Rakesh saar,
https://x.com/johnstanly/status/1811810858160271666 ---> India is not a NATO member. It's not a NATO partner. It's not a treaty ally of the US. It's not even a member of the 'Indo-Pacific 4'. Then why the US is so worked up about Indian PM's bilateral visit to a friendly country? Foreign policy is not, & should not be, a zero sum game.
SRajesh wrote: ↑14 Jul 2024 15:27 Will Trump take V Ramaswamy as his running mate???
Or a Female running mate to negate the Dems!
Either way having a Indian Origin person as a running mate; has that in anyway affected the relationship.
With the potshots being taken at strategic autonomy, how will the return of Trump Presidency affect our relationship??
I mean are going to go forward on Strategic Patnership (Hmm have doubts given Trumps call Make America Great again), Client State (definitely we have moved on from their and i dont think that will happen in 100 yrs to come), Transactional Relationship ( Probably only thing to be expected given Trumps penchant of moving everthing back into America and kicking the Europeans and the Jihadi's in the Cojones)
Will he move further on QUAD or dilute with Brit and the kanedians and the Euro-Mafia??
Both, IIT Kanpur and Delhi have research work going on in areas that are important to Oregon State University as well. One example is in climate science, sustainability, and environmental energy. We came with the hope of learning about what they (the IITs) are doing about it, and get opportunities for our faculty members to collaborate with Indian faculty, have joint workshops, and more.
Further, we are in conversations with IIT Delhi, Hyderabad and Madras.
Today, India maintains deeper and broader ties with the US than with Russia, but Nixon’s China opening still haunts the bilateral relationship. With its decades-long policy of aiding China’s economic rise, the US not only created the greatest strategic adversary it has ever faced, but also saddled India with a formidable military foe that is aggressively striving for regional hegemony. One manifestation of this is the Sino-Indian military standoff in the Himalayas, which is now in its fifth year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usha_Vance
Is she one of them who signed this letter opposing the award to Modi? Does she support or oppose the abrogation of Article 370?Criticism of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation[edit]
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation reduced its investments in non-renewable energy in 2016, after recipients of the Gates Cambridge Scholarship had urged the Foundation's trustees to divest from fossil fuels a year earlier.[10][11]
The Foundation gave Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi its 2019 Global Goalkeeper Award for the Swachh Bharat Mission[12] and the "progress India has made in providing safe sanitation under his leadership."[13] More than 100 Gates Cambridge Scholars and alumni had condemned the Foundation's decision, following the Indian government's decision to withdraw the special status of the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir.[14][15]
So India has been pursuing a goal of Multi-Polar World order, which it will benefit from, rather than continuing to suffer under US hegemony.chetak wrote: ↑17 Jul 2024 02:36
PDF Copy here: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. ... MNN10KSzqZ
sanman ji,sanman wrote: ↑17 Jul 2024 07:58So India has been pursuing a goal of Multi-Polar World order, which it will benefit from, rather than continuing to suffer under US hegemony.chetak wrote: ↑17 Jul 2024 02:36
PDF Copy here: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws. ... MNN10KSzqZ
What your CSIS paper says is that US will seek to perpetuate its hegemony by pursuing a counter-strategy of encouraging a Multi-Polar India
(aka. Divide-&-Rule)
Yes -- and this article promoting meddling inside India's internal politics then triggered me so sharply, that I had to think of a counter-strategy against their foreign meddling strategy of sub-nationalism inside India.chetak wrote: ↑17 Jul 2024 10:47 sanman ji,
What strikes me the most is that some conceited white punk assumes that they have the divine right to interfere in India's internal affairs and reset the local ecosystem to benefit them yet again.
They want to colonize us once more and for the very same reasons that the britshits did
They seek to plunder resources, deploy Indian boots on the ground (as in WWI & WWII), and hegemonize the native population and the fertile land
They tried and failed with the pakis and so now they are seeking to subjugate the Hindus and coopt them into their perpetually rent seeking war machine, thus hoping, on a geopolitical scale, to ensure a market for their battle tested MIC built weapons and systems.
Momentarily, they slipped off the velvet glove to give us a very brief glimpse of their rusted and corroded iron hand.
Also, the contours of the games that are being played by the eyetaalian mafia, under the tutelage of the BIF, are becoming clearer as the days go by
MUCH MORE concerning for USA, India and most decent folks like me is that Harmeet Dhillon is aspiring to become the Attorney General if Donald Trump wins. That won't be for good anyone. She is well known (was there in 2016 giving the same kind of speech and other works in later years)n she and her Managing Partner and founder are pretty well known Khalistani supporters and support anti Indian activities. Her law firm, Dhillon Law Group boasts about taking cases for 'Sikh rights and discrimination'. (She was introduces as "Sikh" (and some times with "Punjabi" or even "South Asian" .. never as Indian American although born in Chandigarh to a Indian family n 1969)
Yes, I'm aware. I liked her at first, but then when I saw her coming out first with opportunistic political statements, and later with blatant anti-India statements, then I used to reply to her Tweets to rebut her.Amber G. wrote: ↑19 Jul 2024 01:24MUCH MORE concerning for USA, India and most decent folks like me is that Harmeet Dhillon is aspiring to become the Attorney General if Donald Trump wins. That won't be for good anyone. She is well known (was there in 2016 giving the same kind of speech and other works in later years)n she and her Managing Partner and founder are pretty well known Khalistani supporters and support anti Indian activities. Her law firm, Dhillon Law Group boasts about taking cases for 'Sikh rights and discrimination'. (She was introduces as "Sikh" (and some times with "Punjabi" or even "South Asian" .. never as Indian American although born in Chandigarh to a Indian family n 1969)
(I am glad to see there is some mention and concern of her is Indian Media)
(Eg she has accused of India running death squad to kill Sikhs & exactly has nor provided any evidence to back up her ridiculous claim... along with many anti-hindu tweets from her (and her supporters) in her SM)..
