Telangana Monitor

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 23 Feb 2010 09:20

SandeepA wrote:District-wise Ranking by Per-capita from the Telugu link below
http://www.imageping.com/out.php/i66092_APranks.jpg

1 Hyderabad - Hyderabad city
2 Vishakhapatnam - Visakhapatnam city
3 Cuddapah
4 Ranga Reddy - Hyderabad city
5 Medak - Hyderabad city
6 Krishna - Vijayawada City
7 Khammam
8 West Godavari
9 East Godavari
10 Prakasam
11 Nellore
12 Nalgonda
13 Karimnagar
14 Guntur
15 Ananthapur
16 Kurnool
17 Adilabad
18 Chittor
19 Mahbubnagar
20 Warangal
21 Nizamabad
22 Vizianagaram
23 Srikakulam

KEY
TELANGANA districts - 10
COASTAL ANDHRA districts - 9
RAYALASEEMA districts - 4

This is the order around 1970 based on development Index. See the reference below as to how they calculated. (Vijayanagaram and RR districts were formed later so there are not here)

1 Krishna
2 Hyderabad
3 Guntur
4 East Godawari
5 West Godawari
6 Nellore
7 Kurnool
8 Vishakhapatnam
9 Cuddahpah
10 Chittoor
11 Anantapur
12 Nizamabad
13 Warrangal
14 Ongole
15 Srikakulam
16 Mehbub Nagar
17 Nalgonda
18 Karim Nagar
19 Khammam
20 Medak
21 Adilabad

Reference: http://66.201.66.231/cerpa/DistrictDeve ... ndices.pdf

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 23 Feb 2010 09:36

Can you put them side by side so one can see what went up and more importantly what went down?

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 23 Feb 2010 09:51

L Ram wrote:
Satya_anveshi wrote:The interior sections of Adilabad where Lambada and other adiwasi tribes still reside, there is little governance has reached. These tracks are still inaccessible, people don't have even clothes ( they resemble aborigins) - I have personally seen these type of areas in other neighbouring districts of Nizamabad and Karimnagar also. Can you name one area in the whole of coastal andhra / rayalaseema at that level of wrechedness?

BTW: I have lived and travelled in Rayalaseema ( just as much as I did in coastal andhra) too and I *know* they don't even come close.
Have you heard of the agency area of coastal andhra spaning from WG to Srikakulam This area is more than backward what the area u have mentioned.

Don't want to get into argument fallacies such as "open fly-torn shirt" (BR lingo), "worse begger than you" (logic applied in cases of castes want to join BC/SC/ST categories). But,

Chenchus and Yanadis in Nallamala range are not better off either. (Incidentally, yesterday's drug bust in Hyderabad highlighted that Tribal lands are exploited and heavily used for Ganja production.) So tribals being poor is across the board phenomenon and nothing unique to Telangana only.

* Chenchus claim to be descendants of Ugra Narasimha and Chenchu Lakshmi. As legend goes, to pacify angry and fierce Narasimha, Lakshmi is born into Chechu tribe and marries Narasimha when he wanders in Chechu lands to pacify him who then turns back to Vishnu. They are still very Hindu and very tribal

*Yanadis at Southern end sell forest plant medicines to town and village people. Unfortunately they are heavy targets of EJs.

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 23 Feb 2010 10:04

ramana wrote:Can you put them side by side so one can see what went up and more importantly what went down?

Ramana, the second one is not based on income alone but based on comprehensive development index.

Ignoring industrial side (so RR and Medak)

Cuddapah, Karimnagar, Khammam, Nalgonda seem to be successful districts (slided up)
Guntur, Chittoor, Kurnool, Vijayanagaram, Srikakulam seem to be loser districts. (slided down)

AjayKK · Post by **AjayKK** » 23 Feb 2010 13:14

vijayk wrote:They are there to serve the dynasty's interests rather than India's. We used to be the target of Shiv Sena in 70s in Bombay. Now we target our own in our capital. This is the tragedy. There is no end to it.

One must always find who gave the supari rather than being content with the ones who carries it out.

People blame TRS for Telangana fiasco, but not who feeds them? Which MPs stood outside parliament showing banners : Jai Telangana, Jai Congress. ?

