MRCA News and Discussion

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Wickberg
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 18:45

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Wickberg »

chackojoseph wrote: Can you please provide me the proof of that? because Grippen is offering ToT. Is there a conclusive proof that Engine technology will be transferred?

OK, but was your list accurate? For example point 1-3 I could´nt find any proof of, you could help me with some links so I can get more informed.

3) You want sales to Pakistan for proof?
Pakistan, Sweden to boost cooperation

RAWALPINDI, April 9 (SANA): Pakistan and Sweden have agreed to further enhance their bilateral cooperation, particularly in the field of defence.

The agreement came at a meeting between Federal Minister for Defence Production, Habibullah Warraich and the visiting State Secretary and Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister of Sweden, Lars Danielsson in here on Sunday.

The Minister apprised the visiting State Secretary about the potential of defence industry of Pakistan. They also discussed the possibility of undertaking a joint venture in defence production.

The two sides expressed satisfaction over the existing level of cooperation

http://www.kashar.net/complete.asp?id=3433
2) Read here What was perhaps more alarming for India was the apparent decision of eight nations- Austria, Denmark, Finland Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Sweden – to push amendments to the US draft.
1) You mentioned it yourself of X-ray flash devices.

You know, I was expecting you to ask for point 4 rather than the 1st three. The point 4 is lesser know.
I have´nt actually read the thousands of papers that clarifies the Gripen-deal and ToT to India (don´t know if they even have been officially released) so I don´t know what you want me to proof.

And about that "Sweden is a very anti-Indian country" I just simply disagree. If you run your list of four points Sweden actually seems to be one of the most friendly Indian country in a world that is very anti-Indian. (That is is your conclusion, I don´t think the world is anti-Indian, that seems to be some conspiracy-theory in a tin-foil hat world..)
Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Sanku »

sunilUpa wrote:Even Russia doesn't qualify, remember Bandars engine?
Well the qualifier could be that it came through China plant.
What is the purpose of buying MRCA? To restore squadron strength or to settle scores?
If you ask me, its to provide employment to Babu's in MoD.
:mrgreen:
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Austin »

See neither does India gives guarantee to any one out there that she would buy arms only from a specific country if that country does not sell arms to its enemy.

India buys from countries depending on what best she can afford and available.

So there is no point in India telling any country that they should not sell arms to Pakistan , much like no country has the right to tell India from where she should buy from.
Last edited by Austin on 17 Jun 2010 16:03, edited 1 time in total.
chackojoseph
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4297
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Location: From Frontier India
Contact:

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by chackojoseph »

sunilUpa wrote:Even Russia doesn't qualify, remember Bandars engine?

What is the purpose of buying MRCA? To restore squadron strength or to settle scores?
Bandars engine is not the regular rated engine as open sources say. The issue was strongly taken during one of the meetings with Russians.

besides comparing Swedish cutting edge and Chinese cutting edge is not in same league. Even Pakis want western equipment but end up wit Chinese if have no option.

Besides, most MMRCA's are more or less conveniently matched to ASR, if not, they will be eliminated. Then its a question of political factor. even Euro fighter, Boeing, LM, MiG, and Grippen have made it know in someway or the other. Settling scores is your word. I would put it more like looking into political factors and deciding. Past is a very good parameter among various other parameters.
Last edited by chackojoseph on 17 Jun 2010 16:08, edited 1 time in total.
chackojoseph
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4297
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Location: From Frontier India
Contact:

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by chackojoseph »

Wickberg wrote: I have´nt actually read the thousands of papers that clarifies the Gripen-deal and ToT to India (don´t know if they even have been officially released) so I don´t know what you want me to proof.

And about that "Sweden is a very anti-Indian country" I just simply disagree. If you run your list of four points Sweden actually seems to be one of the most friendly Indian country in a world that is very anti-Indian. (That is is your conclusion, I don´t think the world is anti-Indian, that seems to be some conspiracy-theory in a tin-foil hat world..)
Where does ani-India comes from?

See the Grippen offer suffers from this main factor, i.e, the engine.
Carl_T
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2533
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 02:37
Location: anandasya sagare

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Carl_T »

What is the issue with Sweden selling to Pakistan? Has Russia not sold anything to China? We have US planes in the tender and we are talking about Sweden selling things to Pak?
Wickberg
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 18:45

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Wickberg »

chackojoseph wrote:
Where does ani-India comes from?

See the Grippen offer suffers from this main factor, i.e, the engine.
From you yesterday? "If history serves right, Sweden has been a very anti-India European country." You wrote that, and I disagreed.

BTW, it´s not "Grippen", it´s the Gripen, if you want a english version it should be be Griffin or Gryphon.
About the engine of the Gripen I have written this a thousand times on this board; there is no way USA could deny a Swedish export of the engine to India. Did you know that large (and important) parts of the Rafale and Eurofighter also is from USA?
arthuro
BRFite
Posts: 627
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 13:35

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by arthuro »

rafale is 100% french with no large part coming from the USA.

