Bharat Rakshak

sunilUpa wrote:Good show Vivek. I have run out of nails (to bite) now looking at nails of SHQ..

may your soul rest in peace.....

hari...you have got it all wrong...the PIVOT HAMMER is already authorised by the PM....as vivek stated in one of is very early post.It was a question of WHEN...and MoD has that power to decide when and how to launch a certain operation.Apart of that....you should consider that it was an attack on th...

Bala_r......lots of loopholes....for a starter..none can hide the movement of an aircraft carrier in todays day and age....people dont send satellites up there only for telecasting cricket.And secondly...IN aint idiot...it will never allow any chinese armada to close in anywhere near IOR in such sce...

who the f**k cares about Bangladesh's permission in such a situation??even now IAF overflies bangladesh many a times to save fuel and time without "permission" ..and we are talking about WAR here...not a cricket match that things will be by the book!

pandyan wrote:
urrr...there are 51 other people with the same joining date....are they all clones????

may be they are ...or atleast some of them are .

{please don't take it too seriously} Joy_ray buddy, you know there is only rule/code in a forum: never mess with forum administrator . Otherwise, you might end up losing your democratic right of posting your views. :) And, I believe, sometimes suggestion can be expressed as if you are not forcing s...

joy_roy you want to interfere with artistic freedom? When you write you implement your suggestions. Shankar is what he is because of his style. err...it was just a suggestion...not a fatwa :roll: .ramana i have been reading shankar`s scenarios from day one...and am a big fan of his works.so make no...

way too much detail and very little advancement of the story....shankar i think most jingos who lurk here knows a lot about these stuffs a lot....can you please keep the technical details a little short so that we can concentrate on the story...just my 2 cents...

saty wrote: i.e.are the 0.8, 0.4, 0.2 etc fixed quantity for eternity but depending on forum laws and admin strictness may vary to 0.7, 0.5 and 0.3 perhaps?

sorry couldnt resist

[img][img]http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/6354/dgfsdgzk0.png[/img][/img]

is it just me or some folks here are trying to suggest it was an ARROW-II testing? in that case...IMHO..this is not tsp where they smuggle ding dongs and claim them as desi..neither its smarty pants chicomland..where they tinker a lil with phoren stuffs and give em a new name and claim em as their o...

is it just me or some folks here are trying to suggest it was an ARROW-II testing? in that case...IMHO..this is not tsp where they smuggle ding dongs and claim them as desi..neither its smarty pants chicomland..where they tinker a lil with phoren stuffs and give em a new name and claim em as their o...

a missile of similar performance can very well have same size and shape...and its very possible that losta input have gone into this ABM from ARROW 2. P.S: ADMINS...a message is coming up a lot nowadays when i try to post saying " NO POST MODE SPECIFIED"... i had to click 3...4..sometimes ...

the US is supposed to have the source code of harpoons and sidewinders....aint it?

wtf?? pak attacking US cvbg?? and trying to sink one??if unkil finds even a scratch on his shiny new carrier...he will nuke tsp to stone age..again bring em back to life..and again will nuke em :lol: .theres no way pak can be dat suicidal unless osama is da president ( it may not be that impossible ...

shankar.....those were f 16C according to you..and they didnt even try to engage the flankers with amraams????????The whole engagement looks little too easy...i think you are underestimating paki pilots too much here.

Come on guys!!!!Even i agree that this scenario is kinda far from reality but hey we never know ...may be in next 20 or 30 yrs we might see indian forces fighting in a far land.....and besides if it wasnt for shankar this thread would have been history a loooooooooooooooong time back.

ColletralDamage wrote:Tell me why would the americans would even help us?

I suggest you read the entire scenario from the begining....you will know why unkil will help us under these circumstances.

2 Mig 29s lost in battle with F 16A ??????????? .HIGHLY UNLIKELY....unless our fulcrum pilots are sleeping in cockpits.

Mig 29 launching sea eagle??????????? .How come anyone make the two entirely different systems to met with each other?

With all due respect, a heat seeker seaks heat, not smoke ... otherwise designing counter measures would be exceptionally easy. A heat seeker seeks heat???????? Silly me....I used to think that they are after the pilot`s autograph :lol: . Anyway....a smoking engine leaves a trail of hot smoke behin...

One thing i would like to point out is the fulcrum`s engines does tends to smoke a lot ...as moose mentioned...and also as we can see in the part 2 of MISSION UDAAN.This might not help fulcrums fighting in a WVR situation and a heat seeker missile after her.

Nobody having any views about this ? I think the loss of 2 Migs would have been easily possible avoided by sending a advance party of 3-4 Migs to take out the CAP party of F-16 and Mirage .More then the loss of 2 Mig 29 the loss of 2 human lives is what hurts. Its a war and casualties will be there...

Shankar ji can we see some air launched baburs in this action?Some P3C Orions firing baburs will probably make things a bit more interesting.Its just a thaught.anyway...awesome build up as usual...waiting for the next parts.

Isnt it a bit too much risky for IN to operate with INS Vikramaditya carrier task force only 150 kms away from pak coast?I dont think they have to be that close for a blockade.

Dont agree - a cruise missile is difficult to detect but onec detected it can be shot down like any other subsonic low flying aircraft . I believe USAF is prepared to use The AMRAAM for this role . There is no reason why our Su-30 s cannot do the same with R-73 . While its radar signatite is small ...

Guys I have a question ,S-400 or AKASH may be useful to hunt down incoming ballistic missile ,but can they hunt down incoming cruise missiles? I would it's much harder to down ICBMs than subsonic cruise missiles, I suggest you refer to earlier posts in General Missiles Discussion about shooting dow...

Guys I have a question ,S-400 or AKASH may be useful to hunt down incoming ballistic missile ,but can they hunt down incoming cruise missiles?I know the claims of pak army that babur aka HN-1 is a terrain hugging missile is probably trash,but we should be prepare for everything.PATRIOT is crap,it co...