ramana wrote:So the police never had any sniffer dogs to sniff for bomb materials in the Hosur house?




ramana wrote:So the police never had any sniffer dogs to sniff for bomb materials in the Hosur house?
Now, it turns out that it was likely the CPM's Kerala State Secretary, Pinarayi Vijayan. He is already implicated in the huge Lavlin fraud case. There should be investigation into Pinarayi Vijayan, who already has been involved in several shady episodes.SSridhar wrote:The Thadiyan was caught twice by Kerala Police but let off on both occasions due to pressure from the top
Now, who is this 'top' ? Politburo ? Karat ? Who ?"Newspaper reports suggest that he was let off following pressure from the top," said Chandy.
CPM caught in a Burning Bus
Kalamassery bus-burning case that points an accusing finger at Abdul Nasser Madhani is likely to unleash a storm within the CPM. The digital evidence collected by the inquiry team will disprove all arguments that CPM state secretary Pinarayi Vijayan had raised in favour of Madhani.
CPM insiders told Express that when an electoral understanding between the CPM and the PDP came up for debate in the party secretariat it was Pinarayi who strongly argued the case for Madhani. Pinarayi reportedly acted on the advice of K T Jaleel MLA, who vouched for the PDP chief.
During the debate some members expressed apprehensions about the tie-up.
Those in the know of things, including Home Minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, briefed the meeting about the risks, especially since there was clinching evidence against Soofiya Madhani.
But Pinarayi took the firm stand that, whatever be the allegations against Soofiya and others, Madhani was a changed man.
Pinarayi's theory that it was the duty of the Left parties to rehabilitate Madhani, who had bid goodbye to terrorism, was accepted by the secretariat and the state committee overruling the objections raised by Chief Minister V S Achuthanandan.
Despite a flood of media reports about Madhani's terror link during the campaign, Pinarayi repeatedly said that his party didn't care for those who called Madhani a terrorist.
Even while addressing a press conference last Sunday, Pinarayi was in the dark about Madhani's having been linked to the case.
That is why he didn't disown him completely. "The CPM doesn't have the responsibility of defending the past actions of Madhani," he told reporters then. But he was not ready to say anything concrete about the possibility of a future CPM-PDP tieup.
It was in this context that Achuthanandan reopened the PDP case on Wednesday.
He clearly said what Pinarayi had hesitated over.
VS's announcement that there wouldn't be any future tie-up with the PDP or any other terror outfit was totally in line with the policy of the CPM central leadership.
The hasty reaction of PB member M K Pandhe against the PDP and Madhani the other day needs to be read along with VS's reaction. If the police can successfully link Madhani to the case, Pinarayi will have a struggle defending himself within the party.
The Bangalore police, with the help of Kerala their counterparts, arrested three persons — Tajuddin from Vedimara, Ernakulam district in Kerala, Sarfuddin alias Sarfu from Kannur in Kerala and Abdul Khadar from Virajpet in Karnataka.
The trio were involved in the Bangalore serial blasts by providing logistics like vehicles to carry out bombing. Four vehicles involved in transportation of bomb materials and planting of bombs were also seized from Kerala, police said.
With these arrests, the number of the accused arrested has increased to 15.
The main accused like Riyaz Bhatkal (30) from Bhatkal town, Sameer(30) of Kannur are still at large. Wali alias Rehan alias Rasheed Obidulla, a Pakistani national, Ali alias Isha alias Ali Abdul Azeez Hooti, a Omani national and Saleem alias Mabasheer Shayeed alias Yahya, a Pakistani national are also wanted in the case.
Red-corner notices were issued subsequently against them, police commissioner Shankar Bidari said.
During the course of Nasir’s interrogation, it was revealed that at the age of 16, he joined Abdul Nasir Madani’s organisation called ISS and also is a PDP member.
Nasir started ginger cultivation in 2005 at Madapura and Hosathota in Coorg, Karnataka. Nawaz and Nasir visited the place and decided to start jihadi training there for youths.
Nasir also held a conspiracy meeting with Sarfaraz Nawaz and sought monetary help for carrying out the serial blasts in Bangalore.
During March 2008, Nasir and Sarfaraz along with one more accused Shafiq conducted a recce of Bangalore.
Nasir along with Mujeeb, Aleem, Bomb Ismail, Raisal and Abdul Raheem committed theft of explosives like ammonium nitrate, gelatin sticks and electronic detonators from a shop at Perambavoor in Ernakulam. They collected other accessories like jelly, iron bolt, nuts, cement and newspapers from Bangalore and manufactured bombs in Mujeeb’s house and planted them at various places in Bangalore.