News from a special edition from air&cosmos :

http://www.journaux.fr/air-cosmos-hors- ... 37147.html

here are summary that I made from Key : (F22 through Rafale's osf pictures if you follow the link)

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showth ... 19&page=18

1)
Some news about the 9-1 for the rafale against the typhoon in corsica from Air&Cosmos. (Some other sources like in DSI said 8-0)

>>That were WVR gun dogfights only. (Nice pictures of Typhoon gun-locked in the magazine)

All the pilots from RAF and AdA were very experimented and the goal was to assess both aircraft when pitched against each other. RAF pilots were specialized in Air superiority missions only whereas rafale pilot dedicated a significant part of their flying hours to other missions.

The mission profile was chosen by the RAF in a configuration that would have theoretically put the Typhoon at an advantage.

aircrafts met at 18000 ft and 350kts with the same trajectory for 2km and then turned 45° (external turn) and then went head on against each other to start the dogfight.

Usually rafale pilots needed less than 40 seconds and three turns to have the upper hand and score a shot. For french pilots the results is explained by rafale superior FBW system and rafale ability to point its nose even at extremely slow speeds.
2)
Some additional infos about rafale vs Typhoon, rafale vs SH block2 and rafale vs F22 coming from air&cosmos special edition

For the typhoon :

>>in WVR dogfights the quality of the FBW system associated to the close coupled canard configuration allows to generate a lot of lift a slow speed and point the nose very rapidely without exessive energy bleeding. This is what allows to score 9-1 (or 8-0 for DSI and AFM) during dogfights against the typhoon in corsica according to pilots

>>in BVR encounters the Typhoon has a bigger radar and Amram have a slight advantage in terms of range over the mica Air&cosmos told. But rafale proved to be superior (ATLC : 7-1 for the rafale) for the following reasons according to pilots :

-a smaller radar cross section which according to them compensate the advantage of typhoon bigger radar.

-a better sensor fusion and MMI which allows rafale pilots to have a better understanding of the tactical situation.

-the use of some specifics tactics which are considered as quite surprising.

Against the Superhornet block 2

-In dogfihts the rafale was clearly superior. Rafale pilots told that the SH has an impressive ability to take a lot of angle of attack...Up to 65° in defensive manoeuvres. But that resulted in a lot of energy loss and were then easy prey as the SH tend to "sink" after such manoeuvres

-In BVR against the SH block2 rafale pilots acknowledge that SH AESA radar has a greater range than the rbe2 PESA and that lattest amrams versions have a bigger reach than micas. However the OSF, sensor fusion, correct use of link 16 and surprising tactics helped the rafale to keep an edge.


Against the F22

5 draw and one loss during WVR gun dogfights against the F22 during ATLC.

-rafale pilots said that in dogfight it is quite even. The F22 also offer exellent very slow speed maneuvrability due to TVC but it burns a lot a fuel with a big IR signature whereas the rafale bleeds less enrgy and thus doesn't need the same level of thrust to achieve similar performance.

-In BVR they conceed that the F22 would hardly be defeated as stealt+speed+altitude+more powerful radar makes it an untouchable opponents in that field.


Conclusion : even in its current form (F3) the rafale proved to perform very well against the mosts modern threats. With the arrival of the AESA radar and meteor it should even widen the gap.
chackojoseph
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4297
Joined: 01 Mar 2010 22:42
Location: From Frontier India
Contact:

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by chackojoseph »

Wickberg wrote:
chackojoseph wrote:
Where does ani-India comes from?

See the Grippen offer suffers from this main factor, i.e, the engine.
From you yesterday? "If history serves right, Sweden has been a very anti-India European country." You wrote that, and I disagreed.

BTW, it´s not "Grippen", it´s the Gripen, if you want a english version it should be be Griffin or Gryphon.
About the engine of the Gripen I have written this a thousand times on this board; there is no way USA could deny a Swedish export of the engine to India. Did you know that large (and important) parts of the Rafale and Eurofighter also is from USA?
:D OK
arthuro
BRFite
Posts: 627
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 13:35

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by arthuro »

full article, picture (HUD gun, and rafale with typhoon) to be seen if you click on the link below :

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/forumdisplay.php?f=5
Enemy Brothers
Air&Cosmos - June 2010



Since birth, both were scheduled to compete. The wrestling (commercial) which has now engaged the Eurofighter Typhoon and the Rafale on the international scene has its roots in the early 80s, while Europe is seriously considering a joint development of a new multinational European fighter aircraft. France, United Kingdom and Germany are the main actors in a drama that will last many years. These last two countries, which have already collaborated in the Panavia consortium for the development of the Tornado are looking to replace a portion of their tactical fleet. For its part, France is trying, too, to have a fighter that can replace almost all of its combat aircraft. But from the beginning, the situation appears complex, whereas the English call for an air superiority aircraft class 11-12 tonnes, Paris argues for a device of only 9 tons. Moreover, the problems of industrial shares weigh down the prospects of cooperation including France, whose aeronautical companies ardently defend their plans to support the maintenance of their skills. In 1985, France announced it will develop alone its future combat aircraft. For their part, the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and Spain will start the Eurofighter program. While France wants to start building a really multirole aircraft, the nations in the Eurofighter consortium finance the development of a superiority aircraft, designed for air to air combat. To date yet, the 'Typhoon has only very limited air-ground capabilities compared with the Rafale.

