So we say -- but Khalistanis are now very stirred up and agitated from these narrative, which only causes problems for us.
We put on a brave face, so that we don't have to deal with the problems.
So we say -- but Khalistanis are now very stirred up and agitated from these narrative, which only causes problems for us.
That's old news. It was already posted long back in another thread and not sure why it is brought out here now? Trying to show how the current somnambulant is still gung-ho about US-India relations and how great they are in shoring it up?
The first three items are again brought out in bold. USCIRF/US SD are tools to "keep India in check", but instead it causes enough strife in the relations and it impacts innocent lives.disha wrote: ↑06 Jul 2024 06:20
... Americans who have a rosy tinted world view, unsure of their own contributions latch on to all this "rosy outlook" and nehruvian style virtue signalling to show that "they" are doing something for Indo-US relations and genuflect in front of new desis and desis in India.
The next stage of India-US relations needs to move far beyond this mutual virtue signalling and real real progress on the ground. To start with:
1. Removal of per country quota limit. Or a deal for all the people waiting in the GC line since decades. If the current administration can give special services to illegal immigrants, they can as well give special status to *legal immigrants*. Most Indians in America will be happy.
2. Stop the "religious" interference via USCIRF in India.
3. Stop interfering in Indian elections and democracy.
4. Increase energy, materials, space and other high tech cooperation between two countries.
5. Stop assisting anti-India elements like terroristan and khalistanis. Snakes will bite back.
But Indian Americans stuck in the rosy genuflection mode will get their pants wet just seeing Modi meeting Samosa Caucus. That is unsatisfactory.
What has Obama while signing legislation for "dreamers" do? What did Bhaindanwa do? What is Comma,La doing?Over 250,000 children of legal immigrants, many of them Indian-Americans, face risk of being deported due to "aging out" as they turn 21 and lose dependent status.
As requested multiple times before, I'm requesting again: Please refrain from trolling, personal attacks, and using crude/vulgar language in your comments or rants that reference my quotes.disha wrote: ↑26 Jul 2024 23:10That's old news. It was already posted long back in another thread and not sure why it is brought out here now? Trying to show how the current somnambulant
Looks like your friends at US SD are still stuck with thooker & pisser gang and talk only about Kanwaariyas when US is facing many issues...
< Rest of crude/ nonsense rant remove c>
Request you to please stop responding to mine and please place me in your ignore list. You promised to do so in past.
Please do not use my pseudonym in vain and club it with the "tool kit gang". You never apologized for it in past.- Please refrain for using words like 'thooker' and 'pisser,' for 'my friends' (or anybody else).
That's all fine, but here is what I said (copying again from above):disha wrote: ↑23 Jul 2024 04:38Did we? We have got the following within India:KL Dubey wrote: ↑21 Jul 2024 08:44
Our challenge is to not get drawn into these conflicts, and at the same time balance our cooperation with the US and Russia. So far we have tread a middle path successfully, i.e. joining the west against Chinese aggression, but not taking sides in other conflicts. Given that China is the real problem, this policy will likely remain unchanged.
1. Manipur xtian "insurgency"
2. Punjabi "Farmer Protest" in Delhi
3. Increased terrorism in Cashmere
4. Political interference in India (you have Amb Gar$hitty leading the charge on behalf of Bombaba and Nuland)
And if the deep state was not so much threatened by Trump, why did they try to assassinate him?
Qstn: Is China a real problem or just a spring chicken? Right now, the cheeni economy is in doldrums. And they hate the prospect of Trump coming back to power. Cheen can easily give up its claims and settle the borders with all and start growing, but the little emperors that they are, they will go down and most likely take the world down with them.
Cheen is not India's problem. Cheen is world's problem. But we can take that up in the Cheen thread.
As examples of this continuation of policy:Our challenge is to not get drawn into these conflicts, and at the same time balance our cooperation with the US and Russia. So far we have tread a middle path successfully, i.e. joining the west against Chinese aggression, but not taking sides in other conflicts. Given that China is the real problem, this policy will likely remain unchanged.
( Really not a bad news/quote /sigh/)This cultural property agreement is about two things. First and foremost, it's about justice - returning to India and the Indian people what is rightfully theirs. Secondly, it's about connecting India with the world. Every American and global citizen deserves to know, see, and experience the culture we celebrate here today. To know Indian culture is to know human culture.'"
Biden is Deep State's sock puppet (now being replaced by another sock puppet Comma,la Harris). And Rahul Pappu Gandu is the sock puppet of the sock puppet.More proof of Rahul Gandhi-deep state links? As Congress leader threatens OpIndia, read how he had confirmed meeting with Biden officials, talks around ‘Indian democracy’
All well and good, but aap kehna kya chahte ho!KL Dubey wrote: ↑29 Jul 2024 02:40
Our challenge is to not get drawn into these conflicts, and at the same time balance our cooperation with the US and Russia. So far we have tread a middle path successfully, i.e. joining the west against Chinese aggression, but not taking sides in other conflicts. Given that China is the real problem, this policy will likely remain unchanged.
As examples of this continuation of policy:
https://www.rubio.senate.gov/rubio-intr ... rtnership/
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... s?from=mdr
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/fre ... 69574.html
China may be the "world's problem", but the world in general doesn't have a 2000 mile border alongside territory occupied by the CCP and armies facing each other since 2020.
So you will start fighting with US since some sections of Indians believe that US cannot have good relationship with India, even if its life depended on it?
