

Could not have put it better.bart wrote:
Look at it this way, the more such incidents take place in Porkistan, the less resources they have to perpetrate such incidents in India, and they also reduce the value of Porkistan to the Anglo-Saxons as an anti-India tool. Since this Jihadi infrastructure is created and sustained by them, and passively supported/endorsed by most of their 'innocent' population, while ideally no innocent should die, I would rather their innocents die than ours. If it takes killing 10,000 innocents on their side to save one of ours I would still prefer the above.
It's also called reality TV, 24X7 with no commercial breaks.jamwal wrote:Seems like Pakis have invested heavily on high quality CCTV equipment.
You found Amar Singh? Call Zain "Mahdi" Hamid (pbuh) immediately.amdavadi wrote:One of the dude in that karachi video looks like kasab's long lost twin.
The army has a long history of strategic incompetence stretching back to the very first war the country fought with India in 1948. On that occasion, tribal militants from the regions now in open insurrection against Pakistan flooded into Indian-controlled Kashmir. After numerically overwhelming the Indian soldiers there, they promptly went on a binge of rape and looting while the army looked on.
Again at war with India, in 1965, the better-equipped Pakistan army lost more ground, and tanks, than its adversary. But perhaps the army's darkest moment was the 1971 war that lead to the creation of Bangladesh. That conflict saw Pakistan troops involved in widespread acts of extermination against the indigenous Bengali population of what was, at the time, known as East Pakistan.
The Hamoodur Rahman Commission held in Pakistan following that war found large swathes of the high command to be deeply negligent – the commander of Pakistani forces in East Pakistan, the report revealed, was involved in sexual misconduct even as his troops were killing, and being killed, on the battlefield.
In 1999, an ambitious Pakistani general by the name of Pervez Musharraf devised the tactically brilliant, but strategically near-suicidal, plan to invade Kargil, an Indian mountain post in Kashmir. That gamble nearly led to nuclear war, and almost certainly led to a military coup later that year.
How does one explain these failures? There can be no one explanation. But if there is an overriding message from these debacles, it is that the army is ill-equipped to defend the state because it has captured much of the bedrock of the state to which it is totally unaccountable.
The folks at timesonline need to get in touch with Zaid Zaman Hamid sahab for the proper explanation. They will realize that those were not really failures, but victories. They will also learn how Pakistan is going to be _the_ place to be in the next 20 years. Explosive growth, followed by lasting peace is in the offing.
Indian raw material can come to Pakistan, and Pakistani products can find in India, an eight-time bigger market.A new set of political relations can also develop from trade relations which may also help lead to the solution of the Kashmir issue. Some more helpful measures can be the visits of the parliamentarians of the two countries, politicians’ interaction with other country’s institutions and centres of public opinion; and the ties between the civil societies of the two countries. In a fast changing world and an age of information revolution, the two countries can offer their sources of knowledge for the benefit of each other. The writers and artists have been visiting each other, but not very smoothly. They can best represent the creative faculties of their societies and be their best ambassadors. Sending books and magazines across the border has become almost impossible, given the inflated cost of postage. The traffic of students and teachers is also negligible.
Hence, people on both sides are unaware of each other’s publications and research outputs of the universities. Unfortunately, we know each other very little. There are five or six centres of Pakistan studies in Indian universities, but in Pakistan there is none solely devoted to Indian studies. It means that we do not want to know much about a country which we regard as our adversary. {why would you? when you think you can get rid of them} The attitude needs change as all diplomatic as well as other socio-economic relations between nations in today’s world rely heavily on informed knowledge and intensive research.
With respect to improvement of Indo-Pak relations, the aspects which can pose a challenge in the future need to be examined. On top of the list is the environmental issue, affecting water and food resources. Environmentalists agree that the future conflicts in the world, particularly in South Asia, will be on the issue of water. If this is so, India and Pakistan need to start serious dialogue about water resources, before they reach a crisis point, and while doing so, they should keep in view the larger interest of human welfare, and rise above the narrow considerations often glossed with nationalistic verbiage.
Dr Farrukh Saleem in his article “India-Pakistan: military angle” (January 1) has made a very pragmatic observation that Pakistan cannot continue to race a race it cannot win. This is the issue our intelligentsia needs to consider seriously as an ever-increasing military budget is getting beyond the sustainable limits. The point is that a state does not ensure security by simply beefing up its military potential. War in the modern times is influenced by many factors, such as international security environment and the economic strength of the rivals. At the bilateral level both the adversaries escalate war to an extent that favourable conditions are created for diplomacy to take over.