Similarly, people blame the Senas but not their political friends who help them thrive

Why the Congress LOVES the Sena(s).

This may come as a surprise, but one of the points on the Congress-NCP’s wishlist is that the Shiv Sena remain at the helm of affairs at least in Mumbai and Thane.

What is helping them is the fear in the rest of Maharashtra that if the Sena is finished, the city that lays golden eggs will be taken over by people from UP and Bihar.

A few years ago, a senior Sena leader had confided in this correspondent that more than half the Congress and NCP leaders ‘tell us in private that they share the ideology of the Shiv Sena’.

It may have been just a claim, but it nevertheless makes one think if indeed there is a line that divides the Congress-NCP from the Sena.

A look at the origins of the Sena only magnifies the doubts.

The party, actually it was more of an organisation, was launched in 1966. It was allegedly nurtured by late CM Vasantrao Naik who feared that south Indians, who dominated the service sector then, would take over Mumbai.

Read complete edit.

Meanwhile from the Hindu

We are alive to situation over Telangana: Manmohan

NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Monday said the government understood the situation in Andhra Pradesh over the Telangana issue and would deal with the problem appropriately.

He conveyed this to a group of 11 Congress Lok Sabha members from Telangana who met him in Parliament House

joshvajohn · Post by **joshvajohn** » 23 Feb 2010 13:23

Three more suicides for Telangana
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 605234.cms

We are alive to situation over Telangana: Manmohan
http://www.hindu.com/2010/02/23/stories ... 261000.htm

Govt has not dropped statehood issue, Congress assures Telangana MPs
http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_go ... ps_1351281

RayC · Post by **RayC** » 23 Feb 2010 13:33

I believe the Telengana lawyers went on a rampage in Delhi. 250 arrested.

What's the problem? Aren't the all Telegus?

I understand the issue of Gorkhaland or Bodoland or Kamatipura and all that but why should Telegus want to separate from Telegus?

Rather insane, if I am permitted to say!

At the same time, I will say that I am not aware of the emotional and psychological aspect of the issue.

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 23 Feb 2010 20:00

Now some 1500 "lawyers" are visiting Delhi for agitation for Telangana. This made me remember in the year 1993 there was a demend from Costal Andhra that a High Court bench be given in Costal Andhra. It was felt that litigents are facing lot of problems for going to Hyderabad and most of the litigations are in fact from costal and rayalaseema and these two areas will be better served with HIgh Court benches. The courts were bandh for some 6 months period. There were relay hunger things etc. But the same was opposed by High Court advocates in Hyderabad that High Court can not be divided and openly telling their income will be redused drastically. That agitation failed. Even after that there is always some talk for asking for benches. Now the same Hyderabad advocates want a saparate state becaue most of the income now comming from Hyderabad and they do not want to share their income from advocates from other areas. Interesting thing.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 23 Feb 2010 21:48

Not only the High Court bench but some sessions of the Legislative Assembly have to be held in the three regions to provide a sense of belonging to the people. For folks in Srikakulam DT, Hyd is door ast.

L Ram · Post by **L Ram** » 25 Feb 2010 10:57

http://andhramania.com/andhramania_news ... flash_news

pls chk this link

RayC · Post by **RayC** » 25 Feb 2010 14:05

What the latest?

All quiet on the Southern Front?

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 25 Feb 2010 23:34

RayC wrote:What the latest?

All quiet on the Southern Front?

Sri Duggal of the SriKrishna committee is in Hyd collecting viewpoints. Meanwhile TRS and others are busy doing what they do best.
Sri Duggal was former MHA secy and knows his Internal Security and States issues very, very well. And importance of Andhra Pradesh to India.

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 28 Feb 2010 16:57

Now MIM people are saying that AP state should not be divided. Their logic is BJP will become strong on Telangana. So if one political party becomes strong in areas so that state can not be given. Soon some one else will so we will become weak so dont give a new state. Strange logic. In fact both naxals and BJp want Telangana because they thing they will become powerful in that new state. Congress wants to Kill TDP and Jagan with one bird so they will want Telangana CPM is afraid of Gurkhaland so it dones not want Telangana. Did any one really want anything for people ????

TRS in reality may not want Telangana at lease not so soon. There are romours all around how crores of rupees are being paid to KCR by this person and that person. Why any one want to kill the regular income.

