RaviBg wrote:No proof against Hafiz Saeed in 26/11 attacks: Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has said it cannot arrest outlawed Jamaat-ud-Dawah chief Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, linked by India to the Mumbai terror attacks, since there is no proof of his involvement in the 26/11 assault. ...
A direct outcome of the delinking process.
Under pressure, Pakistan arrested Hafeez, but kept him only under
house arrest, thereby extending him all the facilities and helping him plan more terror attacks against India. He was initially arrested for a month, but no trial took place and the detention was extended by another month every time. Then, the much delayed trial took place in the Lahore High Court when the judges asked the Pakistani Government pointedly why Pakistan should even consider the UNSC resolution when India has blatantly spurned the Kashmir Plebiscite resolution of the same UNSC. The Attorney General didn't think prduent to answer this question which would have created problems for himself and his country. Thus an impression was sought to be created by the judiciary that the Pakistani government's approach to Hafeez Saeed was anti-national. Anyway, the judges opined that there was insufficient evidence. The Attorney General said that the State of Pakistan possessed that but that could be presented only privately to the judges. After this interaction, everyone knew what the learned judges would decree and they were not disappointed when they set Hafeez Saeed free for lack of evidence. In fact, a Review Board of the LHC had already released two more accomplices of Sir Hafeez Saeed arrested along with him from his Al Qadsiyya manzil in central Lahore.
The Punjab Government and the Federal Government 'appealed' against the LHC judgement in the Supreme Court. First the lawyers appeared in the SC after business hours on a Friday so that no business could be transacted for the next two days. Then the SC Registrar found some 'technical isues' in the application. That took a few more days. Then the case was taken up for hearing. The much more learned judge, and hence the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Chaudhry revealed his mind quite early on when he said he did not find enough evidence. AT this point and immediately, the Punjab government dissociated itself from the case feigning that furnishing evidence was the responsibility of the federal government. The case was adjourned for a few days as the Attorney General was busy. Obviously, the effort was to delay any worthwhile legal action against Hafeez Saeed for as long as possible and most definitely at least until the Egypt meeting.
Now, compare that with what the NWFP CM says about how they intend to prosecute the TNSM chief, Sufi Muhammad:
No witness needed to prosecute Sufi because "... he publicly spoke against the constitution, the judiciary, misled the provincial government, has links with the Taliban and has been facilitating the group". Is there anybody else that fits the above criteria more than Hafeez Saeed vis-a-vis terrorism against India ?
In the meanwhile, the case against Lakhvi and four others proceeding in the Anti Terrorism Court in Karachi was delayed. GoP attributed many excuses and finally in May, the judge hearing the case was removed but no substitute appointed till about a fortnight back.
The Sharm-el-Sheikh meeting took place and the most important joint statement was produced. Utterly oblivious to the Indian Chankyanness, the Pakistani Government proceeded to continue with its plan which was to announce that the emperor was truly naked and that contrary to earlier claims, the Pakistani Government did not possess any incriminating evidence to arrest Hafeez Saeed.