Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): Apr. 11, 2010

archan · Post by **archan** » 12 May 2010 21:16

^^ Prem, don't challenge them, they might just run their tanks over Red Fort if they get too angry!

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 May 2010 21:26

By gawd, the hindoo bunniyaaz are implementing their plan to make pakistan pyasa and nanga.

But where is the bhookha part? I think that is yet to be implemented. Oh I remember, when the pakistanis were facing grain shortage and farmers in Indian punjab wanted to trade sugar and grains across the border, the bharatiya government prevented them from doing so.

So it is indeed a plan by RAW and hindoo bunniyaaz to make Pakistan, Bhookha, Nanga and Pyasa.

By gawd, we will fight a battle in panipat just for this. We will plant our flag on the red fort just for this.

PS: I love it how india denying them cotton sends the abduls onto the streets to further damage what little infrastructure pakistan has left.

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 12 May 2010 21:37

Rahul Shukla wrote:Cotton May Be New Dispute for India, Pakistan (Wall Street Journal)

And the Paki solution to unfair Indian ban on cotton exports (due to Indian shortage of cotton) leading to shortage of yarn in Pakistan is to......wait for it......wait for it.....Ban Pakistani export of yarn to other countries!!
http://tribune.com.pk/story/12255/texti ... -protests/

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 12 May 2010 21:41

Taliban kill 2 tribesmen in Northwest Pakistan (Hindustan Times)

The bodies of the tribesmen were dumped on Wednesday in Miranshah, the main town in North Waziristan Agency. A note attached to the bodies said "others should learn from the fate of American spies."

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 May 2010 21:44

Gagan wrote: PS: I love it how india denying them cotton sends the abduls onto the streets to further damage what little infrastructure pakistan has left.

Those who are rioting are actually Ahmadya kaffir pretending to be Pakuslims, if Paki want to be Ghazi then just shoot them.

Hiten · Post by **Hiten** » 12 May 2010 21:47

Portion from last Sunday's GPS where Fareed Zakaria discussed terrorism, pakistan & faizal shahzad

Terrorist haven Pakistan: How Pakistanis threaten world peace 01 of 02

Terrorist haven Pakistan: How Pakistanis threaten world peace 02 of 02

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 May 2010 21:49

Pakistan's bomb and Saudi ArabiaWestern intelligence officials believe that Pakistan has pledged to provide nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia in a Middle East crisis, but would Islamabad keep its end of the bargain?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/julian- ... audiarabia

achieving break-out capacity).

Putting it briefly: Turkey would not jeopardise the Nato umbrella by going nuclear unilaterally. Egypt has considered its options and decided it cannot afford to go nuclear and risk losing its annual US grant. The biggest worry is Saudi Arabia, which cannot rely on a US nuclear umbrella for reasons of domestic and regional politics. According to western intelligence sources (the meeting was under Chatham House rules so I am not allowed to be more specific) the Saudi monarchy paid for up to 60% of the Pakistani nuclear programme, and in return has the option to buy a small nuclear arsenal ('five to six warheads) off the shelf if things got tough in the neighbourhood.
There is a third partner in the relationship, the US, who might have something to say about it and the means to exert pressure to make sure it did not happen. Still, it remains one of the more likely dominoes to fall in a worst-case scenario.

Amber G. · Post by **Amber G.** » 12 May 2010 21:50

archan wrote:^^ Prem, don't challenge them, they might just run their tanks over Red Fort if they get too angry!

Yeah! or drive out Danish Amby from Pakistan ... (Some how I find the image below quite interesting)
clicky
Or at least get there IT/Photoshop experts to hoist a flag (wonder why they are so obsessed with it)
For example images like this

But seriously: The tank you see below is actually a Pakistani T-59 (Performing bhangra on it is by 23 Punjab Regiment .. Major Kuldip Singh Chandpuri with his back to camera)

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 12 May 2010 21:56

Gagan wrote:But where is the bhookha part? I think that is yet to be implemented.

Yindoostan will stop their paani which means no wheat/rice and no roti much less any naan. So then paa'stanis will eat up all the grass and the goats will starve so no kabab/biryani either.