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 01 Mar 2010 05:05

Cop out by PCC president. The way the committee is putting rules such as "party heads should give party's one opinion" looks like it is a committee to get TDP to commit on one side. Chindambaram already got earful of dual opinions from dual-sided parties so he is getting TDP commit to one opinion through the committee.

BJP's Venkaiah Naidu said committee was a farce. Telangana JAC boycotted it. Non-Telangana TDP doesn't believe it. KCR's son said it would ultimately give opinion of what Sonia will instruct them to give.

http://expressbuzz.com/edition/print.as ... rfU9ZcbfY=
Congress high command to present case
HYDERABAD: The Andhra Pradesh unit of the Congress today left it for the party high command to take a decision on presentation of its case before Srikrishna Committee on the Telangana issue.
``The committee has asked respective party chiefs to present their views on the State bifurcation issue. Since ours is a national party, either the AICC president or anyone authorised by Congress chief will reply to the Committee’s letter,’’’ PCC president D Srinivas said here.
In an informal chat with newsmen on the Assembly premises today, Srinivas, said, ``being a national party, our Central leaders would give the opinion to the committee.
Party president Sonia Gandhi would designate a person for this job.’’ He said that one of the party’s national leaders like Pranab Mukherjee, Veerappa Moily and Chidambaram might be entrusted the job.
It may be recalled that the Srikrishna Committee has asked the eight recognised political parties of the State to submit their opinions by March 22. According to the guidelines, a person designated by the party will submit the letter and this would be considered as party’s opinion.
In the case of Congress, the Central leadership would do the job through a designated leader and other national parties might follow the cue.
However, in case of regional parties like Telugu Desam, Praja Rajyam, Majlis-e-Itteahadul Muslimeen and Lok Satta, presidents or their representatives at the State-level have to submit the opinions.
However, the committee might not entertain the opinions of the leaders of the political parties from different regions. Regardless of the stipulations, regional leaders of the Telugu Desam and Congress have stated that they would give their opinions separately.

svinayak · Post by **svinayak** » 01 Mar 2010 06:02

Narayana Rao wrote:Now MIM people are saying that AP state should not be divided. Their logic is BJP will become strong on Telangana.

was about to recruit people from telengana for BJP and now this news

Muppalla · Post by **Muppalla** » 01 Mar 2010 07:33

ShyamSP wrote:Cop out by PCC president. The way the committee is putting rules such as "party heads should give party's one opinion" looks like it is a committee to get TDP to commit on one side. Chindambaram already got earful of dual opinions from dual-sided parties so he is getting TDP commit to one opinion through the committee.
...
...

Hmmm. It will be interesting to see the strategy of TDP.

Regarding MIM and BJP, I remember an article in DC just after re-alignment of constituencies. In Telangana including constituencies of Hyderabad, lowest percentage of Muslims in any given constituency is 15%. I don't know if that is true about that many muslims even if Khamam district.

MIM was alway opposed to Telangana state because of their fear of direct confrontation with Hindus. Their fear is that if a direct confrontation occurs, there will be no Naxal or other factors will be any priority and they are scared of a religious polarization. BJP's real reason for Telangana is also similar reason. Unlike in the neighbouring state of Karanata BJP did not nurture any social groupings (castes) in AP. They support base is mostly Takleef/erstwhile anger against Nizam and decendents.

However, in this round MIM supported Telangana just like anyone thinking that no one will give it in the end. MIM's fear is true as the pro-Telangana movement turned communal in Nizamabad and there were clashes.

Rony · Post by **Rony** » 01 Mar 2010 09:35

Foolish Telugu's are fighting among themselves while Asaduddin Owisi says Hyderabad belongs to Muslims .

When will our people learn from History ?

Listen to his commemts at 0.50

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKnR8RGl ... r_embedded

RamaY · Post by **RamaY** » 02 Mar 2010 08:25

Don't celebrate Holy in view of Student self-immolations - Prof. Kodandaram

T-JAC directs Telangana people to stay away from Holy celebrations in view of the students' self-immolations!

They did not have any such self-consciousness when it came to X-mas celebrations. They even cancelled their bandh on that day.

Really disgusting.

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 02 Mar 2010 09:18

He is a over ground naxal brother what do expect from such people.