The blasts were carried out with the financial assistance and guidance from Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT). Nasir and Shaffaz were assisted financially by LeT during their stay in Bangladesh.
Nasir also revealed about his involvement in Aasad Murder case, Calicut twin blast case and other cases.
In Kerala any thing and every thing is used to settle political scores. VS Achuthanandan the wily old-fox would surely rake up this alliance of Pinarayi Vijayan and Mahdani. Some of the recent statements which VS made yesterday are taken as indicators, that old Com. Achu has got his weapons loaded. With Lavlin case with the CBI, and Mahdani case with the NIA and Central Intel agencies (and out-side-the-state police), Vijayan would be having a tough time for a while.SSridhar wrote:There should be investigation into Pinarayi Vijayan
I don't think the threat will materialise...SSridhar wrote:Apparently, Maudhany has threatened that if his wife was taken outside Kerala borders, the Kerala government will have to bear the repercussions.
Stan_Savljevic wrote:The intellectuals strike again![]()
New visa rules ‘will hit’ Indian-Americans
http://beta.thehindu.com/news/internati ... e66342.ece
Where these 1000s of paki-land born Indian amrikans come from, perhaps only the intellectuals can esplain poor sdres with a pea-sized brain like moi.
WTH is a Pakistan-born Indian American??“This decision treats Pakistan-born Pakistani-Americans and Pakistan-born Indian-Americans on equal footing.
ramana wrote:Soon after Partition some IM went to TSP and found out its true nature and returned to India. Now while there they had children whom they brought back to India. Those childrne grew up and went to US for higher studies etc. That is how you have Pakistan born Indian Americans.
I know of a dozen cases from Hyderabad, Deccan.
Ananya wrote:but if that is the case why did not they take indian citizenship or would birth place would make a issue here and what is the year this occured between 50s and 70s
India: Whether a person who previously held Indian citizenship and is now a citizen of another country is eligible to re-acquire Indian citizenship, or is eligible to be registered as an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI); whether a foreign citizen charged with military desertion can re-acquire Indian citizenship or be registered as an OCI and enjoy the rights associated with this status
Re-acquiring Indian citizenship
Under Article 5.1.b of the Citizenship Act, "persons of Indian origin who are ordinarily resident in any country or place outside undivided India" are eligible to obtain citizenship (India 1955). "[O]utside undivided India" refers to citizens of countries other than Pakistan and Bangladesh (India 2003, Art. 3.ii). Article 5.3 states, however, that:
"[n]o person who has renounced, or has been deprived of, his Indian citizenship, or whose Indian citizenship has terminated, under this Act shall be registered as a citizen of India ... except by order of the Central Government." (ibid., Art. 5.1)
Article 9 of India's Citizenship Act (Nº 57 of 1955) states that, upon acquiring the citizenship of another country, Indian nationals lose their Indian citizenship (India 1955; see also US Mar. 2001, 94).
Days have changed. Now it is Hyderabad, Telengana.I know of a dozen cases from Hyderabad, Deccan.
After quietly preparing for several months, the Centre has finally launched its biggest ever offensive against the Maoists. Authoritative sources told DNA that as of now the operation will be limited to Chhattisgarh and Maharashtra. Senior officials said more aggressive and better coordinated operations will start in Jharkhand and Orissa, but that will take time.
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_bi ... te_1324838Senior officials revealed that the original plan was to simultaneously start the operations in four worst-affected states -- Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Orissa -- but it was altered because of the on-going assembly elections in Jharkhand.
Joint team combs Kaimur forest area to arrest top Naxal leader in Uttar Pradesh
A joint team of the Central Reserve Police Force, Provincial Armed Constabulary and anti-Naxal (Left Wing Extremism) unit of Police began combing operations in Kaimur forest around Kon area in the Sonbhadra District on December 16 following a tip-off that the 'sub-zonal commander' of the Naxals, Munna Vishwakarma, was hiding in the area. The State Government had earlier announced a reward of INR 50,000 for Vishwakarma's capture. According to the Police, Vishwakarma, who is in-charge of Naxal's operations in the tri-junction of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Jharkhand, was injured in the firing with a rival Naxal group led by Ram Vriksha Kol on November 9 and was hiding in the Kaimur forest. It is to be mentioned that Kol was killed in the firing incident. After the incident, Vishwakarma had sneaked into Rohtas District in Bihar where he received medical treatment at a private hospital. Nearly a week ago, he had returned to his hideout in the forest. According to the information with the Police, the Naxal leader has not fully recovered and can't move freely. "The Police force deployed in the area is getting inputs and we are trying to catch Munna Vishwakarma," said Superintendent of Police of Sonbhadra Preetinder Singh.
