Thank you.kmkraoind wrote:Small request to Mupalla garu, when you post eenadu links, post links from Archive link so that they cannot change the content when the date changes, TIA.
Here it is.
http://www.eenadu.net/archives/archive- ... panel5.htm
Thank you.kmkraoind wrote:Small request to Mupalla garu, when you post eenadu links, post links from Archive link so that they cannot change the content when the date changes, TIA.
His new slogan is Khammam Steel is Telangana's Steel. Well Khammam leaders retorted Khammam steel (actually it is iron ore) is Khammam's. For T-leaders getting Telangana is bonanza as old exploiters are gone they become new exploiters.Narayana Rao wrote:if state is divided then INC will be wipped out in rest of the state and TRS will be i power in T land. So both side they will lose. In case of division JAGAN DO NOT NEED INC TO BECOME CM. He can win on his own. In fact most of the leaders will jump out of congress.
Without Hyd T vadis never going to accept division. The main reason for the division is the loot in the Hyd real estate. Do you think KCR will let it go?
Now if the above report is correct, then why not Jagan in the first place? My orginal question is still not answered. Why the Sonia system is unhappy with YSR when they delivered the state twice? Because they are corrupt is a BS. Gandhis are not-corrupt is joke.* Sonia is extremely angry and is expecting God to punish Jagan.
* As per her since YSR helped the party a lot, though YSR looted a lot of money she overlooked the stuff and allowed YSR to be CM for two terms. (she used the term minted money)
* She reitereated that she is very determined to take head on with Jagan
* She expected Jagan to be loyal to party through out his life as she has extened a lot to their family
* She reiterated that there will be no replacement of Rossiah.
Uncle using Infra-red sat images (~20K) to locate the missing helicopter raised fears of YSR's outside connections. The surmise is that YSJ carries the connections as shown by his defiance despite the sympathy/support shown by INC at center (Recall picture of SG sitting on the feet side of the bed).Hari Seldon wrote:^^^I also agree.
Something really smells regarding why dy-nasty is unable to come to terms with sri sri jagan garu as AP CM. Esp since he is also a preacher, a devout man of the book etc.
Chalo, for a while I accepted that it must be that regional satraps threaten the die-nasty in Dilli. But at the risk of losing the state wholesale (or retail) why not relent and accommodate what looks, talks, walks etc like a congressman?
It is about national security when external connections are involvedramana wrote:
Uncle using Infra-red sat images (~20K) to locate the missing helicopter raised fears of YSR's outside connections. The surmise is that YSJ carries the connections as shown by his defiance despite the sympathy/support shown by INC at center (Recall picture of SG sitting on the feet side of the bed).
So its seen as threat to the dynasty itself.
BTW AP is a golden goose that lays multiple eggs. CBN was modest by YSR standards.
Also AP is a key state/region in India. Thrice in modern history it served as gateway to conquest: Fall of Kakatiyas, Loss of Telangana to Bahmanis, Nizam's compromise with the English.
At the end of the day, YSR&family are factionists and profiteers. Their outlook is shaped by their own background and so in politics they play black-and-white politics and nothing grey in what they did. In my opinion they are way less dangerous than the Congress and Sonia&co.Acharya wrote:It is about national security when external connections are involvedramana wrote:
Uncle using Infra-red sat images (~20K) to locate the missing helicopter raised fears of YSR's outside connections. The surmise is that YSJ carries the connections as shown by his defiance despite the sympathy/support shown by INC at center (Recall picture of SG sitting on the feet side of the bed).
So its seen as threat to the dynasty itself.
BTW AP is a golden goose that lays multiple eggs. CBN was modest by YSR standards.
Also AP is a key state/region in India. Thrice in modern history it served as gateway to conquest: Fall of Kakatiyas, Loss of Telangana to Bahmanis, Nizam's compromise with the English.
Well, CBN is like Mr 10%. YSR is more like Mr 90%. Gandhis are upset that they didn't get proper share in the loot. May be they were expecting to be Ms. 50% (of the loot) but got 10% only.CBN was modest by YSR standards.
ShyamSP garu I reiterate this is not convincing and this is the quest that I had and with no results yet.ShyamSP wrote: I believe main grouse (if there is one) for Central Congress is YSR&co safeguarded themselves by being friends with Galis (who hailed from Tirupati area) so effectively nullifying Congress tactics to take Karnataka. Both sides they looted mines even by killing some obstacles (Paritala for example). With YSR&co power politics, nobody else couldn't be accommodated unless they were loyal to YSR (note not to Congress) so Congress might have thought it is time to accommodate others....
