shiv wrote:Methinks Kayani is the real "ringleader" who gave the go ahead for 26/11. Sometimes signs in history are difficult to read when the come decades apart (and besides I may be wrong) but just like some tribes used to have a tradition where a young man "comes of age" only after he has killed a bull or something, the Pakistani army has required an army chief to "prove his credentials" by initiating action against India. That gives him status and respect in the inner circles of Pakistan.
To go back over the last 40 odd years, Ayub Khan initiated the 1965 war. Yahya the 1971 war, Mushy started Kargil and Kayani signaled his "arrival" by ordering Mumbai. (Only Zia had Afghanistan to his credit, probably Khalistan as well) There is nothing happy about suffering a Mumbai like attack, but if my guess and timeline is true it means that over 40 years the Pakistanis army's action against India has moved completely from Pakarmy vs Indian armed forces to "non state actors" versus Indian armed forces to "non state actors" versus Indian civilians.
Right and wrong. Right on the generics and wrong on specifics.
the Pakistani army has required an army chief to "prove his credentials" by initiating action against India (That's right)
Not only in TSPA, but among the aam junta and all sorts of acronymns, ISI, TTP, LET, JEM which are nothing but one and the same people, a strong action against India gets respect, obedience and retirement goodies.
But 26/11 in it's conception was too small an operation to have been gone at Kayanee level or even ISI chief level. It was no different than Akshardham and in its expected results the parliament attack was way bigger.
26/11 success surprised the TSPA top brass as it shocked Indians and later TSP brass usurped it.
Kargil was a way bigger operation and Mushy got his 10 years due to it.
Kayanee I guess is still waiting for that golden chance to "prove his credentials".