Modi 3.0 - Bharat

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Vayutuvan wrote: 10 Apr 2025 04:00 What I don't understand is how and why PV saab let this happen. He wouldn't have listened to Sonia ma'am for sure.


Vayutuvan ji,


PVN did this because the POW is toothless law/act.

Whatever anyone may say, PVNR was the most intellectual of any of India's PMs. The man was an erudite scholar, an accomplished linguistic and a philosopher of repute, and also a man with deep religious convictions. He would not have passed an act like the POW, if it were capable of doing any real harm to the Sanatani Dharma.

He was also a very astute politician who would have seen through the mafia family, their BIF Backers, and their game plan

Remember how he was insulted, even in death, by the gori mafia and that scum ysr. That was a needlessly extreme reaction, as also a very vengeful one, but those genes are culturally so very different from the normal Sanatani genes. The mafia also went after APJAK with a similarly spiteful appetite

There is another much older act called the ASI act

Under that act, even your house, if over a hundred years old and has some cultural or some other remarkable value, it can be declared as "an ancient monument" and will be "protected" by the GoI, and the authority to do that is vested in a statutory body: National Monuments Authority (NMA). The AMASR Act defines an “ancient monument” as any structure or building, cave, sculpture, inscription, or monolith that is of historical, archaeological, or artistic interest.

This covers religious sites/buildings too, if they have any historical, archaeological, or artistic interest


Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act

The Indian government, in March 2023, announced plans to review the legal issues affecting construction-related activities around protected monuments and sites. This move is aimed at allowing infrastructure-related work while preserving the rich heritage of the country.

About Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act

The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act is an important piece of legislation in India that aims to preserve and protect the country’s rich heritage and cultural assets.

The act was passed in 1958 and has since undergone several amendments to keep pace with changing times.

Overview of the AMASR Act

The AMASR Act defines an “ancient monument” as any structure or building, cave, sculpture, inscription, or monolith that is of historical, archaeological, or artistic interest.

The act aims to protect such monuments and ensure their preservation for future generations.
It applies to all monuments that are over 100 years old, whether they are in public or private ownership.

The act prohibits any construction activity or alteration to the protected area around ancient monuments without the approval of the National Monuments Authority (NMA).

This protected area is defined as a 100-metre radius around the monument, and a regulated area extends up to 200 metres beyond that.

The NMA is the regulatory authority responsible for implementing the AMASR Act.

It is a statutory body that oversees the protection and preservation of ancient monuments and archaeological sites in India.


It is empowered to grant permission for any construction or developmental activity within the protected and regulated areas.

Current restrictions on construction activity near protected monuments:

The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act prohibits construction within a 100-metre radius of protected monuments and has strict regulations for construction permits in an additional 200-metre radius beyond that.

All 3,696 protected monuments in the country fall under this prohibition and require specific approval from the National Monuments Authority for any construction or related activity in these areas.
Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 9117
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Sachin »

Ashok Sarraff wrote:Amit Shah ji said in one of the interviews that the act does not take effect retrospectively. If that is correct, what happens to all the properties, both private and governmental, that the Waqf Board has occupied prior to this act over the years? Do such properties remain under the control of the Waqf Boards permanently?
I can take a stab at that one. This is the bill which was tabled in the Parliament. Refer to the below provisions.
Sec 3 Waqf Bill: This is to amend Sec 2 of the parent Act (i.e Waqf Act 2013). A new proviso is getting introduced. “Provided further that nothing in this Act shall, notwithstanding any judgement, decree or order of any court, apply to a trust (by whatever name called) established before or after the commencement of this Act or statutorily regulated by any statutory provision pertaining to public charities, by a Muslim for purpose similar to a waqf under any law for the time being in force.”.

A Muslim (or any one else) can start a Charitable Trust in India, using provisions of the Indian Trust Act 1882. In such a case, such charitable trusts CANNOT be considered as Waqf Trusts, just because a Muslim started it. The donation/hand over to Waqf has to be explicit. For example; there can be an educational trust started by a Muslim which runs a college. This trust nor the college can be now considered Waqf. They will be treated as a religion-agnostic trust and all India Trust Act provisions will apply.