Meanwhile, Songanga Vindhyachal Committee (SVC), a group affiliated to the People's War Group, confirmed that Vishwakarma was injured but was not currently in Uttar Pradesh. Jamuna, the secretary of the group, said that contrary to the reports, Vishwakarma had not attacked Kol. Instead, a member of a group from Varanasi who had joined Kol about nine months ago had fired indiscriminately in which Kol was killed. "The assailant had attacked both Vishwakarma and Kol after he was quizzed about a levy amount of INR 1 lakh, which he had not handed over to either of them," said Jamuna.
Anti Naxal Force launches combing operation in Karnataka
The Anti-Naxal Force (ANF) has launched combing operations against the Naxals (Left Wing Extremism) holed up in the thick forests of the Western Ghats spread across Udupi, Chikmagalur and Shimoga Districts, reports Manglorean.com. According to Police sources, the operation, which will last for three days have been taken up jointly by the state Reserve Police, ANF and the civil Policemen. The teams have been provided with Global Positioning System to keep track of each other after they fan out.
ULFA + NE-axis: Nothing new, butBullet for bullet against Naxals, says Maharashtra Chief Minister Ashok Chavan
"It'll be bullet for a bullet in our fight against Maoists...We will not spare any Naxal in Vidarbha. They have already killed 52 police jawans this year and it is high time we take a firm stand," said Chief Minister Ashok Chavan on December 16, according to Times of India. Chavan said there was a rise in Naxal (left wing extremist) migration from other states to Maharashtra. "We cannot have any sympathy for them nor can we wait for them to surrender. So many lives have been lost. We will henceforth be more aggressive," he stated, adding, "Maoists from Nepal have infiltrated and provided firearms and logistics support to Naxals hiding in our jungles. We are, therefore, expediting the process of strengthening our police machinery in Gadchiroli and other Naxal affected areas, and providing more funds for modern weaponry, helicopters and equipment." The State Home Minister R. R. Patil, had on December 14, announced various measures being taken by Government to tackle the Naxal menace.
However, he had harped on the surrender policy for Naxals and the need for development in the region. The CM has, however, taken an aggressive stand on the issue. Chavan said that the government was also encouraging IAS and IPS officers to take up posting is these areas. "I often see officers reluctant to take up such postings. But we are now giving them incentives to serve Naxal-hit areas," he stated.
AGP stages protest rally in DelhiULFA got money from political parties
The United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) received “benefits” from political parties mostly in forms of money, particularly during every subsequent elections. This revelation came during questioning of the arrested leaders of the ULFA, highly placed security sources said. Sources told The Assam Tribune that the ULFA leaders, including the chairman of the outfit Arabinda Rajkhowa, did not divulge the name of any political leader who paid money to the outfit. {which may mean, hold on, we are arresting them. may be, a big may be}
Sources said that the ULFA was involved in selling arms and ammunition to different militant groups of the region including ATTF, NLFT, KLNLF etc as over the years, the outfit managed to establish very good contacts with the clandestine arms dealers of South East Asian countries, while, the outfit also received Programmable Time Device (PTD) Switches from Pakistan. {note, it was received, not bought} The outfit still has a good stock of PTD switches and the potential to trigger off explosions. However, seizures of a large number of weapons of the ULFA in 2004 and 2007 in Bangladesh severely affected the outfit, sorces added.
Sources said that the relation between ULFA and the NSCN (I-M) was never very cordial because of various reasons and one of the main reasons is the demand of the Naga militant outfit for creation of Greater Nagalim , which includes areas of seven districts of Assam. The close ties between the ULFA and NSCN (K) is the other major reason for the differences between the ULFA and NSCN (I-M). Though both the outfits refrained from attacking each other, the relations were never very comfortable and the fact was admitted by the arrested leaders of the ULFA.
Though the ULFA leaders were forced to keep mum on the problem of infiltration of Bangladeshi nationals to Assam as they were taking shelter in that country, the top leaders including Rajkhowa were not supportive of infiltration. Interestingly, it is a established fact that the ULFA leaders had close contacts in Bangladesh in political and official levels, they are yet to disclose the names of their contacts during questioning.
http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/det ... c1809/at06Presenting an united face, Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) today staged a sit-in-demonstration highlighting six issues including unconditional political dialogue with ULFA{and these oiseaules were ousted only recently} and other insurgent groups. The protest rally was joined by most of the senior leaders of the regional party including MLAs and MPs. However AGP’s ally the BJP kept away from the rally, indicating the widening rift between the two allies.
