
Edited: ok, i understand now, he is right. Stalin's famine pre-dated Nazi era. I stand corrected.
That was very gracious of you comrade Hercule!!!Cyrano wrote:What exactly was A_Gupta complaining about? Moi pas compris
Edited: ok, i understand now, he is right. Stalin's famine pre-dated Nazi era. I stand corrected.
Mon Dieu! An approach that is more honoured in its breach than in its observance by the general population.Cyrano wrote:Our eyes and ears are but tiny holes through which we see the world in the visible and audible spectrum. Our mind, while trying to make sense of it, applies its own filters. Then our emotions distort, and our character selects. It would be mighty foolish of me to think I have the truth on any subject when presented info contrary to my views, because I'd be squandering an opportunity to learn and hopefully improve. A_Gupta has done me a favour by pointing out my error.
"Even if one can argue about the term “Nazi,” the fact remains that these militias are violent, convey a nauseating ideology and are virulently anti-Semitic. Their anti-Semitism is more cultural than political, which is why the term “Nazi” is not really appropriate. Their hatred of the Jew stems from the great famines of the 1920s and 1930s in the Ukraine, resulting from Stalin’s confiscation of crops to finance the modernization of the Red Army. This genocide—known in the Ukraine as the Holodomor—was perpetrated by the NKVD (the forerunner of the KGB), whose upper echelons of leadership were mainly composed of Jews."Cyrano wrote:Our eyes and ears are but tiny holes through which we see the world in the visible and audible spectrum. Our mind, while trying to make sense of it, applies its own filters. Then our emotions distort, and our character selects. It would be mighty foolish of me to think I have the truth on any subject when presented info contrary to my views, because I'd be squandering an opportunity to learn and hopefully improve. A_Gupta has done me a favour by pointing out my error.
My take is that @A_Gupta brought facts to the table which invalidate only a small part of your theory(s). The general thrust is still valid. I don't think anybody knows "truth". One can't find truth from just facts alone.Cyrano wrote:Merci !Cyrano khush hua !
![]()
![]()
No not the whole program but the Foreign Legion. French invented that back in 1800s.dnivas wrote:So crazy video of a french news reporter going to interview some of the foreign fighters. finds out that the whole program is run by US military .
https://twitter.com/antiwar_soldier/sta ... 7442569227
Yes I was supposed to mean the international legion of fighters in Ukraine.Vayutuvan wrote:No not the whole program but the Foreign Legion. French invented that back in 1800s.dnivas wrote:So crazy video of a french news reporter going to interview some of the foreign fighters. finds out that the whole program is run by US military .
https://twitter.com/antiwar_soldier/sta ... 7442569227
Ukraine seems to have a lot of male prison population who can be released from prisons and then expected to pick up arms and fight for the country. Russia can also make some intellitence assessment on the prison population in Ukraine and figure out how much of "reserve forces" do they have now. Also I see a little less of Ukraine & Russia war news at least on the news outlets I regularly scan through.Cyrano wrote:Ukraine is now releasing prisoners in Kharkov and other eastern cities, giving them arms and forming battalions to defend these cities, to supplement UkrA.
Yes, I noticed the same too. Perhaps the reason is :I see a little less of Ukraine & Russia war news at least on the news outlets I regularly scan through.
May be it is just fatigue. The initial shock value is gone and now it is just repeating the same.I see a little less of Ukraine & Russia war news at least on the news outlets I regularly scan through.
Russians have now got grips with the war. They seem to be taking out Drones regularly. Ukrainians have resurrected their dead air force after 2 weeks in time for Easter. Did they get new planes or repair damaged ones? Russians are regularly shooting them down. New TB-2 are being shot downs about 100km away from front lines. More UkrainianTB-2 orders are being placed and probably with American missiles.Cyrano wrote:The Slovakia supplied S300 system (thanks to Victoria Nuland's arm twisting) was transported quite far into central Ukraine and it was destroyed by Russian bombs near Dnipro. If they hoped to interdict RuAF CAS over the cauldron, that possibility is gone now.
It's actually Russia that may be facing a manpower shortage.Cyrano wrote:Ukraine is now releasing prisoners in Kharkov and other eastern cities, giving them arms and forming battalions to defend these cities, to supplement UkrA. They have done this already at the start of this conflict in and around Kyiv. No one knows how efficient they were, but Ukr is scraping the bottom of the barrel now.