Sec 4 Waqf Bill: This is to amend Sec 3 of the parent Act. Along with providing for intervention of revenue authorities (such as Dist. Collector) there is also a provision to be added to the end of Sec 3. "“Provided that the existing waqf by user properties registered on or before the commencement of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 as waqf by user will remain as waqf properties except that the property wholly or in part, is in dispute or is a government property;".

Waqf by user is the most disputed condition of the previous act. This is where a property used for Muslim religious purposes, can be claimed as Waqf property. This proviso now gives exemption in two cases. One there is a dispute on the land, and/or the land in question is a government property. This would ensure that for any Waqf land which is under dispute (example; land in Munambam village, Kochi, Kerala or that village with a temple in Tamil Nadu), would not be considered as Waqf land unless the dispute is settled. And no more Waqf claims on any land which is considered government land, which means no encroachment of government land at any time. What this proviso excludes is land handed over to Waqf as Waqf by user for which no dispute has been raised.

Sec 5 Waqf Bill: This is to introduce a new section Sec 3A to the Parent Act. “3A. (1) No person shall create a waqf unless he is the lawful owner of the property and competent to transfer or dedicate such property. This will put a stop to Waqf by user. Only rightful owners can hand over the property to Waqf. And there are further provisions that even when doing so; it should not lead to denial of inheritance rights to heirs including women heirs.

Sec 8 Waqf Bill: This amends Sec 6 of the principal act. This is about the time limit to approach the Waqf tribunal in case there is a dispute. A new provision "Provided further that an application may be entertained by the Tribunal after the period of two years specified in the first proviso, if the applicant satisfies the Tribunal that he has sufficient cause for not making the application within such period".

This will be of help in a situation that a person does not know that his land has been usurped by Waqf trust, and only after two years he realises the same. This usually happens, as the whole claim would only be known to the property owner when he tries to clear his tax dues or sell the property.
Last edited by Sachin on 10 Apr 2025 19:25, edited 1 time in total.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 510
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Hriday »

Why did Congress change the name of their alliance from UPA to I N D I A(Indi alliance)?

As per Amit Shah, it is to avoid taking the blame for mega corruption done by Congress and its allies during the UPA rule. He calculated the total of the money involved in the scam and stopped counting after it crossed 12 lakhs crores.
He said that he wanted to tell the nation about it
through the parliament. Also listed are several scams; see the video of Amit Shah talking in the link below.

https://x.com/Nationalist2575/status/19 ... LCieA&s=19
Last edited by Hriday on 11 Apr 2025 10:50, edited 1 time in total.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 510
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Hriday »

Shamika Ravi is a member of the Economic Advisory Council of Modi govt. She says that the source is Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. From her post in X, see the charts in the link below.
https://x.com/ShamikaRavi/status/182669 ... n0JXg&s=19
The last 10 years have been economically remarkable for the poorest 20% of Indian population. Here’s one important marker: the proportion of poorest households that owned a vehicle (motorcycle/scooter,car/jeep)-
2011-12: 6%
2022-23: 40%
State-wise growth is even more fascinating!
Owning a two wheeler will be a huge boost in the quality of life in rural areas. It can also be used as a goods carrier for their own shops.
I think that the massive rural road building program by BJP govt played a major part.
Cyrano
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6368
Joined: 28 Mar 2020 01:07

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Cyrano »

Reports of massive anti wakf amendment violence from Murshidabad, WB.

This was predictable, time to get rid of Mamta and save Bengal.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Under-construction greenfield expressways in India.



