Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by RajeshA »

SSridhar wrote:With people like this author, India doesn't need enemies
Dr Sandeep Pandey, social activist and Ramon Magsaysay Award winner, has just returned from a week long trip to Pakistan.
Why was he allowed to return? :evil:

BRF should hire some pickpockets in Pakistan, who can steal the Indian passports, cash, and credit cards of these useless WKK? Let them stink in Pukiland for a while longer, say something like 1-2 years.
Last edited by RajeshA on 30 Jul 2009 18:41, edited 1 time in total.
Avinash R
BRFite
Posts: 1973
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 19:59

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Avinash R »

SSridhar wrote:Dr Sandeep Pandey, social activist and Ramon Magsaysay Award winner, has just returned from a week long trip to Pakistan.
:D
As usual effect of fresh afghani maal.

It will take some weeks before it wears out and he along with his stoned jholawalla friends regain some of their lost brain cells.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by SSridhar »

Pakistan's Chief Justice opines that Musharraf can be tried for high treason
As Pakistan's former military ruler Pervez Musharraf defied summons and failed to show up before the country's highest court for the second day on Thursday, Chief Justice Iftikhar M. Chaudhary has observed that the ex-President can be tried for "high treason" by Parliament.

The Chief Justice also observed that the Parliament can also annul all ordinances issued post-emergency imposed by Gen. Musharraf.

But, Justice Chaudhary, who himself was the victim among the more than 60 Judges sacked by the former Army chief, however, turned down a plea to launch a treason case against Musharraf.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by CRamS »

Guys:

What is a succint definition of surrender? After all the terror perpetrated by terror, India has huffed and puffed, and now says jee war is ont an option, we have no choice but to talk bla bla, why is this not a surrender? Does Pranabda even listen to what he just said? Where is the Indian army in all this?

But here is the beauty, if you want to call it that, about India. Except for a few of us here on BR, and some in the Indian strategic community, for the millions and millions of Indians, either this India Pak BS is of no consequence, or MMS is Chanakyan or a statesman. Thus, they do not view all these events as a surrender; hence the morale of the entire nation as a whole, the entire Indian people as a whole that is, has not hit rock bottom because they don't even realize what a bunch of eunuchs they are, as it has for us tiny minority --- a sense of shame and helplesness. And Raja Ram says this shameless apathy or cowardice or delusion by Indians at large is not an indicator of India's failure as a nation state.

Looks like MMS has weathered this surrender and is sitting pretty. Thoo.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shravan »

CRamS wrote:What is a succint definition of surrender? After all the terror perpetrated by terror, India has huffed and puffed, and now says jee war is ont an option, we have no choice but to talk bla bla,
We don't have a option. We can't go on war with Pakistan till America is in Afghanistan. Why is it so hard to understand ?

We are lucky that we don't have leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16006
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by RajeshA »

shravan wrote:
CRamS wrote:What is a succint definition of surrender? After all the terror perpetrated by terror, India has huffed and puffed, and now says jee war is not an option, we have no choice but to talk bla bla,
We don't have a option. We can't go on war with Pakistan till America is in Afghanistan. Why is it so hard to understand ?

We are lucky that we don't have leaders like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Okay fine. War is not an option. Why is Talks a necessity? Make me understand please.
John Snow
BRFite
Posts: 1941
Joined: 03 Feb 2006 00:44

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by John Snow »

Boss the top leadership in IA also councils " Make wine not war", war is expensive yada yada ...

We dont have the capacity or doctrine for hot pursuit or special forces raids on terror camps.

We still are married to Stalins doctrine of throwing young officers into the enemy fire rather than do innovative ops. Even in Kargil only desparation drove the IA top brass to seek IAF sorties.


We stiil romance large scale Tank battles like in Africa campaigns or battle of the bulge, rather than rapid mobilization.
Remember the Cold start, we develop cold feet.


Sorry that is truth.

****
Shravan
Excuses Excuses and even more innovative excuses. Taking out terrorists is the objective ( atleast professed)of USA so Use IA and say we helped unkil.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shravan »

RajeshA wrote:Okay fine. War is not an option. Why is Talks a necessity? Make me understand please.
If you have followed the news from April then you would not be surprised by the Joint Statement. America forced us for the talks because it wants to see the tensions calm down so they could force PA to move towards West.