Kayamat has an early appointment with Pakistan if the kufr yindoos succeed. Islam is in danger (as always)!

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 May 2010 22:03

Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Michael Scheuer: Pakistan must get a free pass on Shahzad
Despite Hillary Clinton’s rhetoric, Scheuer argues that we cannot levy any consequences on Pakistan, even if Shahzad trained there, because we need Pakistan more than they need us. He contends that they are fighting this war on our behalf and until we are ready to kill the enemies ourselves and quit apologizing for casualties, we can’t touch them.
http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2010/05/mich ... -free.html
Interesting part is the remarks by Americans .

Amber G. · Post by **Amber G.** » 12 May 2010 22:05

No Kidding...Simple search finds lot and lot ofg of Pakistani tanks all over India ... at Red Fort, Chittor (Rajastan), or even in Hydrabad..
Like this:
Patton Tank on Tank Bund .. Hyderabad.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 May 2010 22:05

Amber G. wrote: Yeah! or drive out Danish Amby from Pakistan ... (Some how I find the image below quite interesting)
clicky

Amber G. this image is not loading. Can you post one on imageshack and post a link here?

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 12 May 2010 22:13

Pakistan Inflation Rate Accelerates to 3-Month High (Business Week)

“If inflation stays above 13 percent until July, the central bank may consider increasing interest rates.”

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s government wants low borrowing costs low to revive consumer and investment demand, derailed by terrorist attacks that claimed 3,000 lives in 2009.

Mahendra · Post by **Mahendra** » 12 May 2010 22:32

Rahul Shukla wrote:Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani’s government wants low borrowing costs low to revive consumer and investment demand, derailed by terrorist attacks that claimed 3,000 lives in 2009.

[/quote]

Surely that figure must include deaths caused by Microbial Pacquistanis like E coli

kenop · Post by **kenop** » 12 May 2010 22:35

a_kumar wrote:
kenop wrote:The other aspect is that all of the activities/missions directed against Indian were traced to Pakjab and AK based groups (LeT, JeM).
AK based groups??

JeM operates from the area Pukistan calls Azad Kashmir

Carl_T · Post by **Carl_T** » 12 May 2010 22:46

Suppiah wrote:
Carl_T wrote:I don't disagree with you, but you're projecting Indian interests wrt TSP onto the US and implying that the US needs to deal harshly with TSP when it's really our responsibility to do so.

US coddling TSP isn't wimpy, as long as TSP attackers don't bomb Times Square etc. it is perfectly fine.
Unfortunately correct...but partly so if you consider 9/11 as an incident where TSPA-ISI had several fingers in the pie...if not directly indirectly...but then even CIA itself had a role to play in events that led to 9/11 so I guess that does not count...

For 9/11 many things from the CIA to Egypt and KSA had a role. I think as long as the LeT/JeM etc. do not attack the US, any policy that they take towards appeasing them with a few F-16s here and there is ok. Terrorist attacks in Kabul or Baghdad are routine, but attacks in NY mean Obama might join the unemployment rate.

IMVHO from the US perspective it makes perfect sense to actively support insurgent groups against potential strategic rivals, I think there can be two scenarios: instead of directing Jihad against the US, they should direct Jihad against some other nations. Or possibly another alternative is, in addition to material aid to insurgents, the US can indoctrinate their own political ideology via conversion/psyops in groups with the goal of building US-inspired/friendly regimes. I don't think the US thinks like that though, I feel they would rather prop up state actors as buffers rather than non-state ones, although it is hard to tell as it changes with every POTUS...

Samay · Post by **Samay** » 12 May 2010 23:12

“It’s a slap on the face of free trade in the global economy,” said Mohsin Ayub Mirza, a textile manufacturer in Karachi and chairman of the Pakistan Readymade Garments Manufacturers & Exporters Association.

This new web of political accusations like water,dams,raw,they are making around India to show as if it is the aggressor, may have profound effects if they are allowed to keep on lying thousand times for few years with the help of volunteers from western media.
It seems americans have started working with them along these lines after two decades,to entangle India on these political issues ..
but again pakis will get a slap on their own face .

