Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 October 2004

Locked
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by jrjrao »

Column by Robert Scheer in the LA Times:

Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
If it had been even a primitive nuclear weapon that hit the World Trade Center three years ago, hundreds of thousands of people would have died instead of fewer than 3,000, and the free society we enjoy almost certainly would have been a casualty as well. In the shock of that moment, the administration probably would have created a national network of detention camps for suspected terrorists, and military retaliation might have included the launch of nuclear missiles with the capability of killing millions. All of which is exactly why it was so terrifying to read in an investigative article in the Los Angeles Times on Saturday that our "allies" in Pakistan, who have done so much to spread nuclear weapons technology in recent years, are still capable of doing so.

"Senior investigators said they were especially worried that dangerous elements of the illicit network of manufacturers and suppliers would remain undetected and capable of resuming operations once international pressures eased," The Times reported. The article dissected the inability of investigators worldwide to fully penetrate the illicit nuclear weapons bazaar, which was run until last year by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan is currently under the protection of Pakistan's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, the same man who pardoned Khan and refuses to allow foreign investigators to speak with him. Yet it was Musharraf whom President Bush spent the weekend praising and accommodating.

As The Times article made clear, what "officials call the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation" — in which sophisticated nuclear technology was supplied to Libya, Iran and other rogue nations — never would have been possible without the support of the Pakistani military. This is the same complex and powerful organization that made Pakistan a dictatorship in a 1999 coup by Musharraf. Yet within two years of this coup, Bush dropped U.S. sanctions against Pakistan, showing clear disregard for international nonproliferation restraints. The rationale then and now was Pakistan's alleged support in the "war on terrorism" after 9/11.

And despite the exposure of the Khan black market ring, nothing has changed: In a White House meeting Friday, Bush honored Musharraf — who since seizing power has purged his country's Supreme Court and rewritten its constitution — as a "courageous leader."

The administration again hastened to explain that Musharraf was vital in the three-year effort to capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," as Bush frequently has proclaimed. How embarrassing then, when hours later Musharraf conceded in a Washington Post interview that Bin Laden's trail had grown completely cold but that the arch-terrorist is still very much alive and functioning.

Musharraf complained that attempts to pin down Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives had been seriously undermined by what he politely called "voids" in U.S. troop commitments to the area, which are equal to a mere 15% of the U.S. forces in Iraq. The U.S. strategy instead has been to rely on Pakistan's military to trap Bin Laden, a dependence that Bush administration officials have cited while refusing to pressure for access to Khan.

Musharraf complains that calls for international access to Khan show "a lack of trust" in Pakistan, but his real problem is the scientist's enormous popularity as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb program. Khan "has been a hero for the masses," said the general who has survived several assassination attempts and faces the possibility of a revolt if he tilts too far toward the West.

Meanwhile, Bush is so eager to cater to Musharraf that he is even championing the dictator as key to the creation of a democratic Palestinian state "that is truly free. One that's got an independent judiciary; one that's got a civil society; one that's got the capacity to fight off the terrorists; one that allows for dissent; one in which people can vote. And President Musharraf can play a big role in helping achieve that objective."

What balderdash. None of those conditions of a free society exist in Pakistan, nor are they likely any time soon in U.S.-occupied Iraq.

Yet while we chase the chimera of democratizing the Islamic world through the use of force, the true cost of this crusade can be measured by our indifference to our original justification of the Iraq invasion: stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

And there's no margin for error here. Next time the terrorists could take Manhattan and a whole lot more.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by jrjrao »

Column by Robert Scheer in the LA Times:

Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
If it had been even a primitive nuclear weapon that hit the World Trade Center three years ago, hundreds of thousands of people would have died instead of fewer than 3,000, and the free society we enjoy almost certainly would have been a casualty as well. In the shock of that moment, the administration probably would have created a national network of detention camps for suspected terrorists, and military retaliation might have included the launch of nuclear missiles with the capability of killing millions. All of which is exactly why it was so terrifying to read in an investigative article in the Los Angeles Times on Saturday that our "allies" in Pakistan, who have done so much to spread nuclear weapons technology in recent years, are still capable of doing so.

"Senior investigators said they were especially worried that dangerous elements of the illicit network of manufacturers and suppliers would remain undetected and capable of resuming operations once international pressures eased," The Times reported. The article dissected the inability of investigators worldwide to fully penetrate the illicit nuclear weapons bazaar, which was run until last year by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan is currently under the protection of Pakistan's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, the same man who pardoned Khan and refuses to allow foreign investigators to speak with him. Yet it was Musharraf whom President Bush spent the weekend praising and accommodating.

As The Times article made clear, what "officials call the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation" — in which sophisticated nuclear technology was supplied to Libya, Iran and other rogue nations — never would have been possible without the support of the Pakistani military. This is the same complex and powerful organization that made Pakistan a dictatorship in a 1999 coup by Musharraf. Yet within two years of this coup, Bush dropped U.S. sanctions against Pakistan, showing clear disregard for international nonproliferation restraints. The rationale then and now was Pakistan's alleged support in the "war on terrorism" after 9/11.

And despite the exposure of the Khan black market ring, nothing has changed: In a White House meeting Friday, Bush honored Musharraf — who since seizing power has purged his country's Supreme Court and rewritten its constitution — as a "courageous leader."

The administration again hastened to explain that Musharraf was vital in the three-year effort to capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," as Bush frequently has proclaimed. How embarrassing then, when hours later Musharraf conceded in a Washington Post interview that Bin Laden's trail had grown completely cold but that the arch-terrorist is still very much alive and functioning.

Musharraf complained that attempts to pin down Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives had been seriously undermined by what he politely called "voids" in U.S. troop commitments to the area, which are equal to a mere 15% of the U.S. forces in Iraq. The U.S. strategy instead has been to rely on Pakistan's military to trap Bin Laden, a dependence that Bush administration officials have cited while refusing to pressure for access to Khan.

Musharraf complains that calls for international access to Khan show "a lack of trust" in Pakistan, but his real problem is the scientist's enormous popularity as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb program. Khan "has been a hero for the masses," said the general who has survived several assassination attempts and faces the possibility of a revolt if he tilts too far toward the West.

Meanwhile, Bush is so eager to cater to Musharraf that he is even championing the dictator as key to the creation of a democratic Palestinian state "that is truly free. One that's got an independent judiciary; one that's got a civil society; one that's got the capacity to fight off the terrorists; one that allows for dissent; one in which people can vote. And President Musharraf can play a big role in helping achieve that objective."

What balderdash. None of those conditions of a free society exist in Pakistan, nor are they likely any time soon in U.S.-occupied Iraq.

Yet while we chase the chimera of democratizing the Islamic world through the use of force, the true cost of this crusade can be measured by our indifference to our original justification of the Iraq invasion: stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

And there's no margin for error here. Next time the terrorists could take Manhattan and a whole lot more.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by jrjrao »

Column by Robert Scheer in the LA Times:

Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
If it had been even a primitive nuclear weapon that hit the World Trade Center three years ago, hundreds of thousands of people would have died instead of fewer than 3,000, and the free society we enjoy almost certainly would have been a casualty as well. In the shock of that moment, the administration probably would have created a national network of detention camps for suspected terrorists, and military retaliation might have included the launch of nuclear missiles with the capability of killing millions. All of which is exactly why it was so terrifying to read in an investigative article in the Los Angeles Times on Saturday that our "allies" in Pakistan, who have done so much to spread nuclear weapons technology in recent years, are still capable of doing so.

"Senior investigators said they were especially worried that dangerous elements of the illicit network of manufacturers and suppliers would remain undetected and capable of resuming operations once international pressures eased," The Times reported. The article dissected the inability of investigators worldwide to fully penetrate the illicit nuclear weapons bazaar, which was run until last year by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan is currently under the protection of Pakistan's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, the same man who pardoned Khan and refuses to allow foreign investigators to speak with him. Yet it was Musharraf whom President Bush spent the weekend praising and accommodating.

As The Times article made clear, what "officials call the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation" — in which sophisticated nuclear technology was supplied to Libya, Iran and other rogue nations — never would have been possible without the support of the Pakistani military. This is the same complex and powerful organization that made Pakistan a dictatorship in a 1999 coup by Musharraf. Yet within two years of this coup, Bush dropped U.S. sanctions against Pakistan, showing clear disregard for international nonproliferation restraints. The rationale then and now was Pakistan's alleged support in the "war on terrorism" after 9/11.

And despite the exposure of the Khan black market ring, nothing has changed: In a White House meeting Friday, Bush honored Musharraf — who since seizing power has purged his country's Supreme Court and rewritten its constitution — as a "courageous leader."

The administration again hastened to explain that Musharraf was vital in the three-year effort to capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," as Bush frequently has proclaimed. How embarrassing then, when hours later Musharraf conceded in a Washington Post interview that Bin Laden's trail had grown completely cold but that the arch-terrorist is still very much alive and functioning.

Musharraf complained that attempts to pin down Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives had been seriously undermined by what he politely called "voids" in U.S. troop commitments to the area, which are equal to a mere 15% of the U.S. forces in Iraq. The U.S. strategy instead has been to rely on Pakistan's military to trap Bin Laden, a dependence that Bush administration officials have cited while refusing to pressure for access to Khan.

Musharraf complains that calls for international access to Khan show "a lack of trust" in Pakistan, but his real problem is the scientist's enormous popularity as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb program. Khan "has been a hero for the masses," said the general who has survived several assassination attempts and faces the possibility of a revolt if he tilts too far toward the West.

Meanwhile, Bush is so eager to cater to Musharraf that he is even championing the dictator as key to the creation of a democratic Palestinian state "that is truly free. One that's got an independent judiciary; one that's got a civil society; one that's got the capacity to fight off the terrorists; one that allows for dissent; one in which people can vote. And President Musharraf can play a big role in helping achieve that objective."

What balderdash. None of those conditions of a free society exist in Pakistan, nor are they likely any time soon in U.S.-occupied Iraq.

Yet while we chase the chimera of democratizing the Islamic world through the use of force, the true cost of this crusade can be measured by our indifference to our original justification of the Iraq invasion: stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

And there's no margin for error here. Next time the terrorists could take Manhattan and a whole lot more.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by jrjrao »

Column by Robert Scheer in the LA Times:

Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
If it had been even a primitive nuclear weapon that hit the World Trade Center three years ago, hundreds of thousands of people would have died instead of fewer than 3,000, and the free society we enjoy almost certainly would have been a casualty as well. In the shock of that moment, the administration probably would have created a national network of detention camps for suspected terrorists, and military retaliation might have included the launch of nuclear missiles with the capability of killing millions. All of which is exactly why it was so terrifying to read in an investigative article in the Los Angeles Times on Saturday that our "allies" in Pakistan, who have done so much to spread nuclear weapons technology in recent years, are still capable of doing so.

