Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

shiv wrote:Vijender Thakur's view on Indradhanush makes an interesting read
http://thumkar.blogspot.in/2015/08/su-3 ... truth.html

The Su-30MKI doesn't feature AIS and sensor fusion, but has a weapon system operators to monitor and act upon inputs from on and off board sensors.
Su-30MKI definitively has sensor fusion between Bars-M radar and OLS-30 IRST as they both work inside fire control complex. I am not sure of indiginous RWR. If MKI could program and lock anti-radar missiles through its on board RWR, than it is integrated inside fire control complex, if it needs additional pod to do that for anti-radar missiles then it is not.
It has a significantly smaller radar signature than the Su-30MKI.
Most RCS reduction is achieved through shaping , considering none of the current 4 plus gen fighter use shaping to lower its rcs barring engine through S duct or similar thing , in a dynamic environment of flight it wont be of much importance.

They use Paints to hide rcs which are band specific mostly X band and when you lug your external weapons all this goes for a toss

An integrated Jammer and Defensive suite will play a far greater significant role for 4 plus gen fighter like MKI . EF etc then any RCS does
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Austin, to add, the Typhoon doesn't even have an anti radar missile. Its multi role capabilities, to be honest are fairly limited.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by SaiK »

I think these kind of dozen-zlich reports can scare the massans more than any other air-forces let alone RAF.
JSF is already on the beaten path on 101 issues.

A 35ish upgrade can ensure couple of dozen more zilches for the opponents. What we could also apply is the learning from Rafale.
so, our 35ish upgrade must wait till we realize the 36 Rafales into ops.

A super duper stealth-skin can nail JSF before it leaves massan borders.
A makeInIndia deal should be signed before we go into 35ish upgrade.

UB saab thought the idea of permeable skins and internal return shaping is a super stealth we can introduce. this is possible!
externally, it would be just looking the same 35
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

Karan M wrote:Has to be balanced against the fact the Su-30 MKI has a huge EW fit, known as the SAP-518 which Thakur ignores completely.
Some update if not seen already on 518

http://kret.com/en/news/3544/
Gyan
BRFite
Posts: 1183
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Gyan »

IAF wants to import anything under the sky except ordering more Su-30MKIs and LCA. So much for make in India.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by shiv »

Austin wrote:
Karan M wrote:Has to be balanced against the fact the Su-30 MKI has a huge EW fit, known as the SAP-518 which Thakur ignores completely.
Some update if not seen already on 518

http://kret.com/en/news/3544/
You guys are talking about the Su-30 MK12-0 :rotfl:
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Singha »

the pods seem to be huge..as big as a uran ASM....
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by shaun »

Those pods are indeed huge and wont be standard fitment for all a/c . How many "Growlerski" configured a/c we have ??
and can a single a/c configured with SA-518 send jamming signal to multiple platforms ???

SAP-518
Image

SAP-14
Image
Last edited by shaun on 11 Aug 2015 10:01, edited 1 time in total.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

Singha wrote:the pods seem to be huge..as big as a uran ASM....
It huge because half of it is empty and cater for future growth potential.

When I asked the DARE guy why is the Siva pod so huge , he told me the same thing that more than half of it is empty and they need to factor into future potential growth area into this pod.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Singha »

what does the SAP14 do the TX pod of the SA-518 does not?
getting 4 of these "sets" into every Su30 squadron could be a relatively cheap but wise investment if no special cockpit mods are needed.

playing havoc with enemy targeting systems with softkills like these may not be sexy but underpins the survivability of american strike assets in any of their colonial wars. amirkhan a/c are almost never "bounced" in ambush attacks or enter a fight with poor SA or numbers.
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by SaiK »

and what about Ka and mmw ?
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Singha wrote: what does the SAP14 do the TX pod of the SA-518 does not?
getting 4 of these "sets" into every Su30 squadron could be a relatively cheap but wise investment if no special cockpit mods are needed.

playing havoc with enemy targeting systems with softkills like these may not be sexy but underpins the survivability of american strike assets in any of their colonial wars. amirkhan a/c are almost never "bounced" in ambush attacks or enter a fight with poor SA or numbers.
Shaun wrote:Those pods are indeed huge and wont be standard fitment for all a/c . How many "Growlerski" configured a/c we have ??
and can a single a/c configured with SA-518 send jamming signal to multiple platforms ???
First, these pods will be standard fitment for all a/c if the mission profile calls for jamming (most will) for A2A threats expected. These pods are SPJs. 6-18 GHz designed for X Band FCR and for missile seekers.