Let us imagine that war breaks out between India and Pakistan. There are two possibilities for the initiation of war – either Pakistan initiates it to achieve Kashmir’s independence or India chooses to attack Pakistan after an escalation in the insurgency in Kashmir. The international security environment in our region does not suit the US and the western powers for a local conflict. Both the countries have nuclear arsenals which pose a serious threat to the world. Hence, no war can last more than two weeks as international pressure will force the two countries not to cross the nuclear threshold. To complement this Pakistan does not have enough stamina to go for a long war. As far as war aims are concerned, it is absolutely beyond logic to consider that Kashmir will ever be won through military might. Conversely, India has the capability to end the war at a favourable note, thus accruing political and diplomatic benefits. So going by this analysis and geographic compulsions, any future war between Pakistan and India will be short and will confine to 50 kilometres astride the borders.
Why should war be fought if it does not fulfil political aims? For the sake of security, we need defence forces which could deter the enemy. But we already have nuclear deterrence. Therefore, the existing defence structure is not in line with the reality — it is too cumbersome and extremely expensive. I support Farrukh Saleem’s viewpoint and suggest that Pakistan should be realistic and prudent in its conduct of external security. There is no doubt that war is too serious a business to be left to generals alone.
SwamyG wrote:Well it is one thing to wish and want the destruction of Pakistan as country; and so counting the dead in an actual battle or skirmish might be appropriate or natural. But wanting the number of dead, many of them innocent in such incidents, to go up is simply wrong.vavinash wrote:Number has increased to 75. Not bad count for a Friday but kaafir new year. Hope it reaches a century.
If I am not wrong, our soldier did anthim sanskar or arranged for last rites ceremonies of dead Pakistan soldiers; we come from that kind of country. So let us keep it that way.
Why don't individuals keep their humanity intact and not preach others to keep theirs? let us not try to force others to act in a way which we like to see. That's a mod's job.Jarita wrote: Hear! Hear! Please folks. Let us keep our humanity intact.
Question is can Zardari rally the secessionist forces in both proviences to create a new two nation theory and two new nations, North Pakistan and South Pakistan? I hope MEA is reading this thread and act on it! Granting autonomy to Sindh alone under the Indian constitution will go a long way to solve India's Pakistan problem!Satya_anveshi wrote:Now straight from horse's(Zardari) mouth about threats to him.
This man being "Sindhi Baloch" has now become central to both provinces of Sindh and Balochistan. Clearly, Pubjab vs Sindh- Baloch axis is being formed and taking more prominance than ever.
Anti-Baloch clique wants ‘my removal’: Zardari
Zardari is India's new man in Pindi. Pakistanians must get rid of him before the loose S&B. There is a rumor in inner circle of Delhi that He has already passed many Paki secrets in a secret deal to have political asylem in India .Satya_anveshi wrote:Now straight from horse's(Zardari) mouth about threats to him.
This man being "Sindhi Baloch" has now become central to both provinces of Sindh and Balochistan. Clearly, Pubjab vs Sindh- Baloch axis is being formed and taking more prominance than ever.
Anti-Baloch clique wants ‘my removal’: Zardari
The so-called Sindh Card has also come into play again, besides protestations to the contrary. On the eve of the Supreme Court decision on the NRO, there were orchestrated demonstrations in Sindh. Thankfully, Mr Zardari subsequently disowned the Sindh Card by paying lip service to the federation and chanting the slogan “Pakistan khappey” at the Naudero rally.
However, the Sindh home minister, Zulfiquar Mirza, thinks otherwise. He claimed on the eve of the rally that it was only on the advice of his party boss that in the immediate aftermath of the assassination of Ms Bhutto two years ago, he refrained from chanting the slogan “Pakistan na khappey.” The maverick Mirza, who is a personal friend of the president and husband of the speaker of the National Assembly, Fehmida Mirza, should have been sacked, on two counts. Firstly, by doing disservice to his party and Pakistan and secondly for failing to anticipate or take measures to prevent the immense loss of life and property in Karachi, which happened on his watch as home minister.
The death toll in Friday’s demonstration of the IED Mubarak variant of the IEDology of Pakistan has now climbed to 90:jamwal wrote:88 dispatched
Ah the Peacenik pragmatic Indo-Paki bhai-bhai Ayaz Amir. This is what he had to say on June' 99 about Kargil.Muppalla wrote:Here comes the support for Zardari.
Friday, January 01, 2010
Ayaz Amir
Zardari may deserve all the pejorative adjectives in the dictionary but has he committed any crime which comes close to the enormity of the disaster that was Kargil? That adventure was meant to seize advantage in Kashmir once again. It ended up exposing Pakistan to fierce international criticism and giving birth to the term cross-border terrorism, the stick with which Pakistan has been regularly beaten ever since. Are we calling for a national commission to investigate Kargil, as we should? No, we are into other things.
