The squashed low res image looks straight from file. For a real test multiple photos are released. Also the discrepancy in reported weight of the missile... 28T is nearer to reported K4 weight....
Just my suspicions...


Is that the modified Astra or the older one?Karan M wrote:Posted earlier?
http://www.sps-aviation.com/exclusive/? ... n-progress
Astra carriage trials successfully in progress
By SP's Special Correspondent
Photo Credit : DRDO / Land Test
December 21, 2013: While the Tejas team gets set to test the Derby BVRAAM as part of the FOC regime, a team in Pune is ticking off performance points on the indigenous Astra indigenous BVRAAM. The missile, integrated with a modified Su-30MKI is currently undergoing carriage trials, the final phase of trials before a first ever test-firing from an airborne platform next year.
New one as singha said. But mk1 with aero performance roughly equal to R77 (range specs) & upgraded electronics.merlin wrote:Is that the modified Astra or the older one?
Dec 13, captive trials continue on Su-30, and these are the final ones before firing in 2014"Finally, we changed the entire missile configuration. It has now undergone three successful ground trials. It then underwent captive flight trials in a Sukhoi-30MKI this April. We are over the hump now. We hope to actually fire it from a Sukhoi-30MKI by year-end," said Chander.
With these "developmental flight trials" slated to soon kick off, which will involve a battery of tests covering the entire flight envelope, the aim is to make Astra ready for induction by mid-2015 "if there are no further surprises", added the DRDO chief.
MK2 is slated to (as of now) use dual thrust propulsion as on the LR/MRSAM:Karan M wrote:Was this posted:
http://www.spsaviation.net/exclusive/?i ... s-revealed
To understand what the 44 km range is - its not the maximum but one from the middle of the max and min operational altitudes.Astra missile to be fired, two variants revealed
By SP's Special Correspondent
Photo Credit : SP's Special Correspondent
Astra MissileJuly 06, 2013: With successful captive trials completed in April, and a fully reconfigured missile now ready for the next phase of development testing, India's indigenous beyond visual range air-to-air missile Astra is set for its debut firing from an aircraft by the end of this year. As first reported in SP's Aviation in March this year, 2013 has been christened 'Astra Year' by DRDO in light of expectations that the Astra beyond visual range air-to-air missile will finally see a flight test firing from an IAF aircraft.
Now, it is confirmed that it will happen. It has also now learnt that while the base version Astra Mk.1 will have an intercept range of 44 km, it will be the Astra Mk.2 that will be a true force multiplier weapon, with an intercept range in excess of 100 km. That, at any rate, is the intended configuration. The Astra will be deployed from underwing hardpoints on the Su-30MKI, not wingtip pylons as earlier intended. The Astra is an all-weather all aspect beyond visual range and close combat missile that will be deployed on the IAF's LCA Tejas, Su-30MKI, Mirage-2000 and possible, the Rafale MMRCA in the future too. The missile sports active radar terminal guidance (dual mode guidance), smokeless propulsion, improve electronic counter-countermeasures and what the DRDO calls improved effectiveness in a multi-target scenario.
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/India ... s_999.html
27 miles, 44 km is the range obtained at 5 miles altitude or 8 km alt.The DRDO said Astra will be able to be launched from different altitudes but those alterations would affect the range. It will cover nearly 70 miles when launched from an altitude of just more than 9 miles but only 27 miles when fired from an altitude of 5 miles (9K feet).
At sea level the range is expected to be 13 miles.
Active homing range will be nearly 16 miles.
A longer range version, the Astra Mark 2, will have a 93-mile head on range with a tail chase range of 21 miles. The DRDO also is said to be looking at rocket/ramjet propulsion similar to that used in its Akash surface-to-air missile project.
At 9 miles, say around 15-16 km altitude, the range obtained is 70 miles, or 112 km.
The seeker range is 26 km!!
Look at the R77 range at 20 odd km. Around the same as mentioned for Astra MK1.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_44d3OT-xI3U/S ... R-77-2.jpg
No wonder the IAF is waiting eagerly for the Astra, it will match the R77 in service, in terms of range but will be better in other areas.
A) More flexible (both CCM and BVR) b ) Local ECCM and complete control over software c) Buddy targeting d) with enhanced seeker range, can be used LOBL at significant ranges
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-TigLajcRPNE/U ... 281%29.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AQJuf3d.jpg
The MK2 being spoken of, will be a game changing missile for the IAF more in the class of a Meteor. At any rate, they can get that done leveraging tech from MRSAM etc (dual propulsion, booster) once the MRSAM gets done and Astra MK1 is finished.
Note, tarmak says that 100 MK1 will be produced "initially" before MK2 but (IMHO) the IAF will likely order more because we have a severe need of ARHs in our inventory, and right now we are paying through our nose for even the relatively shorter ranged types like Derby & Mica (MICA at least has an IR variant which offers some nifty capability).http://tarmak007.blogspot.in/2011/12/bv ... p-for.html
India has already developed a dual-pulse rocket motor (enahances the range) for Astra Mk-II. "Self reliance in air launched missile and particularly air-to-air system is of strategic importance considering the new paradigm of air superiority warfare," sources said.
So which of the 3 images linked to above is going to be test fired from the Su-30MKI this year? I think not the first one for sure, but is it second one or the third? Is the second one the improved Mk. 1 and the third one the Mk. 2?Karan M wrote:As to changes, when the original Astra MK1 prototype was put in tests, it had severe aero issues and had to be scrapped totally.
