sukhdeoji,
I assume that you have assumed that my projections were based on astrology. Although I have only recently started reading up on original texts of astrology, I had avoided them even when I read up Sanskrit texts (even though do contain important historical and astronomical clues). I began reading up these texts, because I came across the widespread use of "prophecy" in westerm media or western christian sources to mobilize the "faithful" or the vulnerable.
Having said that, for me a true scientist keeps his minds open. He only can say, "I cannot accept this statement or claim based on current knowledge and understanding. However, in the future, if evidence comes up to the contrary I will reconsider my current non-acceptance." Openness, and awarness that "testability" is limited by current knowledge should also be a part of a scientists attitude. It is not scientific to reject "astrology" "forever" by shutting the door on future repeated and continued testing.
For me, I will keep on testing it, and for me these are not things about "believing" or "not believing". I do not take steps based on astrological predictions, and I have never used it in my personal life. (It would have been "dangerous" for a lot of people, if I really believed in what was predicted about me as a child -
) Neither would I use it for my country and nation. But at the same time I will continue testing it out. It is important even politically and sociologically, because unlike you, a lot of people do seem to be affected by astrological predictions.
Now to get back to the actual issue : this is exactly what I wrote :
I would expect a major transition by 2035-2037. A new system and regime that comes through this transition will finally see India to a muche increased level of self-sufficieny and dominance over global affairs. The period starting from 2005-2007 is very similar in intrinsic tendencies as to the period between 1915-17 to 1945-1947. I would think the main ideological drives have already started moving - although things are not clear or very visible. There will be increased public participation in public political activities starting from 2011-2012 although initial responses may not seem much, and which may not also take forms that the existing rashtryia setup expects. In 1921-22 a new form of political struggle started in India, that bypassed the ruling regime even if not being violent and quite within the law. But this was a period, when a larger section of public opinion began to veer round to the realization that the regime they had ruling over them was not really working in their interest. We should also keep in mind, that substantial portion of Indian elite, landed and business or industrial interests were even at the 1920's stage quite firmly aligned with the ruling British regime.
The driving forces of Indian politics will change over the next 10 years. But the real maniestation of this process will perhaps only be visible around 2020. The following 15-17 years to 2035-37 will be the most critical.
Where have I used any astrological terminology? My main observation starts from considering a sequence of years starting from 1947, going back 90 years at each step. The sequence that you get, is 1947, 1857, 1767, 1677, 1587, 1497, 1407, 1317, 1227, 1137, 1047, 957, 867, 777, 687, 597, 507, 417, 327, 237, 147, 57,33 BCE, 123, 213, 303, 393, 483, 573.
If you look carefully and compare with Indian historical timeline, you can see that these dates are very close to major changes in the nature, expanse, and character of a regime that covers large parts of the subcontinent. For me there could be several factors behind this. There could be climatic cycles that create social disruptions in a periodic and accumulative manner, by which older regimes with time -dependent ossification, becomes unable to face such conditions. This loosens the rashtryia power apparatus, and allows more appropriate for the circumstance, and up-to-date leadership to emerge. There is at least one astrophysical cycle roughly 90 years long (one of the shorter cycles of the sun), which could have some effect on the climate. Also 90 years is approximatley the activity time of three consecutive generations. It is possible that when overall economic and other conditions come to a head due to climatic factors, and the 90 year generation has more or less been replaced - changes take place rapidly. We can perhaps compare the situation to the process by which earthquakes happen from plate tectonics - the pressure gradually grows, but the rock crystals does not cross their threshold stress for snapping. They get deformed slightly but they do not collapse entirely. We can compare the rock crystals to the rashtryia machinery and associated social networks which resist change and reform as that might upset their privileges. However atime comes when external triggers and building up pressure suddenly crosses the threshold , and the crsystal snap. That is the older generation and their dependent components at control of rashtryia power snaps.
Now this does not, and should not be taken to mean, that no action is needed. But those who understand the process by which these society wide phenomena take place, can try to harness this potential. I would again bring in another physics example here which I have used before - that of simulated annealing. If we choose the optimizig path better, we may be able to reach a better optimum earlier, rather than the more "random" approach which may temporarily land us in a "worse" equilibrium.
.
}that there seems to be too much emphasis on the past while discussing the strategic leadership of the "future". There can be no doubt that those who dont know history are doomed to repeat it. It is equally true that knowledge of "true" or "correct" history is imperative, which requires a lot of research and straying away from the mainstream, as history is written by winners.
. Keep it up. 
minimizing corruption tax