More thrust for the Typhoon

On paper, the Typhoon has some undeniable advantages: more powerful than M88, its two reactors give it a better weight/thrust than the Rafale. According to the Eurofighter pilots, this additional power would be particularly appreciable during simulated combat below 20,000 ft, where the density of air allows the engines to be fully expressed. In the battle beyond visual range (BVR), the Typhoon also has an greater "extension" than the Rafale. This is because of the the physical characteristics of the radar, which antenna "sees" futher than the RBE2-PESA, but also because of the dynamic performance of the American missile AIM-120 AMRAAM . Designed exclusively for medium-range interception, it certainly does not have the versatility of the Mica, but it is superior in terms of range. Facing a Rafale, these theoretical advantages, however, must be nuanced.
In BVR combat, although the lengthening of the radar and missiles of the Typhoon are superior, the french Rafale fighter's radar signature is, according to many pilots, much less important than the Eurofighter's one. It is therefore an asset. Even better: the sensors fusion which enjoys the Rafale is also a crucial advantage in BVR combat, because it offers the pilots a much better understanding of the tactical situation during combat, and this, 360 degrees around the aircraft.
Once the "merge" is reached (when BVR combat turns into short-range), the Rafale has still strong chances of victory against the Typhoon. In the opinion of French pilots who have confronted the European aircraft, it's above all the quality of the electric flight controls [FBW] of the French fighter who makes the difference. In dogfight, Rafale can quickly point its nose to the threat, while less degrading its energy than the Eurofighter does. And this partly because the maximum angle of attack of the Rafale is "clamped" around 30, which allows it to evolve in a controlled manner even at low speed.
This difference in terms of maneuverability is also illustrated by the position of the canard on the two planes: placed well in front of the fuselage on the Typhoon, they play the role of an additional control surface used to "steer" more quickly the nose of the plane to take the incidence.

Conversely, the Rafale ducks are located very near the delta wing and are used primarily to pick up the airflow to slow up the loss of lift on the wing, thus giving the pilot a full control of the aircraft at low speeds. [/color][/b]

A first indisputable skirmish

The Armée de l' Air has been able to experience this superiority in dogfight in September 2009, during an exercise organized by the French and British headquarters, during a deployment on the Solenzara airbase in Corsica .
Few days , the EC-1/7 stands next with the Royal Air Force transformation squadron on typhoons. The English have thought of everything, and introduce to the French pilots the simulated engagement patterns they wish to practice facing the Rafale. The French pilots push back a smile: the conditions of the exercice are, on paper, custom-made for the Typhoons , they plan within visual range fights , 1 vs 1, under 20,000 ft and at 350 knots. Whatever. The 'Provence' squadron takes up the gauntlet ... The 2 planes take off, then meet up at 18 000 ft to start the exercise. The aircraft are flying on the same trajectory with about 2 km of lateral separation. "Turn Away" with this announcement, the pilots turn 45 ° outward, to move away from each other. A few seconds later, the "turn in" and the planes turn toward each other to meet face-to-face in the sky. Once both aircraft is within visual range , its the ultimate ad: "Fight's on!". The first skirmish is indisputable. It need less than 40 seconds and only 3 crossing for the Rafale pilot to have its gun in firing position. However, the pilots flying the two planes are far from beginners. While the English is considered a Typhoon specialist in air-to-air, the "Provence" pilot has also a solid experience in within visual range combat.

Nine wins, one defeat

This initial result is not a fluke: the two next passes end also to the advantage of the Rafale. In total, 4 different engagements will take place in Corsica, for a total of 9 wins against 1 defeat for the french fighter. A nice demonstration of force that inspires the pilots the following moral: without mastery, power is nothing ... It is however an area where the Typhoon is victorious: the one of exports. While the Rafale is still looking for a first client, the Typhoon has already been sold to Saudi Arabia and Austria, and remains opposed to the Rafale in Switzerland and India.
Luxtor
BRFite
Posts: 262
Joined: 28 Sep 2003 11:31
Location: Earth ... but in a parallel universe

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Luxtor »

Wickberg wrote:
chackojoseph wrote:
Where does ani-India comes from?

See the Grippen offer suffers from this main factor, i.e, the engine.
From you yesterday? "If history serves right, Sweden has been a very anti-India European country." You wrote that, and I disagreed.

BTW, it´s not "Grippen", it´s the Gripen, if you want a english version it should be be Griffin or Gryphon.
About the engine of the Gripen I have written this a thousand times on this board; there is no way USA could deny a Swedish export of the engine to India. Did you know that large (and important) parts of the Rafale and Eurofighter also is from USA?
Mr. Wickberg, what are you basing this (bolded) statement on? What makes you so sure that the U.S. wouldn't deny Sweden the right to resell G.E. engines and other U.S. origin equipment on the Gripen to India? How are the End User Monitoring and prohibition of the transfer of technology and equipment by Sweden to a third party handled between U.S. and Sweden in relation to the potential sale of Gripen to India? Thanks
Craig Alpert
BRFite
Posts: 1438
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 17:36
Location: Behind Enemy Lines

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Craig Alpert »

arthuro wrote:rafale is 100% french with no large part coming from the USA.