400% foresight on how glorious jeeehaard the fighting in Kargil would be. We should all listen to such a seer !!Setting aside the threat of war, it is instructive and not a little inspiring to consider the courage and skill of the fighters who are challenging the might of the Indian army and air force along the cruel heights of Drass and Kargil in Indian-held Kashmir. Risking a battle in which the chances of death outweigh those of remaining alive requires motivation of a high order. Whatever the Indian side may say, these fighters have a better right than most to call themselves mujahideen, those who fight in the way of Allah.
The spirit of jehad so magnificently exemplified by the fighters of Kargil and Drass is at odds with the nature of Pakistan's polity...This certainly does not mean that these causes are unjust. How can the liberation of Kashmir by force of arms be considered an unjust cause? But it does mean that if we are to sustain this policy it must become the common property not only of madrassa students, great as their contribution is, but of all Pakistanis, including those from the affluent classes. Why must only the poor go to Kargil? Why not others?
One guess (and it need not be politically correct). Just think of what constitutes as the opium for the hordes of believers on a fateful day like Friday in the land of the pure. Mix that potent cocktail of thought with high unemployment, desperation, hopelessness, aimlessness, orders from representatives of god, easy access to gasoline/kerosene and combined with perceived hurtfulness and fragile egos, and bang! You got a neat little ethnic riot on a typical porki street that you can set your watch to.arun wrote:I have always found it difficult to fathom why in an Islamic Republic, the Muslim weekly holy day of Friday seems to bring out in its Jihadi Islamic terrorist population a higher level of bloodlust.
There are two powers in the world; one is the sword and the other is the pen. There is a great competition and rivalry between the two. There is a third power stronger than both, that of the women.
Pak claims arrest of RAW agent from Balochistan
January 02, 2010 11:37 IST
Pakistani security officials have claimed arresting an agent of Indian intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing from Qila Saifullah district in Balochistan.
Officials said they apprehended the alleged RAW agent, Abdul Salam, during a raid on a refugee camp following an intelligence tip-off.
Salam is said to be an Afghan national.
"We believe he works for RAW. He entered Pakistan via Afghanistan and hid himself in a refugee camp," The Daily Times quoted an official as saying.
An official, who spoke on conditions of anonymity, said important documents and maps were also recovered from Salam's possession.
Source: ANI
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and Defence Minister Chaudhry Ahmad Mukhtar are trying to remove misunderstandings between the Army leadership and President Asif Ali Zardari, while, on the other hand, they are also ready to face any “extraordinary situation”.{So, the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces needs the PM's mediation between himself and his COAS !}
. . . Prime Minister Gilani will arrange a meeting between President Zardari and Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayaniin a few days.
According to close circles of the PM House, the PPP leadership has decided that if there will be any “extraordinary situation”, Gilani will come to the rescue President Zardari![]()
Prime Minister Gilani has decided to become the most lethal political weapon of Zardari if so needed.Now he wants to give an impression that he is not a part of any move to remove Zardari from the Presidency. He is working on both the options. He is trying to become a bridge between the Presidency and the Army and he is also ready to resign if need arises.
On another plan, President Zardari and Prime Minister Gilani have decided to take some bold political initiatives to dispel the impression that they were running their governments from bunkers.
The security agencies have recommended holding the cabinet meeting in Peshawar or Nathia Gali but PM Gilani and many federal ministers desperately want to hold the cabinet meeting in Swat. {All this bravado to dispel the impression that they were running their government from bunkers ? What an idea, Sirjee}
ANP leaders are of the opinion that if the military operation in Swat has been a great success then there should be no problem for the arrangement of a cabinet meeting in that area. {I love it. The ANP is joining with Ms. Farhat Taj in ridiculing the Army's fake operations, and very sarcastically too.}
“An army supported by 170 million people, with faith in Allah, is a formidable force to reckon with,” he said.
So much for the Fizzle-yaI have heard people particularly appreciating the precision of drone strikes. People say that when a drone would hover over the skies, they wouldn’t be disturbed and would carry on their usual business because they would be sure that it does not target the civilians, but the same people would run for shelter when a Pakistani jet would appear in the skies because of its indiscriminate firing.
So, it finally boils down to Allah to save the Paki @$$ despite all the Amirkhan and Taller than mountain weaponry.“An army supported by 170 million people, with faith in Allah, is a formidable force to reckon with,” he said.
And the boxers are now in karachi of all the places, imagine.....India sent its first sports team to Pakistan in more than a year on Thursday as a seven-member boxing team flew into Karachi to compete in an international tournament. The boxers are the first Indian sports team to cross the border since India stalled sporting links with Pakistan after the November 2008 attacks on Mumbai, which New Delhi blamed on militants based in Pakistan.