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 12 May 2010 23:25

Two killed in NATO tanker blast in Pakistan (AFP)

CHAMAN, Pakistan — Two people were killed in Pakistan on Wednesday when a bomb exploded in a tanker carrying fuel for NATO troops in neighbouring Afghanistan, a military spokesman said.

Edited: Analysis of this news to be posted in the real Paki thread.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 May 2010 23:39

Samay wrote:This new web of political accusations like water,dams,raw,they are making around India to show as if it is the aggressor, may have profound effects if they are allowed to keep on lying thousand times for few years with the help of volunteers from western media.
It seems americans have started working with them along these lines after two decades,to entangle India on these political issues ..
but again pakis will get a slap on their own face .

I think the ground is being prepared to redirect the Jihad against India.

LET has already gotten in the bandwagon, mentioning water as core issue no. 1, then there is hyderabad deccan, and Junagadh to name a few for starters. There is that old aim of the pakistani flag over red fort thing. The other groups will sooner or later join in. The likes of ZZH are being used to indoctrinate the educated abduls into a hatred for India, because of fears that this generation of pakistanis does not hate india as much as the generation that saw the events of partition first hand. The current generation is more likely to be enamored by India and its success.

IOW they want to push India to the same status as Israel amongst the muslims and arabs in general.

The conventional thinking is that the Pakistani army is encouraging this for reasons of its own survival. What one needs to find out is if the 3.5 friends are playing a more direct role than merely keeping Pakistan alive. That being the case, the 3.5 will not allow Pakistan to fail, will allow it to keep N weapons to threaten India while it continues to sponsor terror attacks against India.

Also this leaves any GoI with little leeway. I wonder what a GoI faced with this understanding will do?
1. Create alternative channels of communication amongst Pakistani civilians. 'Aman Ki Asha' anyone?
2. Undertake steps to undermine the Pakistan Army's ascendent role within Pakistan.
3. Rapid economic development on the one hand and building a stake with the 3.5 on the other hand so that their actions can be tempered.

What do you all think?

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 May 2010 23:45

Is the Predator drone armed with stealth tech? Its shape certainly betrays a good level of stealth design. It probably has advanced RAM coating that the lizard would like to get its hands on.

The pakis would like to use this against india AND pass on the tech to the lizards.

Carl_T · Post by **Carl_T** » 12 May 2010 23:50

Gagan wrote:
IOW they want to push India to the same status as Israel amongst the muslims and arabs in general.

That is an interesting point. Why do you/anyone else feel it has not happened? Is it because there are no Arabs in question?

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 13 May 2010 00:01

There are historical connections between Indians and many ME/Muslim states - from Iran to the Saudis, to Syrians, Egypt & Indonesia. We are a continuing civilization with history & interaction that spans hundreds of years. Not a state created in 1940's in the name of religion.

The last time they tried something funny in OIC ignoring India's steadfast support to the Palestinians, India retaliated (under Rao garu) by upgrading relationship with Israel creating a definitive shift in India's foreign policy, defence acquisitions and trade. The Arab world is still reaping the fruits of that stupidity. I think that they would have learned a thing or two from that.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 13 May 2010 00:04

Not to mention Al Hind being mentioned by PUBH.

Note no Paki/Baki there.

svinayak · Post by **svinayak** » 13 May 2010 00:25

Anujan wrote:There are historical connections between Indians and many ME/Muslim states - from Iran to the Saudis, to Syrians, Egypt & Indonesia. We are a continuing civilization with history & interaction that spans hundreds of years. Not a state created in 1940's in the name of religion.

This is true. But after independence UK and western powers have made sure that India as a state has minimum relationship with other states. One example after 1955 KSA did not have much interaction with the Indian state until 2005. This is 50 years and no other state has faced this kind of situation.

Virupaksha · Post by **Virupaksha** » 13 May 2010 00:27

Carl_T wrote:
Gagan wrote:
IOW they want to push India to the same status as Israel amongst the muslims and arabs in general.
That is an interesting point. Why do you/anyone else feel it has not happened? Is it because there are no Arabs in question?