"Senior investigators said they were especially worried that dangerous elements of the illicit network of manufacturers and suppliers would remain undetected and capable of resuming operations once international pressures eased," The Times reported. The article dissected the inability of investigators worldwide to fully penetrate the illicit nuclear weapons bazaar, which was run until last year by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan is currently under the protection of Pakistan's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, the same man who pardoned Khan and refuses to allow foreign investigators to speak with him. Yet it was Musharraf whom President Bush spent the weekend praising and accommodating.

As The Times article made clear, what "officials call the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation" — in which sophisticated nuclear technology was supplied to Libya, Iran and other rogue nations — never would have been possible without the support of the Pakistani military. This is the same complex and powerful organization that made Pakistan a dictatorship in a 1999 coup by Musharraf. Yet within two years of this coup, Bush dropped U.S. sanctions against Pakistan, showing clear disregard for international nonproliferation restraints. The rationale then and now was Pakistan's alleged support in the "war on terrorism" after 9/11.

And despite the exposure of the Khan black market ring, nothing has changed: In a White House meeting Friday, Bush honored Musharraf — who since seizing power has purged his country's Supreme Court and rewritten its constitution — as a "courageous leader."

The administration again hastened to explain that Musharraf was vital in the three-year effort to capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," as Bush frequently has proclaimed. How embarrassing then, when hours later Musharraf conceded in a Washington Post interview that Bin Laden's trail had grown completely cold but that the arch-terrorist is still very much alive and functioning.

Musharraf complained that attempts to pin down Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives had been seriously undermined by what he politely called "voids" in U.S. troop commitments to the area, which are equal to a mere 15% of the U.S. forces in Iraq. The U.S. strategy instead has been to rely on Pakistan's military to trap Bin Laden, a dependence that Bush administration officials have cited while refusing to pressure for access to Khan.

Musharraf complains that calls for international access to Khan show "a lack of trust" in Pakistan, but his real problem is the scientist's enormous popularity as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb program. Khan "has been a hero for the masses," said the general who has survived several assassination attempts and faces the possibility of a revolt if he tilts too far toward the West.

Meanwhile, Bush is so eager to cater to Musharraf that he is even championing the dictator as key to the creation of a democratic Palestinian state "that is truly free. One that's got an independent judiciary; one that's got a civil society; one that's got the capacity to fight off the terrorists; one that allows for dissent; one in which people can vote. And President Musharraf can play a big role in helping achieve that objective."

What balderdash. None of those conditions of a free society exist in Pakistan, nor are they likely any time soon in U.S.-occupied Iraq.

Yet while we chase the chimera of democratizing the Islamic world through the use of force, the true cost of this crusade can be measured by our indifference to our original justification of the Iraq invasion: stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

And there's no margin for error here. Next time the terrorists could take Manhattan and a whole lot more.
jrjrao
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 01 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by jrjrao »

Column by Robert Scheer in the LA Times.

Pakistan and the True WMD Threat
If it had been even a primitive nuclear weapon that hit the World Trade Center three years ago, hundreds of thousands of people would have died instead of fewer than 3,000, and the free society we enjoy almost certainly would have been a casualty as well. In the shock of that moment, the administration probably would have created a national network of detention camps for suspected terrorists, and military retaliation might have included the launch of nuclear missiles with the capability of killing millions. All of which is exactly why it was so terrifying to read in an investigative article in the Los Angeles Times on Saturday that our "allies" in Pakistan, who have done so much to spread nuclear weapons technology in recent years, are still capable of doing so.

"Senior investigators said they were especially worried that dangerous elements of the illicit network of manufacturers and suppliers would remain undetected and capable of resuming operations once international pressures eased," The Times reported. The article dissected the inability of investigators worldwide to fully penetrate the illicit nuclear weapons bazaar, which was run until last year by Pakistan's top nuclear scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan is currently under the protection of Pakistan's military dictator, President Pervez Musharraf, the same man who pardoned Khan and refuses to allow foreign investigators to speak with him. Yet it was Musharraf whom President Bush spent the weekend praising and accommodating.

As The Times article made clear, what "officials call the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation" — in which sophisticated nuclear technology was supplied to Libya, Iran and other rogue nations — never would have been possible without the support of the Pakistani military. This is the same complex and powerful organization that made Pakistan a dictatorship in a 1999 coup by Musharraf. Yet within two years of this coup, Bush dropped U.S. sanctions against Pakistan, showing clear disregard for international nonproliferation restraints. The rationale then and now was Pakistan's alleged support in the "war on terrorism" after 9/11.

And despite the exposure of the Khan black market ring, nothing has changed: In a White House meeting Friday, Bush honored Musharraf — who since seizing power has purged his country's Supreme Court and rewritten its constitution — as a "courageous leader."

The administration again hastened to explain that Musharraf was vital in the three-year effort to capture Osama bin Laden "dead or alive," as Bush frequently has proclaimed. How embarrassing then, when hours later Musharraf conceded in a Washington Post interview that Bin Laden's trail had grown completely cold but that the arch-terrorist is still very much alive and functioning.

Musharraf complained that attempts to pin down Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda operatives had been seriously undermined by what he politely called "voids" in U.S. troop commitments to the area, which are equal to a mere 15% of the U.S. forces in Iraq. The U.S. strategy instead has been to rely on Pakistan's military to trap Bin Laden, a dependence that Bush administration officials have cited while refusing to pressure for access to Khan.

Musharraf complains that calls for international access to Khan show "a lack of trust" in Pakistan, but his real problem is the scientist's enormous popularity as the "father" of Pakistan's nuclear bomb program. Khan "has been a hero for the masses," said the general who has survived several assassination attempts and faces the possibility of a revolt if he tilts too far toward the West.

Meanwhile, Bush is so eager to cater to Musharraf that he is even championing the dictator as key to the creation of a democratic Palestinian state "that is truly free. One that's got an independent judiciary; one that's got a civil society; one that's got the capacity to fight off the terrorists; one that allows for dissent; one in which people can vote. And President Musharraf can play a big role in helping achieve that objective."

What balderdash. None of those conditions of a free society exist in Pakistan, nor are they likely any time soon in U.S.-occupied Iraq.

Yet while we chase the chimera of democratizing the Islamic world through the use of force, the true cost of this crusade can be measured by our indifference to our original justification of the Iraq invasion: stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

And there's no margin for error here. Next time the terrorists could take Manhattan and a whole lot more.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Post by Rangudu »

KK's piece in Asia Times
US tied over nuclear kingpin


The United States is selling the theory that the Pakistan-based nuclear proliferation ring has been broken up and its mastermind, Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, has been "brought to justice". He is under house arrest in Pakistan. Unfortunately, as much as the Bush administration would like to wish away the Khan issue, it continues to dog two of the biggest foreign-policy crises for the US.

The first one is Iran. With the re-election of President George W Bush, the neo-conservatives within the administration want to ensure that the Bush second term looks at every option, including a military one, to prevent Tehran from developing and deploying nuclear weapons.

But then again, the neo-conservatives do not want to talk directly to the hardline Iranian regime, and have let Britain, France and Germany do the negotiations with Iran, in conjunction with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) doing the verification. But so far, the Iranians have been playing a clever game of hide-and-seek by agreeing to stop uranium enrichment one day, and denying it the next. And IAEA inspectors, mindful of the Iraq weapons of mass destruction assessments, have been cautious about giving conclusive findings on Iran's nuclear weapons program. In this ambiguity, Iran could stall and dodge its way into presenting the world a set of nukes as a fait accompli.

One man holds the key to this puzzle - Khan. It now appears that Khan not only sold advanced uranium-enrichment centrifuges to Iran; he likely sold it an actual nuclear weapon design along with nuclear fuel material, according to a report issued by the US Central Intelligence Agency on November 23.

A direct testimony from Khan, with corroborating evidence obtained by IAEA inspectors, could provide the US and the Europeans with clinching evidence of Iran's violation of its Non-Proliferation Treaty pledge and lead to a showdown with the United Nations Security Council. Faced with global condemnation, the Iranian clerics in this scenario may choose to back down and agree to intrusive inspections.

But this could only happen only if Pakistan allows IAEA inspectors to interrogate Khan. Official IAEA reports on Iran reveal that agency's frustration at not being able to nail Iran because of Pakistan's obstructive tactics. Interestingly, other IAEA reports reveal that even the supposedly concluded investigation into Libya's nuclear program hit a roadblock thanks to Pakistan's non-cooperation.

On the other side of Asia, the United States' blow-hot, blow-cold crisis with North Korea appears as calm as a dormant volcano, but is liable to erupt at any time without warning. Prior to the US presidential elections in November, North Korean leader Kim Jong-il had been stalling for time, hoping perhaps for a John Kerry victory, which could have resulted in direct negotiations with the US. But with a Bush victory, the Korean peninsula is once again headed toward a possible showdown. Here too, the ambiguity about the North's nuclear program has been a big hindrance for the US.

The bone of contention with North Korea is its clandestine uranium-enrichment program, whose existence it denies. The North contends, not too credibly, that it kept to its end of the 1993 framework agreement and therefore deserves direct talks with the US. In addition, the release of news of an earlier secret South Korean nuclear-weapons program (since abandoned), gives the North a much-needed lever. The North's main patron, China, has long demanded to see proof of the uranium program, even though it should know about it for sure. No prizes for guessing who holds the key to the secret door hiding Kim's uranium program - it's A Q Khan again.

It has emerged that Khan was the main figure behind what is now believed to be Pakistan's nukes for missiles barter deal with North Korea in the late 1990s. Khan's eponymous lab in Kahuta, Pakistan, has been producing the Ghauri medium-range ballistic missile, which is in fact a repainted North Korean No-Dong missile. Part of the payment for this illegal missile transfer is believed to be a complete uranium-enrichment kit from Khan's nuclear bazaar. In addition, the only nuclear device that Khan was entrusted to explode during Pakistan's 1998 nuclear tests is now believed to be a North Korean plutonium bomb, which Pakistan tested as a returned favor for North Korean missile transfers. Interestingly, former Pakistan army chief General Jehangir Karamat, whom many experts claim oversaw this deal with North Korea, is now the Pakistani ambassador in Washington.

The European Union has enough belief in this claim to officially ask Pakistan about the test. Of course, for the US to accept this would lead it to face the fact that at least the North Korean side of Khan's business portfolio had state sanction in Pakistan - a situation it desperately wants to avoid.

