
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/army- ... rs/509398/
This is unfortunate. It is really necesaary to have CRPF people in uniform. Maybe gurus will be able to expound. I would prefer for central forces to be in plain clothes as far as possible, blend in with the population. They could even go around carrying carbines beneath burkhas.2 jawans killed in twin militant attacks near J-K Assembly
http://www.ptinews.com/news/256999_2-ja ... K-Assembly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STAFF WRITER 14:7 HRS IST
Srinagar, Aug 31 (PTI) Two CRPF personnel were killed and eight people injured in twin-attacks by militants in the crowded Lal Chowk and Batmaloo areas of the city, barely half a kilometre from the Assembly this afternoon.
Armed with guns and grenades, the militants struck almost simultaneously at around 1 PM when the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly went for a recess after completing the morning session, officials said.
Militants shot two CRPF jawans of 28th battalion in the head from point blank range outside a bank at Lal Chowk, Srinagar's nerve centre, sparking panic in the city.
A few minutes later, militants lobbed a grenade on a CRPF patrol party outside Fire and Emergency Services headquarters at Batmaloo causing injuries to eight persons including three jawans, they said.
Errr...nothing to suggest our forces dont do all this?I would prefer for central forces to be in plain clothes as far as possible, blend in with the population. They could even go around carrying carbines beneath burkhas.
Had once talked to an army colonel serving in J&K. Apparently, that sort of thing does not happen very much. The could be a few mil int people in civvies but bulk of troops are used in a fairly traditional way. imho at least in urban areas, uniformed troops should not be posted unless absolutely necessary. for example, troops manning a check point might need to be in uniform. But troops in say Lal Chowk or Maisuma should not be in uniform.sum wrote:Errr...nothing to suggest our forces dont do all this?I would prefer for central forces to be in plain clothes as far as possible, blend in with the population. They could even go around carrying carbines beneath burkhas.
A few in uniform will have to be there for psychological purposes...a lot will surely be in civvies.
But it falls short of the main demand of the people of Gilgit-Baltistan for a constitutional status to the region as a fifth province and for Pakistani citizenship to its people.
On the other hand, Kashmiri political leaders have slammed the package as a step that undermines the “disputed” status of Jammu & Kashmir by seeking to formalise the status quo that exists on the ground.
According to them, the move aims to turn Gilgit-Baltistan into a virtual province of Pakistan, and is a tacit shift away from Islamabad’s stated position of support to the struggle for the self-determination of the people of Jammu & Kashmir.
Yasin Malik, leader of the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF), who is on a visit to Pakistan, expressed strong opposition to the move. He described the decision as “an arrow that has been shot into the hearts of Kashmiris” by Pakistan.
Reminding Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani of his promise to consult all stakeholders before making any decision, he demanded that the Pakistan government consult the entire Kashmiri leadership first.
Amanullah Khan, leader of his own faction of the JKLF, also denounced the move. He said it was on account of Pakistan’s “wavering stand” on the Kashmir issue that it had lost the support of the Security Council, and now it was squandering any goodwill left for it by “merging” Gilgit-Baltistan with Pakistan.
At an iftaar organised by the PoK government on Sunday in the capital, at which Mr. Malik was the chief guest, all the talk was about the new move in Gilgit-Baltistan, with various theories being offered for the government move, including the “American hand,” and the “Indian hand.”
There have been protests in many parts of PoK over the decision. Despite holding the position that Kashmir should merge with Pakistan, the Jamat-e-Islami too has lent its voice to the protests, saying it opposes a piece-meal solution to the Kashmir issue.
Apparently bowing to the protests and to the Kashmiri accusations that Islamabad did not consult them, Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry is to hold a briefing for Kashmiri leaders on September 4 about the new package for the Northern Areas.
Looks like the folks of Gilgit-Baltistan are also not too happy with the arrangement .. This guy seems pissed at Paki perfidy ...SSridhar wrote:Gilgit-Baltistan generates suspicion
Despite of high claims of granting internal autonomy, a governor, to be appointed by the presdient, and the prime minister, himself, have been made the supreme authorities. The Gilgit – Baltistan Council would be chaired by the prime minister, who will not be elected by votes of the people of Gilgit – Baltistan, while an un-elected governor, to be appointed by the president, would act as vice – chairman of the council. This arrangement is being seen as a major ploy to control the elected representatives of Gilgit – Baltistan.
A new designation, called Chief Minister, has been created but the CM would not be authorized to form his cabinet. The governor would form a cabinet, albeit with “advise” of the chief minister. Also, the legislative assembly would not be able to elect the chief minister. He would be selected by the Gilgit – Baltistan Council
Good one.Satya_anveshi wrote:Must Watch!!
