A_Gupta wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 09:25
As I have written before, criticism of Gandhi is fine;
inventing your own “historical facts” to do so is not. This deluge of lies and misinformation does no one any good.
A_Gupta ji,
The reality of ghundhy's (and neverwho) roles are now increasingly getting exposed. the imaginary history that is still being pushed as the factual by the commies, congis and the woke BIF is showing it's frayed construct and the devious intent that motivated its venomous origins and cancerous spread.
Not for nothing are such éminences grises hated in africa and their statues are being pulled down.
Unlike in India, there was never any narrative run in africa by the BIF to deify ghundhy, so the africans have the true facts in all their naked glory.
Does anyone wonder as to why such "historical facts" in africa differ so much from the same "historical facts" in India
how and why did India have so many muslim "education" ministers post independence or was that a mere coincidence to some peoples way of thinking and interpreting. Again, there are not just “historical facts” but criminal acts in a newly independent India trying to find her feet and establish stability
BTW, what exactly did a partitioned India owe these pigs whose jihadi culture was responsible for the vivisection of the motherland. So the real question is who were the shadowy figures behind neverwho's throne and why were they there. They were there because they never really left India. They had merely changed hats and continued as before with a new brown मुखौटा in place of the original white and that continued till 2014 barring the tenures of PVNR and ABA
on what basis was the result of the election that overwhelmingly preferred the Sardar overturned, and ghundhy slyly installed neverwho as the potential pm frontrunner. he was allegedly neither a member of the congi party, and nor was he a "politician" so on what basis did he "overturn" the election
Was this democracy or was it on orders from his non majority constituency that undoubtedly included the britshits
this was not an innocent act and neither was it in the interests of the Indian civilization nor the future prospects of the emerging sovereign state of India.
Post independence, the Hindu was tightly constrained and the abrahamics were mollycoddled by the state and that continues to date and the cost of such largesse is borne by the majority, and that partisan attitude of the state also reaffirmed their false sense of entitlement, while increasing their strong feelings of victimhood which was reinforced by their strong cultural belief in the so called historically inherited and religiously inherent right of the conqueror to rule over the conquered, thus they believed that their inborn and ingrained rights to rule over the "inferior" Hindus was being violated and was in direct contradiction to their long held assumption that they came from a superior race and culture. All this was not very conducive to the peaceful formation and social progress of a newly independent sovereign state
one should take a fresh look at these so called “historical facts” that some people lay such great store by They are pure unadulterated fiction.
The massive backlash that the introduction of the "new ugc rules" has unleashed has not even caused a blip on the forum and yet posters wax eloquent on what is happening in some hick town in texas or whatever
ghundhy and neverwho have nil relevance in today's India. We are well past that stage where we need them (if indeed, we ever did need them in the first place). Indian independence was won by people who fought for it in the only way that the britshits understood, not by fakirs who bleated non violence but stayed very very quiet when the jihadis were involved in the perpetration of the violence against the Hindus, and these are a few of the uncomfortable "historical facts". Many historians actually say that ghundhy's antics delayed India's independence by as much as 10 years
Nishikant Dubey has raked up the entire neverwho खानदानी history and geography in parliament. Matters suppressed for decades have been revealed and their shenanigans have been exposed, including arrests in the US by the FBI for carrying cash close to $200K
The Henderson brooks report on the 1962 war will probably be made public because as Dubey said why was it suppressed at all and probably several banned books concerning the mafia खानदानी acts of omission and commission may well be unbanned as well. The blowback will be very damaging to the mafia in particular and the party in general
The congis and the mafia will rue the day that papooze opened this door on the floor of the parliament and the repercussion from the backblast will singe the mafia and erode their carefully constructed façade of being the singular entity that was instrumental in India getting her freedom
