Anyone watched the presidential hopefuls, white Christian nationalist republican dim-wits' hot air debate last night? (I must tell you though, with no substance, US media like Faux nooge can put on grand high-tech show, which they did last noght with Google

. No wonder Indiands follow US debatesd more passionately than they do their own political debtes.).
Anyway, the topic of TSP came up, specifically, what should US do if Talibunnies sieze nukes. And the answers wre so pathetically lame and uneducated, but it still told you something.
First, that Perry cowboy from TX spewed some incoherent mumbo jumbo about how if US relationship with India were strengthened and offered up-graded F-16, this "paaaakistaaani siutaion won't arise". Can anybody decipher what he meant?
And then that Christian extremist clown Ric Santoum went on about how Obama dumped a faithful ally in Mush leading to this situation

. And all that Newt Gingrich could say was that TSP poses an important problem.
But here is my take. Given that these republican clowns represent rougly 50+% of the US popuation, probably 75% of whites, and have their pulse, it seems to me from their unprepared, woefully ill informed answers, is that TSP is still not on the radar screen as much as it should be among this constituency. This in turn means that Pentagon/CIA boses through their media mouthpieces have not diseminated TSP perfidy to the joe six pack to elicit any strong support for some tough action against TSP.
Thus, despite the public tough-talking posture from 1500-star general Mullen, I don't expect any escalation. Looks like CIA/Pentagon strategists still have an open line of communication with Kiyani and there is still trust in him to deliver. India should better watch out. As Kiyani gives in, in return for US delivering on India which is Kiyani's main objective, US could very well be working on the Perkovich, Fair bimbo formula with willing collaboraters in New Delhi.