This brings us to how US policymakers justified their decision to accept at face value Pakistan's "blame it all on Khan" show put on by Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf and the accompanying televised confession by Khan. The official US stance was best explained by Robert Oakley, a former ambassador to Pakistan, who told the Associated Press soon after the Khan confession, "The most important thing is to get as much information possible as to where the links [to accomplices] were ... we have to make sure it doesn't happen again."

But George Perkovich of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, while supporting the free pass to Pakistan, warned "there's always the possibility that you are being played by Pakistan: that they will give you just enough information to keep the money flowing, but not enough to root out the real problem".

Ten months since the confession, Perkovich's caveat seems to be proving correct, as evidenced by the Iran, Libya and North Korea investigations. Even efforts to nab other individuals involved in Khan's dealings have been stymied. With Pakistan holding Khan incommunicado, Malaysia, too, seems emboldened to hold the next person in the Khan network, Buhary Seyed Abu Tahir, under wraps, fearful perhaps of Tahir's ties to influential Malaysian politicians coming to light should outside investigators get to interrogate him. Malaysian leaders clearly operate on the reasoning that the US can hardly press Malaysia to make a number two man available when they are mute spectators to Pakistan's denial of access to the kingpin - Khan.

And then there is the possibility that the Khan enterprise may not be the only underground nuclear network around. Even as the Khan expose was unraveling in early 2004, American investigators arrested a South African man named Asher Karni for illegally trying to acquire and sell devices known as spark-gaps, which are used in hospitals but which can also be used in nuclear warheads as part of the triggering assembly. Karni was busted in a sting operation when he procured and shipped 200 spark-gaps, which were disabled before Karni acquired them. And the buyer was a state-owned "lithography" firm in Pakistan, which is now known to have been a front for that country's Inter-Services Intelligence. It can be concluded that Karni was supplying components for Pakistan's nuclear bombs.

Further interrogation of Karni has revealed a network spanning many continents, from South Africa to America to Dubai in the United Arab Emirates to Pakistan. The Bush administration, however, has been reluctant to divulge the details of the Karni investigations for reasons that are evident. Karni was part of a loose network that supplied dangerous material to Pakistani state-owned facilities. Khan led a network that brought in material for the Pakistani government-owned facilities and then turned around and sold excess material elsewhere. The only common link between the Khan network and the Karni ring is the Pakistani government. So if one were to focus on a particular person or entity with the aim to ending nuclear proliferation, what would that be - Khan or the Pakistan government? Gary Samore, former non-proliferation expert with the US National Security Council, recently said that the Khan network was not an individual matter but a manifestation of "proliferation as a matter of state policy" by Pakistan.

One may wonder why Pakistan would risk global opprobrium and keep the nuclear networks alive. An obvious reason is that Pakistan needs the black market for the viability of its nuclear-weapons program. Pakistani journalist Shahid ur-Rehman, who wrote an insider chronicle of Pakistan's nuclear-bomb program, recently revealed that Pakistan is still very dependent on underground networks for nuclear weapons components.

The second reason could be that Musharraf feels he is bulletproof when it comes to this issue because the US is paralyzed by the general's oft-repeated claim that if he goes, all (nuclear) hell could break out. In other words, the American brainstrust has decided that pushing Musharraf on nuclear proliferation is a bridge too far and will not even consider it. This gives Musharraf enough confidence to do nothing more than to display some activity, without any underlying action regarding the "investigation" of Khan's dealings.

This is not to say that the US should take knee-jerk action, like taking military control of Pakistan's nuclear assets, or do anything harsh to punish Pakistan. But the Americans can and should ask Musharraf to justify the lavish rewards his nation has been receiving from the US (aid, arms) and not be afraid to bring Musharraf's bad-faith efforts out in the open. One must recall that even though the US had been privately pressing Musharraf since 2001, he allowed Khan to operate until 2004.

As former US Senate non-proliferation expert Leonard Weiss put it to this correspondent, "Pakistan's lack of cooperation on the investigations of the Iranian and Libyan nuclear programs is more likely the result of not wanting more details of their illicit nuclear trade to emerge." In the recent past, other prominent non-proliferation experts, such as David Albright, Joseph Cirincione, David Kay, Kenneth Pollack and many others, have publicly called for the US to press Musharraf to give access to Khan.

For the US to keep hoping that Pakistan will voluntarily reveal key nuclear network secrets, many of which likely implicate key Pakistani figures and state institutions, is illogical and dangerous.

Meanwhile, the nuclear underworld is likely morphing rapidly and moving out of the reach of international investigators. And Iran and North Korea are happily thumbing their noses at America, thanks to America's impuissance with Pakistan
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

SAAG's B. Raman on Need o grill A.Q.Khan
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14223
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Post by svinayak »

Libya leaks Pak, China proliferation

18 December 2004: Libya has shown evidence that it received Chinese nuclear designs and that its scientists attended nearly twenty in-house nuclear seminars in Pakistan.

It has also told Western investigators that three of its scientists were present in Pakistan to monitor the May-1998 nuclear tests in Chagai Hills.

Libya has plainly told American investigators that it will not be able to provide details of its scientists who had visited Pakistan.

It has said that if it does so, its relations with the Arab world and Muslims in general would be gravely impaired.

Besides, it would violate three bilateral agreements with Pakistan against leaking nuclear collaboration details.

But it has shown evidence of Chinese centrifuge designs and related nuclear drawings to Western investigators.

It also refuses to share details of how it got the designs from China, fearing Chinese action.

But diplomatic sources said that the Americans had got enough leads to carry out further investigations on China and Pakistan.
www.indiareacts.com
enqyoobOLD
BRFite
Posts: 690
Joined: 09 Sep 2004 05:16
Location: KhemKaran, Shomali Plain

Post by enqyoobOLD »

The US had absolutely no shyness about "debriefing" people immediately below Xerox Khan in 2001 and later, so the terrible shyness about seeing Khan's "secrets" makes no sense. Until now - see above post.

The problem with admitting to debriefing Xerox is that Xerox is only a minion. He Xeroxed the brochures and sold them, but the stuff came from PRC.

The US can't afford to reveal that, because it removes what nanocredibility survives in the NPT, MTCR etc. etc.

Since the EP3 saga, enthusiasm for arm-wrestling contests with the PLA is rather low in DupleeCity. :roll:
kgoan
BRFite
Posts: 264
Joined: 30 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by kgoan »

And it's noticeable to.

Personally, I prefer my own pet conspiracy theory that level 0, if nothing else, acting as a catalyst via the "all weather friendship", is the PRC.
Tim
BRFite
Posts: 136
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: USA

Post by Tim »

Enqyoob,

James Mann, in "Rise of the Vulcans" (a book I've recommended before) points out that Condoleeza Rice stated early in 2001 that they'd try to pick a fight with China early - which coincided with the P-3 incident, to some extent.

Since 9-11, the administration has been very nice to China - partly to get support in GWOT, partly to try to get them to pressure North Korea, and partly to limit the number of diplomatic trouble spots they have to deal with.

I think the "be-very-nice-to-China" policy has a lot more to do with external events than it does to the P-3. Rice pretty much told an interviewer that we were going to be tough on China early and then back off later. 9-11 just made that policy more relevant.

At least, that's my read.

Tim
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

Pioneer, 22 Dec. , 2004
Who paid for AQ Khan network?

Wilson John

A year ago, around this time, startling revelations were tumbling forth from Washington about how a Pakistani rogue nuclear scientist, Mr AQ Khan, had set up a global chain of illegal nuclear trade with branch offices in Dubai, Malaysia, Germany, US, UK, Tripoli, Tehran, Baghdad and Pyongyang. The investigations carried out by the US intelligence agencies and officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) revealed the involvement of several people dispersed across the globe, and raised the spectre of terrorists tapping into the nuclear blackmarket chain. What the US agencies and the media failed to focus on was that the American taxpayer bankrolled the nuclear underworld.

A report prepared by Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based public policy think tank, on the AQ Khan's network, reveals how the CIA was was aware that "Pakistan was diverting a large portion of its foreign aid to nuclear development programme". In 1993, testifying before the Senate Committee on Government Affairs, the agency said Pakistan had received $19 billion in aid from foreign countries and donor agencies like the International Monetary Fund. In a written response, the agency said out of $19 billion, $2.7 billion was not designated for any specific purpose, thus enabling Pakistan to spend it on its nuclear programme. Even if these figures are to be taken as real, they fail to explain the total amount spent by Pakistan on its nuclear development programme between 1974 and 1993 - $19.85 billion.

There could only be two explanations for this accounting difference. First, Pakistan spent the aid it received from various donor agencies and countries-about $19 billion according to CIA -almost entirely on the programme. This is highly unlikely, given Pakistan's critical foreign exchange reserves, a burgeoning defence budget and a perpetual and desperate need to find money to initiate development programmes, especially in water resource management. Add to all this, the scourge of corruption. Second, the money came from a more anonymous source, considering no less a crucial fact that $19.85 billion (1993) was only the official figure. It does not take into account the missile-to-nuke barter Pakistan had entered into with North Korea. Nor the money routed through the network to set up front companies in Europe, the US, Dubai and Britain, pay agents to procure nuclear materials and know-how illegally, and thereby more expensively, and ship them to Pakistan through various cut-outs and routes to avoid detection.

The question is how did the money reach the Khan Research Laboratory, the nuclear facility set up by the Pakistan and run by Mr AQ Khan. Most of the funds were parked with two less-known entities - the Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Science and Technology, set up in Islamabad to honour President Ghulam Ishaq Khan and Attock Cement Private Ltd (APCL), a factory off Dera Ghazi Khan owned by Ghaith Pharaon, a Saudi billionaire who owns, besides the cement unit, two oil refineries and a software firm in Pakistan. Both these organisations had a common link: Bank of Credit and Commerce International. The Institute was set up with a grant of $10 million from the Bank. The Institute's first director was AQ Khan, a close ally of President Khan from the days of Bhutto. Pharaon, declared a fugitive by the US authorities, was a close friend of Abedi who helped BCCI to secretly buy an American bank, First American, and introduce Abedi to the power brokers in Washington DC.


An independent investigation carried out by a US Senate Committee in 1992 would pin down the Institute and the cement factory as the conduits for the BCCI to fund Pakistan's secret programme for nuclear deals through the Black Network. Senator John F Kerry headed the Senate Committee, which unravelled the web of a powerful, anonymous financial underworld that stretched from the lanes of Karachi to the White House. The BCCI was not an ordinary bank. Nor was its owner, Agha Hassan Abedi. By 1977, the BCCI was the world's fastest growing bank, operating from 146 branches (including 45 in the United Kingdom) in 43 countries including Africa, the East Asia and the Americas.