From 2010 (actual tests): http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HtzHWTyO9xc/T ... issile.jpg
From 2011 AI: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/T ... 752532.JPG
By 2013: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6iUbQKeR9b4/U ... 770640.JPG
Per Chander they did a detailed redesign...might have shaved off some extra kilos via better avionics (e.g. the new Astra MK1 has a laser prox fuse) and better packaging.
But both have the same range 44Km (8km alt) and 112 km (15-16km alt). LCA has reached 50K feet so far (thats around 15km) so a launch at that height will give MK1 (against approaching target etc) 100 km ranges.
MK2 OTOH, will have a good increase in envelope in that it envisages 93 miles, 150 odd km at high alt. Basically a 30% increase in performance, but more than the numbers alone, fact that it will have a two stage propulsion mean more terminal energy and hence much harder to avoid, and increased no escape zone.
Third one... its MK1 revised. The second image (2011) is basically WIP MK1 before config was frozen or an indication towards MK2.merlin wrote:So which of the 3 images linked to above is going to be test fired from the Su-30MKI this year? I think not the first one for sure, but is it second one or the third? Is the second one the improved Mk. 1 and the third one the Mk. 2?Karan M wrote:As to changes, when the original Astra MK1 prototype was put in tests, it had severe aero issues and had to be scrapped totally.
From 2010 (actual tests): http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HtzHWTyO9xc/T ... issile.jpg
From 2011 AI: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o_no4M2xEPY/T ... 752532.JPG
By 2013: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6iUbQKeR9b4/U ... 770640.JPG
Per Chander they did a detailed redesign...might have shaved off some extra kilos via better avionics (e.g. the new Astra MK1 has a laser prox fuse) and better packaging.
But both have the same range 44Km (8km alt) and 112 km (15-16km alt). LCA has reached 50K feet so far (thats around 15km) so a launch at that height will give MK1 (against approaching target etc) 100 km ranges.
MK2 OTOH, will have a good increase in envelope in that it envisages 93 miles, 150 odd km at high alt. Basically a 30% increase in performance, but more than the numbers alone, fact that it will have a two stage propulsion mean more terminal energy and hence much harder to avoid, and increased no escape zone.
that's what i thought when i first saw this missile at AI-2013.Karan M wrote:
BVR & CCM (second means it has a very low minimum range & a single aircraft can presumably be all Astra equipped)
Seeker can be slewed to IRST & HMS (this means passive launches - sneaky!)
Autonomous search before launch backs up above two points
Offbore sight launch - another big plus
And yes, buddy mode! (This means fighter 1 launches missile, fighter 2 provides info for MCG. See similar test from SHar Derby here:
http://www.livefistdefence.com/2009/07/ ... -test.html
(OT: Folks can judge for themselves that if the LCA has the same missile/same or similar radar combo..)
Astra MK1 is basically a missile which can be very useful in MK1 version itself, which is why I think IAF may order it in substantial numbers.
The buddy part is very interesting because historically, most shoot downs have been of the unaware targets. If a JF-17 sees a Tejas painting it from behind, but a missile comes in from entirely another area...
It say slaving seeker with IRST/HMS and there is RF seeker only for terminal phase, so does it mean IRST can be used as mid-course update?Karan M wrote:dual mode guidance means mid course guidance (with INS/ datalink) and RF (terminal).
IRST means the fighters IRST.
so the missile only has one seeker and that is RF.
PS: if you went to AI 13 share some pics of the eqpt, info boards etc so we can sit and look through them. thats always fun.
With IRST, you still need range, you can use the radar for that - one quick burst or take an offboard fix.nash wrote:@Karan M
So is it like in case of ASTRA if LCA or MKI has IRST of detection range of about 70-100km then they can guide the missile to the target and in case of CCM Mode it can also be done by HMS.
It is kind of innovative because in CCM Mode it will make any DIRCM defense useless and in BVR Mode it will be too late for many fighters.
Here is the link as i said it is from simple digi so quality is not that good.
https://picasaweb.google.com/112251027758229481822/AI13
I hope to see a day when Agni tests will be treated the sameAditya_V wrote:![]()
These days BRF treats Prithvi tests like as if some has fired bullets from Insas.
Do we any open source figures on Prithvi production numbers?Aditya_V wrote:I hope we have 1000+plus stocks, 20-25 of these should be fired at Sargodha, Jacocabad, SHorkat raod etc, before being visited by 40 Ship SU-30 Jaguar combo.
vic wrote:I wonder why DRDO never made any attempt to develop a WVR AAM?
Well, they have so many programs already underway which require their current focus. Plus, resources are not infinite & DRDO head is already complaining that existing funds are just enough to run some programs at full speed (not all) and more funds are required for future programs.vic wrote:I wonder why DRDO never made any attempt to develop a WVR AAM?
I meant to say, funds should have been sanctioned to DRDO to develop a WVR AAM as obviously DRDO will not spent from its pocket.Karan M wrote:Well, they have so many programs already underway which require their current focus. Plus, resources are not infinite & DRDO head is already complaining that existing funds are just enough to run some programs at full speed (not all) and more funds are required for future programs.vic wrote:I wonder why DRDO never made any attempt to develop a WVR AAM?
Aditya_V wrote:Sometime back a poster posted a link of a DRDO attempt in 70's tp build a radar seeker based short ranged AAM in the 70's which was rejected by the IAF.
I don't think the current crop of Prithvi missiles need to be fueled before launch. They are all already fueled and ready. This is IMHO, but would be glad to be corrected. Also there is a Solid Fueled variant of Prithvi too (The IAF variant )SaiK wrote:so how much time it took for them to add liquids to a randomly chosen prithvi and test fire in salvo mode? since this is done by the user from prod stock, this data on oped can add more value to deterrence.
else, we might as well see a1-700km wala all solid in salvo mode testing.