Image
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13570
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Vayutuvan »

Wish they connected Hyderabad to Anathapur (?) which would reduce travel distance to both Chennai and Bengaluru. Now they have to go via Vijayawada.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

Its connecting upto Bagepalli from Bengaluru.
There is already NH44 connecting the two cities.
And the NH44 along Blr-Hyd is being expanded to 12 lane Expressway.
https://www.oneindia.com/bengaluru/beng ... 74403.html
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

Rail, road & irrigation projects to promote connectivity and modernize farming | Cabinet Decisions


Rising Bharat Summit 2025: Vande Bharat Trains Were Meticulously Designed: Ashwini Vaishnaw | N18V


EAM Dr. S Jaishankar’s remarks at inaugural session of Carnegie Global Technology Summit 2025
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/amitsurg/status/1910908813588259277
Amit Thadhani
@amitsurg
Imagine this. They aren’t willing to show their own bonafides that qualified them to be in the Supreme Court. But have the gall to set rules for and question the bonafides of the constitutional head of the country.

https://www.barandbench.com/columns/imp ... us-process
Impeachment of Judges: A rigorous process and a history of fruitless attempts
Its impossible to impeach Judges in India because, the process goes to Judges themselves who in turn decide whether to impeach their kind or not.
This Committee comprises the following members:

a Supreme Court judge
a High Court Chief Justice
an eminent jurist, as per the opinion of the Speaker/Chairman (as the case may be)

And how many Judges are impeached till now: 0

By putting themselves above the powers of the Honorable President, they have literally told everyone in India that, they are the lawmakers. Parliament, Speaker, President ityadi are just for show.

One could foresee Pro Anarchist Gov will pass legislations through their states which the Judges will approve bypassing President.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

National Herald Scam: ED Begins Process To Seize Properties Linked To Gandhis





April 12, 2025

Sonia, Rahul's assets being seized in National Herald case

On 11 April, the ED issued notices to land registrars in Delhi, Mumbai, and Lucknow.

These cities are where the assets of Associated Journals Limited (AJL) are located.

AJL was taken over by Young Indian Limited (YIL), a company owned by Sonia and Rahul Gandhi.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/na ... r-AA1CMMtz
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

Interview: Supreme Court timeline to decide on bills overreach, says Kerala governor
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... 30873.html

Kerala governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar said, adding that it is up to Parliament to decide such things.

What I felt is that the bench which heard the matter should have referred the matter to a Constitution bench. But the court said whatever it wanted to say. The matter which they were discussing was a constitutional matter. The Constitution has not put any time-limit for the governor to give assent to the bill. But if the Supreme Court today says there has to be a time-limit, be it one or three months, it becomes a Constitutional amendment. If the constitutional amendment is being done by the court, why are legislature and Parliament needed?

It is the right of the Parliament to make amendments. You need to have a two-third majority in favour of the amendment. And two judges sitting there, they decide the fate of the constitutional provision? I don’t understand this. This is overreach by the judiciary. They should not have done this. I may be wrong.

We have seen many judicial cases in different courts pending for years together.High courts and the Supreme Court keep matters pending. There must be some reasons. If SC judges have some reasons, governor also may have some reasons. That has to be accepted. If at all, people of this country feel there should be a time-limit, let the people do it through Parliament.

And the President according to the provisions of the Constitution has withheld assent. The issue ends there.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

uddu wrote: 12 Apr 2025 21:28 Interview: Supreme Court timeline to decide on bills overreach, says Kerala governor
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... 30873.html

Kerala governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar said, adding that it is up to Parliament to decide such things.

What I felt is that the bench which heard the matter should have referred the matter to a Constitution bench. But the court said whatever it wanted to say. The matter which they were discussing was a constitutional matter. The Constitution has not put any time-limit for the governor to give assent to the bill. But if the Supreme Court today says there has to be a time-limit, be it one or three months, it becomes a Constitutional amendment. If the constitutional amendment is being done by the court, why are legislature and Parliament needed?

It is the right of the Parliament to make amendments. You need to have a two-third majority in favour of the amendment. And two judges sitting there, they decide the fate of the constitutional provision? I don’t understand this. This is overreach by the judiciary. They should not have done this. I may be wrong.

