Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49Right. And before Lord Ram, there was no Diwali. So we can't say Diwali is intrinsic to Hindu culture.S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
isubodh ji,
but when people get selective in their criticism than a firm boot to the butt is more than deserved
why do such people only find their voices during specific festivals, while remaining as quiet as church mouses during other festivals
not a word about the parali burning (among other things...) from this sanctimonious environmental mahatma
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
Not true, isubodh ji.
There is ample evidence to the contrary
isubodh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 21:49The word is “controlled” not “banned” . I dont like crackers going on at ungodly hours and i dont like azaan either on loudspeakers. And G20 Kant has suddenly started polishing his environment credentials. In X people have started taking PETA to task on Id as well..S_Madhukar wrote: ↑21 Oct 2025 20:59
Crackers were never part of original Diwali celebrations, it was lights of diyas. So linking anyone asking for them to be controlled as anti-religion is not right.
