The fountainhead of religious extremism - DT op-ed
Unless Pakistan and the US seriously take a look at the activities of the JI, any meaningful progress in stopping extremism feeding this terror will be impossible.
Why US ? JI is a Pakistani Islamist party patronized by the state for very long. Why is Pakistan not taking any action against the JI or its student wing, the IJT even today ? Why is Pakistan not doing anything when the US (and even the UN) has taken a very serious view of the LeT and Prof. Hafeez Saeed ? What is then the sovereignty of Pakistan when it needs to invite another country to take a 'serious look' into one of its own terrorist organizations ?
It must be remembered, for those who still care about the reasons why we made this country in the first place, that Jinnah’s Pakistan and Maududi’s Pakistan are mutually exclusive. Pakistan must decide here and now: do we wish to make Pakistan a prosperous and democratic state, which is at peace home and abroad ala Jinnah? Or do we wish to make Pakistan a violent dystopia run by maniacs and religious extremists with twisted ideas about religion ala Maududi?
Jinnah's Pakistan and Maududi's Pakistan were conceived in the same womb as identical twins. Let's see why.
In
circa 1942, Maulana Abu ala Al Mawdudi wrote in his article Musalman aur Maujooda Siyasi Kashmakash Vol III (Muslims and the Current Political Struggle), that "As a Muslim, I have no interest in their (Muslim) rule in those areas of India where the Muslims are in a majority. For me the primary question is whether in this 'Pakistan' of yours the basis of government will be the sovereignty of God or, in accordance with the western idea of democracy, the sovereignty of the people. In the first case it will certainly be 'Pakistan,' otherwise it will be as much of 'Na-Pakistan' as that part of the country where, according to your scheme, the rule will be that of non-Muslims: in fact, in the eyes of God it will be 'na-pak' -- and damned.”
Jinnah and his Muslim Leaguers knew exactly where Maulana Mawdudi stood with respect to how Pakistan should be administered. In the above, he is questioning Jinnah as to whether it would be run according to God-given Shariah or according to man-made Democracy. Later, Jinnah sought the support of Mawdudi to gain support for his programme of division of India. Jinnah had assured a representative of the influential founder of the Deobandi order, Mawdudi that he saw no incompatibility between their two approaches. Hetold the representative allegorically: "I seek to secure the land for the mosque; once that land belongs to us, then we can decide on how to build the mosque". Thus Mawdudi reconciled with the Quaid-e-Azam (whom he once referred to as Kafir-e-Azam) as he interpreted Jinnah's statement as a reference to the Islamic nature of the State under creation. As Vali reza says in his book, "The Vanguard of the Islamic Revolution",
If anything, Jinnah had hinted that his task was only to secure the land for the “mosque”; its building, the Jama‘at concluded, would be the work of the religiously adept.
There are many other instances where Jinnah invoked Islamic fervour including being partial to rabid fundamentalists. His muddled thinking, his lack of vision for Pakistan and his greed are the root causes for all the wrong things affecting the world today.