Thanks a ton. Found the info and wolfed it down!!!sivabala wrote:Google books says page 222 and 223sum wrote:....
Could you please point out the approx chapter number/page where Indian references come?


Posting the relevant excerpt for jingoes not having read the book. Enjoiee:
All i can say is wow..Probably the best place within the entire region to install a listening
post is the Indian city of Mumbai. It represents the kind of location where
the NSA would seek to establish a secret presence; it is also an example
of how many people may now be tapping into private phone calls and
e-mail worldwide. From a listening post in Mumbai, eavesdroppers could
listen to conversations between Europe and Asia, for example.
Mumbai contains the central switch for virtually all the cables in the
Middle East and much of Asia, including FLAG, FLAG Falcon, SEAME-
WE 3, and SEA-ME-WE 4. SEA-ME-WE 3 alone is the longest
system in the world at over twenty-four thousand miles—the distance
around the earth. It has thirty-nine landing points in thirty-three countries
on four continents, from Western Europe (including Germany, England,
and France) to the Far East (including China, Japan, and Singapore) and
Australia. Some of the cables connecting in Mumbai also have links to
Iran, Pakistan, and other countries of great interest to the NSA.
The Mumbai switch is owned by VSNL, part of the Indian government.
A few years ago the Indian NSA, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW),
proposed tapping into it, according to Major General V. K. Singh, a former
top official for RAW. “Sometime in 2000–2001,” Singh said, “someone
in RAW proposed that monitoring equipment should be installed at
the VSNL gateway in Mumbai. When I joined RAW in November 2000,
the project was still being discussed.” VSNL, he added, “agreed to provide
the facilities for installation of the interception equipment, but expressed
misgivings about the presence of RAW personnel and equipment
in its premises, which were frequently visited by foreign members of the
consortium [that owned the cables].”
To alleviate the company’s concern, RAW suggested that the company
buy and install the equipment themselves and then apply for reimbursement
from the intelligence agency. But while the company found the
arrangement agreeable, Singh himself was troubled. “I had felt uneasy
about the project right from the beginning,” he said. “It would have been
okay if we were going to intercept traffic going from or coming to India.
One could always justify this on the ground that we wanted to monitor
traffic related to terrorism . . . But the SMW 3 [Southeast Asia–MiddleEast–Western Europe cable] was also carrying traffic that had nothing to
do with India. What right did we have to monitor a call between a person
in Germany who was talking to someone in Japan? . . . I expressed my
misgivings several times . . . What we were planning to do was clearly
another form of illegal interception. In fact, it was worse because we
would not only be violating our own but also international laws. I was
surprised when I found that other people in RAW not only disagreed but
scoffed at my ideas.”
General Singh was relieved when VSNL became privatized and was
sold to the very large Indian company the Tata Group, thinking that the
new company would not want to get involved in illegally spying on its
customers. “But apparently this did not happen,” he said. Agreements
between the company and the government were signed. Singh left RAW
in 2004, and he does not know if it is continuing. “But the fact that it
was planned and approved raises many questions,” he said. “Intelligence
agencies need to be reminded, occasionally, that they are working not for
themselves but the country and its citizens, who must never be humiliated
by their actions.”![]()