"..Huma’s middle-east connections surpass even Hillary’s..."!

NRao wrote:Now Huma has amnesia, cannot recall how those emails got onto her Ex-husband's (or is still husband?) server/laptop.
I think we should get rid of these yahoos and start all over again, with these two candidates.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
Soon the world will discover HRC & Obama are at the center of the Syrian conflict, profited from the Clinton foundation, & ignored ISIS.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
Quatar & Saudis donated to the Clinton foundation while HRC was Sec. State. In exchange for the donations, the CIA was sent to Syria (2011).
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
CIA was behind a staged Arab spring uprising to attempt to topple Assad, because he was blocking the Quatar/Turkey pipeline plan.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
ISIS formed by accident, and spiraled out of control but also provided cover for the Obama/HRC agenda of laudering bribes for the pipeline.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
Emails on HRC's private server confirm these tragic events, and Obama & HRC thought they could pardon eachother after the election.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
Little did Obama/HRC realize that an auto-sync feature between Huma & Weiner inadvertently saved the deleted emails on Weiner's machine.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
Russia also cut a deal with Assad to allow an alternative Iran pipeline to go through Syria in exchange for favorable OPEC votes & cash.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
The cash payments from Iran were actually wealth transfers from Obama>>Iran>>Russia. Obama got pissed that the Iranian money went to Russia.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
The Democrats were so irritated for being played by the Iranians and Russians that they now want to reignite the cold war against Russia.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
These bombshells will be confirmed by Wikileaks/Dikileaks soon, but maybe not before the election. The volume of hacked material is massive.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
If HRC wins then Obama & the Clinton's will pull off the largest heist in the history of the world. That's how important this election is.
Hector Morenco @hectormorenco 5h5 hours ago
This high level heist leaving millions dead is also why HRC wants to assasinate Assange & why Obama sent Kerry to Ecuador. Now its too late.
AoA! When a company owner gives $31.3M to a political foundation, that is not "theory". It is "Conspiracy" all right, hain?Lalmohan wrote:The world seems totally absorbed by conspiracy theories these days...
There is/was really no shot for her to be a part of the cabinet anyway given the importance and qualifications usually required for that role.Mort Walker wrote:NRao-ji,
The good thing is that Huma Abedin may be removed from the Clinton team as an advisor and potential cabinet official. At least we hope so to somewhat reduce the Sunni pro-Paki influence. Let's see if HRC throws her under the bus.
Why exactly were donors writing checks? The Band memo makes clear that donations untied to additional Clinton or Teneo services weren’t all that appealing to potential supporters. This is significant, because the large grant-making foundations in the U.S. are almost entirely run by Clinton voters. So you know they weren’t turned off by the brand name. They’d contribute more if they thought they were also buying goodwill and influence with a current Secretary of State and a potential future President.
***
We don’t applaud WikiLeaks or the theft of information, and these hacks deserve a firm U.S. government response. {WSJ showing why they are Democrat rear-ends: the **ONLY*** reason why these facts are public is because of Wikileaks, not these sorry excuses for Journalism} But the emails are public and they will confirm for many Americans their worst suspicions about the people who run their government.
That's a GOOD ONE, Brarji.There is/was really no shot for her to be a part of the cabinet anyway given the importance and qualifications usually required for that role.
The notion that "A John Kasich, Marco Rubio or even a Jeb Bush would be polling ahead by at least 5-10%." is very wrong.brar_w wrote:There is/was really no shot for her to be a part of the cabinet anyway given the importance and qualifications usually required for that role.Mort Walker wrote:NRao-ji,
The good thing is that Huma Abedin may be removed from the Clinton team as an advisor and potential cabinet official. At least we hope so to somewhat reduce the Sunni pro-Paki influence. Let's see if HRC throws her under the bus.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet
I really hope that the next major party nominee really requires something like 20-30 million votes to secure the nomination. That and the GOP brings back the super-delegates. That's the only way to avoid another bad choice 4 years from now. Come to think of it, even a dangerous and obnoxious Ted Cruz could have won (could you imagine that) over HRC. A John Kasich, Marco Rubio or even a Jeb Bush would be polling ahead by at least 5-10%.
One fallout of the Comey letter is that we'll probably also know what the FBI is doing vis-a-vis any investigation into Trump or Trump's current and ex advisors. The Feds had denied information on this based on the 60 day election tradition. Another positive would be that the Republicans may have a better shot at holding, or at the very least narrowing down the senate lead. I full expect Trump to rescue HRC again over the next 4-5 days. He released his final week campaigning roster and is campaigning in Michigan and New Mexico where he has little to no shot of winning. It also says volumes when just a few weeks prior to the election the GOP nominee's most influential surrogate (VP nominee) is campaigning in Utah, and the nominee himself is in Arizona.