News from a special edition from air&cosmos :

http://www.journaux.fr/air-cosmos-hors- ... 37147.html

here are summary that I made from Key : (F22 through Rafale's osf pictures if you follow the link)

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showth ... 19&page=18
^^ Great now how about you provide one for Rafale vs Su-30 MKI....
Wickberg
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 18:45

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Wickberg »

Luxtor wrote: Mr. Wickberg, what are you basing this (bolded) statement on? What makes you so sure that the U.S. wouldn't deny Sweden the right to resell G.E. engines and other U.S. origin equipment on the Gripen to India? How are the End User Monitoring and prohibition of the transfer of technology and equipment by Sweden to a third party handled between U.S. and Sweden in relation to the potential sale of Gripen to India? Thanks
Watertight contracts and the dual companionship between USA and Sweden my friend. That´s all I need to say about that.
Hitesh
BRFite
Posts: 792
Joined: 04 Jul 1999 11:31

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Hitesh »

Wickberg,

No way man. US companies want this contract. It is the literally the contract of the decade or close to the contract of the century. They will pressure US and GE not to sell the technology to Sweden for Gripen. They will make some BS excuse and find a hole in the contract and cause problems. No contract is watertight. Sweden will have no choice but to play ball.

The only platforms not susceptible to American tactics and pressure are the MiG-35, Typhoon, and Rafale.
Wickberg
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 18:45

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Wickberg »

Hitesh wrote:Wickberg,

No way man. US companies want this contract. It is the literally the contract of the decade or close to the contract of the century. They will pressure US and GE not to sell the technology to Sweden for Gripen. They will make some BS excuse and find a hole in the contract and cause problems. No contract is watertight. Sweden will have no choice but to play ball.

The only platforms not susceptible to American tactics and pressure are the MiG-35, Typhoon, and Rafale.
LM or Boeing may very well (and probably will) play out this card to the media in order to scare folks and some politicians. (They tried that in Brazil) In reality it will not happen.
Now you and a few others wants me to explain that statement and before I have provided links that explains that. At the moment I have lost those links but that really does´nt matter because some people refuse to think rationally and have this idea that USA is almighty and rules over every other countries foreign policy s.
To put it simple, Sweden (together with UK and Australia) have the closest collaboration and agreements with USA when it comes to defense research and RnD. With that comes special agreements and deals.
Samay
BRFite
Posts: 1171
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 02:35
Location: India

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Samay »

Watertight contracts and the dual companionship between USA and Sweden my friend. That´s all I need to say about that.
LM or Boeing may very well (and probably will) play out this card to the media in order to scare folks and some politicians. (They tried that in Brazil) In reality it will not happen.
Now you and a few others wants me to explain that statement and before I have provided links that explains that. At the moment I have lost those links but that really does´nt matter because some people refuse to think rationally and have this idea that USA is almighty and rules over every other countries foreign policy s.
To put it simple, Sweden (together with UK and Australia) have the closest collaboration and agreements with USA when it comes to defense research and RnD. With that comes special agreements and deals.
Wickberg,in your previous posts in support of gripen(sweeden)you have been consistently emphasizing that usa will allow tot to India in case gripen wins.
I agree to each and evry contradictory thing you have said . Those things may be possible between sweeden and yamerica and there is a known special relationship. But thats for sweeden and america and may not be happening for India .
For us to believe that america will be neutral (ie allowing its own technology transfers with a big smile) in case of defence relatinships between India and Sweeden and that too of such a big scale, you have to give proof where USA had earlier accepted such a defence related trade between India and sweeden at the cost of its own companies .
Unless and until you or anyone doesnt gives any such proof,we dont buy that bs you are selling consistantly that all tot will happen if gripen wins.
such a big risk cant be taken with fingers crossedc .
bring a substantial proof ...
safest options are EF<Mig35< Rafale, .
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Indranil »

Samay wrote: bring a substantial proof ...
safest options are EF<Mig35< Rafale, .
First of all let me say that I am not knowledgable enough to say which plane is best in all, and which plane gets the biggest mileage for India etc etc.

But going by your own standards, how do you prove that EF<Mig35< Rafale? what makes you feel that the consortium or the Mig or the French are going to give you all the ToT. We have no experience of ToT with the consortium. Anybody can provide links huge gaps in ToT with the French (Scorpene), Russia (T-90). So I fail to understand your proof!

Firstly, let me acknowledge that I do not know what ToT means for a fighter. What all in encircled in that? Secondly, I don't believe in true friends and allies. It's all in the money and power. We as buyers would try to get as much as possible for the money. The seller whoever it might be tries to be as stingy as possible of what he has to part with :). No saints out there my friend.

You seem to bank on Indo-Russo friendship a lot. If Russia would not have sold there engines, the scores of "next-gen", "cheap" and "home-built" fighters would not have flown off Paki airstrips. It makes sense for Russia to be on our side. It is a lot of money that we give them, a lot of support for their fledgling, and yet critical projects. No saints my friend, no saints out there.