Carl_T,

right until 1960s, they were using Indian currency. You dont get closer than that, especially when seen in context of a piddly 10 year old euro

Rohit_K · Post by **Rohit_K** » 13 May 2010 00:42

Amber G. wrote:No Kidding...Simple search finds lot and lot ofg of Pakistani tanks all over India ... at Red Fort, Chittor (Rajastan), or even in Hydrabad..
Like this:
Patton Tank on Tank Bund .. Hyderabad.

Image of a Sherman tank that I took in Nagpur. It was captured in the Sialkot sector in 65.

Akshut · Post by **Akshut** » 13 May 2010 00:42

I hope it's OK to post this. Got something about the Paki arrested in Chile, from a forum. Not sure about it's authenticity.

Its a lie! He is my brother. He never wanted any US visa... He already had a US visa and visited the US before. He was a student there doing an internship.

Please pray fro him. By Allah he is innocent. It was all staged!!!

Here is what happened:....

Mr. Muhammad Saif-ur-Rehman has done his A-levels from the prestigious University College in Islamabad (UCI), affiliated with the University of London. Saif had extensively travelled around the world including the United Kingdom and the United States. He had worked in the hospitality industry for a while. He learnt about a Spanish language learning opportunity with a hotel internship in Chile from his college principal who also happened to be the visa counselor at the Chilean embassy in Islamabad. After completing his Spanish language course at eFronteres, he was doing an internship at a hotel in Santiago, Chile.

A few days back Saif while chatting on Skype with his family on Friday 7th May 2010, told his father that a person named “Bill” had called him from the US embassy in Santiago. He had asked him to come to the US embassy for some “identification check-up”.

Sensing that it was strange that he was being called presumably from the US embassy without any reason, he informed an officer at the Pakistani embassy who knew him. Therefore, he called back “Bill” using his cell phone on the number that the call originated from and was informed that he could come to the embassy on Monday at 3:00 pm when he would be off from work at the hotel.

On Monday morning, Saif visited the Institute’s (eFronteres) director, Alejandra Vicencio and related the matter. At 3:00 pm on Monday (local time) Saif went to the US embassy with his educational documents and passport (which already had the 5 years multiple visa stamped).

Since yesterday, his family has been trying to contact him on his mobile/cell phone number but to no avail. Then all of a sudden, this news flash on a local TV channel caught his family’s attention back in Pakistan. They are shocked and extremely worried about his condition and detention. They contacted the Chilean embassy in Islamabad.

Following are the questions which still remain answered in relation to this incident:

- Why did a person from the US embassy in Santiago contact Saif while he already had a 5 year valid US visit visa (24 September, 2009 till 22 September, 2014).

- In addition, why did “Bill” call Saif from his mobile number, while something of this nature should have come officially from the embassy?

Maybe the guy had gone to Chile to get out of Unkil's agencies' radar. And the call was to catch him in the embassy, than in the country(Chile) itself. Do US have extradition Treaty with Chile. If not, then maybe this is an explanation.

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 13 May 2010 00:43

Anujan wrote:There are historical connections between Indians and many ME/Muslim states - from Iran to the Saudis, to Syrians, Egypt & Indonesia. We are a continuing civilization with history & interaction that spans hundreds of years. Not a state created in 1940's in the name of religion.

If Ombaba is scared to meet his holiness Dalai in public just bacause the dragon is a big market how can small fries like Iran & Saudi ignore India another huge oil market. They will keep the pot boiling but will not let the milk spill remember we are not pushover any more.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 13 May 2010 00:45

Expect big terrorist attack emanating from Pukcerland in next 4-6 weeks.

Kayani meets Zardari, Gilani
ISLAMABAD, May 12: Chief of the Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, today held separate meetings with President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani here. He first called on President Zardari prior to his meeting with Prime Minister Gilani, in which professional matters, war against terror, law and order situation, Hunza lake and other issues came under discussion.

http://www.thepakistaninewspaper.com/ne ... p?id=16742

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 13 May 2010 00:49

Prem wrote:Expect big terrorist attack emanating from Pukcerland in next 4-6 weeks.

No, expect Kayani to get a 5 year extension in the next 4-6 weeks.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 13 May 2010 00:54

Anujan wrote:
Prem wrote:Expect big terrorist attack emanating from Pukcerland in next 4-6 weeks.
No, expect Kayani to get a 5 year extension in the next 4-6 weeks.

