manjgu wrote:pankajs wrote:
From what I understand .. Starting @ 1:57] what the General is saying is that our capture of Black top has neutralized the Chinese advantage on the north bank of Pangang tso BECAUSE there is a height on F4 that dominates <<f2-8/something>> AND "Ane La" which we COULD have used to cut off the Chinese <<at IB/Fort area and trapping the Chinese in the middle>> ... Now we have squared up the game.
So "this" height he is referring to is the Black top <<or something near>> that allows us to "negate" the advantage that occupation of F4 and a specific location on F4 allowed the Chinese.
1)
he makes 2 different stmts..one is about black top etc which negates chini in the chushul sector And
a height over F4 which dominates F 4.F8 and ane la pass...( which i dont know cuts access to what?).
2) per se exchanging these occupations with chini withdrawing from f4 to f8 is utter nonsense. With a black top road from f4 to f8 and beyond how does it matter if chini are at F6 or f7 or f8... even if they withdraw to f8 they can capture all the height captured by us on 1st sept and then calmly drive to f4 once again... one has to be v stupid. ofc i dont the know the implications of other chini incursions... but to my limited understanding the chini incursions are on relatively flat ground not exactly high features like mountain tops ?
Let me restate what I have understood from the General and see if you too have come to the same conclusion ..
My transcript Starting 1:40] Firstly
Black top is a very pivotal locality because while it gives you
deep insight right on to Srijap and that area, it also denies the enemy any observation into Chushul bowl which is a ground of strategic importance as also the Spanggur gap. Having done this, now we have neutralized the Chinese advantage on the north of Pangang tso BECAUSE on f-4 there is a height which dominates the <<something/assume F4-8>> bowl and also
Ane la pass which WE could have used to cut off the Chinese. So now we have squared up the game and when we go on the negotiation table we go on equal footing.
1. Black top gives deep insight right on to Srijap and that area i.e. to say the whole of F2/8 comes under direct observation from here including all the approached to the ridge-lines.
2. Black top denies the Chinese observation into Chushul bowl and Spanggur gap.
3. The next point is tricky the way he says it ... Having done that {the above i.e occupation of Black top that gives India deep insight between F2/8} we have neutralized the Chinese advantage on the north banks of Pangang tso {acquired recently by their capture of the ridge-lines between F4-8}
4. The Chinese control "a height" on F4 which dominates the << something>> bowl and also Ane la pass and thus PREVENTS India from going around their F4 position via Ane La and cut off the Chinese at IB/Kurnak fort.
The way to make sense of his last point it to work backwards. We cannot go behind the Chinese on F4 via Ane La and cut him off to the east because Ane La is under Chinese observation from a height on F4 i.e. to say that THE height on F4 being talked about is under the Chinese control.
BUT as far as negotiation is concerned, we "have squared up the game" with our counter occupation of Black top that allows us to observe the the F2-8 ridge-line and its approaches.
As I have stated about 3 times before, I am more comfortable with the current configuration given that our position around Spanggur gap is strategic while the Chinese position around F4-8 is not even tactical. The Chinese do gain about about 40 sq km territory but I will trade that for permanently closing the Spanggur gap.