vimal wrote:
I would add a bit more colour to that.
1. You are underestimating the ability for Abrahamics to self-organize. There is a reason why they have mandated prayer sessions every week where a large number of faithfools meet; exchange notes and build long lasting social and communal bonds.
2. There are over 50 pissfool countries who send thousands of people with green cards every year; now multiply that with decades of immigration. That number is not insignificant and is shaping the demographics of unkil along with the voting pattern. Combine that with point 1.
2. Most pissfools enter unkil at a lower socio-economic level than asian groups and go on the government's teats pretty much as soon as they emigrate. It's easy to control them as a vote block to keep the gravy train flowing and make them vote in blocks. They have a much higher fertility rate and reproduce many times more than average Joe leading to voter consolidation. Look around you and count how many asians have more than 1-2 kids.
3. Active support from their governments. A lot of gelf countries and even our neighbours have very powerful presence in unkil to push their narrative. Monetary and physical support is provided. What exactly does MEA do? When some people raise their voice; they are on their own.
4. The less I say about Bhartiya elected representative the better. They are the worst back stabbers of the entire universe constantly trying to erase their own links and talking to brown folks like Goras. Folks like Ro, Kamalla and Premalla immediately come to mind. The only person who has tried standing up for Hindus is Tulsi; who is not even Indian.
Your points are valid to some extent but even they oversimplify the case.
The point of Islamists running candidates for low-level, grass-roots posts is precisely so that they do NOT have to rely solely on fellow Pissfools as a votebank.
Unlike in the UK for example, 99.9% of US districts do not have a sufficient number or concentration of Pissfools to elect someone to office by themselves (the Michigan and Minnesota districts where huge immigrant populations have managed to send Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar to US Congress are very much the exception-- not the rule).
So things like mosque sermons and gelf money don't play the kind of role here that they do in Europe, useful as they are. Likewise, the significant demographic shift created by having large numbers of children has not happened in the US yet.
Instead, where the Islamists have been wise-- and the Hindoos could be wiser-- has been in running for low-level positions. In the process of running for school-board member or county comptroller, you get to do a lot of the groundwork needed to progress further, and also to inject sympathy for your views into the party mainstream.
As they run for these sorts of elections, Islamists make friends with, trade favours with, build up networks of obligation and patronage with huge numbers of politically engaged people in the local (usually Democratic) party organizations. They come out of their Pissfool communities and engage with the mainstream communities of their neighbours-- mostly White, suburban liberals-- who in turn get used to having these Islamists becoming standard, recognizable features of the local political landscape.
This has a (pardon the pun) whitewashing effect where the white mainstream Americans they interact with become inured to their Islamist views or Muslim identity: "heck, Javed is just a regular guy! No way he's a jihadi terrorist!" Even though the same Javed might be sending hundreds of dollars to Lashkar-e-Taiba every month.
It also makes the white liberals MUCH more receptive to the victimhood sob-stories their new Islamist buddies feed them at election-watch parties, campaign celebratory events, backyard barbeques and what not. White Americans have no idea what's going on in the rest of the world, but they LOVE to feel like generous, empathetic saviours.
Every chance Javed (or Uzra, or whoever) gets-- he/she will be telling tearful stories to their gora party compatriots regarding Nazi BJP, Hitler Modi, Genocide in Cashmere etc. And since the party compatriots already enjoy a sense of camaraderie with these Islamists, and also see the same views rehashed endlessly in the mainstream US media, such Islamist propaganda points end up becoming accepted as reality among a huge swath of the American public. They're no longer just the stuff of news items broadcast on websites or TV, but "personal accounts" narrated by their friends (or friends-of-friends) who actually lived and suffered in Nazi BJP India. What could be more convincing than that?
And when the very same gora Americans get elected to City Councils, they end up passing resolutions against CAA or the Article 370 repeal. After all Javed told them that these are fascist activities, and Javed is a good guy.
It's a brilliant campaign of micro-persuasions to spread influence in and across local networks-- when repeated on a large scale, they produce a politically significant net effect over time, and we can already see the results. Kashmiri Islamists occupy positions in the Biden administration while Amit Jani is sidelined just because his family had some connection to Modi. The Democratic platform has a section for Muslim Americans, including plans to punish India for CAA and Article 370, but Hindu Americans might as well not exist.
Hindus are nowhere, and I mean NOWHERE in this game. The only Hindus who do what the Islamists do-- engage actively with the wider American communities they live in, are almost invariably deracinated Hindus who either stay silent or join in the Modi-bashing. As for the rest of us-- all we can do is post clever Tweets like "so what if Seattle Council condemned CAA, my colony in Nagpur also passed a resolution about George Floyd and police brutality in the US, ha ha".
We simply have no concept of what the long game is, let alone how to play it.