If you follow rules, how can you raise hundreds of millions every year from every freaking country in the world?TSJones wrote:that vain, imperious woman may wind up losing the election. simply incredible..........
the secret service hates her. she was rude and abusive to the uniformed secret service guards at the white house. i've known about this for years.
all she had to do was be a little humble and follow the stinking rules and she would indeed have been 50 points ahead of the spoiled rich (old)kid.
the DoJ has been corrupted. Obama needs to answer for that.
The notion that "A John Kasich, Marco Rubio or even a Jeb Bush would be polling ahead by at least 5-10%." is very wrong.
Again, what is this 'almost all the media'?. Do take a look at what dominates the TV News as far as the cable coverage in the US, which shows top the TV viewership numbers, how much audience the top Talk Radio News/Commentators have and what political leanings they have. Similarly look at the conservative or conservative leaning print media outlets such as the NI, WS, WSJ, Hill, CSM and others. Then have a look at the digital media space and see where Drudge and Breitbart stand as far as online viewership is concerned.But anyone who contests against HC will be a demon as per the media and almost all the media, as a rule, is leftist.
instead of just wanting to be president for the good of the country, she wanted to the first WOMAN US president in history.The only surprising thing is why did she have to come back to become President? The family has been making millions in foundation. Why even bother?
Yeah that's the reason why. He as a person, his campaign, his policy proposals and his rhetoric has absolutely nothing to do with itHe is not an official candidate. So he has to be opposed.
That has nothing to do with the conservative POV not reaching out to tens of millions of people that tune in every sing day to watch the folks listed in the link above. That is also the media. You personally may not watch it every day, but just dig up the number of people that tune into all of these things every week i.e FNC numbers, individual FNC commentator's prime-time numbers, Talk Radio #'s and online viewership for outlets like the NI, WS, Drudge, Breitbart, Hill, CSM.Conservatives may be too rigid in what they support.
All that points to two things -Left on the other side seems to support HC no matter what.
The FBI has become politicized much the same way in India the CBI has become politicized and could no longer conduct impartial criminal investigations. The result in India is that we now have the NIA (National Investigation Agency) created in 2008 after the Mumbai attack.TSJones wrote:that vain, imperious woman may wind up losing the election. simply incredible..........
the secret service hates her. she was rude and abusive to the uniformed secret service guards at the white house. i've known about this for years.
all she had to do was be a little humble and follow the stinking rules and she would indeed have been 50 points ahead of the spoiled rich (old)kid.
the DoJ has been corrupted. Obama needs to answer for that.
I guess folks see what they want to see but Sonia Gandhi was up against someone with a proven track record of governance and an unpopular status quo administration at a time when people wanted change. HRC is up against Trump who is no Modi! Moreover, have a look at BO's gallup track on job approval rating since Trump entered the picture.What is happening now in the US has many parallels to what has happened in India. Hillary Clinton == Sonia Gandhi.
Well, that is good old American racism at work. After "zero tolerance" was put in place after Columbine (the Columbine school shooting took place in 1999) student suspension rates shot up -- for black students. Obama merely tried to reverse that trend.TSJones wrote:obama has not only corrupted the DOJ but help destroy the public school system by making it harder to kick out young thugs.
nobody wants to send their kids to a school that is not safe.
and oh btw, colleges and universities have to file a Clery report ever year that is available to each parent.
the public school system should have to do the same but hide it under "protecting juveniles privacy".
I went to 5 different high schools before I graduated as my family followed Nasa Apollo program from city to city.A_Gupta wrote:Well, that is good old American racism at work. After "zero tolerance" was put in place after Columbine (the Columbine school shooting took place in 1999) student suspension rates shot up -- for black students. Obama merely tried to reverse that trend.TSJones wrote:obama has not only corrupted the DOJ but help destroy the public school system by making it harder to kick out young thugs.
nobody wants to send their kids to a school that is not safe.
and oh btw, colleges and universities have to file a Clery report ever year that is available to each parent.
the public school system should have to do the same but hide it under "protecting juveniles privacy".
