
More Navy projects should go for the private yards. Now the gov shipyards will feel the heat.
Does L & T have design or it just wants to manufacture those subs under license as MDL is doing in case of scorpenes...Vipul wrote:L&T will bid to build navy's second submarine line.
The lab is just 5km away from my house..Later, HEMRL issued a press note saying, “HEMRL scientists were processing experimental propellant composition in a mixer in the laboratory premises. During the mixing process an explosion occurred today at around 3.45 am. The mixing process is remotely controlled and located in a standalone building outside the traverse. All safety norms were followed and nobody was in the mixer room. The building is heavily protected with soil filled traverse and designed in such a way that the roof is weak. In the explosion the roof of the building was blown off. However, there is no casualty, no one is injured and there is no damage to the facility.” Standing Safety Board of HEMRL is conducting an enquiry, it was stated.
A nice example of commercialization of research. Other production houses should follow the similar example of midhani and DMRL.Midhani works in close partnership with the Defence Materials Research Laboratory (DMRL), located next door. DMRL, focusing on fundamental research, develops new alloys and materials; Midhani scales up DMRL’s laboratory production into industrial production.
India has sought from the erstwhile Soviet Republic supplies of opto-electronics for armament systems for tanks and combat vehicles, upgradation of BMP-2, T-72 and T-90 tanks including Fire Control Systems, Commander Panoramic Sights, Digital Ballistic Computer and missile firing capability. The Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) is holding talks with M/s Teatradr for technology, equipment and spares for refurbishing the OSA-AK missiles for the IAF.
DRDO has also signed contracts worth $2.6 million with various institutes under the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for joint R&D of technologies in Laser and Powder Metallurgy.
Under the Defence Procurement Policy 2009 that comes into effect from November 1, private Indian firms can be directly approached to take part in the multi-billion dollar local defence market. These companies will be free to look for foreign partners. The rationale behind the move is that the Indian companies can do away with production of major technology through expensive and time consuming research and development process.
They can directly enter into a joint venture with a foreign company and start production of weapon systems that could be delivered fast to the armed forces. In other words, if army wants to buy new tanks, it can place the order with an Indian company instead of a foreign vendor.
future applications could include each troupe gets networked displays for planning, attacks, orbat, logistics, supplies, everything going on displays.. click and drag to know what happened or happening from CHQ.DRDO breaking new grounds..
http://flonnet.com/stories/20091120262310200.htm
Army wanted the DTRL to create a Google Maps-like application that would not compromise on secrecy.
"Suppose I want to know how many villages are there on a 100-km stretch of a road, it is not available in Google [Maps]. We should also be able to search certain features, including similarly spelt names,"
Mahindra Satyam said that it has already initiated the setting up of a centre of excellence for network centric warfare (CoE – NCW) which will offer comprehensive skills and a repository of tools, systems, middleware, integration platforms and system showcases in the field of NCW.
The company through the CoE hopes to tap the high potential market for nationwide security, for which the Indian government has large investment plans. “This relationship will jumpstart our foray in mission critical areas of defense. Our commitment in the domestic market will be reaffirmed by this collaboration and also set the stage to enter uncharted territories in the global arena,” said C P Gurnani, CEO, Mahindra Satyam.
The centre, which will be accessible to both the partners, is for mission critical applications and Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence solutions for global opportunities. The capabilities of the centre will also span areas of homeland security to provide end to end security solutions.