If MMS achieves even some action against LeT it would be a great success.
---
US hails Pak Army's redeployment from eastern to west border
Thursday, July 30, 2009, 14:23 IST
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shravan »

John Snow wrote: Shravan
Excuses Excuses and even more innovative excuses. Taking out terrorists is the objective ( atleast professed)of USA so Use IA and say we helped unkil.
John Snow Sir,

That would mean more deaths of American Soldiers in Afghanistan.
Rahul Shukla
BRFite
Posts: 565
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
Location: On a roller-coaster.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Rahul Shukla »

Mera Bharat mahan onlee! Why are Pakis taking so long in blowing up some more yindoos? Give these netas something to talk about in the Compost Dialogue pls.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shravan »

Rahul Shukla wrote:Why are Pakis taking so long in blowing up some more yindoos?
I am also waiting for terrible news but it seems like Chidambaram is doing a good job.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by ramana »

John Snow wrote: Boss the top leadership in IA also councils " Make wine not war", war is expensive yada yada ...
Correction its" Make Whine not war!"

Hence the need for talks.
archan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6823
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 21:30
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by archan »

Two of shravan's posts have been moved to a new thread dedicated to non-TSP related (meaning, the TSP link yet to be found) terrorism.
Rahul Shukla
BRFite
Posts: 565
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
Location: On a roller-coaster.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Rahul Shukla »

Pakistan's forex reserves fall to $11.77 bln (Reuters)
KARACHI, July 30 (Reuters) - Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves fell by $80 million in the week that ended July 25 to $11.77 billion, the third straight weekly fall, the central bank said on Thursday.

The State Bank of Pakistan's reserves eased to $8.35 billion from $8.43 billion a week earlier, while reserves held by commercial banks were flat from the previous week at $3.42 billion, the central bank said in a statement.
All because of expenditure on GOAT-e-FATA onlee. Yindoos meanwhile sit pretty whining about imaginary Mumbai losses and hoarding $$$ with forex reserves going up by 2.27 billion in one week to 266.19 billion onlee.

So right now Pak = India x 0.0442 onlee. Not fair. Give more aid to Pak onlee. And remember, "you no ask, we no tell" onlee. :((
Rahul Shukla
BRFite
Posts: 565
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 23:27
Location: On a roller-coaster.

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Rahul Shukla »

China delivers warship to Pakistan: Navy (AFP)
"The first F-22P Frigate constructed for the Pakistan navy at the Hudong Zhonghua Shipyard in Shanghai was delivered to Pakistan on Thursday," said Lieutenant Commander Shakeel Ahmed.
"The F-22P frigates will not only enhance the war fighting potential of the Pakistan navy but will also strengthen the indigenous ship-building capability of the country," said Ahmed.
Only in Pakistan does a warship built by for foreign country enhance Pakistan's domestic ship-building capability. The only logical explanation of the contradiction is that Pakistan has purchased China outright with payment in cold hard cash. That explains the fall in forex reserves also. AOA!

Also, Pakistan is nuclear power. So all Pakistani ships operate under a nuclear power and hence are nuclear powered ships onlee.
Last edited by Rahul Shukla on 30 Jul 2009 22:44, edited 1 time in total.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by anupmisra »

Porki MPA caught using stolen credit cards
On CCTV. Bought jewelry and "mardana" suits.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by anupmisra »

niran
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5538
Joined: 11 Apr 2007 16:01

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by niran »

Rahul Shukla wrote: Only in Pakistan does a warship built by for foreign country enhance Pakistan's domestic ship-building capability.

Also, Pakistan is nuclear power. So all Pakistani ships operate under a nuclear power and hence are nuclear powered ships onlee.
PN will have to paint it Green, this will enhance pindigenous ship buil... err painting capability.
shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7100
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shyamd »

x post

About the Karachi attacks against French engineers. The answer lies in Riyadh. A chap called Bin Mussalam who was the agent was pushed out by the french govt(due to change in govt), by incidentally the members of Rafeeq Hariri (Former Lebanese PM, who was assassinated by someone). So Bin Mussalam lost his commissions for the Agosta submarines and the La Fayette sales to KSA. Bin Mussalam is a Saudi of Yemeni origin. Bin Mussalam worked with the Saudi defense minister at the time, Sultan bin Abdulaziz. But he also had very close links with the most radical fringe of ISI agency which is suspected of having taken part in organizing a bomb attack against employees of French warship builder DCN in Karachi in 2002. In the 1980s, Bin Mussalam had worked with the ISI to finance Afghan mujahedeen fighting the Red Army.

