I can't believe BRFites are falling for this "middle class driving the movement" perception carefully created by the English Media. Its bad enough that CNN-IBN/NDTV are trying to pit middle class with lower class, minorities with majority to serve the Congress.
Why are we falling for that divide-and-rule policy.
Lets consider the typical political meetings where the motivation often tends to be incentives offered (aka bribes). This brings out a particular working class to the meetings.
However, in the current movement, there is
no such incentive offered. On top of that this brought out
working class and middle class.
If one uses typical political gatherings as reference, the delta is "middle class". That does not mean that this is driven by the "middle class". It only means, lower and middle class have become partners.
Theo_Fidel wrote:
Let me tell you a story about a peanut farmer in my neck of the woods. About 15 years ago his neighbor a powerful landlord filled a bogus case against him over illegally cropping/occupying some land. It was about 10 sq yds IIRC. The court sentence was 10 years in prison.

After 6 months the appeals court quietly suggested a donation be made. About Rs 10,000 exchanged hands and he was set free. This is the experience the really poor have of corruption. Sometimes it is the only option they have of saving their lives.
The system might bend to them if they can raise enough money.
A rigid lokpal system might cause quite a bit of harm especially when the system is so deeply deeply unfair and rigged against the really poor.
This is like saying, lets create a small hole in the hen house. Because when the wolf gets in through the main access, hen need something to escape. But then, what about those that can't fit through the hole? and What if something else comes through this hole?
One would think the solution should actually prevent wolf from getting into the hen house.
Coming to your example, what if those farmers that can't pool 10,000? What if it required more money to get him out? Is that really a justification for loose laws?
One would think the solution is to protect the person like your peanut farmer from
bogus case (your words) by a
powerful landlord (your words). And if Jan Lok Pal has the power to investigate judiciary (don't take that as a vote for that item, I have my reservations), it would be solved. So, if you really want to help your peanut farmer, you should be supporting the Jan LokPal as it exists right now.
Theo_Fidel wrote:
I don't see what is cynical at all. Nitish came through the constitutional process did he not. IMHO he has had 1000 times the effect of AH (or for that matter the entire achievements of this 'movement') who only had a tiny village to deal with. People are not opposed to voting for anti-corruption leaders. AMMA, Nitish and even DIDI in recent times have come up through the electoral system. Reform within the system is far far more effective than any attempt at revolution.
What if Nitish becomes corrupt tomorrow or DIDI gets corrupt. Is there a guarantee that they wont? How much should one rely on moral compass of the powerful or wait until all the elected leaders and morally upright? Is that really a winning strategy, I mean that is what we have been doint for 64 years right. What actually happened is that they consolidated more and more power and are sitting on a pile of "conflicts of interests" (they now get the MP funds instead of IAS distributing it previously, they successfully protected themselves from being prosecuted by anybody outside the parliament).
In absense of recall or any similar mechanism to fire the MPs in the 5 year period (I am not sure if we are ready for that yet).. an investigative agency which is not controlled by the government and has the jurisdiction on all govt employees is a big shot in the arm.
How does one ensure LokPal is not corrupt, that is a valid question and can be discussed!