We have seen many judicial cases in different courts pending for years together.High courts and the Supreme Court keep matters pending. There must be some reasons. If SC judges have some reasons, governor also may have some reasons. That has to be accepted. If at all, people of this country feel there should be a time-limit, let the people do it through Parliament.

And the President according to the provisions of the Constitution has withheld assent. The issue ends there.



uddu ji,


next target is the election commission, and voters be damned, the voters can vote, but the unelected will declare the results that they want.


This is following a all too familiar BIF pattern, specifically to hobble the nationalist forces

It's high time that this agenda is busted and busted for good.

they are just one of the pillars but they seem to have forgotten the constitution and are hell bent on totally subverting the will and maliciously negating power of the people and the supremacy of the parliament
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

They will target the Electronic Voting Machine vs Ballot Paper. The BJP need to change the narrative as the current VVPAT system having both the Electronic and Ballot paper. So its a 2 in 1 system that's superior to anything singular. Whether symbol of party is printed onto paper and the voter seeing it before it drops into the ballot or someone stamping and putting in ballot box are one and the same etc need to be the narrative from BJP spokesperson and party in national debates. They must emphasize that VVPAT is also a paper ballot system. Also they must specifically emphasize that, these dual safe system ensures that no booth capturing like old times don't happen and also the electronic voting credibility is validated by counting the paper ballot. Both matching brings the improved credibility VVPAT brings to the election process making it the best in the whole world. We are not seeing such clear cut narrative in debates. Its better to create the correct narrative before someone things they can push their agenda onto the people. And to further strengthen the points, BJP should point out that they won even where paper ballots are used in Village panchayat elections etc. Also must state that its better to bring in the Dual safe VVPAT in Panchayat elections and so and so. Also its time to change the impeachment of Judges procedure where the right to give the go ahead to investigate and take action against Judges should only vested with the Parliament and the President. A debate need to be brought in parliament.
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/anilp68/status/1910987069880668607
Anil Padmanabhan🇮🇳🕉️🚩
@anilp68
The Law Ministry should also pass a law to withhold the salaries and allowances of judges whose cases are pending within 3 months in the cases that come before them. Don't give them the money, lets see how far they will go!!

The Govt is that of BJP. And they do nothing about it while judges decide they are above the people and their representatives should be challenged and told it is unacceptable in any manner Judges deciding anything other than the constitution given to them by the people. Even the current liberty given to Judges to make peronal opinions should be removed. These kind of unwanted freedom to Judges is one of the reasons they think they can dictate to people and elected representatives and even to the President. Just like the Gentleman said other than the salary, they be given a timeframe to give judgement on cases and failure should resign or be sacked.
vijayk
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9418
Joined: 22 Jun 1999 11:31

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by vijayk »

I haven't seen more nikkamma govt. than BJP fools. They are literally wetting in their pants as these scoundrels are running parallel Islamist, terrorist and globalist constitution. They are usurping powers of President, Governor and deciding laws.
Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 510
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Hriday »

A surprise statement by Rashtriya Lok Dal leader. Does it means a division amongst Muslim communities ? I am not saying that lower caste Muslims will vote to BJP in future.


See the video in the link below.
https://x.com/TheNewIndian_in/status/19 ... uiSCA&s=19
Spoke to Muslim leaders before & after the Waqf Board Amendment—none have opposed it. They trust Lok Dal hasn’t compromised its principles & believe a solution will emerge," says @jayantrld.
PM Modi said in X,
https://x.com/narendramodi/status/19079 ... AW_Aw&s=19
For decades, the Waqf system was synonymous with lack of transparency and accountability. This especially harmed the interests of Muslim women, poor Muslims, Pasmanda Muslims. The legislations passed by Parliament will boost transparency and also safeguard people’s rights.
Pasmanda Muslims refers to the backward caste Muslims.
From Wikipedia,
Which is the highest caste in Sunni Muslims?
Ashraf hierarchy is determined by the degree of nearness to Muhammad and country of origin; Syeds (who trace descent from Fatima, Muhammad's daughter) have the highest status. Non-Ashrafs are categorized as ajlaf, with untouchable Hindu converts also categorized as arzal ("degraded").
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