From assets worth $200 million, the bank, by the mid-1980s, was operating from 73 countries with assets over $22 billion. Its rise was phenomenal and of the several reasons, the most crucial was Abedi's friendship with some of the most powerful personalities - President Zia, President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, President Jimmy Carter, the ruling families of Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, billionaires like Ghaith Pharaon, Khalid bin Mahfouz and Saudi intelligence chief Kamal Adham, a key liaison man between the CIA and Saudi Arabia.


Among those who allegedly benefited from the BCCI were US Ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young, Bert Lance, Jesse Jackson, former British Prime Minister James Callaghan, then United Nations Secretary General Javier Perez de Cueller, Jamaican Prime Minister Edward Seaga, Antiguan Prime Minister Lester Byrd; a large number of African heads of state; and many Third World central bank officials. An example of Abedi's influence could gauged from the fact that he lent his corporate jet to Carter after his retirement, donated $500,000 to help establish the Carter Centre at Emory University in Atlanta and donated heavily to Carter's Global 2000 Foundation.

It was the John Kerry Committee that, perhaps for the first time, hinted at the possibility of BCCI funding the nuclear smuggling network. In its exhaustive report (available at www.fas.org), the committee quoted a CIA memorandum which stated that "the Agency did have some reporting (as of 1987) on BCCI being used by Third World regimes to acquire weapons and transfer technology". In its conclusion, the Senate report said there was "good reason to conclude that BCCI did finance Pakistan's nuclear programme through the BCCI Foundation in Pakistan, as well as through BCCI-Canada in the Parvez case. However, details on BCCI's involvement remain unavailable. Further investigation is needed to understand the extent to which BCCI and Pakistan were able to evade US and international nuclear non-proliferation regimes to acquire nuclear technologies." Years later, an Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) officer, Major Ikram Sehgal, would write (Gulf News, November 24, 2001) about the mysterious, daily remittances of $100,000 made by BCCI in Karachi to bank accounts in Canada till mid-1988.

With the collapse of the bank following the Senate investigations and death of Abedi in 1998, many of those who ran the BCCI escaped prosecution and vanished from the headlines but only to emerge later as honourable businessmen, high-profile bankers and traders, a few as key financiers of Osama bin Laden's network of terror. A 70-page intelligence report prepared by French authorities in October 2001 said Laden's network of investments was quite similar to the one set up by the BCCI "often with the same people (former directors and staff of the bank and its affiliates, arms merchants, Saudi investors)". The report identified dozens of companies and individuals who were involved with the BCCI and were found to be dealing with the bin Laden network after the bank collapsed.

This link has not been probed indepth and needs to be investigated thoroughly, given the recent disclosure by a former Al Qaeda senior leader about Osama bin Laden getting access to nuclear material.
Sunil
BRFite
Posts: 634
Joined: 21 Sep 1999 11:31

Post by Sunil »

Years later an ISI officer Major Ikram Sehgal....
:D

Enjoy...

http://www.mediamonitors.net/ikramsehgal50.html
To whom was US $ 100000 or thereabouts transferred from BCCI Karachi (now Bank Alfalah) to bank accounts in Canada almost on a daily basis uptil mid-1988? Why is a government committed to accountability not hauling up the beneficiaries who live in affluence, and in positions of influence, while the tarnishing of the name and reputation of the Pakistan Army goes on, many of whose valiant sons lie in unmarked graves across Afghanistan?
svinayak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14223
Joined: 09 Feb 1999 12:31

Post by svinayak »

All trail is leading to BCCI and its sponsors
Umrao
BRFite
Posts: 547
Joined: 30 May 2001 11:31

Post by Umrao »

If you dig BCCI a little further you see Paki Chelabis and Jilebis crawling out with H&D tucked in the hind legs.

But the Bald eagle bred them to have a feast later in the process the largest democracy is paying in human toll.
Leonard
BRFite
Posts: 227
Joined: 15 Nov 2000 12:31

PAKIs and nuke knickers

Post by Leonard »

Khan's nuclear ghost continues to haunt
By B Raman

CHENNAI - Dr Abdul Qadeer Khan, the self-styled father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, has been back in the headlines after a statement disseminated by the National Council of Resistance of Iran, a group opposed to the present regime in Tehran, last month that between 1994 and 1996, when Benazir Bhutto was in power, Khan gave Iran a Chinese-developed nuclear-warhead design.

The statement enjoyed a certain credibility in nuclear-non-proliferation circles in the United States because an earlier allegation of the same organization about the existence of a clandestine uranium-enrichment facility at Natanz, Iran, was found to be correct on inquiry by officials of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Inquiries by IAEA officials brought out that the centrifuges for Iran's enrichment facility had been supplied by Khan. Not only that: spot inspections by IAEA officials reportedly revealed that some of the centrifuges had traces of highly enriched uranium, required for a nuclear weapon. This casts doubts on Tehran's contention that the facility was meant to produce low-grade enriched uranium for power stations. Iran contended that since it imported the inspected centrifuges second-hand, it was possible that the traces of military-grade enriched uranium found in some of them might have gotten into them at the place of origin, meaning Kahuta, Pakistan, where military-grade enriched uranium is produced for Pakistan's atomic bomb.

Since then, the IAEA has not been able to establish whether the traces came from Kahuta as contended by Iran or whether they indicated that Iran had clandestinely produced some weapons-grade enriched uranium. The only way of establishing the truth is for IAEA personnel to inspect the centrifuges in Kahuta and to compare the traces found in Iran to the enriched uranium produced in Kahuta.

Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf has been vehemently opposing any suggestion for a spot inspection of Kahuta by the IAEA or for the interrogation of Khan by IAEA and other foreign experts in order to establish the truth. Musharraf has been saying that Khan has already been thoroughly interrogated by Pakistani officials and that whatever information he gave had been shared with the IAEA and others concerned. Hence the question of his interrogation by outside experts did not arise.

Last month's claim of the National Council of Resistance of Iran has thus placed Pakistan in a difficult spot. The Daily Times of Lahore wrote on November 20: "The Iranian resistance group has credibility, since it first blew the whistle on the Natanz facility, which led to revelations about Iran's secret efforts to enrich uranium and also led to Dr Qadeer's connections with Iran. The problem would have been Iran's internal issue if it did not have consequences for Pakistan. Between Dr Qadeer's ambitions and the internal political strife within Iran, Islamabad has been caught like a nut in a cracker ... The problem for us is the alleged Dr Khan linkage. Islamabad had thought that it had put the issue behind it. The trouble also is that Pakistan has not come out with any clear policy on the Iranian nuclear program."

The nuclear ghost of Pakistan's past did not stop to haunt it there. It continued to pop up from different and often unexpected quarters. On November 23, the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) put on its website edited extracts from a report on nuclear proliferation worldwide during the second half of 2003 submitted by it to the US Congress. It had another bombshell for Pakistan. The CIA report said: "Before the reporting period, the Khan network provided Iran with designs for Pakistan's older centrifuges as well as designs for more advanced and efficient models and components."

What did the CIA mean by "designs for more advanced and efficient models and components"? Pakistani analysts maintained that it meant more advanced centrifuges. But the New York Times, in an analytical article as quoted in the Daily Times of November 27, interpreted it otherwise. It said: "A new report from the CIA says the arms-trafficking network led by Pakistani scientist A Q Khan provided Iran's nuclear program with significant assistance, including the designs for advanced and efficient weapons components."

The Daily Times wrote: "The [New York Times] story is aimed at alleging that Pakistan gave a warhead design to Iran and wants to create exactly this impression. This is obvious from the reference to a closed-door speech to a private group by former CIA director George Tenet and references to unnamed CIA officials. According to the NY Times, Tenet described Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear-weapons program, as being at least as dangerous as Osama bin Laden because of his role in providing nuclear technology to other countries."

The Daily Times continued: "The worst aspect of this story is this. The warhead design provided to Libya by the Khan network was for an aging, crude Chinese model. Such a design would nevertheless provide Iran with important assistance in what American officials say is its quest to develop nuclear weapons, a goal, they say, Tehran could reach in the next several years."

The Nation, another Pakistani daily, wrote on November 26: "The Zionist lobbies in Washington have long desired to drag Pakistan also into the affair. The never-ending campaign against Dr Khan is part of the plan. Earlier, it was maintained that he supplied Iran with older designs for centrifuges. What is worrisome is that American officials have raised the stakes by accusing him now of sharing information about bomb components. This is particularly outrageous as bomb-making has never been Dr Khan's specialty." (Now, one could discern an attempt in Pakistan to project Khan not as the father of Pakistan's atomic bomb, but only as the father of Pakistan's indigenous uranium-enrichment capability.)

The Nation warned: "Pakistani investigators have thoroughly quizzed Dr Khan and a number of other scientists. Any direct or indirect suggestion to allow him to be interrogated by outsiders would imply Washington does not have faith in the Pakistan government ..." The paper wanted Musharraf to tell US President George W Bush that "this is not the way to treat a highly active member of the anti-terror coalition who is also a major non-NATO ally". (This is like a serial killer contending that his serial killings should not be investigated because he has been participating in the campaign against AIDS.)

In the meantime, as General (retired) Jehangir Karamat, Musharraf's predecessor as the chief of army staff, took over as the new Pakistani ambassador to the United States, some American non-proliferation experts drew attention to his alleged role in the conclusion of a deal between the North Korean and Benazir Bhutto governments, which led to the supply of North Korean missiles to Pakistan and the assistance to North Korea in the enrichment field. They wondered whether it was wise on the part of the Bush administration to have accepted him as the Pakistani ambassador. They were apparently worried that this could come in the way of a more thorough investigation into the nuclear-missile barter between Pakistan and North Korea, which has not yet received the same attention as the nuclear deals with Iran and Libya.

Non-proliferation activists have also started focusing on Saudi Arabia of late. Did it have nuclear aspirations too? If so, were there any deals with Pakistan?

As more and more disclosures emerge and as more and more inconvenient questions are being asked, most analyses are coming back to the question: Could Dr Khan and a small group of scientists close to him have done this as a rogue operation without the approval and involvement of the political and military leadership of the country? Should the outside world be satisfied with Musharraf's contention that Khan had been thoroughly interrogated and that all the information given by him shared with others and that no further interrogation is needed? Definitely not by outsiders, he says.

Should the world be satisfied with Musharraf's assurance that it was a rogue operation by a small group of greedy scientists and that there is nothing more to be learned? One thing stands out clearly from the recent developments - the entire truth has not come out. Only part of the story, as given out by Musharraf, has come out. Is it not necessary for the safety of the lives of billions of innocent civilians, who face the threat of a possible use of weapons of mass destruction by jihadi terrorists, to find out the truth?