...
...
...
Gandhis are upset that they didn't get proper share in the loot. May be they were expecting to be Ms. 50% (of the loot) but got 10% only.
I jocularly said on money part and it is minor as you said (even if there is element of truth). Money part is major complaint* from non-YSR congress people however. For Sonia&co, when they have whole India, it is minor one.Muppalla wrote:ShyamSP garu I reiterate this is not convincing and this is the quest that I had and with no results yet.ShyamSP wrote: I believe main grouse (if there is one) for Central Congress is YSR&co safeguarded themselves by being friends with Galis (who hailed from Tirupati area) so effectively nullifying Congress tactics to take Karnataka. Both sides they looted mines even by killing some obstacles (Paritala for example). With YSR&co power politics, nobody else couldn't be accommodated unless they were loyal to YSR (note not to Congress) so Congress might have thought it is time to accommodate others....
...
...
...
Gandhis are upset that they didn't get proper share in the loot. May be they were expecting to be Ms. 50% (of the loot) but got 10% only.
Money and loot from YSR is of no use before the Sonia and Gandhis. Just to remind you, they are able to form a cartel to loot Iraq oil using Kofi Annan's son (ex-UN general sec). This they did when BJP was in power. That is just a glimpse of the what their loot power is. I don't even want to get into several arms, drug merchants and underworld etc. which extends to famous bank of middle east called BCCI scandal. In summary Sonia is upset because of YSR loot did not reach her is not even near convincing.
That is why I repeat that daal mea kuch kaala hai. The estrangement of Sonia dynasty and YSR dynasty has some thing very deeper and not analyzed so far. Otherwise they are just doing a drama for the public and finally they will make Jagan as CM.
Is it the same "talk of the town" where Rajdeep Sardesai has brokered a deal between Jagan and Sonia? Per that rumor/whatever, Sonia has given a go-ahead to Jagan to bring the numbers in terms of MLA and if he can show the numbers, Jagan can be CM.Bharath.Subramanyam wrote:Got some news from Delhi:
Jagan is not leaving congress. Deal has been made. Just one point unresolved.
Will update later.
BJP Govt in 1998 called 9/17 as the “Liberation Day” word for 9/17 for the first time. If Hyderabad state got liberated from “muslim rule” on 9/17/48 as BJP says, then how did Nijam continued as the state head till 1/26/1950, and as a Raj Pramukh till 10/31/156?
Nijam invited/helped GOI when the Razakars went out of his control. Nizam continuing Sir Walter Monkton as Hyderabad’s chief counsel on law/justice is an indication of this.
There is a misconception that Razakars mean fanatic muslims only. One shouldn’t forget the fact that “dalit” leaders like Syam Sundar, B.S Venkata Rao, Pisari Veeranna who converted into Islam besides other feudals also were part of Razakars.
Hyderabad people did not get any freedom from this so-called liberation. Indian Army killed thousands of {is this true? Wikipedia puts the total Razakars killed in Operation Polo at 1,373 killed, 1,911 captured http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Polo} of innocent muslims in Martwada and Karnataka regions of Hyderabad state. The Sunderlal committee setup by JLN clearly documented this.
BJP demands that we should celebrate “Telangana Liberation Day on 9/17” as the other two regions (in Karnataka and Maharashtra) of former Hyderabad state are doing that. The fact is that these states started celebrating this so-called “Telangana Liberation Day” only when they came under BJP rule. The point here is that these Martwada and Karnataka regions blended very well “linguistically” with their respective states. But that is not the case with Telangana {The author doesn’t give any reasons why this is the case, if it true to start with}. That is why we have conflicting views on this “liberation’.
We cannot call Police Action as ‘unification’. Unification can happen only when both parties are acceptable to it. The international media {what else can be expected in 1947 context?} called IA’s action as ‘invasion’. Even after 9/17 all govt orders are released on Nizam’s name only. Even Suprem Court of India also many times ruled that Hyderabad is an independent state and its issues do on come under its jurisdiction {is this true?}
Unification in true sense should bring some benefits to local population {lahori logic IMO– in the above para he describes why we cannot call this unification, and now claims that unification didn’t bring any benefits}. Telangana suffered a lot after that. People lost jobs, and were put under outside rule {I guess Madras state}. The lands people won after long fight again went under feudal domination. How can we celebrate such a day as Liberation Day?
