sudeepj wrote:Rakesh ji, I am quite capable of defending an idea and seeing any situation from multiple perspectives, something you are quite evidently, incapable of doing. For instance, one can see the danger and opportunity of a security relationship with the US at the same time. Demanding that I 'defend my idea' requires that this simple idea be under some kind of threat or attack. Playground insults, lazy googling, is neither. Further, arguing against logorrhea dressed up as analysis is a waste of my time.
Please, do reply to this post and have the last word! It will definitely make me respect you more, demonstrate your intellectual superiority and further more, influence the GoI to do what you want them to do!
These multiple perspectives aren't producing a clear path but are confused.
Don't say Russians help in Arihant and lease of Shucka B is something great , they just did it for money. But same time USA not ready to lease their nSub is defended as "why should they share their taj Mahal ..."
Then Arihant and Chakra are disparaged as ineffective for Bharat's security.
Ok so what is important for our security?
"Javelin Missile etc." Pat comes answer
"But usa limited launchers of javelin so balance doesn't tilt against pak... " defeats the purpose of poster's argument that javelin will help our security.
Now it gets more twisted
"Why didn't India MAKE ITSELF USEFUL FOR US, like pakistanis make themselves? Why did not India 15 years back created another supply line IN SERVICE OF USA from irani gwadar port? "
Doesn't stop here but goes further back 50 - 60 years and questions India being NAM member...."
Poster accused other of living in past but himself goes further in past to justify USA enmity.
Perhaps some psychological trick learned from USA to put opponents on backfoot