The party big wigs who joined the demonstration was president and State Opposition leader, Chandra Mohan Patowary, former Chief Minister Prafulla Kumar Mahanta, Atul Bora, Biren Baishya, Kumar Deepak Das, Keshab Mahanta, Nurul Hussain and Biraj Sarma, amongst others.
The party’s six-point charter of demands included implementation of Assam Accord, inclusion of the six communities in the Scheduled Tribe List, immediate halt to constriction work on mega dam projects in neighbouring Arunachal Pradesh and permanent resolution of the inter-State boundary problem. The AGP delegation is calling on the President tomorrow to submit a memorandum high-lighting Assam government’s failure.
http://www.assamtribune.com/scripts/det ... c1809/at09Due to high security risk, ULFA ‘chairman’ Arabinda Rajkhowa, deputy ‘commander-in-chief’ Raju Baruah and ‘sergeant’ Raja Borah were today produced before a make-shift camp court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup at the Guwahati Central Jail where the court remanded the trio to another nine days of Assam Police custody in connection with three blasts cases No 1/2009 of Guwahati registered on January 1. Though the police sought 14 days of custody in each of the three cases registered under the city’s Bharalumukh, Bhangagarh and Paltan Bazar police stations, after they were shown arrested in connection with these three cases, the court, however, granted only three days’ custody in each of the three cases making it a total of nine days’ police custody. The January 1 blasts registered under the three police stations killed five persons besides injuring scores of others.
“The fresh custody was granted in the three blasts cases after the Robin Phukan court rejected the plea of the Assam Police which sought another 10 days police custody against Special Operation Unit (SOU) case no 2/98 in connection with which the trio had already undergone 12 days’ police remand,” advocate Bijon Mahajan and Arshad Choudhury, who appeared for the arrested rebel leaders, told media persons. It needs mention here that two other senior ULFA leaders Sasha Choudhury and Chitraban Hazarika, who are now in judicial custody, were also remanded to police custody in the three blasts cases after the expiry of the custody granted in connection with SOU case 2/98.
Meanwhile, though the production warrant of Raja Borah was also submitted by Joypur police in connection with another case reported in 2005, where Raja is an accused, the court, however, kept its decision in abeyance.
The decision on this is likely to be given after the expiry of the remand period granted in connection with the blasts cases. All the three rebel leaders were earlier brought to the Central jail premises around 2:40 in the afternoon from the Special Branch headquarters in a red Bolero car under strict security vigil and even media persons were barred from taking close view of the ULFA leaders. Family members, including ULFA chairman’s brother Ajoy Rajkonwar, his sister Chandrama Rajkumari and Raju Baruah’s brother Jiten Kalita and brother-in-law Sarat Kalita also were present in the jail premises where they were allowed to meet their relatives for a brief period.
Earlier, citing security reasons, Assam Police had sought permission from the chief secretary for facilitating the production of trio before the camp court. {at least this one has changed, so lets be happy}
http://telegraphindia.com/1091217/jsp/n ... 874500.jspThe Unified Command will meet on December 21 to “seriously consider” reciprocating the unilateral ceasefire offer of the anti-talks Karbi outfit, the Karbi Longri National Liberation Front, and review the developments since the arrest of Ulfa chairman Arabinda Rajkhowa and deputy commander-in-chief Raju Barua.
The Unified Command is a three-tier security structure which plans and executes counter-insurgency operations in Assam. The meeting assumes significance because this will be the first meeting of the group, headed by chief secretary P.C. Sharma, since the formal arrest of the top Ulfa duo on December 5.
Highly placed sources said the KLNLF’s peaceful conduct has swayed Dispur to consider its offer for a dialogue to resolve their demands that included one for a separate homeland. “Backroom parleys are on between the outfit and sleuths of the special branch for giving up arms like DHD (J). The sleuths’ report will be discussed and debated at the command meeting. Based on the outcome, a recommendation will be made to Dispur which will, in consultation with the Centre, take the final call,” the source said.
The KLNLF had been in on-and-off ceasefire since January 1. It had declared a three-month “total” ceasefire in November after threatening to target Hindi-speaking people (and withdrawing the threat). It had also refrained from indulging in violence during the ongoing twin hill districts bandh in support of the statehood demand, besides not disrupting polling during the last Lok Sabha elections.
On April 6, Dispur had indicated before the polls that the outfit was in peace mode and that a channel of dialogue had been opened with the group. The KLNLF, a splinter group of the UPDS, Ulfa and the two NSCN factions, are among the groups active in Karbi Anglong. It is understood that P.C. Haldar, the Centre’s interlocutor for peace talks with both factions of the DHD, the pro-talks NDFB and the UPDS, has taken “stock” of the KLNLF’s position from the UPDS leaders and Dispur during his last visit to the state in the first week of December.