French investigators reckon it was Bin Mussalam who organised this attack. But The Saudi businessman died a few years ago in Geneva. Secrecy long surrounded his death and the exact circumstances have never been fully established.
shravan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2212
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 00:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by shravan »

Translated excerpts from the Taliban code of conduct

Editor's note: The Taliban has released a new "code of conduct" for fighters in the field, listing what is acceptable behavior and what is not. The following are CNN translations of excerpts from the code.

Chapter 1: Security
Any Muslim can invite anyone working for the slave government in Kabul to quit their job and remove themselves from the corrupt administration.

Chapter 2: Prisoners
It is strictly prohibited to exchange prisoners for money. Killing can only be decided by the Imam or his deputy. Noone else has the right to do so.

If a military infidel is captured, any decision to kill, conditionally release or exchange such a prisoner can only be made by the Imam or his deputy.

Chapter 7: On the Mujahideen
Suicide attacks should be at high value and important targets because a brave son of Islam should not be used for low value and useless targets. :(( In suicide attacks the killing of innocent people and damage to their property should be minimized. 8)

Chapter 10: Regional Issues
All Mujahideen must do their best to avoid civilian deaths and injuries and damage to civilian property. :roll:

Chapter 11: Regarding prohibited things
Weapons used to be taken from people by force, this practice is no longer permitted. But people may hand over their weapons voluntarily. :?:

No Mujahid is allowed to smoke. A male who has not yet grown a beard may not stay in a common sleeping area with other men.

It is forbidden to disfigure people. For example the cutting off of ears, nose and lips are severely prohibited. Mujahideen should refrain from such activities. :eek:

Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate should not collect donations from people forcibly. People should be free to choose who they want to give to.

Mujahideen should not search people's homes. If there is a need to do this, they should get permission from authority and the search should be done in the presence of the imam of the local mosque and two elders.

Kidnapping for ransom is strictly prohibited.

Chapter 12
Mujahideen must be well behaved, and treat the people properly, in order to get closer to the hearts of civilian Muslims.

---

Can someone explain Chapter 11 - First Para. I think it only applies to Pakistani Taliban.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Prem »

arun wrote:Hardly surprising.

In a society where adults in Government Institutions like the Army see Jihad as an useful motivational tool for fighting as evidenced by their motto “Iman, Taqwa, Jihad fi Sabilillah “, or translated “Faith, Piety and Jihad in the Way of Allah”, it is but a matter of time before someone recognises the usefulness of Jihad as a motivational tool to get children to fight.:
Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy: 'Children are tools to achieve God's will,' the Taliban commander told me
Lets not forget Islam is Pakistan and Pakistan is Islam . The news above is Paki core contribution to the Glory of Islam, proof of Mercy, Compassion and Egalitarianism,all for 72s.
BijuShet
BRFite
Posts: 1587
Joined: 09 Jan 2008 23:14
Location: under my tin foil hat

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by BijuShet »

shravan wrote:Translated excerpts from the Taliban code of conduct

Editor's note: The Taliban has released a new "code of conduct" for fighters in the field, listing what is acceptable behavior and what is not. The following are CNN translations of excerpts from the code.
...
Chapter 11: Regarding prohibited things
...
A male who has not yet grown a beard may not stay in a common sleeping area with other men.

...
Looks like young boys will not be allowed to spend the night in the common sleeping area with other men hmmm. So no repeal of 377 for Pakibans. :roll:
Satya_anveshi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3532
Joined: 08 Jan 2007 02:37

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Satya_anveshi »

Posted without comment. likely will get banned. This needs to be posted in the S-e-S thread also.

US bails out India from Balochistan wrangle
WASHINGTON: Pakistan has not provided any evidence to the United States of India's involvement in the insurgency in Balochistan, and Washington
attaches no credibility to Islamabad's charges in this regard, a top US official has indicated.

The US view on Pakistan's allegation came during a briefing by the Obama administration's Af-Pak envoy Richard Holbrooke, who, while acknowledging that Pakistan brought up the subject during his recent visit to the country, told Washington's foreign press corps, "I would be misleading if I said it didn't come up, but the narrow answer to your question (has Pakistan given you any credible evidence of India's involvement?) is no."

Holbrooke's terse response to the Balochistan wrangle -- the latest between India and Pakistan -- broadly squares with the assertion in New Delhi that while Pakistan has raised the issue of India's alleged involvement in the region, it has offered no evidence, even as it falsely propagates in the Pakistani media that it has give a dossier to New Delhi in this regard. The Pakistani press is full of dark conspiracies of Indian intelligence involvement in the province, an inference to which New Delhi credulously allowed Islamabad to incorporate in a joint statement at Sharm-el-Sheikh.