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 02 Mar 2010 14:34

I wonder where is this Congress sinistry going with this new ruckus when they requested others to cool down after Sri Krishna committee was instituted. Congress might have done "Madhu Koda" on Botsa to make him pliant but I don't know much about the second minister Mopidevi.

http://newsofap.com/newsofap-7368-21-no ... sofap.html
Now another Andhra leader, Mopidevi, supports separate Telangana

After minister Botsa Satyanarayana, it is the turn of another Andhra minister to lend his support for separate Telangana. Minister for Technical Education and Law Mopidevi Venkata Ramana Rao has today said that he agrees with the demand for the separate Telangana. Mopidevi represents the Repalle constituency.

He said that the demand for the separate state of Telangana has valid reason and he completely agrees with the comments made by another minister Botsa Satyanarayana.

This comments by the minster comes as another shock for the Andhra leaders and people.

But an interesting point to note is that the Telangana Congress leader, D Srinivas is making statements which are considered to be anti Telangana, the Andhra leaders like Botsa and Mopidevi are making statements against United Andhra Pradesh.

One wonders whether it is a ploy by the Congress High Command to make the Telangana leaders to speak against Telangana and Andhra leaders to speak against United Andhra Pradesh.

Added later: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=merFWgPO_0Q
Looks like media added masala that Mopidevi supported separate Telengana. It is only Botsa who supported United AP earlier jumped to the other side.

skaranam · Post by **skaranam** » 02 Mar 2010 14:46

ShyamSP wrote:
One wonders whether it is a ploy by the Congress High Command to make the Telangana leaders to speak against Telangana and Andhra leaders to speak against United Andhra Pradesh.

We are going to have the by-elections for the seats vacated by TRS & BJP. They are making the Andhra leaders issue pro-telangana statements - further proof that only Congress can deliver Telangana. Coming to DS statements - not sure about them. Congress has indicated it will contest. If it contests, it should win them.

RayC · Post by **RayC** » 02 Mar 2010 14:50

skaranam wrote:
ShyamSP wrote:
One wonders whether it is a ploy by the Congress High Command to make the Telangana leaders to speak against Telangana and Andhra leaders to speak against United Andhra Pradesh.

We are going to have the by-elections for the seats vacated by TRS & BJP. They are making the Andhra leaders issue pro-telangana statements - further proof that only Congress can deliver Telangana. Coming to DS statements - not sure about them. Congress has indicated it will contest. If it contests, it should win them.

The elections will indicate how the wind blows!

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 02 Mar 2010 15:08

RayC wrote:
skaranam wrote:We are going to have the by-elections for the seats vacated by TRS & BJP. They are making the Andhra leaders issue pro-telangana statements - further proof that only Congress can deliver Telangana. Coming to DS statements - not sure about them. Congress has indicated it will contest. If it contests, it should win them.
The elections will indicate how the wind blows!

Unless TDP wants to contest and Congress cheats in voting, who ever resigned (TRS -10, BJP-1, TDP-1) will most likely win. By-election is waste of money.

SwamyG · Post by **SwamyG** » 03 Mar 2010 03:56

******deleted wrong thread **********

clumsy hands....

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 03 Mar 2010 06:12

ShyamSP wrote:I wonder where is this Congress sinistry going with this new ruckus when they requested others to cool down after Sri Krishna committee was instituted. Congress might have done "Madhu Koda" on Botsa to make him pliant but I don't know much about the second minister Mopidevi.

http://newsofap.com/newsofap-7368-21-no ... sofap.html
Now another Andhra leader, Mopidevi, supports separate Telangana

After minister Botsa Satyanarayana, it is the turn of another Andhra minister to lend his support for separate Telangana. Minister for Technical Education and Law Mopidevi Venkata Ramana Rao has today said that he agrees with the demand for the separate Telangana. Mopidevi represents the Repalle constituency.

He said that the demand for the separate state of Telangana has valid reason and he completely agrees with the comments made by another minister Botsa Satyanarayana.

This comments by the minster comes as another shock for the Andhra leaders and people.

But an interesting point to note is that the Telangana Congress leader, D Srinivas is making statements which are considered to be anti Telangana, the Andhra leaders like Botsa and Mopidevi are making statements against United Andhra Pradesh.