US is with us today, because it is our money and global stature today. They need us tomorrow and hence they are preparing the grounds. No saints there.

Make no mistake my friend. Don't be foolish to see things in isolation. Though we can't write everything in this thread for want of not going OT. There are never permanent friends. Seek what is best for us and in the most cold-hearted way when it comes to defense. Every body else will take care of themselves.

I have never made a case for the US planes. But don't discount them so easily. F-16s and F-18s are revered by analysts and pilots the world over. Not without reasons my friend!
Wickberg
BRFite
Posts: 271
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 18:45

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Wickberg »

Samay wrote: Wickberg,in your previous posts in support of gripen(sweeden)you have been consistently emphasizing that usa will allow tot to India in case gripen wins.
I agree to each and evry contradictory thing you have said . Those things may be possible between sweeden and yamerica and there is a known special relationship. But thats for sweeden and america and may not be happening for India .
For us to believe that america will be neutral (ie allowing its own technology transfers with a big smile) in case of defence relatinships between India and Sweeden and that too of such a big scale, you have to give proof where USA had earlier accepted such a defence related trade between India and sweeden at the cost of its own companies .
Unless and until you or anyone doesnt gives any such proof,we dont buy that bs you are selling consistantly that all tot will happen if gripen wins.
such a big risk cant be taken with fingers crossedc .
bring a substantial proof ...
safest options are EF<Mig35< Rafale, .
Well, I get can´t provide any proofs of that, but since the Gripen has made it this far I´ll suppose that the IAF does,nt have any complains with the Gripen and ToT -deal? Ether or not USA will become a "enemy" towards India in the future does not conflict with any part of the Gripen that has US designs
You want to know about earlier defense deals? Lets start with the fact that Sweden (not a NATO-member) were allowed to buy the worlds best radars from UK and USA right after WW2. Then the decades that followed Sweden always could buy the brand new missiles, engines or fighters etc from USA/UK. Even before NATO-countris could, they had to settle with F-5 and Sidewinders. Sweden even got to buy the license to produce the Falcon AA-missile with a nuclear head, this was before the Swedish parliament voted No on becoming a nuclear state. The fact was, Sweden had all the top-notch gear while our neighbors had to settle for the vintage stuff (all tough they were NATO members).
Kartik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5872
Joined: 04 Feb 2004 12:31

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Kartik »

Those Swedish posters who claim that the US (and the US Govt. as implied) will transfer technology to India because some contract a Swedish firm signed with a US firm (for instance GE) permits so (if its even true that is) are just being optimistic. No non-US party can offer iron-clad guarantees about ToT for parts/products that are the IP of a US company since they are governed by that country's laws, not Sweden's.

We had 2 US firms, Boeing and Lockheed Martin, unable to DIRECTLY obtain licences to act as consultants to ADA on the LCA and LCA Navy, after having bid for and won tenders, and all of a sudden when it comes to the Gripen all of the ITAR and export control restriction doors will suddenly open up ? The key to these 2 deals was transferring some knowhow and these 2 US giants couldn't get the required export licences for that.

Name one international sale of the Gripen where ToT for key US sourced items like the engine has been carried out.

I'm not saying that GE itself will not cooperate. For them whether it's a F-16IN sale or a Gripen IN sale, they'll be more than happy to work with India. The difference is that the US Govt. can (whether it will is upto them and the ITAR laws at that time) block any transfer of technology to allow for licence manufacture of GE F414 or F-110-132 engines in India. I mean they don't give export licences to even allow consultancy with ADA then how can anyone be so naïve as to believe that they'll allow ToT for something as critical as engine technology?
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19327
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by NRao »

The fact that all vendors have "met" the requirements of "ToT" as described in the RFP should be enough - at THIS point in time - to believe that "ToT' would be provided irrespective of the air craft that is selected.

However, the concern WRT US technologies will always remain no matter what. A cold wind blowing in the wrong direction that hits the US Congress could upset them to do whatever they have to do. It is a matter of percentages what amount of pressure they place on other nations to act in a detrimental way to other nations. (That is part of the game.)

India, going into this deal, would be incredibly stupid thinking that signing with a non-US nation means some form of def-moksha.
shukla
BRFite
Posts: 1727
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Location: Land of Oz!

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by shukla »

Defence companies race to win $12bn Indian Air Force contract.
EADS has denied that its’ shifting of operations to India was linked to trying to win the multi-billion contract, saying it was only interested in procuring cheap, technical manpower.