Saar
Each region has slightly different hierarchies and
Arabic World (Middle East)
Hashemite and Quresh are the top
Even in Shia world if sources are to be believed a faint drop of Arabic blood is a must and only those can wear Black Turban
Aga Khanis have hereditary leadership
Coming to South Asians : broadly three Ashroffs Aljaf and lastly Arzaal
Fatwa e Jahandhari was written by a Persian and clearly calls what local converts are
In the East its which family converted to Islam first
And I have not included the Alwaites the Kharajites (the original separatist) the Ahmadiyya
Paxtan the have Ashraffi Quereshi and Punjabis at top
The Muslim are the most differentiated groups
All that binds them is the Book and the Mecca
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

And if you are from Gujarat check out Bohra’s Dawoodi Bohra’s etc
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

And I have included Turkey as everybody hates them for usurping the Caliphate
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

And only blind obedience controls them
Umayyad’s ( as per some sources wrote unified universal Book)
The Abbasids had Bhukhari (after ?? 200 or 300 years) write Hadiths which is the basic tenet of Islamic Jurisprudence
The Turkish Effendis controlled by conquest and sheer brutality
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GYCCJG1Tdg




Modi Assassination Plot: Shocking Cover-Up By UPA | Rana Key To Unraveling LeT Conspiracy?








The Sunday Guardian’s explosive report suggests that Tahawwur Rana’s interrogation could reveal a larger Lashkar-e-Taiba conspiracy to assassinate Narendra Modi in 2004.

The report reveals internal documents, Headley's testimony, and UPA cover-ups tied to the plot, including a link to Ishrat Jahan and the 26/11 attacks.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

https://www.youtube.com/live/w9Am_0-tLOU



Do Took | आया गुनहगार 'साज़िश' का कौन असली सूत्रधार? | Tahawwur Rana | NIA



chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

My only question is "Did UPA Govt know about 26/11 beforehand?"

What does this attempt to give Clean Chit to Pakistan & blame RSS-BJP incl #Modi Ji suggest?

Pradeep Bhai has cleared the air to great extent.



WATCH VIDEO


The video is about 5:50 minutes long
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Mumbai attacks trial

Tariq Khosa
August 3, 2015

The writer is former DG, FIA.

THE Mumbai terror attacks were claimed by India to be its 9/11. For more than 66 hours, 10 highly trained militants played havoc in India’s commercial metropolis, spraying bullets and shedding the blood of innocent civilians and tourists in November 2008, bringing the two nuclear neighbours to the brink of an all-out war.

In Ufa, Russia on July 10, 2015, both the prime ministers of Pakistan and India were “prepared to discuss all outstanding issues,” and both the leaders “condemned terrorism in all its forms” and agreed to cooperate with each other “to eliminate this menace from South Asia”. Therefore, we in Pakistan should welcome this development wholeheartedly.

Didn’t we suffer the pain and agony of our own 9/11 on Dec 16, 2014, at the hands of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan and its surrogates and aren’t we as a nation determined to root out terrorism in all its forms from our soil? The answer is obviously a resounding yes and I have no doubt that the political and security leadership have resolved to eliminate the scourge of terrorism, militancy and extremism through the counterterrorism National Action Plan. The duality and distinction between good and bad Taliban, including all militants and terrorists, should stand removed from Miramshah to Muridke, from Karachi to Quetta.

Against this backdrop, the agreement between PMs Sharif and Modi in Ufa to approve the meeting of their national security advisers to “discuss all issues related to terrorism” was a welcome development. Pakistan’s concerns in respect of the botched investigation into the Samjhauta Express bombing and alleged covert support to the Baloch insurgency as well as reported ‘terror financing’ both in Karachi and Fata by Indian and other foreign agencies should not only be highlighted but concrete evidence presented to put a stop to such means of non-kinetic warfare resorted to by sleuths from both sides to further their so-called national interests.