The US has now, in effect, bailed out New Delhi. Holbrooke has previously rubbished Pakistan's charges about alleged Indian provocations from its consulates in Afghanistan, saying he had no reason to believe Islamabad's charges, and Pakistan would do well to examine its own internal problems. Other officials too have said Pakistan is merely trying to externalize a serious internal crisis while evading responsibility to crack down on home-grown terrorism.

In fact, Holbrooke's briefing following his latest visit to the region was notable for its dire tone with regard to Pakistan, a country which he characterized as "facing a staggering number of front-page story problems at one time." Describing Washington's efforts to stamp out terrorists in Pakistan frontier province, Holbrooke said it "hard to imagine a more dangerous area on the face of the earth today than an area which contains al-Qaida, Pakistani Taliban, Afghan Taliban, two and a half million refugees. It's just extraordinary how difficult it is."

The US envoy also trashed speculation about a rift with India that led to the reported cancellation of his visit to New Delhi with an extraordinary revelation. "You know, if there's a rift between me and India, it would be the first rift between me and India since I was seven years old. You know, India was the first country in the world I was ever aware of. I have a very special feeling for it," Holbrooke said.

Such expression of personal affection for countries is seldom expressed by US officials and is certain to rankle Pakistan, which is already sour about a perceived American tilt towards India over the last decade. Holbrooke went on to clarify that the only reason he scrubbed the New Delhi leg of his visit was because three of the four Indian interlocutors he engaged with were all going to be out of town. He would be going back in mid August, "within the limits of Indian independence (day)."
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Prem »

Satya_anveshi wrote:Posted without comment. likely will get banned. This needs to be posted in the S-e-S thread also.

US bails out India from Balochistan wrangle

. News belong to the first chapter of 'Lifafa Mahima" Puran
Last edited by SSridhar on 31 Jul 2009 05:00, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed Quote Tag
SBajwa
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5874
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 21:35
Location: Attari

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by SBajwa »

Harbans ji,

Many people have asked me the same question
'you must then hate Muslims'

I reply..

"NO I do not hate muslims! I hate Islam"
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by RamaY »

SBajwa wrote:Harbans ji,

Many people have asked me the same question
'you must then hate Muslims'

I reply..

"NO I do not hate muslims! I hate Islam"
:lol: very common experience... the next quechen would be...

"How can you disrespect my belief-system/faith? How would you feel if I disrespect your faith?" :((
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by anupmisra »

Champions League groups unveiled
The fixtures have been announced for the Champions League Twenty20, which will be staged in India in October. Teams from India, Australia, South Africa, West Indies, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and England will play 23 games in New Delhi, Hyderabad and Bangalore.
Now, who's missing here? :((
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7900
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Anujan »

Satya_anveshi wrote:Posted without comment. likely will get banned. This needs to be posted in the S-e-S thread also.

US bails out India from Balochistan wrangle
Ah, so massa who usually prevents a nuclear war in the subcontinent has now successfully rescued India's H&D ? :roll:
BijuShet
BRFite
Posts: 1587
Joined: 09 Jan 2008 23:14
Location: under my tin foil hat

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by BijuShet »

anupmisra wrote:Champions League groups unveiled
The fixtures have been announced for the Champions League Twenty20, which will be staged in India in October. Teams from India, Australia, South Africa, West Indies, New Zealand, Sri Lanka and England will play 23 games in New Delhi, Hyderabad and Bangalore.
Now, who's missing here? :((
I see that Bangladeshis are missing so also the green Irish teams. :mrgreen:
RamaY
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17249
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 21:11
Location: http://bharata-bhuti.blogspot.com/

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by RamaY »

Anujan wrote:
Satya_anveshi wrote:Posted without comment. likely will get banned. This needs to be posted in the S-e-S thread also.

US bails out India from Balochistan wrangle
Ah, so massa who usually prevents a nuclear war in the subcontinent has now successfully rescued India's H&D ? :roll:
Well, first massa twisted our dear leaders' I-dont-know-what to do a HnD harakiri at S-e-S preventing a nuclear war in the sub continent. Once that mission was accomplished, it saved India's HnD with this statement.