There is only one man in Pakistan who has the entire picture, right from the day the late Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto launched a clandestine project for acquiring a military nuclear capability in the 1970s and brought Khan, then a young scientist working in the Netherlands, and put him in charge of it. Since then, scientists have come and scientists have gone, but Khan has been a constant, shining star in Pakistan's nuclear firmament. Leaders have come and leaders have gone, but Khan continued undisturbed as Pakistan's nuclear czar and became the blue-eyed boy of all leaders - political or military, to whatever side of the political spectrum they belonged. Without having him interrogated by an independent outside panel, the truth will never be known.

India was sneered upon in the 1970s by the outside world, particularly by the US, when it discovered the launching of the atomic-bomb project by Z A Bhutto, his projection of it as an Islamic bomb to the Muslim community in order to get funds for the project and his appointment of Khan as the head of the project and rang the alarm bell. India's cries of alarm were attributed to what was projected as its compulsive anti-Pakistan reflexes.

When India raised an alarm about the construction of the Kahuta enrichment plant, it was told that Khan had been a glorified storekeeper in the Netherlands plant and would not be able to develop an enrichment capability. He did.

When India raised another alarm about the Chinese sharing their old nuclear designs with Pakistan, it was attributed to its anti-China reflexes.

I have been writing about the Pakistan-North Korea nuclear-missile axis since 1998 and have written nearly a dozen articles on it. People were told not to take my articles seriously because of my intelligence background. I was projected as an anti-Pakistan analyst, who misses no opportunity to have Pakistan discredited. But the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and my articles have proved correct in retrospect.

Postscript
The News, the prestigious daily of Pakistan, reported as follows on December 16: "The government has sought return of official [blue] passports of those KRL [Khan Research Laboratory at Kahuta, which produces weapons-grade enriched uranium] employees who were investigated or are still being probed ... Besides Dr A Q Khan, Dr Ghulam Yasin Chohan, Saeed Ahmed, Dr Muhammad Atta, Muhammad Fahim, Chaudhary Muhammad Ashraf, Riaz Ahmed Chohan, F H Hashmi, Raja Arshad Mehboob, M Shamimur Rehman, Raja Gul Jabbar, Dr Abdul Majeed and Badarul Islam have been asked to comply with the latest instructions ... The News has learned that the passports would be used to track down foreign movement of these officials. Earlier, an SBP [State Bank of Pakistan] directive had sought bank account details of Dr A Q Khan, 16 members of his family and 12 other nuclear scientists and members of their families. The SBP had also directed commercial banks to forward details of accounts of the scientists such as account number and type, account opening form, latest balance and statement of accounts. An official said the government 'simply wants to corroborate the statements made by the officials in custody or during the investigation with the situation on ground as it exists in the documents'."

B Raman is additional secretary (retired), Cabinet Secretariat, government of India, New Delhi, and currently director, Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai, and distinguished fellow and convenor, Observer Research Foundation (ORF), Chennai Chapter. E-mail corde@vsnl.com.

(Copyright 2004 B Raman.)

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/FL22Df02.html
JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3146
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by JTull »

Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1513
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Post by Pulikeshi »

India was sneered upon in the 1970s by the outside world, particularly by the US, when it discovered the launching of the atomic-bomb project by Z A Bhutto, his projection of it as an Islamic bomb to the Muslim community in order to get funds for the project and his appointment of Khan as the head of the project and rang the alarm bell. India's cries of alarm were attributed to what was projected as its compulsive anti-Pakistan reflexes.

When India raised an alarm about the construction of the Kahuta enrichment plant, it was told that Khan had been a glorified storekeeper in the Netherlands plant and would not be able to develop an enrichment capability. He did.

When India raised another alarm about the Chinese sharing their old nuclear designs with Pakistan, it was attributed to its anti-China reflexes.
Raman gets kudos for his analysis, perhaps he did predict it all, I am no expert on his analysis. However, this “alarm raising/crying business” does not reflect well our intelligence or our ability to ensure our security. While sharing information with other powers is important, did we just raise the alarm, hope against hope that they would stop them, and then wait for the Nuke’rUs terrorists to run their criminal enterprise?

I am sick of our raising cries, alarams and told you sos. TSP is our responsiblility not their's, the subcontinent and its security is our problem not their's:

What did we do to prevent this terrorist?
ldev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2616
Joined: 06 Nov 2002 12:31

Post by ldev »

An absolutely fascinating look at Pakistan's nuclear proliferation in today's NY Times. Specifies that the bomb design being proliferated was the 4th Chinese nuclear test design of 1966 given to Pakistan by China and then proliferated by the Pakistanis to everyone else. Posting in full given the treasure trove of information. The link is here.

As Nuclear Secrets Emerge in Khan Inquiry, More Are Suspected
By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER

Published: December 26, 2004


hen experts from the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency came upon blueprints for a 10-kiloton atomic bomb in the files of the Libyan weapons program earlier this year, they found themselves caught between gravity and pettiness.

The discovery gave the experts a new appreciation of the audacity of the rogue nuclear network led by A. Q. Khan, a chief architect of Pakistan's bomb. Intelligence officials had watched Dr. Khan for years and suspected that he was trafficking in machinery for enriching uranium to make fuel for warheads. But the detailed design represented a new level of danger, particularly since the Libyans said he had thrown it in as a deal-sweetener when he sold them $100 million in nuclear gear.

Advertisement


"This was the first time we had ever seen a loose copy of a bomb design that clearly worked," said one American expert, "and the question was: Who else had it? The Iranians? The Syrians? Al Qaeda?"

But that threat was quickly overshadowed by smaller questions.

The experts from the United States and the I.A.E.A., the United Nations nuclear watchdog - in a reverberation of their differences over Iraq's unconventional weapons - began quarreling over control of the blueprints. The friction was palpable at Libya's Ministry of Scientific Research, said one participant, when the Americans accused international inspectors of having examined the design before they arrived. After hours of tense negotiation, agreement was reached to keep it in a vault at the Energy Department in Washington, but under I.A.E.A. seal.

It was a sign of things to come.

Nearly a year after Dr. Khan's arrest, secrets of his nuclear black market continue to uncoil, revealing a vast global enterprise. But the inquiry has been hampered by discord between the Bush administration and the nuclear watchdog, and by Washington's concern that if it pushes too hard for access to Dr. Khan, a national hero in Pakistan, it could destabilize an ally. As a result, much of the urgency has been sapped from the investigation, helping keep hidden the full dimensions of the activities of Dr. Khan and his associates.

There is no shortage of tantalizing leads. American intelligence officials and the I.A.E.A., working separately, are still untangling Dr. Khan's travels in the years before his arrest. Investigators said he visited 18 countries, including Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, on what they believed were business trips, either to buy materials like uranium ore or sell atomic goods.

In Dubai, they have scoured one of the network's front companies, finding traces of radioactive material as well as phone records showing contact with Saudi Arabia. Having tracked the network operations to Malaysia, Europe and the Middle East, investigators recently uncovered an outpost in South Africa, where they seized 11 crates of equipment for enriching uranium.

The breadth of the operation was particularly surprising to some American intelligence officials because they had had Dr. Khan under surveillance for nearly three decades, since he began assembling components for Pakistan's bomb, but apparently missed crucial transactions with countries like Iran and North Korea.

In fact, officials were so confident they had accurately taken his measure, that twice - once in the late 1970's and again in the 1980's - the Central Intelligence Agency persuaded Dutch intelligence agents not to arrest Dr. Khan because they wanted to follow his trail, according to a senior European diplomat and a former Congressional official who had access to intelligence information. The C.I.A. declined to comment.

"We knew a lot," said a nuclear intelligence official, "but we didn't realize the size of his universe."

President Bush boasts that the Khan network has been dismantled. But there is evidence that parts of it live on, as do investigations in Washington and Vienna, where the I.A.E.A. is based.

Cooperation between the United Nations atomic agency and the United States has trickled to a near halt, particularly as the Bush administration tries to unseat the I.A.E.A. director general, Mohamed ElBaradei, who did not support the White House's prewar intelligence assessments on Iraq.

The chill from the White House has blown through Vienna. "I can't remember the last time we saw anything of a classified nature from Washington," one of the agency's senior officials said. Experts see it as a missed opportunity because the two sides have complementary strengths - the United States with spy satellites and covert capabilities to intercept or disable nuclear equipment, and the I.A.E.A. with inspectors who have access to some of the world's most secretive atomic facilities that the United States cannot legally enter.

In the 11 months since Dr. Khan's partial confession, Pakistan has denied American investigators access to him. They have passed questions through the Pakistanis, but report that there is virtually no new information on critical questions like who else obtained the bomb design. Nor have American investigators been given access to Dr. Khan's chief operating officer, Buhari Sayed Abu Tahir, who is in a Malaysian jail.

This disjunction has helped to keep many questions about the network unanswered, including whether the Pakistani military was involved in the black market and what other countries, or nonstate groups, beyond Libya, Iran and North Korea, received what one Bush administration official called Dr. Khan's "nuclear starter kit" - everything from centrifuge designs to raw uranium fuel to the blueprints for the bomb.

Privately, investigators say that with so many mysteries unsolved, they have little confidence that the illicit atomic marketplace has actually been shut down. "It may be more like Al Qaeda," said one I.A.E.A. official, "where you cut off the leadership but new elements emerge."

A Potential Danger

A. Q. Khan may have been unknown to most Americans when he was revealed about a year ago as the mastermind of the largest illicit nuclear proliferation network in history. But for three decades Dr. Khan, a metallurgist, has been well known to British and American intelligence officials. Even so, the United States and its allies passed up opportunities to stop him - and apparently failed to detect that he had begun selling nuclear technology to Iran in the late 1980's. It was the opening transaction for an enterprise that eventually spread to North Korea, Libya and beyond.

Dr. Khan studied in Pakistan and Europe. After he secured a job in the Netherlands in the early 1970's at a plant making centrifuges - the devices that purify uranium - Dutch intelligence officials began watching him. By late 1975, they grew so wary, after he was observed at a nuclear trade show in Switzerland asking suspicious questions, that they moved him to a different area of the company to keep him away from uranium enrichment work. "There was an awareness," said Frank Slijper of the Dutch Campaign against Arms Trade, who recently wrote a report on Dr. Khan's early days, "that he was a potential danger."

Dr. Khan suddenly left the country that December, called home by his government for its atomic project. Years later, investigators discovered that he had taken blueprints for the centrifuges with him. In Pakistan, Dr. Khan was working to develop a bomb to counter India's, and Washington was intent on stopping the project.