Besides the KLNLF, the Unified Command will chalk out a strategy to ensure that Ulfa does not strike following the arrest of four top leaders. The caution is understandable because chief minister Tarun Gogoi made it clear after his meeting with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and home minister P. Chidambaram this week that he was all for talks with Ulfa if it abjured violence and dropped the demand for sovereignty. “Since the situation is fluid, the Unified Command, which has played a key role in sustaining pressure on the various outfits to come overground, will take a fresh look at the security scenario and plan appropriate response. There will be no lowering of guard either against Ulfa or the anti-talks NDFB,” a source said. Among the priorities will be ensuring redeployment of existing security personnel in high-risk areas from low-risk areas and intensifying intelligence gathering. After the ceasefire with DHD (J), there has to be a new assessment.
http://www.morungexpress.com/regional/39800.htmlAtleast four persons were summoned on Wednesday by P.G Agarwal Inquiry Commission of July 23 Imphal shoot-out to appear on the next hearing of the Commission , scheduled for January 4, next year. The summons issued by the Inquiry Commission included the two journalists, Teressa Rehman and Soma Chowdhury of Tehelka, a New Delhi based weekly magazine which carried the series of pictures of the July 23 incident of Imphal where Chongtham Sanjit and Th. Rabina were killed and had proved to be a fake encounter. The other two were Babulal Saini, and Kaluram Saini of Sana Pukei Restaurant, B.T Road. Both are sons of (L) Ramlal Saini.
It is worth noting that Teressa Rehman and Soma Choudhury were being summoned to appear before the Commission on Wednesday. However, the two journalists did not turn up reportedly owing to the security reasons.
The statement of Judge Agarwal Commission of Inquiry stated that a letter had been received from Tarun J. Tejpal, editor, Tehelka informing that the two journalists of the Delhi based magazine were ready to cooperate with the Commission. However, they ‘apprehend/ arrest/ harassment’ by the police. It also indicated that the expenses for the two witnesses for their travel were to be tendered in advance.![]()
However, it was assured in the statement of the Inquiry Commission that necessary protection would be provided to the two journalists of Tehelka magazine and there was no question of their arrest for their attendance before the Commission. It also informed that the expenses for their travel, boarding and lodging would be paid by the Inquiry Commission to the witnesses on their appearance. The two witnesses were also asked to bring two copies of the journal and photographs published in the Tehelka magazine and therefore produce before the Commission in the statement issued by the Judge Justice Agarwal Commission of Inquiry.
paramu wrote:I think people are missing another crowd. What about people who were born in present day Pakistan before partition (like LKA), came to India after partition, and then moved to US. But I would suggest such people to apply for OCI/PIO cards instead of regular visa.
Days have changed. Now it is Hyderabad, Telengana.I know of a dozen cases from Hyderabad, Deccan.
. . . The firebrand leader said the prosecutor, who appeared in the high court on behalf of the state government, had used communal statements while arguing against Sufiya's anticipatory bail plea. Madani said that the government and its prosecutor had insulted "a pious Muslim woman". {Madani is clearly inciting Muslim anger sounding simultaneously to be respectful of judiciary}
Mahdani can whine like a bitch-in-heat. Mahdani himself has a chance of getting interrogated by the National Investigation Agency. Karnataka Police and NIA is also planning to get a production warrant issues, which allows them to take Sufiya into their custody and interrogate. MathrubhumiSSridhar wrote:insulted "a pious Muslim woman".
I once had a colleague who comes from the same place as Madhani/Sufiya who objected to affixing a photograph of his wife in the passport. His claim was that his religion forbade him from taking photographs or uncovering the face of a woman to strangers. The passport officers asked him to **** off.Sachin wrote:BTW, Sufiya Mahdani also came up with a ridiculous excuse that as per Cr.PC women in Purdah cannot be arrested. This is reported in today's Mathrubhumi. AFAIK, Cr.PC has a clause which says when the police wishes to search a place, where women generally do not come out in the open (for eg: Purdah) the police is supposed to give due warning and time for these women to vacate the place.
Women in Purdah cannot be arrested, but then they can run terror networks and plan for bus-burnings.
* A Tamil Nadu State Road Transport Corporation (TNSRTC) bus bound for Salem from Ernakulam was set ablaze at Kalamassery on September 9, 2005.
* Soofiya’s role came to light when an accused in the case Majeed Parambayi was arrested and interrogated.
* A chargesheet was filed before the Aluva Judicial First Class Magistrate Court on February 19, 2009.