Does it mean, CIA figured out our poojya Pradhan Mantriji's RAW plans to nuke TSP from the face of earth :?:
Hari Seldon
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9374
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 12:47
Location: University of Trantor

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Hari Seldon »

Silver lining from the enforced Chankian-ness of S-e-S is that enough vocal (and likely, backroom) resistance from the polity and the security establishment arose so as to force more than one hasty clarification after nasty climbdown. Heartening.

It in some sense serves to underline the limits of lifafagiri, top level wooly headedness, trial-balloon p1mping of south asian solutions such as diluting Indian claims on cashmere in exchange for more promises from TSP and backpats from unkil etc.

Or so I hope.

Recall from '06-'07 the stout resistance from the IA to any suggestion even of signing feel-good siachen withdrawal agreements with the PA. PMO appeared leaning towards demarcation of the LoC with the text in annexures. IA saw through the blunder and raised a ruckus, and mercifully, managed to persuade Dilli to baktrack just a wee bit. Of course, the usual face-saving spin was all over the lifafa airwaves but the essential point remains - that the security establishment does step in to check and balance the more inane and surreal proposals initiated by our top-level statesman-wannabe netaship. Or so I hope, for India's sake.

-Hari Om Hari
Muppalla
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7115
Joined: 12 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Muppalla »

Hari Seldon wrote: Recall from '06-'07 the stout resistance from the IA to any suggestion even of signing feel-good siachen withdrawal agreements with the PA. PMO appeared leaning towards demarcation of the LoC with the text in annexures. IA saw through the blunder and raised a ruckus, and mercifully, managed to persuade Dilli to baktrack just a wee bit. Of course, the usual face-saving spin was all over the lifafa airwaves but the essential point remains - that the security establishment does step in to check and balance the more inane and surreal proposals initiated by our top-level statesman-wannabe netaship. Or so I hope, for India's sake.

-Hari Om Hari
You are right. The checks and balances are what that are saving India from various moles inside the polity. However, if you read the book Will The Iron Fence Save A Tree Hollowed By Termites?-defence Imperatives Beyond The Military by Arun Shourie , it is pretty clear that one day these checks and balances will whither away when the moles become kings. India is pretty close to that state is my opinion.
Bhima
BRFite
Posts: 128
Joined: 28 Dec 2008 23:59
Location: UK

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Bhima »

From all options are open to this? Can someone please explain to me the great wisdom of stating war is not an option? It was made painfully obvious after Mumbai but why the need to blurt it out and remove all doubt? Before he said all options were open when he really meant war is not an option. So does this mean all options are still open as nothing he says can really be relied upon?
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21234
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by Prem »

Muppalla wrote:
You are right. The checks and balances are what that are saving India from various moles inside the polity. However, if you read the book Will The Iron Fence Save A Tree Hollowed By Termites?-defence Imperatives Beyond The Military by Arun Shourie , it is pretty clear that one day these checks and balances will whither away when the moles become kings. India is pretty close to that state is my opinion.
This is why its very important to watch which party, politician or people are working to undermine the Constitution and various fundamental insitutions in india . Pinkoes, Commie, Sooth Asian "inte-llectuals", WKK, PSs etc are on top of the list who indulge in doing so at every chance they get. The day they successfuly insert communal angle to Security Institions, India will wither away in few decades. These elements need to be scrutnized all the time and kept under surveliance .
Last edited by SSridhar on 31 Jul 2009 04:58, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fixed Quote Tag
pgbhat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4172
Joined: 16 Dec 2008 21:47
Location: Hayden's Ferry

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by pgbhat »

Editorial:Singh’s statesmanship
Posting in full --- no comment.
The Indian prime minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, proved his political stature once again while defending his “Pakistan policy” at the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, a policy that had been described by the opposition as “capitulation to an enemy” who had allowed its territory to be used for terrorist attacks in Mumbai in 2008. He firmly stood by the joint statement he had issued at Sharm al-Sheikh together with his Pakistani counterpart, Syed Yousaf Raza Gilani, including a reference in it to Balochistan.

Despite platitudes about Mr Singh being a “weak” prime minister, he has proved once again that he is indeed the “paradigmatic” leader after Jawaharlal Nehru. India owes its new stature in the world to him after he changed the Nehruvian model of the economy in 1991 as finance minister. He is now about to change the Indo-Pak strategic equation if the politicians on both sides care to listen to him.