There are very knowledgeable and competent professionals with investigation and intelligence background in Pakistan who can meet the Indian security officials and talk as professionals. They too have many skeletons in their cupboards. So why fight shy? Let both India and Pakistan admit their mistakes and follies and learn to co-exist while trying to find solutions to their thorny issues through peaceful means.

Pakistan has to deal with the Mumbai mayhem, planned and launched from its soil. This requires facing the truth and admitting mistakes. The entire state security apparatus must ensure that the perpetrators and masterminds of the ghastly terror attacks are brought to justice. The case has lingered on for far too long. Dilatory tactics by the defendants, frequent change of trial judges, and assassination of the case prosecutor as well as retracting from original testimony by some key witnesses have been serious setbacks for the prosecutors. However, cognizance was taken by the Islamabad High Court which directed the trial to be concluded within two months.

The following facts are pertinent. First, Ajmal Kasab was a Pakistani national, whose place of residence and initial schooling as well as his joining a banned militant organisation was established by the investigators. Second, the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorists were imparted training near Thatta, Sindh and launched by sea from there. The training camp was identified and secured by the investigators. The casings of the explosive devices used in Mumbai were recovered from this training camp and duly matched. Third, the fishing trawler used by the terrorists for hijacking an Indian trawler in which they sailed to Mumbai, was brought back to harbour, then painted and concealed. It was recovered by the investigators and connected to the accused. Fourth, the engine of the dinghy abandoned by the terrorists near Mumbai harbour contained a patent number through which the investigators traced its import from Japan to Lahore and then to a Karachi sports shop from where an LeT-linked militant purchased it along with the dinghy. The money trail was followed and linked to the accused who was arrested. Fifth, the ops room in Karachi, from where the operation was directed, was also identified and secured by the investigators. The communications through Voice over Internet Protocol were unearthed. Sixth, the alleged commander and his deputies were identified and arrested. Seventh, a couple of foreign-based financiers and facilitators were arrested and brought to face trial.

After an exchange of multiple investigation dossiers with the Indian police authorities, the trial court was requested to give approval to obtain voice samples of the alleged commander and his deputies for comparison with the recorded voices. The court ruled that the consent of the accused should be obtained. Obviously, the suspects refused. Then a plea was submitted before the sessions court to authorise the investigators to take the voice samples despite the lack of consent. The plea was denied on account of there being no such provision in the Evidence Act or the antiterrorism law applicable at that time. The investigators then went in appeal before the High Court. That appeal, I believe, is still pending. The Fair Trial Act, 2013 caters for admissibility of such technical evidence. However, its application with retrospective effect is a moot point.

The Mumbai case is quite unique: one incident with two jurisdictions and two trials. While the Indians managed to nab Ajmal Kasab and were able to obtain his confession to close the trial, proving conspiracy in a different jurisdiction is more complex and requires a far superior quality of evidence. Therefore, the legal experts from both sides need to sit together rather than sulk and point fingers.

Indian interlocutors, engaged during the talks between the then prime ministers of India and Pakistan in Egypt in 2009, had conceded that the Pakistani investigators had done a professional job in the indictment of seven perpetrators of the attack. However, the Pakistani authorities should not forget that the FIA declared various other facilitators and operatives as fugitives in the case. The trial will not be over with the disposal of those under arrest or on bail. Other missing links need to be uncovered after the absconders’ arrest.

This case will not be over soon.

Are we as a nation prepared to muster the courage to face uncomfortable truths and combat the demons of militancy that haunt our land? That is the question!

The writer is former DG, FIA.