It later proved to be the first of several occasions when the United States failed to fully understand what Dr. Khan was up to. Joseph Nye, a Harvard professor who has served in several administrations, said American intelligence agencies thought Pakistan would try to make its bomb by producing plutonium - an alternative bomb fuel. Mr. Nye was sent to France to halt the shipment of technology that would have enabled Pakistan to complete a reprocessing plant for the plutonium fuel. "We returned to Washington to celebrate our victory, only to discover that Khan had already stolen the technology for another path to the bomb," Mr. Nye recalled.

To gather more atomic gear and skill, Dr. Khan returned to the Netherlands repeatedly. But the United States wanted to watch him, and a European diplomat with wide knowledge of nuclear intelligence cited the two occasions when the C.I.A. persuaded the Dutch authorities not to arrest him. Intelligence officials apparently felt Dr. Khan was more valuable as an unwitting guide to the nuclear underworld.

"The Dutch wanted to arrest him," the diplomat said. "But they were told by the American C.I.A., 'Leave him so we can follow his trail.' "

A Chinese Connection

Dr. Khan quickly led the agents to Beijing. It was there in the early 1980's that Dr. Khan pulled off a coup: obtaining the blueprints for a weapon that China had detonated in its fourth nuclear test, in 1966. The design was notable because it was compact and the first one China had developed that could easily fit atop a missile.

American intelligence agencies only learned the full details of the transactions earlier this year when the Libyans handed over two large plastic bags with the names of an Islamabad tailor on one side and a dry-cleaner on other - one of several clues that it had come from the Khan Laboratories. The design inside included drawings of more than 100 parts, all fitting in a sphere about 34 inches in diameter, just the right size for a rocket.

Equally remarkable were the handwritten notations in the margins. "They made reference to Chinese ministers, presumably involved in the deal," one official who reviewed it disclosed. And there was also a reference to "Munir," apparently Munir Khan, Dr. Khan's rival who ran the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission and was in a contest with Dr. Khan to put together a Pakistani weapon that would match India's.

In that race, size was critical, because only a small weapon could be put atop Pakistani missiles. One note in the margin of the design, the official said, was that "Munir's bomb would be bigger."

Intelligence experts believe that Dr. Khan traded his centrifuge technology to the Chinese for their bomb design.

A certain familiarity developed between Dr. Khan and those watching him.

"I remember I was once in Beijing on a nonproliferation mission," said Robert J. Einhorn, a longtime proliferation official in the State Department, "and we knew that Khan was in Beijing, too, and where he was. I had this fantasy of going over to his hotel, calling up to his room, and inviting him down for a cup of coffee."

Of course, he never did. But if he had, Dr. Khan might not have been surprised.

Simon Henderson, a London-based author who has written about Dr. Khan for more than two decades, said the Pakistani scientist long suspected he was under close surveillance. "Khan once told me, indignantly, 'The British try to recruit members of my team as spies,' " Mr. Henderson recalled. "As far as I'm aware, he was penetrated for a long, long time."

Still, for all the surveillance, American officials always seemed a step or two behind. In the 1990's, noted Mr. Einhorn, the assumption was that Iran was getting most of its help from Russia, which was providing the country with reactors and laser-isotope technology. Virtually no attention was paid to its contacts with Dr. Khan.

"It was a classic case of being focused in the wrong place," Mr. Einhorn said. "And if Iran gets the bomb in the next few years, it won't be because of the Russians. It will be because of the help they got from A. Q. Khan."

Triumph and Mystery

As soon as Mr. Bush came to office, his director of central intelligence, George J. Tenet, began tutoring him on the dangers of Dr. Khan and disclosing how deeply the agency believed it had penetrated his life and network. "We were inside his residence, inside his facilities, inside his rooms," Mr. Tenet said in a recent speech. "We were everywhere these people were."

But acting on the Khan problem meant navigating the sensitivities of a fragile ally important in the effort against terrorism. That has impeded the inquiry ever since.

Washington had little leverage to force Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, to clamp down on a national hero, especially since Dr. Khan may have had evidence implicating the Pakistani government in some of the transactions. And in interviews, officials said they feared that moving on Dr. Khan too early would hurt their chances to roll up the network.

Stephen J. Hadley, the deputy national security adviser, went to Pakistan soon after the Sept. 11 attacks and raised concerns about Dr. Khan, some of whose scientists were said to have met with Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda's leader. But Mr. Hadley did not ask General Musharraf to take action, according to a senior administration official. He returned to Washington complaining that it was unclear whether the Khan Laboratories were operating with the complicity of the Pakistani military, or were controlled by freelancers, motivated by visions of profit or of spreading the bomb to Islamic nations. The Pakistanis insisted they had no evidence of any proliferation at all, a claim American officials said they found laughable.

As evidence grew in 2003, Mr. Bush sent Mr. Tenet to New York to meet with General Musharraf. "We were afraid Khan's operation was entering a new, more dangerous phase," said one top official. Still there was little action.

But in late October 2003, the United States and its allies seized the BBC China, a freighter bearing centrifuge parts made in Malaysia, along with other products of Dr. Khan's network, all bound for Libya. Confronted with the evidence, Libya finally agreed to surrender all of its nuclear program. Within weeks, tons of equipment was being dismantled and flown to the Energy Department's nuclear weapons lab at Oak Ridge, Tenn.

Pressures mounted on General Musharraf. "I said to him, 'We know so much about this that we're going to go public with it,' " Secretary of State Colin L. Powell told journalists last week. " 'And you need to deal with this before you have to deal with it publicly.' "

On television, Dr. Khan was forced to confess but he gave no specifics, and General Musharraf pardoned the scientist. American officials pressed to interview him and his chief lieutenant, Mr. Tahir, a Sri Lankan businessman living in Dubai and Malaysia, who was eventually arrested by Malaysian authorities.

But the Pakistanis balked, insisting that they would pass questions to Dr. Khan and report back. Little information has been conveyed.

"Some questions simply were never answered," said one senior intelligence official. "In other cases, you don't know if you were getting Khan's answer, or the answer the government wanted you to hear."

Dr. Khan's silence has extended to the question of what countries, other than Libya, received the bomb design. Intelligence experts say they have no evidence any other nation received the design, although they suspect Iran and perhaps North Korea. But that search has been hampered by lack of hard intelligence.

"We strongly believe Iran did," said one American official. "But we need the proof."

Dr. Khan has also never discussed his ties with North Korea, a critical issue because the United States has alleged - but cannot prove - that North Korea has two nuclear arms programs, one using Khan technology.

"It is an unbelievable story, how this administration has given Pakistan a pass on the single worst case of proliferation in the past half century," said Jack Pritchard, who worked for President Clinton and served as the State Department's special envoy to North Korea until he quit last year, partly in protest over Mr. Bush's Korea policy. "We've given them a pass because of Musharraf's agreement to fight terrorism, and now there is some suggestion that the hunt for Osama is waning. And what have we learned from Khan? Nothing."

Some Missing Pieces

In March, American investigators invited reporters to the giant nuclear complex in Oak Ridge to display the equipment disgorged by the Libyans. They surrounded the site with guards bearing automatic weapons, and Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham joined the officials in showing off some of the 4,000 centrifuges.

"We've had a huge success," he said. But it turned out that the centrifuges were missing their rotors - the high-speed internal device that makes them work. To this day, it is not clear where those parts were coming from. While some officials believe the Libyans were going to make their own, others fear the equipment had been shipped from an unknown location - and that the network, while headless, is still alive.

John R. Bolton, the under secretary of state for arms control and international security, echoed those suspicions, saying the network still had a number of undisclosed customers. "There's more out there than we can discuss publicly," he said in April.

Federal and private experts said the suspected list of customers included Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Algeria, Kuwait, Myanmar and Abu Dhabi.

Given the urgency of the Libyan and Khan disclosures, many private and governmental experts expected that the Bush administration and the I.A.E.A. would work together. But European diplomats said the administration never turned over valuable information to back up its wider suspicions about other countries. "It doesn't like to share," a senior European diplomat involved in nuclear intelligence said of the United States. "That makes life more difficult. So we're on the learning curve."

Federal officials said they were reluctant to give the I.A.E.A. classified information because the agency is too prone to leaks. The agency has 137 member states, and American officials believe some of them may be using the agency to hunt for nuclear secrets. One senior administration official put it this way: "The cops and the crooks all serve on the agency's board together."

The result is that two separate, disjointed searches are on for other nuclear rogue states - one by Washington, the other by the I.A.E.A. And there is scant communication between the feuding bureaucracies.

That lack of communication with the United Nations agency extends to the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a loose organization of countries that produce nuclear equipment. It can stop the export of restricted atomic technology to a suspect customer, but it does not report its actions to the I.A.E.A. Moreover, there is no communication between the I.A.E.A. and the Bush administration's Proliferation Security Initiative, which seeks to intercept illicit nuclear trade at sea or in the air.

"It's a legitimate question whether we need a very different kind of super-agency that can deal with the new world of A. Q. Khans," said a senior administration official. "Because we sure don't have the system we need now."

Dr. ElBaradei, the head of the United Nations agency, says he is plunging ahead, pursuing his own investigation even as the Bush administration attempts to have him replaced when his term expires late next year. In an interview in Vienna, he defended his record, citing the information he has wrung out of Iran, and his agency's discovery of tendrils of Dr. Khan's network in more than 30 countries around the globe.

"We're getting an idea of how it works," he said of the Khan network. "And we're still looking" for other suppliers and customers.

One method is to investigate the countries Dr. Khan visited before his arrest. Nuclear experts disclosed that the countries were Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia and the United Arab Emirates. Many of them are Islamic, and several of the African countries are rich in uranium ore.

In one of its biggest operations, the agency is hunting for clues in a half dozen of the network's buildings and warehouses in Dubai, which for years were used for assembling and repacking centrifuges.

Both in Washington and in Vienna, the most delicate investigations involve important American allies - including Egypt and Saudi Arabia. So far, said European intelligence officials familiar with the agency's inner workings, no hard evidence of clandestine nuclear arms programs has surfaced.

Suspicious signs have emerged, however. For instance, experts disclosed that SMB Computers, Mr. Tahir's front company in Dubai for the Khan network, made telephone calls to Saudi Arabia. But the company also engaged in legitimate computer sales, giving it plausible cover. Experts also disclosed that Saudi scientists traveled to Pakistan for some of Dr. Khan's scientific conferences. But the meetings were not secret, or illegal.