This is a very interesting interview with Yasin Malik with one of my favorite Pakistani journalist Iftikhar Ahmed.
http://www.pkaffairs.com/playshow.asp?pageId=5169
More than that this episode captures the transformation of Yasin Malik the terrorist to Yasin Malik the leader of J&K. It highlights the dynamics in Kashmir at that time and of today. There is enough ammo to paint Yason Malik a great civil rights leader or the one who ditched his team and got thousands killed. Pretty much who ever opposed him in JKLF got killed at Indian handsAcharya wrote:Good one.
Can see the Paki psyche for violence
I talk to K Pandits regularily. If Yasin Malik is genuine then he should invite the KP back to Srinagar. Non violence is also being secular and making sure that everybody and their religion has a space in JK.Satya_anveshi wrote:More than that this episode captures the transformation of Yasin Malik the terrorist to Yasin Malik the leader of J&K. It highlights the dynamics in Kashmir at that time and of today. There is enough ammo to paint Yason Malik a great civil rights leader to the one who ditched his team and got thousands killed. Pretty much who ever opposed him in JKLF got killed at Indian handsAcharya wrote:Good one.
Can see the Paki psyche for violence![]()
He comes as across being a western piddu for his continued belief in the "third option" just as other harried rats are.
THey have to claim the entire history but only talk about Islamic period just like Paki. This is part of the Islamists talk which is actually Islamo fascism and Islam centric. There is no concept of giving any space even in history to non muslim part. This Aryan part of the Indian history is reluctantly adopted just because the British/west adopts it to show superiority over the SDRE.Prem wrote:Which 5 thousand years history he is talking about ? From Aurangjeb's time or Paki Qasim time ?
ISLAMABAD: Kashmiri politicians opposed a Pakistani plan on Monday they say is aimed at integrating the strategic but disputed Northern Areas into Pakistan, arguing it will undermine their case for independence from India.
The Northern Areas of Gilgit and Baltistan were bundled in with Kashmir and demarcated as disputed territory under UN resolutions passed after Pakistan and India fought the first of their three wars in 1948.
Amanullah Khan, leader of the pro-independence Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front, rejected the package, saying it appeared to be aimed at merging the disputed areas into Pakistan.
‘We strongly condemn this package. It will harm the interests of Pakistan as well as Kashmiris,’ he told Reuters.
‘It looks like they are integrating these areas into Pakistan as done by India.’
India reacted sharply to the incident and will lodge a strong protest with Pakistan over the truce violation.
The cheapest life in the world is that of an Indian Soldier, a cold blooded murder takes place and we have a protest and peaceniks will chai biscuit with the man who ordered the killing. Next cheapest is the life of Indian civilian.rkirankr Terrorist Paki army violates ceasefire http://indiatoday.intoday.in/index.php? ... ssueid=121
Indian reaction
Quote:
India reacted sharply to the incident and will lodge a strong protest with Pakistan over the truce violation.
An army division, comprising around 15,000 troops, is being withdrawn from Jammu and Kashmir and some of its
units have already returned to its base in Himachal Pradesh, a senior army officer said on Tuesday.
The shifting of the division from the districts in Jammu and Kashmir comes close on the demand of separatists and opposition PDP to withdraw troops from the state in view of the improved security situation there.
Satya_anveshi wrote:Must Watch!!
This is a very interesting interview with Yasin Malik with one of my favorite Pakistani journalist Iftikhar Ahmed.
http://www.pkaffairs.com/playshow.asp?pageId=5169
Jammu: Security forces have eliminated 15 top militant commanders of various outfits in recent months, Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP) Kuldeep Khoda said here on Sunday.
Those killed include Abu Jindal and Abu Hamza, he told mediapersons after a function.
"This is a big achievement for security forces fighting militancy in the state," he noted.Kudos. Can we do something about some of the sick rats in the valley?
Khoda, however, said there was a rise in infiltration of militants from Pakistan across the Line of Control (LOC) and "Pakistan is backing the infiltrators".
General Officer Commanding in Chief of Northern Command, Lt Col P.C. Bhardwaj, recently told newspersons that over 70 infiltrators had sneaked into India this year, compared to 45 over the same period last yearInfilteration is picking up, again
So the facts are two women were raped and murdered. And these four police offcials colluded and destoryed the evidence. And all this prosecution is of these four. So what happened to the real perpetrators of the crime? Any comments?FLASH | Saturday, September 12, 2009 | Email | Print |
Police officials gets bail in Shopian case
PTI | Srinagar
Nearly two months after they were arrested, Jammu and Kashmir High Court on Friday granted bail to four police officials including the suspended SP Javed Iqbal Matoo in the Shopian rape and double murder case.