Published in Dawn, August 3rd, 2015

Don't click the link unless needed:

https://www.dawn.com/news/1198061


That's why the article has been posted in full
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

https://www.youtube.com/live/KZbsg9C_oGg




Why Pakistani press is silent over Mumbai attacks accused Tahawwur Rana & how it once spoke out




Hriday
BRFite
Posts: 510
Joined: 15 Jun 2022 19:59

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Hriday »

https://lawtrend.in/delhi-hc-states-pas ... us-events/
In a notable decision, the Delhi High Court has emphasized that past untoward incidents should not automatically prevent the holding of religious events, such as the Hanuman Jayanti procession in Jahangirpuri. The court has directed the Delhi Police to reconsider their earlier refusal to permit the procession scheduled for April 12.
...
despite previous occurrences, including a violent clash during the 2022 Hanuman Jayanti procession which resulted in injuries to eight police officers and a civilian,..
...
The petitioner, who has been organizing the Hanuman Jayanti procession since 2010, argued that the event had been consistently denied approval since 2019.
From today's news, citing the same security concerns police also denied permission for a Christian procession.
BJP is in centre and state govt, is it a case of incompetency from police? Other news reports state that religious processions which have a history of facing violent opposition is still continuing in other parts of the country with police protection.
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

Is WAQF turning into a new CAA type street fight
Yes the trouble is still limited to the Bengal but can that act as a catalyst for trouble elsewhere??
How or when can the Federal Government into the state subject of law and order??
When does 356 kick in??
Can the Hiz Honors nullify 356 if the President orders it
My question hence is who is the head of state??
President or the Unelected Selfselected
A Deshmukh
BRFite
Posts: 691
Joined: 05 Dec 2008 14:24

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by A Deshmukh »

they have tried to create a CAA like street fight in multiple states (GJ, Assam, Tripura, UP, etc), but failed so far (apart from WB).
its not a catalyst for trouble but pre-mediated sponsored riots, to slow down India's growth.
Waqf is just an excuse. If not waqf, it would have been Sambhaji (in Nagpur) or some other excuse.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Image
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

A Deshmukh wrote: 14 Apr 2025 22:55 they have tried to create a CAA like street fight in multiple states (GJ, Assam, Tripura, UP, etc), but failed so far (apart from WB).
its not a catalyst for trouble but pre-mediated sponsored riots, to slow down India's growth.
Waqf is just an excuse. If not waqf, it would have been Sambhaji (in Nagpur) or some other excuse.
This is not the reason. People are not yet ready to see the reality. Even if those who reality is not yet ready to accept it, because it brutal and barbarian in nature and could not believe how in the world can such things be done by human beings. Its hardcore religious fanaticism and the objective is to target kafirs and every opportunity will be used. There is no cure to this. The faster the world realize it and accept the truth, the better.

The Slowing down economy. Send political messages, use votebank for winning elections are for the stupid politicians and countries abroad that could utilize the same for sometime. For the believers there are no country, no growth, its hardcore belief and nothing else. Yesterday there was a video that circulated in which the rioter was saying that even the CM of the state is at their mercy and not the other way around.
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

Delhi | On PM Modi in his speech alleging Congress of using the Constitution as a weapon for its vote bank, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge says," They (BJP) say that we have insulted Babasaheb Ambedkar. Which party had made Babasaheb Ambedkar a member of the Constituent Assembly and Chairman of the Drafting Committee? Babasaheb, in his letter, had said that the plot to defeat him was hatched by Dange and Savarkar."

The Prime Minister also recalled how historically Congress opposed the election of Babasaheb.

"We should not forget what Congress did to Babasaheb. Congress humiliated him while he was alive. They made him lose elections twice.

Congress even tried to erase his memory. Congress also tried to destroy Baba Saheb's ideas forever.

Dr Ambedkar was the protector of the Constitution, but Congress has become the destroyer of the Constitution," he said.


https://www.aninews.in/news/national/po ... 414202953/
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

If you think that you have heard it all about 26/11, think again .......

Arnab brutally slams Congress Party, alleges they were hand in glove with Pakistan & instead of punishing them for gruesome 26/11 attack, wanted peace talks, asked us to shut down coverage, taking to common men- so that no pressure is created.


