Philip,Philip wrote:Johann,culture and religion link a huge part of Asia and India together.Buddhism and Hinduism have such a rich heritage apart from the sub-continent,in the ASEAN states like,Burma,Indonesia,Siam/Thailand,Indo-China,even as far as China and Japan.Just look at the architectural heritage.Angkor Wat,Borubador,Bali,In fact,Japanese and Tamil have strong roots as discovered a couple of decades ago by linguists from both countries.This is an area which India has traditionally neglected in conduct of its foreign policy and I'm not sure if it has even woken up now to the potential that it has in furthering closer ties with these nations.
What you are talking about is the influence of ideas, languages and practices from Indian civilisation, which is profound of course.
Certainly I'm sure that such cultural ties can be mobilised to reinforce diplomatic, strategic and the people to people relationships.
What I've asked is whether this thing called 'Asia' has an existence beyond the history of European isolation (the 'Dark Ages') followed by European colonisation in era of racial ideology.
"Asia" is really the home of three different historical civilisations - a Semitic one, a Subcontinental one, and a North-East Asian one. There are also very important hybridised offshoots like Persia and Java which could be argued to be civilisations in their own right.
That changed in the late 1960s with the rise of Admiral Gorshov who was determined to project Soviet influence and strength in to the Indian Ocean.Austin wrote:Wasnt Indian Ocean a kind of Zone of Peace between Soviet and US during Cold War and hence no body played the funny game they played at Atlantic ?
Competition increased throughout the 1970s, and was much sharper around the Horn of Africa, southern Africa and the southern Arabian Peninsula.
This was in part because in a number of countries post-colonial non-Aligned governments were overthrown by doctrinaire Marxist revolutionaries. Afghanistan, Ethiopia, South Yemen, etc.
You could see the conflict at the NAM conference in Havana in 1979 when you had on one side genuinely independent states like Yugoslavia and India, and on the other side Moscow affiliated Marxists like Castro, etc. Castro beat out Tito and dominated the conference. It was really a sort of last gasp in any case.