There is also worry in both Washington and Vienna about Egypt, which has two research reactors near Cairo and a long history of internal debate about whether to pursue nuclear arms. But European intelligence officials said I.A.E.A. inspectors who recently went there found no signs of clandestine nuclear arms and some evidence of shoddy workmanship that bespeaks low atomic expectations. As for Syria, the Bush administration had repeatedly charged that it has secretly tried to acquire nuclear arms. But the I.A.E.A. has so far found no signs of a relationship with Dr. Khan or a clandestine nuclear weapons program.

Worried about what is still unknown, the I.A.E.A. is quietly setting up what it calls the Covert Nuclear Trade Analysis Unit, agency officials disclosed. It has about a half dozen specialists looking for evidence of deals by the Khan network or its imitators.

"I would not be surprised to discover that some countries pocketed some centrifuges," Dr. ElBaradei said. "They may have considered it a chance of a lifetime to get some equipment and thought, 'Well, maybe it will be good for a rainy day.' "


William J. Broad reported from New York for this article, and David E. Sanger from Washington.
kgoan
BRFite
Posts: 264
Joined: 30 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by kgoan »

There is another, quite obvious, possibility as to why the US is so reluctant to push the Pak nuke prolif thing:

That is that China is not the only name that will drop out as to Pak nuke tech and helpers. It's possible that the US' name will also fall out. Along with some of those nice American folk who went "native" during the bright days of Zia and the Muj supermen in Afghanistan who were so so loved in DC at one time.

And BCCI will link a heck of a lot of the "invisible" folk to some very visible ones and probably tie the whole boondoogle together.

I don't find that thought half as bizarre as US antics with Pakistan on their nuke proliferation.
Arun_S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2800
Joined: 14 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: KhyberDurra

Chore Khan and the Communist Chinki chankian

Post by Arun_S »

ldev wrote:An absolutely fascinating look at Pakistan's nuclear proliferation in today's NY Times. Specifies that the bomb design being proliferated was the 4th Chinese nuclear test design of 1966 given to Pakistan by China and then proliferated by the Pakistanis to everyone else. Posting in full given the treasure trove of information. The LINK.

As Nuclear Secrets Emerge in Khan Inquiry, More Are Suspected

By WILLIAM J. BROAD and DAVID E. SANGER

Published: December 26, 2004
So here is a an indication of Pakistani's leading edge nuke design:
American intelligence agencies only learned the full details of the transactions earlier this year when the Libyans handed over two large plastic bags with the names of an Islamabad tailor on one side and a dry-cleaner on other - one of several clues that it had come from the Khan Laboratories. The design inside included drawings of more than 100 parts, all fitting in a sphere about 34 inches in diameter, just the right size for a rocket.
That is 3 feet diameter.
Equally remarkable were the handwritten notations in the margins. "They made reference to Chinese ministers, presumably involved in the deal," one official who reviewed it disclosed. And there was also a reference to "Munir," apparently Munir Khan, Dr. Khan's rival who ran the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission and was in a contest with Dr. Khan to put together a Pakistani weapon that would match India's.
In that race, size was critical, because only a small weapon could be put atop Pakistani missiles. One note in the margin of the design, the official said, was that "Munir's bomb would be bigger."

Intelligence experts believe that Dr. Khan traded his centrifuge technology to the Chinese for their bomb design.
Roop
BRFite
Posts: 672
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by Roop »

kgoan wrote:There is another, quite obvious, possibility as to why the US is so reluctant to push the Pak nuke prolif thing:

... It's possible that the US' name will also fall out. ... I don't find that thought half as bizarre as US antics with Pakistan on their nuke proliferation.
KG: It's more than just "possible". I think it's a virtual certainty that many in, shall we say, "elevated" circles in the US knew about Paki nuke bomb-making, including the Chinese involvement, and more or less sanctioned it with a nod and a wink. All this dismay they are expressing today is just so much play-acting (aided, of course, by the awful realisation that the nuclear "trap" they set for the Soviet Union is now waiting to trap them).
kgoan
BRFite
Posts: 264
Joined: 30 Jul 2001 11:31

Post by kgoan »

Mohan:

Yeah, not to mention the more worrying (terrifying?) possibility that during that time of (what to call it? - the love that dare not speak it's name?) between the Paks and the US, the Paks may have been slipped some US nuke tech as well.

:(
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7128
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by JE Menon »

Yup. Kgoan... and there we may have the ultimate answer to why the mollycoddling of the military regime in Pak goes on...

Personally, I think it improbable, but given the behaviours being exhibited who can rule out the possibility?
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Post by Gerard »

NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19261
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Post by NRao »

Seriously folks, Uncle needs Operation Pure Land. For his own sake.

Need to keep close eye of Paki Amby General Jahangir Karamat
arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Post by arun »

Boston Globe Editorial :

GLOBE EDITORIAL

Pakistan's Secrets

December 30, 2004

A.Q. KHAN, the Pakistani metallurgist, is known to have peddled nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea, and Libya. What is not known -- at least by US intelligence -- is what he did on visits to Afghanistan, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates.

Khan's business trips are a subject of interest because there could hardly be a more pressing mission for US intelligence than to discover what other countries besides Iran, North Korea, and Libya might have received help from Khan's network in developing nuclear weapons. And since some nuclear scientists working in the Khan Laboratories visited Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan before Sept. 11, 2001, Al Qaeda would have to be added to the list.

Khan sold hardware and divulged centrifuge technology in the three countries and, at least in Libya, provided a design for nuclear bombs. But crucial questions about the extent of Khan's proliferation activities remain unanswered because the government of Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf -- after arresting and pardoning Khan more than a year ago -- has refused to allow him to be questioned directly by the CIA. Pakistani authorities do permit questions to be submitted to them for transmission to Khan, but so far that mediated form of interrogation has yielded no pertinent information about potential new sources of nuclear proliferation.

The screen Musharraf has placed between Khan and either the CIA or the International Atomic Energy Agency exacerbates a global security threat. Musharraf's reasons for pardoning Khan and sequestering him from inquisitive foreigners might be understandable, but they place political expediency above the international community's common interest in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.

In shielding Khan's remaining secrets, Musharraf appears to be protecting Pakistan's government and military from the embarrassment of being implicated in the world's worst case of nuclear proliferation. President Bush has until now tolerated Musharraf's pretense that Khan acted alone, without the collusion or knowledge of the generals who in fact permitted his commerce with North Korea to be carried out with Pakistani military aircraft.

This charade should not be allowed to continue. The Khan network cannot be dismantled definitively, and incipient nuclear weapons programs cannot be identified unless Musharraf stops keeping Khan's secrets. It is ultimately more important to prevent nuclear proliferation than to maintain a veneer of good relations with Musharraf.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19261
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Post by NRao »

A.Q. KHAN, the Pakistani metallurgist, is known to have peddled nuclear secrets to Iran, North Korea, and Libya. What is not known -- at least by US intelligence -- is what he did on visits to Afghanistan, Egypt, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates.
WHAT? No Iraq?

:roll:
vasdeva
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 1
Joined: 23 Dec 2004 03:50

Post by vasdeva »

Super power can very well handle A Q Khan or pakistan for that matter, BUT THEY DONT WANT TO.

For the sake of imagination replace this paki khan with Anurag Kharode (indian sceintist) and imagine what would have happened to india as a nation.

padmanabhan did not write a book in vain, as a top brass he knows where india stands vs USA.
Vivek_A
BRFite
Posts: 593
Joined: 17 Nov 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Post by Vivek_A »

The people of saudi arabia, allies against terrorism....

The Saudi Syndrome

The Saudi government, itself under assault from Al Qaeda, is not in the business of directly financing terrorism, and since 9/11 it has responded to American pressure to control the flow of charitable funds to active terrorist groups. But what it still pays for, and what the religious charities its citizens are obliged to contribute to pay for, is a worldwide network of mosques, schools and Islamic centers that proselytize the belligerent and intolerant Wahhabi variant of Islam that is dominant in Saudi Arabia. As a result of this oil-financed largess, the teachings of more tolerant and humane Muslim leaders are losing ground in countries like Indonesia and Pakistan. Wahhabi mosques that glorify armed jihad have also made alarming gains among the Muslim populations of Europe and the United States.

For years, Saudi Arabian oil money bankrolled the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and provided financial support to Pakistan's government. It was Saudi aid that allowed Pakistan to defy international sanctions imposed over its nuclear bomb testing. Without Saudi money there is some question whether chronically impoverished Pakistan could have ever afforded to develop nuclear weapons and the crucial bomb-related technologies that its scientists passed on to Iran, Libya, North Korea and perhaps other countries as well.
Tim
BRFite
Posts: 136
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: USA

Post by Tim »

NRao,

In case you missed it. UNSCOM documents indicate that Khan did approach Iraq indirectly - apparently in October or November of 1990, when Iraq was under sanctions for its Kuwait folly. The Iraqis either didn't take the offer seriously, or felt it was a Western plant. Regardless, there is solid evidence that Khan approached Saddam, and that he refused the offer.

Which makes for a fascinating counter-factual, if you think about it...
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19261
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Post by NRao »

UNSCOM, UN, US, UK. And, others, all have failed us. Fact.

That list with/without Iraq is meaningless.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

The Statesman : ‘Khan gave nuke tech to three more nations’

‘Khan gave nuke tech to three more nations’

Press Trust of India
JERUSALEM, Jan. 2. — A former official of Israel’s intelligence agency Mossad has said that Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Syria may have acquired some kind of nuclear capability through the illicit network of disgraced Pakistani scientist Dr AQ Khan, who had been “purveying his goods extensively in West Asia.”
Former Mossad chief and national security adviser Mr Ephriam Halevy told Jerusalem Post that while Israel is understandably concerned by the threat of Iran going nuclear, “maybe we should be looking beyond the lamp post”.
“The lamp post may be Iran”, but there were “question marks” about Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, Mr Halevy, who resigned as Prime Minister Mr Ariel Sharon’s national security adviser at the end of 2003, said.
It could well be that those countries might have a nuclear capability Israel was not aware of. “Its certainly something that should be looked at,” he argued.