The SAP-14 pod is a support jammer for SAM radars. That may be used only in high threat zones - we have no confirmation IAF purchased this, but its likely it will/would have, given integrating non Russian, western/israeli jammers into the Su-30 MKI avionics is an issue.
Austin wrote:..It huge because half of it is empty and cater for future growth potential.

When I asked the DARE guy why is the Siva pod so huge , he told me the same thing that more than half of it is empty and they need to factor into future potential growth area into this pod.
The SAP-518 is also huge because it is stated to be a derivative (modernized variant of the L005S) which is basically a phased array system. Check out the antenna.

Image

The KNIRTI L005S Sorbtsiya-S mid/high band defensive jammer is carried in wingtip pods. Unlike competing Western designs, this system uses a steerable mainlobe to maximise the Jam/Signal ratio at the threat emitter. The design uses a wideband phased array and dielectric lens arrangement (KNIRTI).

KNIRTI makes the SAP-518 and SAP-14 now.
Newer Flankers carry the podded wingtip mounted KNIRTI SPS-171 / L005S Sorbtsiya-S mid/high band defensive jammer (ECM), this system being an evolution of a jammer developed for the Backfire C. The Sorbtsiya-S, unlike most Western jamming pods, is designed to operate in pairs and uses forward and aft looking steerable wideband phased arrays to maximise jamming effect, a similar arrangement to the Eurofighter Typhoon EWSP package. It is worth observing that the Sorbtsiya is clearly built to provide cross-eye jamming modes against monopulse threats, and the wideband mainlobe steering capability provided by the phased array permits best possible utilisation of available jamming power. A graded dielectric lens is employed. Russian contractors have been recently using Digital RF Memory (DRFM) technology, which is of the same generation as the US IDECM EWSP, and competing Israeli systems.

The most recent defensive jamming equipment to be offered on Flanker variants is the new KNIRTI SAP-518 wingtip jamming pod, displayed at MAKS 2009. Concurrently KNIRTI displayed a high power support jamming pod, the SAP-14, intended for centreline carriage on a large pylon. To date little has been disclosed on these pod designs, which are likely to retain the wideband phased array / lens antenna system first used on the Sorbstiya.
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Flanker.html

Also
Newer Flankers carry the podded wingtip mounted KNIRTI SPS-171 / L005S Sorbtsiya-S mid/high band defensive jammer (ECM), this system being an evolution of a jammer developed for the Backfire C. The Sorbtsiya-S, unlike most Western jamming pods, is designed to operate in pairs and uses forward and aft looking steerable wideband phased arrays to maximise jamming effect, a similar arrangement to the Eurofighter Typhoon EWSP package. It is worth observing that the Sorbtsiya is clearly built to provide cross-eye jamming modes against monopulse threats, and the wideband mainlobe steering capability provided by the phased array permits best possible utilisation of available jamming power. A graded dielectric lens is employed. Russian contractors have been recently using Digital RF Memory (DRFM) technology, which is of the same generation as the US IDECM EWSP, and competing Israeli systems.

The most recent defensive jamming equipment to be offered on Flanker variants is the new KNIRTI SAP-518 wingtip jamming pod, displayed at MAKS 2009. Concurrently KNIRTI displayed a high power support jamming pod, the SAP-14, intended for centreline carriage on a large pylon. To date little has been disclosed on these pod designs, which are likely to retain the wideband phased array / lens antenna system first used on the Sorbstiya.
Basically SAP-518 = Sorbstiya with modern processing, lighter electronics and DRFM and new architecture to make use of DRFM.

Otherwise no need to retain the original 2 pod design.

And guess what configuration HAL tested for Brahmos?
http://www.oneindia.com/india/hal-condu ... 50389.html
The tests were carried out for nine configurations, including clean configuration, with bombs (2 tons) at station 1 & 2 (centerline of the aircraft), with BrahMos missile at the newly-developed station 13, R-27 missiles at station 3-6, R-73 missiles at station 7-10 and SAP518 pod (ECM jamming pod) at station 11-12. "The preliminary results show good agreement between natural frequencies of clean aircraft and design values. These are ongoing tests and are complex in nature. Multiple agencies are involved in the project and we are confident of achieving the tasks within the set targets," Tyagi said. The National Aerospace Laboratories too recently conducted extensive wind tunnel experiments (separation tests) to monitor the health of the aircraft, after BrahMos missile is released.
Read more at: http://www.oneindia.com/india/hal-condu ... 50389.html

Su-30 at HAL
Image

Clearly, this is a IAF representative config. Also, note no R-77s.

