to look at their GDP development as a goal to aim to beat, but just comparing GDP figures is little more than a disruption of this thread, because it has little substance. It would be far more meaningful to focus on what bottlenecks exist in our economy, that affect our development.
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Muppalla »

Question for gurus:

FIIs invest Rs 3,500 cr in equities since Budget

Is there a chance that these FII triggered the record collapse of stocks on Budget day to but them cheaper and make profits on other day?
Yogi_G
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2451
Joined: 21 Nov 2008 04:10
Location: Punya Bhoomi -- Jambu Dweepam

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by Yogi_G »

I believe India's true GDP is not being calculated as a lot of the output the unregulated sectors of the economy produces is not being taken into account. I remember Prabhu Chawla once saying that the size of India's economy could actually be ~2 trillion, with a late take-off compared to China I must say that is a pretty good performance. It is only a matter of time before China's growth saturates as did the Soviet economy during the late 70's and early 80's. Fueling that willl be the internal unrest whilst India will happily tick away the numbers.
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Indian Economy: News and Discussion (June 8 2008)

Post by svinayak »

harbans wrote: China was the same size as India today somewhere in 2002. How did China grow 4 times in 7 or 8 years?
China bought $1.5T US treasury to fund the cheap export of merchandise from 2002 to 2007. THis is how they increased their export at the artificial exchange rate.

THey have cheated the system for a short term gain but created a long term implosion. THey may have know that the economic path was a dead end. Now they are working on the War path to create the next wave
Locked