The order was passed by Justice Sunil Hali on Friday after he had reserved the same on September eight. The four police officials including Matoo, DySP Rohit Baskotra, SHO Shafeeq Ahmad and sub-inspector Qazi Abdul Karim have been asked to furnish a bail bond of Rs 15,000.
They were arrested on July 15 on the orders given by a division bench of the High Court for allegedly destroying the evidence in case of alleged rape and murder of Neelofar (22) and Aasiya (17), whose bodies were found on May 30 from a stream in Shopian, 70 kilometers from here.
Justice Hali had reserved the orders after defence counsel for the police officers Aseem Mehrotra concluded his counter- arguments by claiming that the police officials were being made scapegoats by the Government.
Advocate General Mohammad Ishaq Qadri and Kashmir High Court Bar Association President Mian Abdul Qayoom, during their arguments, had opposed the bail plea of the officers.
The Jammu and Kashmir Government has already handed over the case to the CBI and was waiting for the agency to take a decision on taking up the investigation.
Have to agree - nice viewing.Satya_anveshi wrote:Must Watch!!
This is a very interesting interview with Yasin Malik with one of my favorite Pakistani journalist Iftikhar Ahmed.
http://www.pkaffairs.com/playshow.asp?pageId=5169
Of course, I don't know much about Army counterterrorism operations. But, I feel that if we suspect there are terrorists inside a house, we need to take that house down after a failure by occupants to come out when asked to do so through megaphones, for example. There is no need to approach the house to try to get in. The report further statesWhen a posse of soldiers led by a Lt. Col and two Majors approached a house, one of the militants hiding there hurled a grenade, injuring at least six of them including officers.
Major J. S. Suri and a soldier of the rank of Naik were killed when they were trapped inside. The others managed to come out but in the process a Major and two others were injured. An unconfirmed report said a Lt. Col. received a bullet in the hand.
Do we need a 25-hour operation and bring down the house after that ? There is no possibility that these terrorists will surrender. We don't need to take them alive. Why prolong the agony and increase the possibility of more Army casualties ?After the fierce fighting, firing on both sides stopped for the night and it resumed in the morning and continued till late in the afternoon. But overnight, the Army had tightened the cordon. It then used improvised explosive devices to bring down the house, killing the militants hiding there, ending the 25-hour operation.
“It was a great loss to us. Major Suri and others fought valiantly,” said an officer who was in tears.
From the news report, one cannot with exactitude know how the operation was conducted to comment.SSridhar wrote:Army Major, 3 Soldiers killed in North Kashmir encounters
Not a new one, but the same as posted above.
The heavy Army casualties concern me. Of course, my heart goes out to these soldiers and their families. But, such heavy casualties are not worth against these terrorists. We need to be merciless and ruthless with these scums. May be it calls for different tactics. For example, the report saysOf course, I don't know much about Army counterterrorism operations. But, I feel that if we suspect there are terrorists inside a house, we need to take that house down after a failure by occupants to come out when asked to do so through megaphones, for example. There is no need to approach the house to try to get in. The report further statesWhen a posse of soldiers led by a Lt. Col and two Majors approached a house, one of the militants hiding there hurled a grenade, injuring at least six of them including officers.
Major J. S. Suri and a soldier of the rank of Naik were killed when they were trapped inside. The others managed to come out but in the process a Major and two others were injured. An unconfirmed report said a Lt. Col. received a bullet in the hand.Do we need a 25-hour operation and bring down the house after that ? There is no possibility that these terrorists will surrender. We don't need to take them alive. Why prolong the agony and increase the possibility of more Army casualties ?After the fierce fighting, firing on both sides stopped for the night and it resumed in the morning and continued till late in the afternoon. But overnight, the Army had tightened the cordon. It then used improvised explosive devices to bring down the house, killing the militants hiding there, ending the 25-hour operation.“It was a great loss to us. Major Suri and others fought valiantly,” said an officer who was in tears.
Other reports indicated that the major was taken hostage by the pigs...However, once he was killed by the pigs, the IA went the whole hog and brought the house down.Avinash R wrote:^There were civilians trapped inside the house with the militants; only after the civilians had been safely evacuated the house were the militant was hiding was demolished; this is what starnews was reporting live from the site of encounter.
Ray sir,RayC wrote:Which other reports?
How did he become a hostage?