IMO the IAF will integrate Astra's and if integration is possible, Derby-ERs. The Russians will be unhappy with latter and will push for RVV-SD.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Su-34 for both A2A and A2G threats:

Image

Has the SAP-518s and SAP-14.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

You can see it extends below the characteristic space between the intakes for proper coverage, front and aft. The aircraft will jam the radars in its fwd sector as it approaches the target, launch its ordinance and then be protected while egressing.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

I think IAF can integrate any weapons that it wants to be it indian western or israel as it has source code access to BARS , Reason why it could even test Astra on Su-30.

Something which was one of critical requirement for MMRCA but not sure if the current Rafale deal will come with source code for RBE2 but it would be good to get them as then we are not dependent on OEM of weapons package integration.

That would make Tejas , Su-30 and Rafale as the only type we have or would have in very near future where IAF will have the flexibility to integrate any weapons it want , as long as it does not need deep structural modification ( like brahmos ) which will just need more time to get it done
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2429
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Thakur_B »

Karan M wrote:Has to be balanced against the fact the Su-30 MKI has a huge EW fit, known as the SAP-518 which Thakur ignores completely.
..and soon to be complemented with this...
Image
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Austin wrote:I think IAF can integrate any weapons that it wants to be it indian western or israel as it has source code access to BARS , Reason why it could even test Astra on Su-30.

Something which was one of critical requirement for MMRCA but not sure if the current Rafale deal will come with source code for RBE2 but it would be good to get them as then we are not dependent on OEM of weapons package integration.

That would make Tejas , Su-30 and Rafale as the only type we have or would have in very near future where IAF will have the flexibility to integrate any weapons it want , as long as it does not need deep structural modification ( like brahmos ) which will just need more time to get it done
That WCS access was not enough for us to integrate EL/L-8222 on Su-30 MKI, reason we moved to SAP-518.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Thakur_B wrote:
Karan M wrote:Has to be balanced against the fact the Su-30 MKI has a huge EW fit, known as the SAP-518 which Thakur ignores completely.
..and soon to be complemented with this...
Image
That seems like a MAWS fit, is it the DARE one?
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Ok, thats the MAWS. Here is a pic of the new 6-channel RWR with the MAWS.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Nz7m0n7YBRc/U ... -30MKI.jpg
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

The new RWR is meant to address the blanking issue with the Tarang fitment because of the Su-30s drooping nose and canards.

Flight trials underway
Six antennae configur tions of R118 Radar Warning Receiver (RWR) system have been certified
and cleared with Eagle Eye Interface Unit for installation and flight trials on SU-30MKI aircraft
New DR118 variant is being developed. Digital - so advanced radars can be detected, processed.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-0w-Oay-x8GY/U ... design.jpg

DR118 digital RWR is a state-of-the-art, six-channel digital radar warning receiver for Su-30 MKI. It
is an airborne, tactical EW system that performs the functions of creating situational awareness to the
pilot, about ground-based, airborne or ship-borne emitters present in the scenario. High level system
design has been completed. Algorithms for digital reception have been implemented in firmware and
evaluated.
MAWS
Dual-Colour Missile Approach Warning System
DARE along with MoD, Israel, is in the process of design and development of Dual-Colour
Missile Approach Warning System (DCMAWS) for Su-30 MKI aircraft. The system will provide
protection to the aircraft from surface-to-air and air-to-air missiles. The spectral information of
two colours is used to discriminate efficiently between sunlight reflections, background radiation
and the radiation from the missile. The DCMAWS consists of a set of up to six dual-band IR
sensors installed on the platform, which samples the space in accordance with the defined spatial
coverage, and on advanced processors running state-of-the-art algorithms for online defective pixel
identification and image line-of-sight test. Design and development of data processor unit, which is the
heart of the DCMAWS, have been completed successfully.
Pic of the DPU here
http://i.imgur.com/X7mEGH0.jpg

Probably retain the original Siva pod for KH-31 and DRDO NGARM.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/media/413 ... va-pod.jpg

New Mission computing and avionics architecture.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Emj6h04BduY/U ... puters.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/6Wth7hh.jpg

IAF probably wants to own the complete integration and architecture to plug and play its systems like on the LCA. Right now it is still Russian owned to a large degree with the primary MC as a Russian one with the Indian one in parallel IIRC.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

The large format display engineering rig at DARE for Su-30 is seen on Page 12 (2012)
http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/pub/nl/2012/NL_ ... 12_web.pdf

This is an Irkut prototype for the Su-30 (not the Su-35 - see the HUD)
http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/7308/1 ... 5spitc.jpg

Wonder if its two parallel efforts.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

The dual color IR based MAWS is awesome , perhaps the only in the market with dual channel IR based MAWS , the rest AFAIK are single colour .