But analysts say the move was aimed to put indirect pressure on the government to award this contract and even future contracts to the company. “No government, after this move, will be in a position to compromise on the future of 20,000 of its citizens who would be employed by the company,” said an analyst.
We will transfer 60 percent of the Eurofighter technology to India if Typhoon wins the bid. Our long-term strategy is to partner with the Indian aerospace industry for our global market, as we consider the Indian talent and resources as an ideal source for developing newer technologies,” Zoller said.
ehh.. 60%?? wonder which 60%? nuts n bolts...? and wonder how many "%" have others in the race promised??
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19327
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by NRao »

nukavarapu wrote: The RFP requires 50% ToT but does not specify what kind of technologies to be included in that 50%. The figure 50% is purely related to the cost. They can put all the non-critical technologies in the 50% basket and still satisfy the RFP requirements. Even if Russia in terms of MIG 35 or EF wants to transfer critical engine and radar technology, apart from the 50% clause they will surely sign another contract which exclusively says that xyz technologies will be transferred. Its upto IAF and MOD how they shortlist the candidates based on what kind of critical technologies are transferred under the 50% obligation.
No matter what %age is mentioned in the RFP, they ALL has stated that they can and will meet the RFP. So the concern about the Gripen having US components is not an issue. What the US Congress may do in the future remains an issue WRT any components that originate from the US. But then the US Congress can pressure other nations to impose sanctions too.

(IIRC the 50% was related to the AESA. To which the non-US claimed they will transfer 100% (which is not too much as compared to what 50% of the US AESA is). There was no percentages that were released WRT to the rest as far as I can recall.)
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19327
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by NRao »

ehh.. 60%?? wonder which 60%? nuts n bolts...? and wonder how many "%" have others in the race promised??
The EF is based on a consortium, with each one making some components, and the final plane being assembled somewhere. They have stated that IF India selects them that they will allocated some of those components to India and that the whole plane cannot be manufactured in India. "ToT" will have a different meaning. Which is why I think they want to build a design office, etc in India, so that we do not feel that we are not getting our monies worth.

But, the EF will not be completely built in India. It cannot be built in India.
NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19327
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by NRao »

Two different things: ToT and offsets.

50% ToT for AESA, do not know what the %age is for remaining ToT.

50% offset.
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Manish_Sharma »

arthuro wrote:rafale is 100% french with no large part coming from the USA.

Conclusion : even in its current form (F3) the rafale proved to perform very well against the mosts modern threats. With the arrival of the AESA radar and meteor it should even widen the gap.
[/quote]
Arthuro, if India buys Rafale minus 'spectra' and puts up indigenous stuff instead, would it bring the cost of Rafale down significantly? What do you think would be cost of Rafale minus 'spectra'?

And if India wants to have new m-88 engine with increased thrust, do we have to pay royalty to UAE too?
shukla
BRFite
Posts: 1727
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Location: Land of Oz!

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by shukla »

NRao wrote:
ehh.. 60%?? wonder which 60%? nuts n bolts...? and wonder how many "%" have others in the race promised??
The EF is based on a consortium, with each one making some components, and the final plane being assembled somewhere. They have stated that IF India selects them that they will allocated some of those components to India and that the whole plane cannot be manufactured in India. "ToT" will have a different meaning. Which is why I think they want to build a design office, etc in India, so that we do not feel that we are not getting our monies worth.

But, the EF will not be completely built in India. It cannot be built in India.
Was implying 60% TOT... Can they pick n choose which 60% they give us TOT on or will we have a say?
johnny_m
BRFite
Posts: 176
Joined: 08 Dec 2008 16:12

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by johnny_m »

What is the point in buying Rafale without Spectra ? Its the Spectra, OSF and other passive sensors which give Rafale a critical advantage over its peers in A2A. Take that out and you are taking out its strength.
arthuro
BRFite
Posts: 627
Joined: 06 Sep 2008 13:35

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by arthuro »

1) Don't forget that a Licensed rafale would be cheaper as a part of the workforce (the worforce involved in India) will be cheaper.

2) Dassault Team is ready to transfer 100% of the technology with all the source codes. (according to an older article posted here)

3) The rafale F3+ is almost ready and development of the F4 version has started with AESA GaN, SPECTRA GaN. Last but not least a stealth rafale demonstrator is being funded (AC technique apparently). This will guaranty that the rafale will remain relevant in 2020's. So the rafale is already heading for the next step whereas most of the competitors (gripen, typhoon mig35) are trying to catch up. It doesn't seem that the F16IN and SH are getting a new major set of upgrades with new generation AESA and EW suite...

4) If needed India can pick up some of the specific advances of the UAE rafales like the upgraded thrust engine or the HMS. (france will have a more maintenance friendly version with the F3+ standard)
Manish_Sharma
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5128
Joined: 07 Sep 2009 16:17

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Manish_Sharma »

arthuro wrote: 3) The rafale F3+ is almost ready and development of the F4 version has started with AESA GaN, SPECTRA GaN. Last but not least a stealth rafale demonstrator is being funded (AC technique apparently).
What is AC technique?

Yes that's what I think too, even if expensive we should go for this GaN version AESA too, though Spectra I'm not sure, IAF is happy with indigineous products so...
then we can have GaN AESA [ToT and stuff for actually producing GaN chips in India], more powerful m 88s.

If we are going to burn money then why not on best/2nd most sanctionproof.