One wonders whether it is a ploy by the Congress High Command to make the Telangana leaders to speak against Telangana and Andhra leaders to speak against United Andhra Pradesh.

Added later: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=merFWgPO_0Q
Looks like media added masala that Mopidevi supported separate Telengana. It is only Botsa who supported United AP earlier jumped to the other side.

5 mantris back Botsa's plan to divide & rule

RamaY · Post by **RamaY** » 03 Mar 2010 08:51

^^^

One wonders whether it is a ploy by the Congress High Command to make the Telangana leaders to speak against Telangana and Andhra leaders to speak against United Andhra Pradesh.

And INC national leaders speak against India(n Interests).

"Yatha praja... tathaa raja"

skaranam · Post by **skaranam** » 03 Mar 2010 09:09

VinodTK wrote:
5 mantris back Botsa's plan to divide & rule

If this plan of Andhra ministers supporting the split is serious and is supported by the High Command, then some indication should have come for the Rayalaseema leaders (atleast anti-Jagan faction in Rayalaseema). No statements from TG Venkatesh or JC diwakar reddy....indicates it is a ploy...nothing more to it.

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 07 Mar 2010 13:18

what is the news other than advocates getting beaten up.

I wonder how some 1500 advocates at their own cost went all the way to Delhi to do all the ruskus and now doing all the agitations. Just like students (???) these people also some TRS workers bent of creating some incident. We find always there are efforts to increase the heat. In Jan when it was peaceful that MCA student died (HOw GOK) and again there were distrabences now again some more things are comming

Muppalla · Post by **Muppalla** » 07 Mar 2010 23:15

More tables here with comparisions between regions. Most of the statistics are being given excluding Hyderabad and Rangareddy districts too except for the agriculture stats. Obviously there in no agriculture in Hyd and there is no point in removing Hyd from the stats.

http://www.myteluguroots.com/tables.html

GDP details:

as per the author:

In the categories of total workers, government hospitals, primary health centers, livestock, factory employment, power consumption, roads, school and degree education Nizam region performs better.

In the categories of number of beds in the government hospitals, number of vehicles it falls behind.

In the categories of total agriculture output, and poultry Nizam Telangana is comparable to the other regions.

Per-capita income is a good gauge to assess the economic well-being of a region. When summarized by region, Kosta per-capita income is Rs. 28,133, Nizam Telangana is Rs. 26,528, and Rayalaseema is Rs. 20,804. When Hyderabad and Rangareddi districts are excluded from Nizam Telangana, per-capita income drops to Rs. 24,168.

Based on per-capita income, clearly Nizam Telangana is behind Coastal Andhra and ahead of Rayalaseema. However, this difference is not enough to justify the kind of wild and inflammatory exaggerations being made by the separatists to further their agenda of hate. The backwardness of the Nizam Telangana region can be partly attributed to the feudal rule under Nizam. If one were to look at the absolute growth, Nizam Telangana region has grown more than the other two regions, since the state formation.

But here is a more important observation. Separatists mislead their supporters claiming that “self-rule” will change the face of the Nizam Telangana region. Ironically, Rayalaseema, from where 7 of the 15 chief ministers of our state hailed from, continues to be the most backward of the three regions.

Muppalla · Post by **Muppalla** » 08 Mar 2010 00:46

Panel noncommittal on Telangana

“We are not here to initiate the formation of Telangana or to stop its formation. We will ascertain the views of all sections of the people and come to a judicious conclusion.
“It is not for us to satisfy anybody’s emotions. It is up to the Government of India to take a final decision on our report,” he said.

Justice Srikrishna said he could not as yet give his opinion whether the commission favoured bifurcation or a unified state. Nor could he suggest alternatives to protect Telangana’s interests or say if bifurcation was not feasible. “How can we say anything now,” he asked.

State within a State is a workable solution

It is possible to reconcile the sentiments and fulfil the aspirations of both Telangana and Andhra people by adopting the following measures for which a Constitutional framework exists, and to which suitable modifications / adaptations can be made: (i) Establishment of an Autonomous State of Telangana within the State of Andhra Pradesh.