So no hollering in the Western Press about this blatant anti-west move!China delivers weapons to Russia ally Serbia in 'show of force'
A former presidential adviser to both Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin, Sergey Karaganov is honorary chair of the Moscow think tank the Council for Foreign and Defence Policy. He is associated with a number of key ideas in Russian foreign policy, from the so-called Karaganov doctrine on the rights of ethnic Russians living abroad to the principle of “constructive destruction”, also known as the “Putin doctrine”. Karaganov is close to both Putin and his foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and he formulated many of the ideas that led to the war in Ukraine – though he has also expressed disagreement with the idea of a long-term occupation of the country.
Karaganov has promoted the concept of “Greater Eurasia” and has defended a closer partnership with China. He is known as a foreign-policy hawk, and has argued that the long reign of the West in world politics is now at an end. On 28 March the New Statesman columnist Bruno Maçães interviewed Karaganov about his views on the war – including controversial statements on Ukrainian nationhood and denazification that would be disputed by those outside Russia – and the future of the liberal international order.
Bruno Maçães Why did Russia invade Ukraine?
Sergey Karaganov For 25 years, people like myself have been saying that if Nato and Western alliances expand beyond certain red lines, especially into Ukraine, there will be a war. I envisioned that scenario as far back as 1997. In 2008 President Putin said that if Ukraine’s membership of the alliance became a possibility then there will be no Ukraine. He was not listened to. So the first objective is to end Nato’s expansion. Two other objectives have been added: one is the demilitarisation of Ukraine; the other is denazification, because there are people in the Russian government concerned with the rise of ultra-nationalism in Ukraine to the extent that they think it is beginning to resemble Germany in the 1930s. There is also an aim to free the Donbas republics of eight years of constant bombardment.
There was also a strong belief that war with Ukraine was inevitable – maybe three or four years from now – which could well have taken place on Russian territory itself. So probably the Kremlin decided that if you have to fight, let’s fight on somebody else’s territory, the territory of a neighbour and a brother country, once a part of the Russian Empire....
More like 6 years to prepare defensive positions.Cyrano wrote:UkrA has had over 6 weeks now (after years of Donbass conflict) to create defensive structures, lay mines and position their forces and concentrate remaining equipment in the Kramatorsk cauldron. I'd expect that excepting the troops that are guarding Kyiv and Odessa, nearly all the rest is now in the cauldron for the "last stand". Its possible that many troops that managed to escape the noose around Mariupol have joined them. The total Ukr figure could be somewhere between 40-60k troops there.
Welcome back, Arun ji, even if it was only for a single post! While I often disagreed with you back in the day, I do miss reading your perspectives.A_Gupta wrote:
I'll say this much, no doubt unwelcome, and depart again.
...
Bye!
kit wrote:
Bucha was "BRITISH JOB Lukashenko claims.
Yup ., India has been there .. Jallianwala Bagh .. Brits dont change do they
and of course
https://www.republicworld.com/world-new ... eshow.html
I saw the 2+2 readouts and looks to me the Biden govt gave a tacit approval to what India wants. I think SJayashankar let a very astute diplomacy where he managed to indeed walk on egg shells and keep both partners happy or perhaps no sad.IndraD wrote:
Modi stood his ground
refused to condemn Russia, asked for independent enquiry into Bucha. This riled Biden govt
Currently about 11 BTGs have reentered in the North east (this I assume includes some that are part of 8 mile convoy) and 4 more in Russia regrouping.Deans wrote:
More like 6 years to prepare defensive positions.
Lots of clips of Russian sappers clearing mines in the Donbass.
Russian analysts estimate that Ukraine has moved 25,000 men to reinforce the Donbass, while Russia will move an additional 60,000.
Donbass pocket (only the Azov steel plant) has the remnants of 4 Ukrainian battalions.
I am finding a good number of leaders are spouting lunatic crap and they are behaving like total lunatics. The mind is a funny thing, and when thoughts are expressed without due considerations it is lunatic. Take for example the Nato expansion, this must have emanated from a lunatic and later properly couched in terms that made sense for the circle of people involved. Next comes another lunatic idea, we need to poke the bear. Then an other about Sanctions without thought to the World reeling from KungFlu. The list is a string of lunatic ideas that the world leadership thrusts on others who are trying to live their lives, which is a short journey to redeem their karma accumulated over time. The West has its fair share of lunatics and the brits too especially W. Churchill and his famines. See we jump from one lunatic idea to another incessantly. The corpus of human thought in the world is a sorry tale of one bumbling lunatic idea to the next.guy is a total lunatic.