* Police conducts reinvestigation on the role of Soofiya Madhani in the case after the Aluva Judicial First Class Magistrate Court orders reinvestigation on April 1, 2009 based on a petition filed by one P D Joseph.
* The police team led by Assistant Commissioner P M Varghese quizzes Soofiya for conspiracy and abetting the accused in the case.
* The mobile phone call details of Soofiya Madhani reveals that the accused in the Kalamassery bus burning case had contacted Soofiya on her mobile phone immediately before and after the incident.
* Abdul Rahim, who was killed during an encounter with the security forces in Jammu & Kashmir, had contacted Soofiya Madhani over phone. Abdul Rahim was the fourth accused in the Kalamassery bus burning case.
* Police reveal more evidence showing that the calls were made between the number used by Soofiya Madhani and another number 93885 23425 i n the name of Majeed Parambayi of Koothuparambu, the fifth accused in the Kalamassery case.
* Majeed had called Soofiya several times on the previous day of the incident.
* Nine minutes after the bus burning incident, Sabir, the second accused in the case, had called Soofiya on her mobile phone. It has been found that Sabir called Sufiya from his number 94477 39872.
* Police claimed that the accused had stayed in Sufiya Madhani’s residence from September 7 to 9, 2005 just before the bus burning incident which took place on September 9.
* Kerala police have confirmed the participation of LeT operative Thadiyantavide Nazeer in the incident after another accused Muhammed Nawas alias Kanju Nawas, 28, was arrested from Kannur.
* The final list of the accused was redrafted with Thadiyantavide Nazeer topping it. The other accused included Halim, Kanju, Bomb Ismail, Sabir Buhari, Tajudeen, Vedimara Anoop and Shafeeq.
* Thadiyantavide Nazeer gets caught in Bangladesh.
* Police summon Soofiya for questioning on December 10, 2009. But she fails to turn up and files an anticipatory bail application before the Kerala High Court.
* Police file a report before the Aluva Judicial First Class Magistrate Court including Soofiya as the tenth accused on December 11, 2009.
* Kerala High Court dismisses her anticipatory bail plea. Police arrest Soofiya from her residence at Kaloor on December 17.
When considering the cases from Kerala, we also must take due note of the age of the people accused of VISA violation. In a majority of cases, the people accused of over-staying their VISA are old-aged people. Right from 1930s and 40s poor people from Mallu land have migrated to various parts of India. They were illiterate people who did not know what was happening around them. Many of them up had taken menial jobs in Lahore (helpers at hotel for example) and other border-towns, and at that time they never knew that after August 15th, India and Pakistan are two different countries and about the new processes in place (VISA, passport etc.)chetak wrote:Cases highlighted now are mostly from Kerala.
One possibility:Stan_Savljevic wrote:The intellectuals strike again![]()
New visa rules ‘will hit’ Indian-Americans
http://beta.thehindu.com/news/internati ... e66342.ece
Where these 1000s of paki-land born Indian amrikans come from, perhaps only the intellectuals can esplain poor sdres with a pea-sized brain like moi.
http://www.hindu.com/2009/12/19/stories ... 520100.htmThe State had not filed any appeal against the acquittal of some of the accused nor for enhancement of sentence for others. Revision petitions had been filed by some witnesses against the acquittal and for enhancement of sentence.
Assam Rifles goes on ‘build Manipur’ driveThe Khasi militant outfit, HNLC, went ahead with the 24-hour bandh, which began today at 6pm, despite Union home minister P. Chidambaram cancelling his visit to Meghalaya.
Maj Gen Sandeep Singh, “Vishisht Seva Medal” has assumed command as the Inspector General Assam Rifles (North) from his predecessor Maj Gen JP Nehra, “Ati Vishisht Seva Medal”. A press note received here stated that Maj Gen Sandeep Singh has a history of “a rich and illustrious military career with a varied experience of serving in counter insurgency and high altitude areas during his military service spanning over almost 33 years”. During his service the General held various command and staff appointments both home and abroad.
Bhutan denies existence of ULFA camps on its soil‘AFSPA will not be repealed’
New Delhi, December 18 (Agencies): Defence Minister AK Antony Friday stated categorically that the armed forces require special powers to counter terrorism and insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir and the Northeast. “As long as their (armed forces) presence is necessary, they need special provisions. They cannot function without special powers,” Antony told reporters here. “If we see, the situation has improved in Jammu and Kashmir and the northeast,” he added. There have been demands from several quarters, including Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) on grounds that it was leading to gross violation of human rights.
http://www.morungexpress.com/regional/39962.htmlBhutan on Thursday denied the existence of any United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA) terror camp on its soil and promised to take necessary action if any such information was passed on by the Indian government. “I’ve no information that any such ULFA terror elements exist in Bhutan. There is no member of ULFA in our country,” Bhutanese Foreign Minister Lyonto Ugyen Tshering told reporters after inaugurating a new consulate office in Kolkata.