North Waziristan is getting too hot to park Kiyanahi or Gillanahi's Musharraf there, they need way out ASAP. Karzai is in DC making the case for clean up there.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 13 May 2010 00:58

Long term, I think that Kiyani has promised the US and China that he will direct the Jihadi terrorists towards India. To china he has likely promised eternal peace in Xinxiang.

This would probably explain the events of the recent past. With this move, kiyani has immense bargaining power. BHO's poll promise is to end the war in afghanistan, any POTUS's job is to keep the home land safe and the western hemisphere hale and hearty (thus the nobel prize).
This also explains what we consider as absurd pakistani demands - the 56 page list of things they want from the US. It is possible that the US under BHO will give all that they can. This also explains china and the others giving pakistan soft loans or weapons on credit.

IOW there is a possibility that the jihadi's will be directed at India under operation Gazwa-e-hind, and the actions of the 3.5 friends is in some ways tantamount to cutting the red ribbon to initiate this.

Which is why I say that Kiyani-Pasha the Billa-Ranga pair, with 5 year extensions under their belt, are bad news for India.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 13 May 2010 01:01

The only equalizer for Pakistan is all out war with them brandishing N weapons, and 3.5 friends on their side, primed and ready to enforce a cease-fire to prevent an uh-nuclear catastrophe.

India will respond by not giving them that pleasure. There you go - no war.

But this means that India will reply with the same coin that billa ranga mean to use against it.

Now lets see if these guys can withstand it.

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 13 May 2010 01:04

Pakistan May Need Second IMF Loan to Bridge Resource Gap (Business Week)

May 12 (Bloomberg) -- Pakistan may apply for a second loan program from the International Monetary Fund to make up for a shortage of resources caused by low tax collection and delays in aid from donors, the finance adviser said.

“We may need a follow-up program but in the long run we have to get rid of the IMF because it’s expensive,” Abdul Hafeez Shaikh said in his first news conference in Islamabad after being appointed by Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani on March 18 to run the finance ministry.

Shaikh became the fourth person to take charge of Pakistan’s finance ministry in the past two years...

I agree! Loans are haram and so is loan repayment. Paki strategy is to get all the loans they can find because it is kufr money and then IED mubark the donor. Brilliant!

So Pakis are about to "get rid of" the IMF. Only doing so will take a lot of Nissan Pathfinders! IMF will pay for the Nissan's in the third follow-up program.

Mahendra · Post by **Mahendra** » 13 May 2010 01:25

I think the FSU disintegrated because they didn't have access to easy money that the Pakbarians have. Now this isn't an equal equal between the Pakbarians and FSU as the Pakbarians are a much more artificial entity.

Why would anyone even give them a loan when it is certain that they are not going to repay the principal amount forget the profit!

Philip · Post by **Philip** » 13 May 2010 01:43

Pak/AQK and nuclear terrorism.

EXcerptL

How Pakistan's A.Q. Khan helped spread nuclear terrorism
By BOB DROGIN
Los Angeles Times

Sissinghurst: An Unfinished History' and And the Heart Says Whatever' Paging through novels How Pakistan's A.Q. Khan helped spread nuclear terrorism Cory ."Peddling Peril: How the Secret Nuclear Trade Arms America's Enemies" by David Albright; Free Press (304 pages, $27)

Nuclear weapons, which largely faded from front pages after the Cold War, are back in the news. President Obama endorsed a new national security strategy, and earlier this year he signed an ambitious arms control treaty with Russia, further easing fears of global Armageddon. But Obama also led an unprecedented summit of world leaders to warn of an increasingly urgent threat - nuclear terrorism.

Much of this perilous state of affairs can be traced to the villainous deeds of Abdul Qadeer Khan. A.Q. Khan, as he is known, is the self-described father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb and the self-confessed mastermind of a criminal network that seemingly sold nuclear weapons technology like it was aluminum siding. The proof: Nearly every nation that has tried to build or obtain a nuclear device in the last 30 years has relied on Khan's black market enterprise.

