How do pakis reconcile Islam and their private depredations against fellow pakis?
Pakis can rationalize (with enough real/contrived ammunition from the Quran) their bestial behaviour against the kuffar. Thus killing of innocent men, women and children of the hated Hindu India can be swept under the carpet as ‘wajib-ul-qatl’ –Islamically condoned, or even ordained actions. Lying through the teeth to India or the west can also be justified with this or that Quranic injunction or exhortation. Pakis, being the subhuman species that they are, can also condone their horrific treatment of their own women as ‘wajib’ under the rubric of PakIslam. But how do they reconcile their various depredations against fellow pakis of the same sect?
How does a Sunni paki justify demanding a bribe or killing/maiming another sunni paki? I believe that the answer lies in the innate ‘dharmic’ mis-instruction set that pakis carry in their genes. Dharma (Vedic dharma – that pakis adhered to until a few hundred years ago) does not lay down a book of instructions on what is right and what is wrong. But it lays down a set of principles for judging whether an action or inaction is ‘dharmic’ or not. I daresay that a few hundred years ago the paki genes did carry this instruction set (I am speaking metaphorically off course! Dharmic instructions are not encoded in any DNA to be carried through the generations. Perhaps I am referring to dharmic memes!). But over the last few centuries due to an environmental effect (natural selection of Darwin), the original genes have become corrupted and have lost the ability to distinguish between the right and wrong as defined by the original dharmic instruction set. But the new instruction set has neither been fully implanted nor has it been discarded. This creates a morphed gene (meme) that gives rise to a garbled instruction set that mixes unintended parts from both the instruction sets (Vedic and Islamic).
This has interesting consequences. One of the defining cornerstones of the original Vedic instruction set (IMHO) is that there is no external agency/God/Book/Pundit that can sit in judgment of one’s actions. Since every individual (and every animate or inanimate entity) is a representation of the Supreme Truth (Brahma/God/Allah/Yahweh/etc.), every individual is endowed with the privilege to sit in judgment of one’s own actions (karmas). On the other hand, the other instruction set (Islamic) has clear, unambiguous as well as conflicting (which means sometimes ambiguous) rules on what is wajib (Dharmic/Islamic) on a personal level. When pakis do something that the rest of the civilized world would consider odious or bestial, the paki himself/herself is either justifying it on the basis of Islam or on the basis of a personal judgment of right or wrong. But the basis for both the judgments is faulty because the instruction sets have been mixed and mismatched and turned into a mess.
Sorry for the ramble.
ps. forgot to add the obligatory equal-equal

A large % of Indians also carry the same contradictions - in their case the implanted instrcution set is called 'Mackaulay' plus other sundry corruptions of the original instruction set.