Cyrano wrote: ↑25 Nov 2024 00:46
I'm challenging #1 which itself is a scam and IPCC which is yet another brainless and corrupt UN organisation has done a lot to mainstream it over decades.
I am not arguing that with you beyond a point. If you believe it's an IPCC/UN scam without any kind of credible evidence, that is very sad.
So, let's not use any IPCC/UN data at all.
Here is what the largest crude oil producer in the USA has been doing on climate change issues since the 1970s:
Our results show that in private and academic circles since the late 1970s and early 1980s, ExxonMobil predicted global warming correctly and skillfully. .....ExxonMobil’s average projected warming was 0.20° ± 0.04°C per decade, which is, within uncertainty, the same as that of independent academic and government projections published between 1970 and 2007. The average “skill score” and level of uncertainty of ExxonMobil’s climate models (67 to 75% and ±21%, respectively) were also similar to those of the independent models.
A problem, of course, was that EM did not see a good reason to present these results properly to external stakeholders over 2-3 decades. This was not "illegal" (as ruled recently by a NY court) but exposed the company to "climate change denial" accusations.
Having partnered with oil companies for more than 2 decades (and still ongoing) and directly knowing many senior people, I can fully confirm such companies with a long and deep history of high quality R&D - such as EM, Chevron, ConocoPhillips etc - are not "anthropogenic climate change deniers". Especially since they believe their own results, and not relying on IPCC predictions.
Today, companies like EM have an extensive climate change mitigation strategy based on their own results:
You may argue about how good/bad their strategy is, but to deny #1 in my previous post as an IPCC scam is really nonsense.
The companies that pulled out all that carbon from the ground have also come to the same conclusion using their own independent research - which, as it turns out, had remarkably predicted the same results a decade before the IPCC.
Please try and look at this scientifically and objectively, even if nothing more than for the good of your own descendants/next generations of relatives who will have to deal with this.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 26 Nov 2024 09:11
by suryag
OT posts deleted
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 26 Nov 2024 16:14
by chetak
This is the proposed new pan card
The government has approved a major upgrade to the PAN card system. The PAN 2.0 project will modernize services and boost security. The new cards will have QR codes
When ready, it will be replaced as a free upgrade to existing pan card holders
The upgraded PAN card system is set to offer notable advancements:
Upgrade the existing system
Common Business Identifier for all business related activities in specified sectors
Unified Portal
Robust cyber security measures
PAN Data Vault system mandatory for all entities using PAN data
so, if sunanda is dead, and she was legally married to shampoo boy,
do the shares owned by sunanda go to tharoor? and by extension - the cong?
was he thats why sidelined as he refused to part with the monies?
so, if sunanda is dead, and she was legally married to shampoo boy,
do the shares owned by sunanda go to tharoor? and by extension - the cong?
was he thats why sidelined as he refused to part with the monies?
bharathp ji,
The question that should be asked is who exactly owned these shares
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 27 Nov 2024 20:23
by Lisa
^More to the point, if a transfer was done for NO MONETARY value then fraud in obvious. Somebody should be charged.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 27 Nov 2024 20:56
by Hriday
Saw several pro-Hindu people defending India's policy against Bangladesh on the violence against Hindus there. They are rhetorically questioning the subject knowledge of people who criticize and say that the Modi govt is doing the best course available. I am not convinced about this. I made a couple of posts on this subject. Link below.
India had suffered enough from the hero worship of political leaders. From Gandhi, Nehru, and Indira to Vajpayee. Do people remember the diabolical backstabbing by Vajpayee on Modi on the Godhra riots issue? As far as I know, Vajpayee was never made accountable for this treachery as the Hindu right wing was busy in hero worship of him.
Is there a resource thoroughly explaining India's options against Bangladesh and also for other issues as per the policies of BJP and Sangh Parivar?
BJP is in the central govt, and RSS is the largest right-wing organisation in the world. Isn't it their duty to educate the general public on what are India's options on various issues?
What I meant here is that there will be more public scrutiny of these policies and the leadership of Sangh pariwar will be more amenable to course correction. Also, more people could be attracted to join the Sangh Parivar.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 03:45
by KL Dubey
It looks like Wakf JPC will be extended for another couple of months for completing discussions. The bill will be brought again in Feb 2025 during the budget session.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 03:51
by KL Dubey
Hriday wrote: ↑27 Nov 2024 20:56
Is there a resource thoroughly explaining India's options against Bangladesh and also for other issues as per the policies of BJP and Sangh Parivar?