I never compared Trump to Modi. That is your imagination. The corruption parallels to Sonia and Hillary are valid. There are many parallels between the US and India, but they aren't 100%.brar_w wrote:I guess folks see what they want to see but Sonia Gandhi was up against someone with a proven track record of governance and an unpopular status quo administration at a time when people wanted change. HRC is up against Trump who is no Modi! Moreover, have a look at BO's gallup track on job approval rating since Trump entered the picture.What is happening now in the US has many parallels to what has happened in India. Hillary Clinton == Sonia Gandhi.
https://s17.postimg.org/x5nq91k67/Scree ... _01_AM.png
That's an issue states can handle. Basically by economic segregation.TSJones wrote:obama has not only corrupted the DOJ but help destroy the public school system by making it harder to kick out young thugs.
nobody wants to send their kids to a school that is not safe.
and oh btw, colleges and universities have to file a Clery report ever year that is available to each parent.
the public school system should have to do the same but hide it under "protecting juveniles privacy".
The problem you just described cannot be attributed to Obama for the problem was already existing long before Obama came onto the scene. This is just another instance of "Thanks, Obama" blame game.TSJones wrote:I went to 5 different high schools before I graduated as my family followed Nasa Apollo program from city to city.A_Gupta wrote:
Well, that is good old American racism at work. After "zero tolerance" was put in place after Columbine (the Columbine school shooting took place in 1999) student suspension rates shot up -- for black students. Obama merely tried to reverse that trend.
Nowhere did I ever see a fist fight melee in the hall way or classroom or a student hit a teacher. it happens often nowdays.
get. thugs. out of. our. schools.
by keeping thugs in school you are destroying the trust in pubic education and further driving people of good will (both white and of color) from the school system
(For the sake of full disclosure, in this election I have supported Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich and Hillary Clinton for president, in that order.)
The F.B.I.’s job is to investigate, not to influence the outcome of an election.
Such acts could also be prohibited under the Hatch Act, which bars the use of an official position to influence an election.
And that is why, on Saturday, I filed a complaint against the F.B.I. with the Office of Special Counsel, which investigates Hatch Act violations, and with the Office of Government Ethics. I have spent much of my career working on government ethics and lawyers’ ethics, including two and a half years as the chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, and I never thought that the F.B.I. could be dragged into a political circus surrounding one of its investigations. Until this week.
Violations of the Hatch Act and of government ethics rules on misuse of official positions are not permissible in any circumstances, including in the case of an executive branch official acting under pressure from politically motivated members of Congress.
But an official doesn’t need to have a specific intent — or desire — to influence an election to be in violation of the Hatch Act or government ethics rules. The rules are violated if it is obvious that the official’s actions could influence the election, there is no other good reason for taking those actions, and the official is acting under pressure from persons who obviously do want to influence the election.
Absent extraordinary circumstances that might justify it, a public communication about a pending F.B.I. investigation involving a candidate for public office that is made on the eve of an election is thus very likely to be a violation of the Hatch Act and a misuse of an official position.
DOJ being corrupted? May I remind you that FBI is under a Republican man and that under DOJ, they have gone after many democrats. Don't forget that under the Bush administration, 22 million emails have gone missing and never found. They were not investigated by the Senate.TSJones wrote: the DoJ has been corrupted. Obama needs to answer for that.
My question is: Isn't the Yahoo! account stuff basically available from Yahoo!, no need to go to individual computers? In fact it seems extraordinarily silly to STORE 10,000 emails on a laptop, hain? What if it gets stolen?Huma Abedin swore under oath she had given up all her devices that had State Department emails on them
FBI found government-related emails on laptop Abedin shared with disgraced husband Anthony Weiner
The laptop was seized during a separate investigation involving alleged sexts Weiner sent to a 15-year-old girl
Abedin said in June 2016 she looked for all devices she may have used to send and receive emails while working for Clinton at State Department
She gave two laptops, a Blackberry and some paper 'files' from her apartment to her attorneys to review
Abedin said her attorneys were the ones who determined 'what was federal record' and needed to be turned into the State Department
FBI is determining if classified information obtained by Abedin could have been accessed on her computer or forwarded on to unprotected accounts
None of the emails were exchanged directly between Abedin and Clinton
By Dailymail.com Reporter and Jennifer Smith
Updated: 07:18 EST, 30 October 2016
Huma Abedin swore under oath that she had given up all the devices she believed contained State Department emails on them, it has been revealed.
The information came to light just a day after it was revealed the FBI found government-related emails on a laptop Abedin shared with her disgraced husband, Anthony Weiner.
If Abedin did lie, she could be charged with perjury, which carries a penalty of up to five years in prison.
Detectives seized the laptop, which contains 'tens of thousands of emails', in a separate investigation involving alleged sexts Weiner sent to a 15-year-old girl.
In June 2016, Abedin said she had looked for all the devices she may have used to send and receive emails while working for Clinton at the State Department.
She sat for hours of depositions last summer as part of the civil lawsuit filed against the State Department by Judicial Watch.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z4OaUNfc5b