Hyderabad, Mar 7 (PTI) Congress MPs from Telangana today said they will seek a "clarification" from the Prime Minister over his reported statement that consensus is needed for the formation of Telangana.

skaranam · Post by **skaranam** » 08 Mar 2010 07:15

TRS jittery after paper mill defeat

Political observers opine that the result, where Congress-backed Ale Narendera won, indicates that people are not viewing the TRS as the champion of the Telangana cause.
Senior TRS leader and former MLA Nayani Narasimha Reddy was not only defeated but also relegated to third place. The defeat assumes significance in view of the vigorous campaign by Kaveti Sammaiah, the local MLA who resigned his post along with other TRS MLAS for Telangana, in favour of the party’s candidate in the union poll.

Continuing on the State with in a State concept...more clarity
Statehood demands - Time to try the Assam model

The matters listed under the State List and Concurrent List of the Constitution of India were allocated as between the two assemblies. Under this allocation, as many as 61 out of 66 entries in the State List were either wholly or substantively placed in what came to be called the “Autonomous State List”. This list included such matters as agriculture and land, including rights in land. In addition, four matters from the Concurrent List were also made available for legislation by the autonomous state. A Concurrent List between the Autonomous State and the State of Assam was also drawn up. It was further provided that for several purposes, including those of the Finance Commission set up under Article 280 of the Constitution to recommend criteria for the distribution of revenues to and among states, references to states would include the autonomous state formed under ARMA, 69.

This is very interesting. Never knew about this.

VinodTK · Post by **VinodTK** » 10 Mar 2010 05:34

Student's "suicide" leads to tension

More Satyams in a new Telengana?

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 10 Mar 2010 07:40

Muppalla its the Ottomon Millat concept within India.

AjayKK · Post by **AjayKK** » 10 Mar 2010 12:08

Swaminathan S Anklesaria Aiyar visits AP, write article:

More Satyams in a new Telengana ?

Looks like he changed his earlier stand. If old hands like Aiyar influence or float government policies by their articles, this is a sign the gov. of the day does not seem to like the idea of the new state.

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 11 Mar 2010 19:33

I think Justice Krishna knows that there will be lot of noice around the committee and lot of information and submissions made to it will be useless and misleading. We find such indications from their statements. Hope they do a good job is clearing lot of matter once and for all.

vijayk · Post by **vijayk** » 11 Mar 2010 23:18

Narayana Rao wrote:I think Justice Krishna knows that there will be lot of noice around the committee and lot of information and submissions made to it will be useless and misleading. We find such indications from their statements. Hope they do a good job is clearing lot of matter once and for all.

Not so fast...

From the article ...

http://lite.epaper.timesofindia.com/mob ... ublabel=ET

The risk should not be exaggerated.Most businessmen who survived the Great Recession should be able to survive the separation of Telengana too.But some may collapse.Many politician-speculators will suffer too,and so are among the strongest opponents of division.However,division is inevitable : it is only a matter of time

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 12 Mar 2010 18:06

Nothing is certain. it all depends what Rajamatha and her kitchen cabinet decide. The sole considaration is how any steps will help to Prince in the PM (king) 's seat.

ShyamSP · Post by **ShyamSP** » 13 Mar 2010 07:57

Now JAC (Joint Action Committee) started by political parties recently splintered with Congress already left and TDP expelled today.
Only TRS (possibly BJP) is there in JAC.

T-panel ousts Telugu Desam
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/hyderaba ... -desam-551

skaranam · Post by **skaranam** » 13 Mar 2010 08:39

ShyamSP wrote:Now JAC (Joint Action Committee) started by political parties recently splintered with Congress already left and TDP expelled today.
Only TRS (possibly BJP) is there in JAC.

T-panel ousts Telugu Desam
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/hyderaba ... -desam-551

Is this a knee jerk reaction to CBN tour across AP? Do they see a dilution of T sentiment?

Yagnasri · Post by **Yagnasri** » 13 Mar 2010 09:38

I think reasonable people from all the sides are waiting for the out come of the SK committee. So there is some silence. But in the meanwhile CBN is making all kind of noices about other issues like price rise flood relief activities and things like that. TRS does not want any other agitation than T one. So there are attacks.

KCR in the meanwhile condemmed the encounters of Naxal leaders. This may or may not be serious mistake on his part. Can any gurus tell how Delhi may react to possible KCR and naxal overground unity which may become more formal ?