This should be applied fleet wide. New MC is nice they moved to Power based system which would give quantum leap in processing ability over MC3 , 486 system but looks like what you have posted is the package for Super 30 program.

Is the same arch also developed for Tejas Mk2 ?
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Austin »

Karan M wrote:The large format display engineering rig at DARE for Su-30 is seen on Page 12 (2012)
http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/pub/nl/2012/NL_ ... 12_web.pdf

This is an Irkut prototype for the Su-30 (not the Su-35 - see the HUD)
http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/7308/1 ... 5spitc.jpg

Wonder if its two parallel efforts.
Likely with new Archicture , MAWS , Radars etc full sensor fusion is on its way
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

I think probably we will start rolling out upgrades once they become mature, instead of waiting only for Super 30.
We started doing dropin's of the earlier Samtel MFDs f.e.

Tejas Mk2 avionics are great step up and provide an insight into Su-30 path too. Note specific reference to data fusion.

http://i.imgur.com/IrWnzkc.jpg

DRDO on Mk2 also notes: Advanced Sensors with Data Fusion.

BTW, the AEW&C flying now?

http://drdo.gov.in/drdo/labs/CABS/Engli ... ionsc.html
Mission System Controller (MSC) is the nerve centre of the AEW&C system offering the command and control facility, sensor data fusion, identification and classification and threat evaluation to arrive at the air situation picture, advanced threat assessment, interception control and guidance along with data storage by using compression techniques. MSC interfaces with the Data Handling and Display System (DHDS) for all operator control and display features. The MSC performs the following major functions:
Integration of surveillance data from on board sensors like RADAR, IFF, etc.
Threat Evaluation and Assessment based on data received from RADAR, IFF, ESM, Data-link, GES, Flight Plan, TDI, etc.
Creation and management of Air Situation Picture (ASP) data.
Providing the commanders and operators full air situation picture as well as other information through user friendly GUIs.
Enabling the operator on board to control various sensors and equipment in accordance with Operational Requirements. (Interface between on-board sensors and OWS / operator.
Enabling interception of hostile Aircraft through guiding of interceptors. systems & Emitter Information from the Electronic Support Measure (ESM) and Communication Support Measure.
Enabling safe recovery of own aircraft in distress by guiding to nearest safe landing area.
Enabling recording and play-back of the mission for post-mission analysis. Monitoring health of on board avionics systems.
Scheduling the mission related tasks according to predefined priority.
Communication of information from / to AEW&C to other systems such as AEW&C, AWACS, Fighters, ADDCs etc.
Enabling the switching of mission between other AEW&C / AWACS systems.
Coordination and monitoring of the functionality of AEW&C onboard systems.
Management of various Tactical data items like Vulnerable Areas, Vulnerable Points, Boundary Lines, etc.
Supply of Nav data and time data to other systems.
Management of the Mission LAN (which connects all AEW&C subsystems).
Point is the algorithms, experience, now exist within DRDO to be leveraged across multiple programs. The AEW&C data fusion stuff is 10x more comprehensive than anything required by a fighter, we are talking of 100's of tracks and far more complex ESM system
SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 36427
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by SaiK »

carefully reading, moving over to LCA Mk2 data fusion and full duplex ethernet makes a lot more regression testing for all the features of Mk1 now fused on to the new display.

some of these can be tested earlier perhaps in existing Mk1 LSPs/PTVs. unless there are data from the FADEC that is also fused, and we have some dependencies.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

LOL

SAP-14 covers 1-4 GHz
SAP 518 (wingtips) covers 5-18 GHz

:-o

SAP 14 for jamming all G2A surveillance systems and AWACS etc
L 1 to 2 GHz Long wave
S 2 to 4 GHz Short wave


SAP518 for the fire control part for SAMs and A2A
C 4 to 8 GHz Compromise between S and X
X 8 to 12 GHz Fire control band
Ku 12 to 18 GHz Missile seeker band
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66589
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Singha »

MAWS is long overdue...the malaysia MKM has had a saab MAWS since day1.

also the Bars radar is a decade+ old now and getting a bit long in tooth...we urgently need the pakfa radar and perhaps its distributed L-band panels also to pickup low flying low RCS intruders and missiles

and we need to drop the failed munna AA12 (and its workaround the AA10) and move onto astra1 and 2...drop the AA11 as well and move on to python5....tear anyone's backside apart with that combo :evil:
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

>>MAWS is long overdue...the malaysia MKM has had a saab MAWS since day1.