My thinking is MRCA is a farce anyway, so many conflicting reports:
1.) To fill the gap of weight between su 30 & LCA. [Then why call heavyweights like SH?]
2.) For ToT [Then go for most advanced ones like Typhoon & Rafale]
3.) 'cause Tejas is late. [Not anymore it will start inducting from next year instead of MRCA from 2013].
4.) To make up the numbers [Well then Mig 35 would do nicely]

So the right decision would be to cancel MRCA, and order full production of 90 Tejas Mk Is, Until Mk II is ready. But since we are going to throw money on foreign lands why not spend more and get some real good stuff?
Samay
BRFite
Posts: 1171
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 02:35
Location: India

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Samay »

indranilroy wrote:
Samay wrote: bring a substantial proof ...
safest options are EF<Mig35< Rafale, .
First of all let me say that I am not knowledgable enough to say which plane is best in all, and which plane gets the biggest mileage for India etc etc.

But going by your own standards, how do you prove that EF<Mig35< Rafale? what makes you feel that the consortium or the Mig or the French are going to give you all the ToT. We have no experience of ToT with the consortium. Anybody can provide links huge gaps in ToT with the French (Scorpene), Russia (T-90). So I fail to understand your proof!
I was stating facts that these aircrafts are the'safest options' AFA deal is concerned, not talking about technical features, though all of them are comparable technologically, its upon us to decide which feature is more important
Firstly, let me acknowledge that I do not know what ToT means for a fighter. What all in encircled in that? Secondly, I don't believe in true friends and allies. It's all in the money and power. We as buyers would try to get as much as possible for the money. The seller whoever it might be tries to be as stingy as possible of what he has to part with :). No saints out there my friend.

You seem to bank on Indo-Russo friendship a lot. If Russia would not have sold there engines, the scores of "next-gen", "cheap" and "home-built" fighters would not have flown off Paki airstrips. It makes sense for Russia to be on our side. It is a lot of money that we give them, a lot of support for their fledgling, and yet critical projects. No saints my friend, no saints out there.
russia sold engines to pakis?? :eek: and also gives them f16s,missiles,apc,radars,combat helicopters,,everything except nukes(kept a blind eye when they were building nuke plants, dont tell me that it was due to other siviet reasons, whatever may be the reasons, usa will always be what it inherently is.. untrustworthy, pathetic and an arms seller .
US is with us today, because it is our money and global stature today. They need us tomorrow and hence they are preparing the grounds. No saints there.
Yes no saints there ,. usa has a long history of stabbing its own allies,you name them french,pakis,chinese,iraq,iran,,.. what they do is politically angled,. AFA russia/france are concerned, they were not stopping scorpene/gorshkov politically,it was due to other factors like money and infrastructure ,. But usa can pull the trigger any time they feel, also I dont need to redo ,but france and russia have promised tot umpteen no of times, but lm/boeing always had issues because of improbable nature of us congress.

Make no mistake my friend. Don't be foolish to see things in isolation. Though we can't write everything in this thread for want of not going OT. There are never permanent friends. Seek what is best for us and in the most cold-hearted way when it comes to defense. Every body else will take care of themselves.
your own statement is the answer, no permanent friends ,specially a country which imposed sanctions just decade ago cant be considered even a full ally . Neither it could replace old time friends. why?
I have never made a case for the US planes. But don't discount them so easily. F-16s and F-18s are revered by analysts and pilots the world over. Not without reasons my friend!so is mig-29,rafale and ef ,. but most important is trust. usa cant replace russia and france in terms of strategic assurance,because some its own policies are against India and policies do not change that fast .
Danell
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 44
Joined: 26 Sep 2009 15:14

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Danell »

Manish_Sharma wrote: What is AC technique?
Active cancellation:
Stealth RAFALE

According to the French magazine “Air & Cosmos” , A “stealth RAFALE demonstrator” will be funded (according to the very official 2010 french defense budget) to increase its stealth capabilities. Apparently the solution that will be adopted is active stealth (Spectra developments, developped by CEA/DGA). This capability should be operationnal with the 5th batch of the RAFALE program.

Active cancellation means preventing a radar from detecting a target by firing back a deception signal with the same frequency as the reflection, but precisely one-half wavelength out of phase with it. Result: the returned energy reaching the radar has no frequency and can’t be detected.
http://qalaat.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/stealth-rafale/
shukla
BRFite
Posts: 1727
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Location: Land of Oz!

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by shukla »

X-post

New Vice President for Boeing Military Aircraft in India
Bob Gower, a F/A-18 fighter plane expert, has been named as vice president of Boeing Military Aircraft division in India. Gower will "expand and manage" the BMA product line in India, including P-8I maritime patrol aircraft, F/A-18IN fighter jets competing for the IAF's 126 MMRCA contract, C-17 transport aircraft to be bought by IAF, Apache attack and Chinook heavylift helicopters.

He will be based out of St Louis in Missouri, US, according to a company press release here today. Vivek Lall, vice president and India country head of Boeing, would continue to be responsible for all Boeing Defence activities in the country and would work closely with Gower in support of BMA activities, the release said.