The former Mossad chief also drew attention to a New York Times article last week which detailed the scale (and the possible recipients) of what it dubbed “the largest illicit nuclear proliferation network in history” while accepting lack of any evidence to substantiate the claim.
“The most delicate investigations” in the hunt for “nuclear rogue states,” the report said, were those involving important US allies, “including Egypt and Saudi Arabia.” No hard evidence of clandestine nuclear arms programmes had surfaced yet, New York Times said, although “suspicious signs have emerged” regarding Saudi Arabia.
American intelligence officials and the International Atomic Energy Agency are said to be still untangling the details of Dr Khan’s travels to 18 countries in the years before his arrest last year, it said.
Among the countries the Pakistani scientist visited, apparently “to buy materials such as uranium ore or sell atomic goods,” were Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, it said.
Federal and private experts quoted by the US daily put “Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Algeria, Kuwait, Myanmar and Abu Dhabi on the suspected list of customers.” The New York Times article had noted that USA and its allies had failed to detect the fact that Dr Khan began to sell nuclear technology to Iran in the late 1980s, in what it said was “the opening transaction for an enterprise that eventually spread to North Korea, Libya and beyond.” Brushing aside US President Mr George W. Bush’s claims that Dr Khan’s network has now been dismantled, the daily had said that the investigators doubt this is the case.
------------
The reality might be that some of the excess that was tested at Chagai in 1998 could be in KSA and Egypt as strategic depth. Thats why there is no infrastructure in those countries.
Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8012
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Post by Gerard »

Al-Qaida's Nuclear Ambitions Said Unattainable
Experts interviewed by The Post named two countries from where terrorists may want to acquire a nuclear weapon or materials for making one: Russia and Pakistan.
RajGuru
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 31
Joined: 15 Sep 2004 11:41
Location: South of Musi, Deccan Plateau

Post by RajGuru »

>>Experts interviewed by The Post named two countries from where terrorists may want to acquire a nuclear weapon or materials for making one: Russia and Pakistan

For detonating a JDAM in the freeland they need free passage of illegals/NOC's between US and TSP.As a MuNNA, TSP has some privilages like posting of key personal in sensitive positions inside US.
Long ago,I heard a neice of AQK sits in the checkin counter of PIA in one of those eastern sea board cities of US of A.She could have been relocated after finding a suitable alternative.The point is US has already made too many mistakes to correct for it to be workable.sometimes it is better to write a completely new program than spending ages in debugging a horrendous program.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19261
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Post by NRao »

The reality might be that some of the excess that was tested at Chagai in 1998 could be in KSA and Egypt as strategic depth. Thats why there is no infrastructure in those countries
Interesting thought.

Uncle denuking TSP, then, is a worthless effort/thought. Not only has the cancer spread but the very cancer threatens Uncle himself more than any other single entity.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

From Pioneer, 5 Jan., 2005More questions on AQ Khan
More questions on AQ Khan

Wilson John

One of the factors which helped US President George Bush to regain the White House for the second time was the seemingly decisive manner in which his Administration intercepted, exposed and crippled a global nuclear smuggling network led by Pakistani nuclear scientist, Dr AQ Khan. Although the US Administration and the media traced the network's footprints in several countries, particularly in Iran and Malaysia, both have conveniently avoided looking at own backyard, and Pakistan.


So let us take a look at what the US knew and didn't tell. Exactly three decades ago, the US State Department circulated a confidential note to its top policy-makers titled Pakistan and the Non Proliferation Issue which stated that Pakistan "may well have decided to have the capability to produce a weapon, and they have clearly decided to have the capability to build one." The note was prepared barely three years after Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto had called a meeting of Pakistan's top nuclear scientists at Multan, six weeks after the 1971 war ended in surrender at Dhaka.

In fact, by the 1970s, the National Security Agency (NSA), responsible for technical intelligence, had already drawn up a list of hi-tech companies in Germany and Switzerland whose communication links were constantly monitored and intercepted to detect nuclear trafficking with Pakistan. In fact, the CIA had so successfully infiltrated the Pakistani nuclear establishment that it was able to smuggle out the entire floor plans for the Kahuta Research Laboratory.

By the mid 1980s, the US Administration had also begun receiving information about Dr AQ Khan. A research paper prepared by the CIA Directorate of Intelligence during that time titled 'Pakistan's Nuclear Weapons Programme: Personnel and Organisations', said though "Pakistan's scientists had investigated the possibilities of uranium enrichment... as early as 1968, but efforts did not begin in earnest until AQ returned to the country in 1975. Through his extensive network of European contacts, he began to covertly procure the components that would ultimately enable the then clandestine facility to manufacture highly enriched uranium."

Another report prepared by the CIA Directorate of Intelligence, 'Pakistan: A Safeguards Exemption As a Backdoor to Reprocessing?' on May 20, 1983, only confirmed the earlier intelligence estimates. The report said: "...In our view, Zia and his advisers continue to believe that they must acquire nuclear weapons... we have detected continuation of longstanding efforts to acquire components for nuclear devices and to bring into successful operation the only two facilities capable of producing fissile material for nuclear weapons...".


Barely a year after the note, three Pakistani nationals were indicted in Houston for attempting to buy a shipment of high-speed switch designed to trigger nuclear weapons. They had offered to pay in gold supplied by the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), an infamous bank set up by a Pakistani businessman, Agha Hassan Abedi, who counted among his close friends men like President Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan Finance Minister Ghulam Ishaq Khan (later President), President Carter and a young AQ Khan.


The CIA could be faulted for its intelligence on Iraq but it has been doing credible work on Pakistan's efforts to procure nuclear technology and materials clandestinely. In 1993, testifying before the Senate Committee on Government Affairs, the agency said Pakistan had received $19 billion in aid from foreign countries and donor agencies like the International Monetary Fund. Of $19 billion, the agency said, $2.7 billion was not designated for any specific purpose, thus enabling Pakistan to spend it on its nuclear programme.

According to Leonard Weiss, a counter-proliferation expert and a staff director on the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs between 1977 and 1999, "When Ronald Reagan arrived in the White House in 1981, his Administration came with a desire to send arms to the Afghan Mujahideen. They could only be delivered through Pakistan, and non-proliferation took a back seat to Cold War politics." This pattern continued for several years with no one protesting till a junior CIA intelligence officer, Richard Barlow, whose brief was to track Pakistan's proliferation activities, compiled evidence about Pakistan's clandestine nuclear purchases.

However, his reports were shelved, forcing him, subsequently, to resign from the agency. In 1989, he joined the Government as a proliferation analyst in the office of the Under Secretary of Defence Policy where too he found a similar attitude towards Pakistan. One of the reports he prepared for the Secretary of Defence was about Dr Khan's initial attempts to sell nuclear technology and spare materials to countries which the US considered were sponsoring terrorism. The Secretary, Defence, was Mr Dick Cheney. Mr Cheney dismissed the Barlowe report and told a Pentagon official testifying before the US Congress to underplay the threat posed by Pakistan's nuclear proliferation activities. Mr Cheney wanted to protect the $1.4 billion sale of F-16 fighter jets to Islamabad.

Another issue on which the Bush Administration has maintained an intriguing silence is the involvement of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) which, a US Senate Report in 1992, said, financed "Pakistan's nuclear programme through the BCCI Foundation in Pakistan, as well as through BCCI-Canada in the Parvez case. However, details on BCCI's involvement remain unavailable. Further investigation is needed to understand the extent to which BCCI and Pakistan were able to evade US and international nuclear non-proliferation regimes to acquire nuclear technologies". Needless to say no effort was made, whether then or now, to take the investigation forward.

The reason is not far to seek. To quote the Senate report: "Among the Americans who BCCI provided with financial assistance in addition to Carter (President Jimmy Carter), were US Ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young, Bert Lance, and Jesse Jackson. Abroad, important figures with extensive contact with BCCI included former British Prime Minister James Callaghan, then United Nations Secretary General Javier Perez de Cueller, Jamaican Prime Minister Edward Seaga, Antiguan Prime Minister Lester Byrd; a large number of African heads of state; and many Third World central bank officials."

Not only were the top US leadership bankrolled, the bank had the top hierarchy of the intelligence establishment on its side. The Senate Report throws enough light on this nexus: "Former CIA officials, including former CIA Director Richard Helms and the late William Casey; former and current foreign intelligence officials, including Kamal Adham and Abdul Raouf Khalil; and principal foreign agents of the US, such as Adnan Khashoggi and Manucher Ghorbanifar, float in and out of BCCI at critical times in its history, and participate simultaneously in the making of key episodes in US foreign policy, ranging from the Camp David peace talks to the arming of Iran as part of the Iran/Contra affair."

As for Pakistan, the Bush Administration should urgently take the following two actions: Interrogate Dr AQ Khan in detail about the smuggling network. Second, arrest a little-known businessman named Humayun Khan who owns a computer hardware firm in Islamabad, Pakland PME. He is a small fry, but a key link between the smuggling network and the Pakistan Army. There is evidence, in the form of emails exchanged between Dr Khan and a Jewish businessman Asher Karni, that the former had been acting on behalf of the Pakistan Army to buy Sidewinder missiles and infrared sensors from Lockheed Martin Naval Systems and nuclear triggers from two US firms.


The question is whether the Bush Administration will come clean on these counts. Only then, perhaps, a serious attempt could be made to prevent rogue nations and terrorist entities from threatening the global order.
AJay
BRFite
Posts: 107
Joined: 09 Mar 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Post by AJay »

NRao wrote:Seriously folks, Uncle needs Operation Pure Land. For his own sake.

Need to keep close eye of Paki Amby General Jahangir Karamat
I have finished about 80% of "Engaging India: D,D,B" by Talbott. Karamat gets high marks from Talbott. Also, lots of info on the nuc. front (what is not said in the book). All in all, Talbott shields and gives a lot of (undeserved) credit to Clinton in the book as well as aggrandizing himself, though he lost the gambit for US.
Umrao
BRFite
Posts: 547
Joined: 30 May 2001 11:31

Post by Umrao »

You can listen here how Dalmott makes tall claims about Russia policy during his tenure and the way he talks of Russian president Yelstin

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... Id=1143758
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59874
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Post by ramana »

From Deccan.com
Pak confines 12 N-experts to capital


Islamabad, Jan. 6: Pakistan has barred over a dozen scientists and staff of its nuclear installation Khan Research Laboratories, who are under investigation for proliferating nuclear technology, from travelling outside Islamabad without permission. The Interior ministry has directed all the under-investigation KRL officials not to travel to any other city without permission from KRL’s Director-General of Security.

The ministry’s Joint Secre-tary Tippu Mohabat Khan told the The News, “it is a usual procedural matter under the Security of Pakistan Act.” The order also included not meeting or exchanging any information with any foreigner. The “suspects” have been asked to remain prepared for appearing before the investigators, it said. Asked whether these restrictions were part of the probe into the disgraced top nuclear scientist A Q Khan, who is under house detention, Interior Secretary Tariq Mahmood said, “the investigation into the Dr A Q Khan issue is a long, legal procedure and an ongoing affair.”

Khan had been under detention since early last year after his admission that he proliferated nuclear technology to Libya, Iran and North Korea.
Noose tightening? Or is to prevent access to uncle?
Locked