Problem with most current MAWS is false alarm rate, beyond published figures..

>>also the Bars radar is a decade+ old now and getting a bit long in tooth...we urgently need the pakfa radar and perhaps its distributed L-band panels also to pickup low flying low RCS intruders and missiles

Actually, while the Bars that we have, has been upgraded only a couple of years back with the kits now getting all the improvements. IAF gave a lot of feedback on operation of the system which NIIP included in its latest set of improvements.

A stage 2 Bars or an AESA fit is planned but IMO, it will be done only once the Su-30 serviceability rises so airframes can be taken off the flightline without an impact on number of Su-30s available.
shaun
BRFite
Posts: 1391
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by shaun »

Karan Saab Thank you for those beautiful posts packed with info and data points. :)
member_28990
BRFite
Posts: 171
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by member_28990 »

Are the Super Sukhoi and the Su35 one and the same? Is the IAF getting one or the other?
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Thanks Pandyan, fair point. Have to think how to go about it.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Here is the confirmation about final Bars clearing tests in 2012. There was another article mentioning it included IAF feedback from their extensive operation of the radar.

Image

Relevant Page

Image

Image
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Same issue on the Su-30 MKM - also shows why IAF may be interested in making the entire mission suite Indian in the Super-30.

cartridges with flares and chaff).
Actually, the share of Russian-made compo-
nents is larger than that on the Indian variant
due to Russian components replacing some of
the Indian and Israeli ones. Particularly, the
Su-30MKI has two different digital comput-
ers (the main one is Russian and the backup is
Indian), while both of the Su-30MKM’s com-
puters are Russian-made.
Thakur_B
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2429
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Thakur_B »

Karan M wrote: Probably retain the original Siva pod for KH-31 and DRDO NGARM.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/media/413 ... va-pod.jpg
Why retain when an upgrade is already in works ?
Image
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

Interesting.
http://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/tenders/vie ... Micro=8119

The earlier Siva pod clearly had 4 sets of antenna fwd and back. Looks like new antennae for the set based on the new design.
JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3176
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by JTull »

Karan M wrote:Interesting.
http://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/tenders/vie ... Micro=8119

The earlier Siva pod clearly had 4 sets of antenna fwd and back. Looks like new antennae for the set based on the new design.
The whole idea of putting all these details on a tender are plain stupid!
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

One way or the other the vendors will get it.

>>optical windows in new pod

interesting. some sort of FLIR/CCD for optical detection of target perhaps. a combination of optics/HADF!
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 60273
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by ramana »

I think this tendering process for critical defence equipment is moronic.
You should ideally have a list of approved contractors who are cleared to do such work and have them bid as required.
Why this open kimono policy?
Who are you trying to inform?

Defence equipment is not like buying potatoes for the kitchen mess.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 20844
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by Karan M »

The open list is supposedly to minimize corruption and allegations of hush hush stuff.
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34981
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion - August 9 , 2014

Post by shiv »

JTull wrote:
Karan M wrote:Interesting.
http://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/tenders/vie ... Micro=8119

The earlier Siva pod clearly had 4 sets of antenna fwd and back. Looks like new antennae for the set based on the new design.
The whole idea of putting all these details on a tender are plain stupid!
Maybe I am ignorant but I scanned 20 of 30 pages of the tender and was unable to find anything that looked like a state secret. We have Vinten pods and Remora pods and Litening pods. They can all be taken apart and details of brackets, weights, screws and rivets made public but it will do no good unless the actual electronics payload details are revealed.

There is nothing in that document. Looking at it is the most boring thing I have done so far this morning The only information available is that it has provision for 2 x 45 degree antenna or something at back and front. That is obvious even from the external image. In fact the word antenna is not used at all as far as I can recall. That is as much secret detail as saying "This animal has mouth and nose in front and crap and peehole at back"

Recall that we are a nation where people get hauled up by the police for photographing planes taking off at an airport and we know that is absurd. I believe that we should not allow that mentality to cloud our own thinking.
Locked