Outside the CIA and its sister services overseas, probably no one has investigated Khan's smuggling network as thoroughly as David Albright. His "Peddling Peril" is the most authoritative account we are likely to see of how a Pakistani metallurgist with monstrous ambition used front companies, forged documents and legal loopholes to create a nuclear Wal-Mart, or what Albright calls "Bomb Inc." Dr. Strangelove couldn't have said it better.

For years, government officials downplayed or ignored Khan's illicit trade as industrial spying, or violations of export control laws, rather than as nuclear espionage on behalf of a foreign power. Security breaches were repeatedly concealed lest they jeopardize other diplomatic priorities or corporate profit margins. It is a terrifying tale, not least because the failure to prosecute or imprison most of Khan's associates means the world's most dangerous business may still be thriving.

Khan's drawings and documentation for Libya's centrifuge plant were so detailed they contained instructions on where to install toilet paper holders in the bathrooms. He also supplied Iran with critical components for a then-secret uranium enrichment program that still bedevils the international community. "Without Khan's assistance," Albright writes, "Iran's gas centrifuge program would pose little threat to the region or the United States today."

Khan has claimed patriotism and Muslim solidarity as his motive, but he and his cohorts raked in hundreds of millions of dollars. Vital supplies, purchased from the United States and Europe, were routed through a maze of businesses and third-party cutouts in Malaysia, Dubai, Turkey and elsewhere to avoid suspicion. "They could not outmaneuver us, as we remained a step ahead always," Khan boasted on Pakistani TV last year.

Although the CIA and British intelligence investigated Khan from at least 1978, it took them nearly three decades to take him down, an intelligence failure that haunts us today. The evidence suggests willful blindness in successive U.S. administrations more concerned about using Pakistan as a Cold War proxy against the Soviet Union than on stopping this nuclear Johnny Appleseed.

It's still unclear how much Pakistani leaders authorized Khan's freebooting (he frequently used Pakistani Air Force planes to ferry his supplies) and, more important, whether his customers included al-Qaida or its murderous offshoots. The Pakistani government has refused to let foreign intelligence or U.N. experts interview Khan since he was placed under house arrest in 2004.

Albright is a unique figure in Washington, a nuclear proliferation expert who flourishes in the interstices between intelligence and journalism. He founded and heads the Institute for Science and International Security, a one-man think tank for all practical purposes. He regularly makes news by relying on commercial satellite photos, personal ties to U.S. policy makers and U.N. nuclear inspectors (Albright served with U.N. teams in Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War) and a deep grasp of nuclear science. Like many journalists, I called him regularly when I reported on nuclear proliferation.

In September 2007, for example, Israeli jets bombed a nondescript building in the Syrian desert. Neither government, nor the George W. Bush administration, initially acknowledged the raid's purpose. But Albright's institute used commercial satellite imagery to determine that the target appeared to house a nuclear reactor built with technology from North Korea. For six months, Albright's analysis was the only independent assessment. Finally, in April 2008, the CIA publicly concurred........

Read more: http://www.kansascity.com/2010/05/12/19 ... z0nkVp8qfZ

Rahul Shukla · Post by **Rahul Shukla** » 13 May 2010 01:51

Mahendra wrote:Why would anyone even give them a loan when it is certain that they are not going to repay the principal amount forget the profit!

One giant amount for kufr yindoos...
One small write-off for Uncle Sam!

Pakistan is cheap!

svinayak · Post by **svinayak** » 13 May 2010 01:59

Rahul Shukla wrote:
Mahendra wrote:Why would anyone even give them a loan when it is certain that they are not going to repay the principal amount forget the profit!
One giant amount for kufr yindoos...
One small write-off for Uncle Sam!

Pakistan is cheap!

It is not one country. 1965 was a large coalition against India. all of them from that period are supporting Pakistan.

Mahendra · Post by **Mahendra** » 13 May 2010 02:08

[youtube]rmJ-meh8EBM&feature=related[/youtube]

Pakbarian propagandoo video against Bollywood

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 13 May 2010 02:47

Obama Praises Pakistani Cooperation on Qaeda

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/world ... arzai.html

President Obama lauded Pakistani leaders on Wednesday for what he called a growing recognition that Al Qaeda and Taliban insurgent groups in their country have become a “cancer in their midst.”