The title of the story is misleading as it leads one to believe that it is the defence forces which are against privitization whereas it is the civilian workforce (read labour unions) in defence factories which are against these moves ... Having seen these unions at close quarters I wouldn't put too much faith in their words ...Kailash wrote:Defense staff slam privatization move
Not sure what you mean. These parasites wouldn't want privatization because their do nothing jobs trump national security/technological independence any day.Having seen these unions at close quarters I wouldn't put too much faith in their words
Well ... you have these same unions at Army Base Workshops (which along with Ordinance factories and depots come under Factories Act and not under the Army Act) ... And these unions are no better (if not worse) than the ones plaguing other Govt. factories ... strikes, gheraos, dharnas et al are the norm with these unions. There have been cases when the office holders of these unions have verbally abused and threatened phyisical harm to Army men who are posted in these units. And most of the time these guys get away with it because of the patronage of the local neta for whom these guys form a good votebank ...tejas wrote:AnimeshP wroteNot sure what you mean. These parasites wouldn't want privatization because their do nothing jobs trump national security/technological independence any day.Having seen these unions at close quarters I wouldn't put too much faith in their words
The Foreign Investment Promotion Board has recommended that a decision be deferred on EADS and Larsen and Toubro’s proposal to form two joint ventures for production of defence equipment and services here.
This is the third time that a decision on the project has been deferred.
While FIPB has recommended the deferment, the Finance Minister is yet to take a final view. Sources indicated that the decision has been deferred as sections in the Government wanted more time to examine the proposal, specially to verify that the ‘control and ownership’ of L&T in both the joint ventures is ‘absolute and complete’.
The Ministry of Defence was also of the view that allowing the proposal to go through in its current form could lead to a situation where the current 26 per cent cap of foreign direct investment allowed in the sector could be breached.
“Allowing the proposal to go through in its current form opens the possibility of having foreign equity in defence sector up to 49.49 per cent which would breach the existing cap,” sources said.
EADS and Larsen & Toubro wanted to form two joint ventures to carry out the business of providing design, engineering and product development services and manufacturing, distribution and marketing of products in the electronic warfare, military avionics, defence related mobile systems and radars.
The proposal sought approval to incorporate a joint venture with a foreign equity of 24.5 per cent amounting to Rs 6.12 crore.
According to the proposal EADS will hold 24.5 per cent stake in the manufacturing joint venture. While 51 per cent will be held by L&T Technologies, the balance 24.5 per cent, sources said, is proposed to be held by the services joint venture where L&T would hold majority 51 per cent stake and the foreign collaborator will hold 49 per cent.
Hi....Does anybody have any info about indigenous development of such kind of products like see through radars etc ??A Sharma wrote:Not sure if posted before
Post 26/11, NSG aims for corner shot weapons, ‘through-the-wall’ radars
Yes, you are right. It won't happen againRahul M wrote:sunny, paki comments should be ignored, that's the best they deserve. don't bring them here.
Actually cornershot & see through radar was just an example. I actually meant that DRDO should work on such products too not necessarily the same. Of course they can develop something new that can perform the same operation more efficiently. I mean since technology is already availaible, isn't it possible for DRDO to take this & develop it further indigenously. Like nukavarapu mentioned about Pakistan's POF Eye. Now they have the option to export & earn money. Also it will be a matter of pride for us to see DRDO developed security products being used world over. In terms of exports these small homeland security products are the real thing. It will help them financially too because the speed with which terriorism is spreading, there will be huge demand for such products e.g a country like Maldives or Malaysia might not need Akash or nag missiles but they will definitely need these surveillence products.Rahul M wrote:In this case he is right though, the pakis do have a knock-off of the corner shot. it's not a very complex item so it's not a very big deal to make it once the idea has been demonstrated. since it is not critical technology nor a sanctioned item, it is the small pvt co's who should take the lead in such products. DRDO is better off concentrating on products that either do not exist (India-specific) or that are not accessible to us.
do you bother reading what people post or just respond assuming that they know less ?nukavarapu wrote:Its not all lies, it may not be the case that everything PORKI says is a lie. Check the link:Rahul M wrote:sunny, paki comments should be ignored, that's the best they deserve. don't bring them here.
in this case he is right though, the pakis do have a knock-off of the corner shot. it's not a very complex item so it's not a very big deal to make it once the idea has been demonstrated.
since it is not critical technology nor a sanctioned item, it is the small pvt co's who should take the lead in such products. DRDO is better off concentrating on products that either do not exist (India-specific) or that are not accessible to us.
...........