Agni 3 tested successfully

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
disha
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 8423
Joined: 03 Dec 2006 04:17
Location: gaganaviharin

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by disha »

shiv wrote:
Prem Kumar wrote: A simple way to look at this is the following - of you throw a ball up in the air vertically, it will always land on your hand. Both you and the ball are moving at the same horizontal speed at the time of launch.
Well someone please correct me if I am wrong.

An object thrown up from earth should keep moving in the same direction as earth unless something slows it down.The atmosphere too is moving among with the earth (otherwise we would have 1000 kmph plus winds at earth level). But I think the atmosphere does not "stick" that well to the earth's surface and rotates slower than earth if you go higher. So I suspect air resistance will inevitably kick in to slow down any object that is moving at the same velocity as the earth's surface. The deceleration should be higher flying eastwards and lower flying westwards.
At the same time air density thins considerably as altitude increases. 75% of atmosphere is within 11 Km of the surface (wikipedia), the karman line is at 100 Km altitude and the effect of atmosphere after that line is considered negligible. Agni III does not have fins, since most of the time it does not need it. This is different from small fins on Agni-I, II and fins on Prithvi. For the effect of earth's rotation on atmosphere check out Coriolis effect on the atmosphere.

Needless to say, all this "negligible effects" actually pile up and show up in CEP. That is why technologies like closed loop inertial guidance, ring laser gyros, flex nozzle etc have to come together in a compact form to field an effective missile Hence fielding such a missle is considered a technology feat. All fields of chemistry, physics, metallurgy, mathematics etc have to come together for such a system.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by Singha »

in the end phase, looking at the youtube video did anyone time the distance change
for 100km and work out the terminal RV speed? to me it seemed like 60km covered "on the ground" in 15secs. ..14400kmph....around Mach13...is this in ballpark of
known IRBMs?

readings on the web indicate ICBMs do Mach20-23. how high is their highest point
in a full distance shot?

the altitude drop seemed to be 1km/sec..but that just altitude not speed.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25382
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by SSridhar »

Industry soars with Agni-III
Agni-III has also created a staging platform for Agni-V, the very long range missile that the DRDO is now working on. It also creates the capability for space deployment of micro to mini satellites at short notice as well as a range of other capabilities, Mr {Avinash} Chander said.
vasu_ray
BRFite
Posts: 550
Joined: 30 Nov 2008 01:06

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by vasu_ray »

^^^
sat launch is in their calculus, good to know

the delta V at orbit injection time that is needed to maintain orbit is the reason a high altitude motor exists and incidentally the A-5 will be carrying a similar motor (3rd stage composite motor) so possibly can place a mil sat albeit with lower weight

its a good reason to go beyond A-5 so that we could quickly replace a mil sat should the enemy target one

it also corresponds to higher re entry speeds helping to counter ABMs
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60276
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by ramana »

Singha wrote:in the end phase, looking at the youtube video did anyone time the distance change
for 100km and work out the terminal RV speed? to me it seemed like 60km covered "on the ground" in 15secs. ..14400kmph....around Mach13...is this in ballpark of
known IRBMs?

readings on the web indicate ICBMs do Mach20-23. how high is their highest point
in a full distance shot?

the altitude drop seemed to be 1km/sec..but that just altitude not speed.

One of the news reports says ~4km/sec for the RV.

Any idea what weight satellite the AIII is capable of launching?
I hope its at least ~250kg.
Pratik_S
BRFite
Posts: 325
Joined: 11 Feb 2010 21:19
Location: In the Lion's Den
Contact:

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by Pratik_S »

So when are they testing the SLBM version of A3, more importantly can the Arihant class subs carry them ? Secondly the A3 weighs 50,000kgs so how are they going to make the A5 which will be even more heavy with is extra stage and canister road mobile ?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60276
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by ramana »

smpratik wrote:So when are they testing the SLBM version of A3, more importantly can the Arihant class subs carry them ? Secondly the A3 weighs 50,000kgs so how are they going to make the A5 which will be even more heavy with is extra stage and canister road mobile ?

Not this version of the sub. It was clearly stated that it will carry K-15 vehicles. So please read the Arihant threads in the archives.

The A5 weighs 1 tonne extra and is slightly more in length for that very reason to maximise use of exisiting infrastructure.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60276
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by ramana »

Raj Chengappa's summary article in India Today, 22 Feb 2010

The Long Ranger
Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17167
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: Skies over BRFATA
Contact:

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by Rahul M »

time to archive this thread ? or should we wait to see if the next frontline has a piece by TSS ?
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60276
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Agni 3 tested successfully

Post by ramana »

Lets wait a bit. Jaldi kya hain?
Post Reply