BJP is in the central govt, and RSS is the largest right-wing organisation in the world. Isn't it their duty to educate the general public on what are India's options on various issues?
What I meant here is that there will be more public scrutiny of these policies and the leadership of Sangh pariwar will be more amenable to course correction. Also, more people could be attracted to join the Sangh Parivar.
Akhand Bharat.
It will take time.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 06:03
by Vayutuvan
Akhand Bharat.
It will take time.
Sure it does (I mean time.) What doesn't? Vacuous statements come in fast and in volume. Pray tell us what "Akhand Bharat" is, sirjee.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 09:05
by Aditya_V
Historical Bharat land after certain people emigrate in large numbers to countries where they love, so the population has the right honesty ideology and good enough landmass for resources and proper peaceful law abiding living reversing the absurdity done in the last 1000 years.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 09:14
by A Deshmukh
The land lost in Akhand Bharat, (east and west pakistan), is occupied by rabid, hostile population, that is not compatible with our ideologies.
we dont want any of them in today's Bharat.
they are about 0.5B and cannot be wished away.
let them rot in their ideologies and wither away.
we dont want anything with them for the next 5-10 decades. till a few generations of life without their indoctrination.
at this time, the best we can have is a few corridors - East and West for trade routes.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 11:26
by Aditya_V
It took 500 years before the Rama Temple could be rebuilt, similarly this is a long term project, the fight will street by street , step by step, reclaim education, Industrial economic military might, let the true history be written, free institutions slowly, but over decades we have to undo a lot of the damage which has been done.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 12:17
by sanjayc
^^ The fight was actually over in 1947 had that Gandhi-Nehru jackass philosopher duo allowed full transfer of population. Even Jinnah was insisting on it.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 20:32
by chetak
Only Hindus can be appointed as staff in colleges, schools run by temples, rules Madras High Court
Justice Vivek Kumar Singh dismissed a 2021 writ petition filed by a Mulsim candidate A. Suhail to the post of Office Assistant in Arulmighu Kapaleeswarar Arts and Science College in Chennai. The judge said, a self financing institution, which does not receive
any government aid, would not fall under the definition of the term ‘State’ in order to provide equality of opportunity in public employment.
He said that a self financing college established with temple funds and whose recurring expenses were met with fees collected from students would not fall under Articles 16(1) and (2) of the Constitution which prohibits discrimination in public employment
on grounds religion. It would instead fall under Article 16(5) which permits appointment based on religion in certain denominational institutions, he added.
The judge, further, highlighted that Section 10 of the HR and CE Act insists that any officer or servant appointed to carry out the purpose of the Act must be a person profession Hindu religion. He rejected the argument of the writ petitioner’s counsel that a college, though established with temple funds, could be considered only as an educational institution and not a religious institution and therefore Articles 16(1) and (2) would apply
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 28 Nov 2024 20:38
by uddu
Aditya_V wrote: ↑28 Nov 2024 11:26
It took 500 years before the Rama Temple could be rebuilt, similarly this is a long term project, the fight will street by street , step by step, reclaim education, Industrial economic military might, let the true history be written, free institutions slowly, but over decades we have to undo a lot of the damage which has been done.
Status quo has not taken us anywhere nor is it going to take us anywhere good. Solution is Chatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj's idea and action is the solution. You can call it salami slicing or whatever, gaining land without population. Along with Ghar Wapsi. These two must go on along with above things mentioned.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 02:02
by KL Dubey
A Deshmukh wrote: ↑28 Nov 2024 09:14
The land lost in Akhand Bharat, (east and west pakistan), is occupied by rabid, hostile population, that is not compatible with our ideologies.
we dont want any of them in today's Bharat.
they are about 0.5B and cannot be wished away.
let them rot in their ideologies and wither away.
we dont want anything with them for the next 5-10 decades. till a few generations of life without their indoctrination.
at this time, the best we can have is a few corridors - East and West for trade routes.
Correct. I have posted about "Akhand Bharat" several times earlier, and RSS literature on it is very well known. Akhand Bharat stretches from arabia to the pacific ocean and from tibet to antarctica. It took millennia to create such a region that was culturally influenced and in many ways integrated with the Bharat heartland. As of now the heartland is still recovering from the effects of RoP/RoL invasions and partitions. Rebuilding the heartland into the world's most important country will restart the integration, and it will be much faster than in ancient times.