Prior to taking on the Indian assignment, Gower managed several businesses within BMA. Most recently, he served as vice president of F/A-18 and EA-18 programmes.
By the sounds of it Boeing is looking to convert 'Indian Air Force' to 'Boeing Air Force'.. :twisted:
Samay
BRFite
Posts: 1171
Joined: 30 Mar 2009 02:35
Location: India

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Samay »

The taxpayer suffers in the end because national security remains at swords edge
going japs,soko way isnt the way to become self sustainable superpower
probably thats what they want and there are many middlemen in India who are licking their feet to do any thing no matter what are the consequences

self sustenance is the right way, and right things arent achieved going wrong ways
shukla
BRFite
Posts: 1727
Joined: 17 Aug 2009 20:50
Location: Land of Oz!

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by shukla »

Saab waits on Brazil and India for Sea Gripen go ahead
Saab will only develop an aircraft carrier-capable version of its JAS 39 Gripen NG fighter should either India or Brazil select the land-based variant to fulfil their fighter replacement programmes, the company has said.

Eddy de la Motte, Gripen campaign director for India, told reporters on 12 June that development of the aircraft has, to date, been driven by its core customer, the Swedish Air Force (SwAF). With no Swedish requirement for a navalised aircraft, it requires a customer with a carrier capability to serve as a catalyst for any such development of the proposed Sea Gripen.

"[Development of the Sea Gripen] only makes sense if India or Brazil buy the NG as Sweden has no carriers," he said during a briefing at the company's Linköping facility in southern Sweden.

According to de la Motte, the 'land' Gripen needs only rudimentary changes to make it carrier compatible. These include a strengthened undercarriage, bigger brakes and a tail hook (which the NG will have). The standard Gripen has a large number of the attributes for carrier operations, such as a high precision landing capability, a high pitch and roll rate authority and precision glide slope control, a reinforced airframe and enhanced anti-corrosion protection.
Saab has so much pinned on India and Brazil.. Wonder even if the NG would survive without either Brazil or India though Sweden has promised to order small numbers..
Kronop
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 31
Joined: 11 Jun 2010 13:58

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Kronop »

A Sea Gripen is most likely not something Saab is expecting to start developing in the near future, as far as I am aware there is no immediate businesscase for such a product.

Also developing a Gripen NG, let alone verifying and validating new capabilities and ensuring that operating and systems safety requirements is met is no small undertaking. Even if a Sea Gripen will come into play I would expect Saab to keep development on hold until the NG programme is well on its way.

As for NG programme survival it is more likely than not that Saab will follow through regardless of Brazil or India business, they have invested too much of their own money in this to abort IMO.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Indranil »

Samay wrote: ....
That is my exact point. Stop showing the money that India is showing now and no country will show interest. It's not just the US, the French, the Swedish, the Russians or whoever.

On the other hand keep showing the money and every congress in every nation will see things through for you. So that "safe" adjective for ToT, sanction-prone is more based on us rather than the selling country!
VishalJ
BRFite
Posts: 1033
Joined: 12 Feb 2009 06:40
Location: Mumbai
Contact:

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by VishalJ »

Looks so much like an extra-terrestrial from head-on 8)
Photo is by an ace photographer & friend of mine.

HIGH RES
Image


Check this out, 5 EF2K's in 1,
First 2 slowing, third has just touched-down, fourth one is about to & fifth one on final approach !
Image
Kronop
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 31
Joined: 11 Jun 2010 13:58

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Kronop »

18 Gripens in formation over Stockholm in celebration of the royal wedding today
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Karan M »

The Rafale is by far the most underrated fighter.

As its recent performance against the Typhoons showed, it seems to be no less in air to air, despite all the propaganda against it, run by one "journalist" who let his national preference run roughshod over any sort of journalistic integrity.
The interesting thing seems to be that for all the talk of the Typhoons sensor fusion, it still has a way to go for it to be fully available apparently, considering what the French reports mention, unless they are wrong.
What they also point out is a lower RCS, which coupled with an extremely effective EW system, makes the Rafale a very capable aircraft. The variant being discussed for the UAE will be even more competitive.

Of the really two "independent choices" - the Typhoon and the Rafale, the latter seems more mature and well rounded. The former may retain some advantage in the air to air supersonic arena, but even that seems doubtful once the newer Rafale variants emerge.
Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8426
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

Post by Indranil »

Mrinal wrote:
As its recent performance against the Typhoons showed, it seems to be no less in air to air.
There is no denying of that the Rafale is a superlative fighter. But, don't take DACT results at its face value. There was wonderful link posted here some time back about how DACT is planed and the objectives. So the English might not have just come with the idea of winning one-on-ones. If they wanted to just know what the rafale is capable of, they had more take-aways than the French!
The interesting thing seems to be that for all the talk of the Typhoons sensor fusion, it still has a way to go for it to be fully available apparently, considering what the French reports mention, unless they are wrong.
Take a French article on a french aircraft with some caution. Neither the Rafale nor the EF are fully evolved platforms. And neither of them will be for some time to come.
What they also point out is a lower RCS, which coupled with an extremely effective EW system, makes the Rafale a very capable aircraft.
Here is a perfectly valid example of what I just said. Nobody knows the RCS of either of these aircrafts. Those figures are never released! So who pointed out what!
Locked