Funnily enough my own public school education that made me patriotic did not make me more patriotic than the non public school guy. But it made me look at him with derision and contempt. Descriptive names like "jahil, and ganwar" fit that attitude exactly, except that you have to know Hindi to use those words. In my school they were urchins, "chokra-boys" and "tatiyas" which I guess is a derisive name for Tantia Tope, just like the name "Pandy" was derisive for Mangal Pandey. I was taught that my patriotism is more than theirs and that they represented the dregs of a predominantly backward Hindu society.
It is hilarious to see posts illustrating the exact same points that I have made - by showing public school types as bearing a greater "burden" of nationalism than the greedy local "ganwars".
These are Macaulatyite attitudes. What is interesting is the information that has been missed. As the original public schools were replaced by Indian schools a very large percentage of them took up the public school model with school song, school blazer, tie etc. Anyone whose children grow up in India will see the old public school model replicated in thousands of schools - often called "Public school" like "Delhi Public School".
Speaking as if these public school types carry a greater burden of nationalism than the Kendriya Vidyalaya types of even the "Vernacular" (LOL what a Macaulayite expression - vernacular!!) schools is a load of crap. "Harrumph - my nationalism is greater than thine". Rubbish! Jahils and Ganwars indeed

: Amazing how this stuff is still alive decades after my own schooling. The snootiness and dripping contempt for the "jahil, ganwar" Indian and a sense of personal superiority. The paan spitting high caste UP Brahmin also carries the same attitude - that he is more nationalistic than others who are ganwars - so how does the "Public School" type try to take on that attitude for himself? Funny innit?
Thanks for the Freudian interlude! What a riot