In the near term:
- Integration of Nepal and Bhutan and their total separation from Chinese designs are currently the best targets
- Integration of PoK and GB
- RoP influence in BD and Pak should be worn down in every way, many of the specific issues will then take care of themselves
- Re-establish strong trade and cooperation links with west asia and southeast asia (this is already underway)
I have posted earlier about the need for a triumvirate of BJP (political) + RSS (social) + Sant-samaj (organized religion) all working together in a coordinated manner.
Among several important points, in this episode Pradeep outlines the emergence of such a cooperation in the two largest states UP and MH. In both states, capable leaders who comfortably straddle the triumvirate - such as Yogi (BJP+Santsamaj) and Farnavis (BJP+RSS) - have emerged.
From my point of view, both leaders have been encouraged and raised to prominence by Modi and Shah starting in 2014. So, I have every reason to believe this goal of a triumvirate organization is real and being purposefully worked on.
Irrespective of all the other factors, the 2024 LS election could have still been won with a full majority (BJP 272+) had it not been for JP Nadda weakening the cooperation between BJP and RSS.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 12:43
by chetak
Generous India has long nurtured scorpions in her bosom due to the lack of understanding of the concept of "shatrubodh" or even the need to use it to strengthen the cultural and civilizational firewall
this creep was "manchurian candidated" into the IFS by his biradari and protected by zail singh whom he served as his secretary
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 13:05
by chetak
can someone help me understand ....
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 14:15
by Zynda
This freebie culture is hurting and slowing our chances of climbing towards the next echelon of economy. We need money to be spent on creating more industries, better infra, encourage R&D and better educational institutions. Instead, money meant for development is going towards making people more lazy. Somebody had filed a case against political parties offering freebies during elections and IIRC, the court (not sure which court or level) has barred promises of freebies but just like many laws, it only exists on paper. Even NDA is forced to offer freebies to compete against opposition parties. I don't know how this can be stopped but NDA should think about this strongly before the cycle loses control.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 16:41
by uddu
The onus of making the promises should be made legally binding including financial loss on the leadership and the political party that make those promises.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 17:10
by chetak
uddu wrote: ↑30 Nov 2024 16:41
The onus of making the promises should be made legally binding including financial loss on the leadership and the political party that make those promises.
uddu ji,
The KAR lot are in dilli begging the PM for funds
This is not their first time, or their first trip
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 19:34
by uddu
People rectify them in elections. To ensure that such promises are delivered, there should be a penalty on the politician and the political party when they issue the manifesto. And any such offers should be made part of manifesto and the assets of the party and politician must be at stake. Otherwise, it will go through the process of people learning the hard way and reversing it.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 30 Nov 2024 21:53
by chetak
Sambhal Mosque is an ASI-managed site and isn’t covered under the Places of Worship Act, 1991.
The court-ordered survey is fully justified, and no amount of baseless criticism can change this fact.
@chetak gaaru, what is surprising to me is that Simi Garewal has broken rank with the I. N. D. I. Alla. Isn't she a Raj Kapoor find?
Vayutuvan ji,
she is a botoxed, long term congi stooge with some dubious lootyens connections. She was, at best a bit player, a syrupy, simpering sycophant in borrowed chiffons. she may be about 300 years old, but looks only 299 with her heavily made up façade.
Her saccharine sweet "interviews" were all staged shows, designed to portray some of the so called leading lights of the era in a flattering light.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 01 Dec 2024 12:38
by SRajesh
Bhandhu Log
Have you noticed a new trend in the Indian TV debates: There are too many Political Anal-Cysts ( a la Jihadi type or otherwise).
And a surprising thing is almost all hold a view akin to Congi or openly profess to support Congi.
And the Most famous of the Anal-cysts are:
1. Sanjay Jha (remember Humara Congress.com). Kicked out yet seeking maafi from famiglia. Wonder if he is going to start another Hamara Dump Kahan Hain.com or some such Crap.
2. Tehseen Poonawala of the Mera Dump Khan Hain.com
These two remind me of the old movie(younger ones in the group may not remember) Desperately Seeking Susan. These two have been leaving so many personal ads for an audience with Shri Pappuji and to date he has not obliged them.
I wonder if this a definite ploy by the Pappu team. This way they have two on the panel of the debate and yet at the same time have "Plausible Deniability"
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 01 Dec 2024 15:46
by drnayar
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 01 Dec 2024 15:50
by chetak
SRajesh wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024 12:38
Bhandhu Log
Have you noticed a new trend in the Indian TV debates: There are too many Political Anal-Cysts ( a la Jihadi type or otherwise).