Shame




WATCH VIDEO


The video is about 5:20 minutes long
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

more BS continues


Congress Stalwart and Former CM Prithviraj Chavan has demanded a 'FAIR TRIAL' with 'STANDARDS' for terrorist Tahawwur Rana.

"Rana has not confessed to his crime. He must get a fair trial that follow Indian legal procedures, ensuring fair representation and the right to appeal, just as it was granted to Ajmal Kasab", said Chavan.

The Congress leader stated that a "kangaroo court" will not run in the country as the whole world will be watching India over Rana's trial.


https://www.instagram.com/p/DITCtRGzBjL/
Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 9117
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by Sachin »

SRajesh wrote:Is WAQF turning into a new CAA type street fight
Yes the trouble is still limited to the Bengal but can that act as a catalyst for trouble elsewhere??
I don't think Waqf is going in the CAA route. The Bengal riots are pretty much state sponsored. The moment Mamta begum wants it to stop, it would stop. Also the Waqf law is already getting heard by the Supreme Court. And what must be noted is that the financiers and chief organisers during CAA riots are now behind bars. I am talking about PFI (Popular Front of India) which is banned and their leaders are in Tihar Central Prison. And there is serious monitoring of the fundings for their over-ground worker group SDPI is also happening.
How or when can the Federal Government into the state subject of law and order??
When does 356 kick in??
For Art 356 to kick in the governor of the state has to send a report proving that a state government is not able to manage the show. During early Independence day, Congress was able to execute this well as they had a well oiled machinery, clueless media who was not very well conversant with legal matters and then the judiciary too was not into activism and PILs etc.

National Herald case: ED files charge sheet against Sonia, Rahul
Think about it; when we are thinking about Waqf and L&O issues the Enforcement Directorate has happily filed charge sheet against Pappu & mom. Which kind of gives me a feeling that the union government have good inputs on the L&O situation (when compared to the days of CAA or farmer-broker gang). Actually Congress can try more riots over this issue.
SRajesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2591
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by SRajesh »

^^^^
Well Well Well Sachinji
Congress is going hammer and tongs on NH and organised Nationwide stir!!
NH or WAQF (both entities or things related to them are corrupt)
So which will the (enlightenment acheived recently via RaGa, WhatsApp and X including Dhruv/Swara/R Ayyub/Sherwani/Turde) willing Bandoos go for!!!
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34836
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by chetak »

SRajesh wrote: 16 Apr 2025 19:28 ^^^^
Well Well Well Sachinji
Congress is going hammer and tongs on NH and organised Nationwide stir!!
NH or WAQF (both entities or things related to them are corrupt)
So which will the (enlightenment acheived recently via RaGa, WhatsApp and X including Dhruv/Swara/R Ayyub/Sherwani/Turde) willing Bandoos go for!!!




SRajesh ji,


Drones with face recognition cameras have been deployed in many places, apart from cameras providing recordings from different angles, yogi ji is active

The cops are out in force, and the deployments are obvious to deter street protests and damage to public property

Those identified in the violence will lose access to govt jobs, will not be issued with passports and other things that these puncher wallas usually aspire to

and preparations, in almost all places, were made well in advance of the passage of the waqf bill
uddu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2489
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 17:09

Re: Modi 3.0 - Bharat

Post by uddu »

https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/1912493489713033646

Megh Updates 🚨
@MeghUpdates
🚨 BIG BREAKING

A Union Minister can become the next BJP President, reports Times Now.

— Cabinet reshuffle also likely.
— Leaders from Bihar, Assam & Bengal can be inducted into Modi cabinet.

Dharmendra Pradhan or Shivraj Singh Chauhan?
Annamalai will become Minister.


Megh Updates 🚨
@MeghUpdates
🚨 BIG! BJP is likely announce its new Party President anytime after April 20. [TV9] 🔥

— Who do you think should be the next BJP President...?
Image
Anna must have been a great choice.
Post Reply