After police action govt brought many employees from Madras. These people filled the senior positions vacated by the muslims who left India. These people behaved as if locals are unintelligent and illiterate and of different language This attitude is continued to till date {After 50+ yrs? They must have retired a generation ago}. These people gave preferential treatment to people from their respective regions in low level jobs as well {We need to check stats from previous pages…}
Mulki agitation started in 1952 in this background. More than dozen (12) students died in police firing. Should we celebrate the day (9/17) which is the root cause of all of this as the “liberation” day? It is very surprising that even communists, who called for “Independent Hyderabad” in those days, are in support of celebrating 9/17 as liberation day.
Source: Airavat's blogHyderabad was thus encouraged to declare its own independence after the formation of Independent India. The Nizam also provided a loan of Rs. 20 crore to Pakistan during its unofficial war with India in the Hindu princely state of J&K. Inside Hyderabad an irregular army of terrorists, called the Razakars, was raised and placed under the fanatical Qasim Razwi to crush all political opposition. They murdered Hindus and Muslims indiscriminately, and later began attacking and torching Hindu villages in the countryside. The villagers broke out in an uprising in many parts of the state.
The government of India, after making many attempts to negotiate with the Nizam's government, was provoked into action after the Razakars attacked villages in Indian territory. Termed Operation Polo, the police action defeated the Hyderabad army within five days while the cowardly razakars tried to mingle back into the population. However the simmering rage of the people against these terrorists led to violence for a few weeks, until order was restored.
Despite his complicity in the bloodshed of the razakars, the Nizam was never arrested or tried in court. He was given the ceremonial post of Rajpramukh while the state was integrated with the rest of India.
But the article goes on to show that only the MIM is opposing the celebration of this day.The day is also celebrated as the Telangana Liberation Day after a powerful Indian Army ran over a weak Nizam, who refused to join the Indian Union and wanted to stay independent. Like the Telangana issue, it has divided separatists and some integrationists, with the former demanding official celebrations and the latter opposing it.
The MIM president, Mr Asaduddin Owaisi is unconvinced and says, “It’s a Sangh Parivaar agenda. I am an Indian. For me freedom means August 15 and January 26. Apart from these two days, other dates are irrelevant. It will be a hate campaign against the Muslim rulers, fuel more anger and poison against Muslims.” He points out that there was no such demand in the past and any attempt to do it now will have repercussions. The Muslims of Telangana have not forgotten the brutal massacre and rape of thousands of Muslims during the liberation period.
Mr Ch. Vidyasagar Rao, former Union minister of state for home told this correspondent, "I also feel it should get a mention in text books. Students should know Hyderabad history. The MIM’s objection is uncalled for. During the Razakar movement and its aftermath, Hindus as well as Muslims were victims. Suppressing history will do no good."
HYDERABAD: Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) president K Chandrasekhar Rao’s remarks that all those born in Telangana should be considered Telangana biddalu and his surprising bonhomie with Vijayawada MP Lagadapati Rajagopal have raised the hackles of Telangana advocates who have been demanding 42 per cent quota in judicial posts for those from the region.
Rao made the remarks during a debate on a Telugu news channel on Saturday night. Vijayawada MP Lagadapati Rajagopal, who also participated in the debate, agreed with Rao. Contrary to public perception, the duo exhibited respect for each other to such an extent that Rao found Lagadapati’s courage praiseworthy and professed love and admiration for him.
The new-found “love” between the two opposite poles in the political spectrum took the T advocates by surprise who saw “wrong signals” in the TRS chief ’s assertions and expressed fear that “Andhras” born in Telangana could stake claim to “Telangana jobs.” Bar Council of India member Rajender Reddy wondered if Rao was diluting their one-week long agitation.
The TRS chief, however, clarified on Sunday that he had made the comments in a generic sense.
“Telangana advocates should shed their misconceptions,” he said.
He reiterated that all those born in the region would be sons of the soil and pointed out that many people, with roots in Andhra, were born in Nizamabad and Mahabubnagar districts. “All those who are born here are our atmeeyulu,” Rao said but remained silent on Lagadapati.