And a surprising thing is almost all hold a view akin to Congi or openly profess to support Congi.
And the Most famous of the Anal-cysts are:
1. Sanjay Jha (remember Humara Congress.com). Kicked out yet seeking maafi from famiglia. Wonder if he is going to start another Hamara Dump Kahan Hain.com or some such Crap. 2. Tehseen Poonawala of the Mera Dump Khan Hain.com
These two remind me of the old movie(younger ones in the group may not remember) Desperately Seeking Susan. These two have been leaving so many personal ads for an audience with Shri Pappuji and to date he has not obliged them.
I wonder if this a definite ploy by the Pappu team. This way they have two on the panel of the debate and yet at the same time have "Plausible Deniability"
SRajesh ji,
tehseen is married to robert vadra'a close relative and is also the BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla's brother
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 01 Dec 2024 22:13
by SRajesh
^^Saar regardless of that he finds himself out in the cold.
Still not accepted as part of Congi party.
Remember he tried to defy and stand for election.
And for that he is still finds himself : unforgiven
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 02 Dec 2024 00:01
by chetak
SRajesh wrote: ↑01 Dec 2024 22:13
^^Saar regardless of that he finds himself out in the cold.
Still not accepted as part of Congi party.
Remember he tried to defy and stand for election.
And for that he is still finds himself : unforgiven
SRajesh ji,
It is the vadra connection that has put the kibosh on him.
That connection is radioactive
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 02 Dec 2024 02:00
by chetak
The rallying cry and civilizational catchphrase "बंटोगे तो कटोगे" has cut deeply into the narrative of the wokes, congis, liberandus and urban naxals.
"Hindus should remain divided in castes, that is their identity.
Calls for Hindus to develop a united group consciousness is a political project (of BJP)"
- Swami Avimukteshwaranand, who claims to be a 'Shankaracharya' & wants Article 370 restored
Bharat had a Varnashram of four professions - educators, police & military, farmers & traders, and workers.
A sweeper became an educator, Rishi Valmiki.
"बंटोगे तो कटोगे" has had a deep impact on the congi sponsored, commie and naxal protected conversion agenda
these guys are now slithering out of the woodwork, in a desperate effort to preserve their sickular fiefdoms and meagre political domains while hoping to garner increased social relevance, which they hope leads to a seat in the parliament
They also need to sing loudly for their supper in order to retain the abrahamic patronage that sustains them in their lavish life style that they have become accustomed to ...
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 02 Dec 2024 08:59
by fanne
Chetan Saar what is significance of Sudama?
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 02 Dec 2024 22:21
by chetak
fanne wrote: ↑02 Dec 2024 08:59
Chetan Saar what is significance of Sudama?
Couldn't confirm it fanne saar, but it may be the guy who made the screen shot.
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 02 Dec 2024 22:26
by chetak
A recent bit of history
Deeper implications will be understood by most pundits only a decade later.
Just watch.
Gautam Adani@gautam_adani
Delighted to win the tender for privatization of the Port of Haifa in Israel with our partner Gadot.
Immense strategic and historical significance for both nations!
Proud to be in Haifa, where Indians led, in 1918, one of the greatest cavalry charges in military history! Jul 14, 2022
Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat
Posted: 03 Dec 2024 10:13
by drnayar
chetak wrote: ↑02 Dec 2024 22:26A recent bit of history
Deeper implications will be understood by most pundits only a decade later.
Just watch.
Gautam Adani@gautam_adani
Delighted to win the tender for privatization of the Port of Haifa in Israel with our partner Gadot.
Immense strategic and historical significance for both nations!
Proud to be in Haifa, where Indians led, in 1918, one of the greatest cavalry charges in military history! Jul 14, 2022
The battle of Haifa was a decisive battle. It was fought on 23rd September 1918. In this battle, Indian soldiers from the British Indian Army fought a courageous battle and defeated the army of the Ottoman Empire and their German allies.
Only the Jo hukums (Jodhpur lancers) could have done it. That day the jo hukums had to be restrained as they galloped through the streets of Haifa, even after all the machine gun posts had fallen, towards the placid and unknowing Mediterranean, spearing and butchering unfortunate Turks who crossed their path, civilians even, for the Rathores were crazed with rage. They had seen far too many of their brothers fall.(Wikipedia)
Ps : there is a bit of turkey there and now as well (in the background..but not in good places..both !)