We must say that many people in Pakistan have framed their view of Indo-Pak relations on cue from Mr Singh. Let us revisit this view by reproducing what he said at the Lok Sabha on Wednesday: “If we live in peace, as good neighbours do, both of us can focus our energies on the many problems — like our abject poverty — that confront millions and millions of people in South Asia. If there is cooperation between us, and not conflict, vast opportunities will open up for trade, travel and development that will create prosperity in both countries”.

He must have surprised a lot of members of the Lok Sabha when he praised the “trust” that Pakistan under President Asif Zardari had built up with him by investigating the Mumbai attacks honestly and reporting on the progress in indicting and convicting the “non-state actors” involved in the act. He claimed that this kind of “lifting of denial” by Pakistan had never happened before and that India should not fail to take note of it. He endorsed Pakistan’s approach towards India in the post-Mumbai phase, that of seeking bilateral dialogue instead of squaring off for another war.

The Indian media will probably be put off by the strong expression of conviction when he said: “As neighbours it is our obligation to keep our channels open. Look at what is happening in the world...Unless we want to go to war with Pakistan, dialogue is the only way out. But we should do so on the basis of trust-but-verify”. And the first verification came in the form of 34 pages sent to him by Islamabad giving “details of the planning and sequence of events, details of the investigations carried out by the special Federal Investigation Agency team of Pakistan, a copy of the FIR lodged and the details and photographs of the accused in custody and those declared as proclaimed offenders”.

The details mentioned by Mr Singh had been earlier revealed in a press conference in Islamabad by the interior minister, Mr Rehman Malik, before Prime Minister Gilani left for Sharm al-Sheikh. What he told the Pakistani press was more shocking to the people of Pakistan than to the people of India, about how the terrorists had been trained before being sent to Karachi and provided facilities to journey by sea to the Indian coast. This newspaper had editorially praised the decision of Mr Malik of “coming clean” and predicted its good effect on the Indian side.

The Sharm al-Sheikh meeting has been hailed as a success for Prime Minister Gilani, but the truth is that his government had paved the way for this success by announcing the truth. The result was the reference in the joint statement to Balochistan, something for which the Mr Singh is now quite prepared to take the flak. Because of the good atmospherics at Sharm al-Sheikh, another good bilateral gesture was made possible. Pakistan wisely decided not to present the intelligence dossier on Balochistan. The reference to Balochistan had done the trick. And Mr Gilani has nicely covered up by saying, “India never asked for the dossier”.

At the same time what Pakistan has done to help India in the post-Mumbai phase makes it clear that insinuations from some quarters in India about the State’s involvement were far from true. It is this kind of attitude which Mr Gilani and Mr Singh have tried to counter by showing statesmanship. The Cold Warriors in India should take heed from what Mr Singh has said. Indeed, the brave statesmanlike initiatives of the Pakistani and Indian leaders should be applauded.
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by abhijitm »

Rahul Shukla wrote:China delivers warship to Pakistan: Navy (AFP)

Only in Pakistan does a warship built by for foreign country enhance Pakistan's domestic ship-building capability.
Just like suddenly after hiring and renaming Palapa as Paksat made puki space program ahead of India.
This is one of my favorite archives Pakistan’s space programme is now ahead of India
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14222
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by svinayak »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Jz5StFfrI
Paki RAPE Class .Check the attitude

Recent BBC - report had Paki female doing spa inside Isloo - Yoga/meditation spa.
She was asked about killing and Jihad. She replied that if going to die so be it.
MurthyB
BRFite
Posts: 704
Joined: 18 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: "Visa Officer", Indian Consulate #13,451, Khost Province, Afghanistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by MurthyB »

Acharya wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Jz5StFfrI
Paki RAPE Class .Check the attitude
What attitude? They are just applying makeup with some cheesy music as background.

BTW, at least half of the pakistani women I see in these clips look like transvestites. Also, there was a report where it was said that even actresses can be had for 1lakh per night. I guess that's par for the course for pureland.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by anupmisra »

abhijitm wrote:Just like suddenly after hiring and renaming Palapa as Paksat made puki space program ahead of India. This is one of my favorite archives Pakistan’s space programme is now ahead of India
Especially, this quote from Herr Musharraf (dated Jan. 2003):
“I am really delighted to note that Pakistan’s space programme now is a reality and our scientists must build our own indigenous satellite within three years instead of five years,”
Instead of building someone else's indigenous satellite system. That three year "tryst with dust-iny has come and gone.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - July 07, 2009

Post by anupmisra »

Acharya wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Jz5StFfrI
Paki RAPE Class .Check the attitude
Soon-to-be Tellibunny Fodder.
Locked