He said if the Bhutan government was intimated about the presence of any such camps, it would take necessary action. “We’ve our regular set up ready to deal with that,” the minister added. Talking about the ongoing Gorkhaland agitation, Tshering hoped that the problems in Darjeeling arising out of the Gorkha Janamukti Morcha (GJM)’s agitation for a separate Gorkhaland would be solved through a “political mechanism”.
“I am very fond of Darjeeling. I hope that the problem of Darjeeling will be resolved through a political mechanism. I think they would find out some solution to resolve the issue,” he said. The three sub-division of Darjeeling district - Darjeeling, Kurseyong and Kalimpong - in northern West Bengal have been on the boil for quite some time following the demand for a separate state of Gorkhaland. Tshering also said India and Bhutan shared a congenial relation and the friendship would deepen in the coming days. “India and Bhutan will continue to work together in future keeping in mind the interests of both the nations,” he said.
Good news...the Ul-Umma gang who are acquitted ( and are barely in their 30s and 40s) can now "peacefully" plan for next round of strikes and can even try and send some Tamilians to J&K ( why should only Mallus do it?)CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Friday has confirmed an order of the lower court acquitting PDP leader A.N.Maudhany in the case relating to serial blasts in Coimbatore on February 14, 1998.
A Division Bench consisting of Justices Prabha Sridevan and M.Sathyanarayanan also dismissed a revision petition seeking to enhance the life sentence awarded to the Al-Umma (since banned) leader, S.A.Basha, to one of death sentence.
The High Court confirmed the life sentence on Md.Ansari alias Ansari and 17 others while it acquitted Basith alias Md.Basith and 21 others who were sentenced to life imprisonment by the lower court.
Quite true. But, the point here is why should we put a billion plus Indians at risk because of some inconvenience to a few thousand unfortunate Pakistan born Indian Americans ? Obviously, we will never have a law, rule or procedure that is going to be entirely satisfactory to everyone. In the ultimate cost-benefit analysis, can these few thousands tilt the balance?Rudradev wrote: So maybe these are the "1000s of Paki-land born Indian-Americans" being referred to here.
No, of course notSSridhar wrote:Quite true. But, the point here is why should we put a billion plus Indians at risk because of some inconvenience to a few thousand unfortunate Pakistan born Indian Americans ? Obviously, we will never have a law, rule or procedure that is going to be entirely satisfactory to everyone. In the ultimate cost-benefit analysis, can these few thousands tilt the balance?Rudradev wrote: So maybe these are the "1000s of Paki-land born Indian-Americans" being referred to here.
Soon after Partition some IM went to TSP and found out its true nature and returned to India. Now while there they had children whom they brought back to India. Those childrne grew up and went to US for higher studies etc. That is how you have Pakistan born Indian Americans.
I know of a dozen cases from Hyderabad, Deccan.
A few years ago when Abdul Nasser Madani, leader of People’s Democratic Party in Kerala, announced that he had no links with anyone in Andhra Pradesh, particularly Hyderabad, Intelligence agencies wondered why Madani was insisting on it.
But when information trickled in that Abdul Sattar alias Sainuddin, an alleged militant having links with Lashkar-e- Toiba and closely associated with most wanted militant Riyaz Bhatkal of Indian Mujahideen (IM) reportedly visited Madani several times, even while he was in jail in connection with the February 14, 1998, serial blasts in Coimbatore, it has clearly established Madani’s links with Hyderabad.
`A few years ago, we had arrested a youth in Nalgonda district who was carrying Madani’s photograph in his wallet. It was surprising then to know that Madani had a fan following here too,’’ sources said.
SSridhar wrote:Quite true. But, the point here is why should we put a billion plus Indians at risk because of some inconvenience to a few thousand unfortunate Pakistan born Indian Americans ? Obviously, we will never have a law, rule or procedure that is going to be entirely satisfactory to everyone. In the ultimate cost-benefit analysis, can these few thousands tilt the balance?Rudradev wrote: So maybe these are the "1000s of Paki-land born Indian-Americans" being referred to here.
Let's recall the Coimbatore Serial Blast Case. It was a serial blast at 17 places in Coimbatore on Feb. 14, 1998 at 4 PM targetting Mr. L.K.Advani who came for canvassing votes. The blasts killed 58 people and injured over 200. The Special Court setup to investigate the case, in its judgement in 2007, awarded Life imprisonment for 44 people, awarded 64 others varying punishments ranging from 3 and 13 years and released 8 others including the notorious Madhani for lack of evidence. 14 out of the 64 had been released in September, 2009 by the DMK government on account of good behaviour. Out of the 44 given life imprisonment is S.A.Badsha of Al Umma (founded in 1993 in Tamilnadu after Babri Masjid demolition), the terrorist organization of which Imam Ali was such a committed and dreaded member. Imam Ali escaped from police custody when he was being taken in a van with armed escort. A gang waylaid the escort party, threw bombs, shot at policemen and escaped with him. Imam Ali had already escaped once but was quickly caught. When Imam Ali was finally killed in Bangalore in September 2002 and his body was brought to his home town, police was disallowed from coming anywhere near his locality by frenzied Muslim youths. There were very ugly scenes. In events leading up to the 1998 Coimbatore Serial Blasts, the Muslim youths in Coimbatore were harassing the police, forcibly dismantling their checkposts etc in Kottaimedu area of Coimbatore, a Muslim-predominant area slowly turning out to be a terrorist den and a 'no go' area for others. Thadiyan Nazir had been Imam Ali's chela. See my post here a week back. IIRC, there was an attempt to kill the police inspector who headed the special team that tracked Ali down and killed him and the inspector happens to be a Muslim as well. As a fugitive, Imam Ali lived for some time in Thiruvananthapuram and escaped TN police dragnet narrowly. For his part, Imam Ali was trained by Palani Baba who bombed the RSS office in Chennai in c. 1993 that killed 11 people. S.A. Basha was one of those arrested for that but was inexplicably released in 1996 when the DMK came to power. In the final judgement given in 2007 on the RSS Bomb Blast case, S.A.Basha was released for lack of evidence.Stan_Savljevic wrote:Maudhany’s acquittal upheld
Petition seeking enhancement of punishment of S.A. Basha dismissed
Life sentence on 18 others confirmedhttp://www.hindu.com/2009/12/19/stories ... 520100.htmThe State had not filed any appeal against the acquittal of some of the accused nor for enhancement of sentence for others. Revision petitions had been filed by some witnesses against the acquittal and for enhancement of sentence.
Delhi Court acquits suspected Hizb-e-Islami militant
PTI 19 December 2009, 05:30pm IST
NEW DELHI: A Delhi Court on Saturday acquitted a suspected Hizb-e-Islami militant on charges of carrying RDX four years ago. Additional Sessions Judge Madhu Jain absolved Nazir Ahmed Khan, 42, of various charges under the Explosive Substances Act.
Khan, a resident of Mendser in Jammu and Kashmir, was apprehended by Delhi Police's special cell on June 4, 2005 from Daryaganj on a tip off.
The police allegedly recovered 490 gram of RDX from his possession. The Court, however, in its judgement allowed a contention of defence counsel M S Khan that the police had failed to take mandatory sanction for prosecution of the accused from the competent authority (District Magistrate/Divisional Commissioner) under the Act.
According to the defence counsel, the mandatory sanction was a condition precedent of the trial but in this case the prosecution took the sanction from Commissioner of Police which was invalid.
The prosecution which later obtained fresh sanction from Divisional Commissioner, however, could not impress upon the court which acquitted the accused.
Judiciary just being truly independent.Avinash R wrote:Person found with RDX is let off on minor technicality;![]()
Hope the judge didnt order the police to return the RDX back to him.
Delhi Court acquits suspected Hizb-e-Islami militant
PTI 19 December 2009, 05:30pm IST
NEW DELHI: A Delhi Court on Saturday acquitted a suspected Hizb-e-Islami militant on charges of carrying RDX four years ago. Additional Sessions Judge Madhu Jain absolved Nazir Ahmed Khan, 42, of various charges under the Explosive Substances Act.
Khan, a resident of Mendser in Jammu and Kashmir, was apprehended by Delhi Police's special cell on June 4, 2005 from Daryaganj on a tip off.
The police allegedly recovered 490 gram of RDX from his possession. The Court, however, in its judgement allowed a contention of defence counsel M S Khan that the police had failed to take mandatory sanction for prosecution of the accused from the competent authority (District Magistrate/Divisional Commissioner) under the Act.
According to the defence counsel, the mandatory sanction was a condition precedent of the trial but in this case the prosecution took the sanction from Commissioner of Police which was invalid.
The prosecution which later obtained fresh sanction from Divisional Commissioner, however, could not impress upon the court which acquitted the accused.