I have pointed out earlier and point out again. US is trying to gain leverage. That is the classic deal making that US understands. All the shenanigans are over leverage. Any kid born in US learns leverage before they learn to speak.They are still trying to get concessions on Pannu issue. That is a side show at best.
I have already said what I wanted to say, posting it again the third time:
Nothing I said implies I don't want better Indo-US relations from either side. The links clearly show relations/cooperation are getting continuously stronger - while India continues to pursue its own formulated policy rather than be influenced by other countries.Our challenge is to not get drawn into these conflicts, and at the same time balance our cooperation with the US and Russia. So far we have tread a middle path successfully, i.e. joining the west against Chinese aggression, but not taking sides in other conflicts. Given that China is the real problem, this policy will likely remain unchanged.
As examples of this continuation of policy:
https://www.rubio.senate.gov/rubio-intr ... rtnership/
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ne ... s?from=mdr
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/fre ... 69574.html
Have to agree with this -- taking all the things together. the relations/cooperation between US. and India is stronger than any times in the past.The links clearly show relations/cooperation are getting continuously stronger - while India continues to pursue its own formulated policy rather than be influenced by other countries.
My understanding of what you are saying is that Indian-Americans somehow become a block vote. It is not possible given the following:
Obviously it was met with mocking and derision.A friend of mine wants to start a new political party in India. He is looking for followers.
1. Only 2.1 million have citizenship. Majority of the non-citizens are legal immigrants/work permit holders. They are mostly law-abiding and do not create ruckus like the Islamic community. Islamic community is supported by AAs. There are many AAs who have converted to Islam.Amber G. wrote: ↑02 Aug 2024 02:57 - Indian Americans are one of the fastest-growing immigrant communities, surging more than tenfold since the early 1990s.-- Nearly 5 Millions now (POint 1). ( making them the largest Asian ethnic group and the second-largest immigrant group after Mexicans.)
- Indian Americans comprise less than 1% of U.S. registered voters..but almost one-third live in closely contested battleground states such as Georgia, North Carolina and Pennsylvania (point 2)
That puts them in a position to sway the outcome of the November election (point 2) as their
population far exceeds the margin of victory in the closest elections in these states.
That's not correct.
Careless statements.Vayutuvan wrote: ↑02 Aug 2024 03:23 My understanding of what you are saying is that Indian-Americans somehow become a block vote. It is not possible given the following:
1. Majority live in big cities which are all dem leaning. For example IL is a blue state due to Chicago. NY due to NYC, CA is CA. DC and surrounding areas are deep blue. Only other state TX where are large numbers of PIOs are is a red state. PIOs cannot change the color since they are too small a minority
2. GOP panders to the midwest and south christians.
Not reading the thread carefully leads to waste of time for me to reply. I did not say "we can coalesce" around some Indian-specific commonality. I said that "Indian-Americans have NOT coalesced around any Indian-specific issues in presidential elections." This was stated as a matter of fact, not judgmentally. It is possible they will never find any such issues, or they might. I don't fricking know. They usually track with other Asian-Americans and vote on more general issues, which mostly lead them to vote Dem. I provided ample evidence for all the above.I don't know where you are coming from when you say that we can coalesce around some commonality.
The California Caste Bill, introduced by Senator Aisha Wahab, aimed to add caste as a protected category under the state's anti-discrimination laws. Despite passing both the State Assembly and Senate, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the bill. The veto was largely attributed to the efforts of Indian Americans (including yours truly) who contacted their representatives, expressing concerns that the bill would lead to unintended consequences, such as reinforcing caste identities and creating divisions within the community. This was an issue where many of us come together to educate some of the leaders (who took us granted and had no reason to be ignorant) .. we argued that existing laws already protect individuals from discrimination, r rendering the caste-specific legislation unnecessary. The veto highlights the complexities of addressing caste discrimination in the United States, where the Indian American community is increasingly vocal about its concerns.Vayutuvan wrote: ↑02 Aug 2024 03:40 2. For this to happen, PIOs have to coalesce around a cause. What cause binds all of them together? I can't think of one for the life of me. Let us take the case of that Caste bill that was introduced in CA. I, for one, do agree that such a bill would be good. As long as we are against any kind of discrimination - at the moment HIndu-Americans are at the receiving end - why be afraid of a bill protecting "lower castes"? I tell you why. There are a lot of doctors in the Hindu-American community who are afraid that they will be singled out. They have to deal with it or leave the profession if their liability insurance is too high.
Nobody is asking you to provide any advice political or not. Some pan asian implications this and some stats from 2016 is not all that relevant. What is relevant is 2020 primaries and elections. Harris did not get a single delegate during 2020 and 2024. If you don't know there were primary challengers in the dem party. Look up Dean Phillips.
There is no confusion. I am telling you that we coalesced around the cause because the majority Indian-Americans are "open category" folks and are afraid that they will get sued by the minority "OBC/SC/ST" who are here. Did Indian-Muslim-Americans support you and HAF? Did the "OBC/SC/ST" Hindu-Americans support you and HAF? Did Ro Khanna support in the beginning? He was ambivalent initially.
The desperation in your posts is interesting. I have better things to do than reply to all of your long posts that dont seem to achieve any useful purpose in this thread. I write down facts and you respond with conspiracy/ halfbaked theories and false information in support of one candidates. For some reason you seem to seek my attention in multiple threads by hijacking any discussion i am engaged in. I'm really not flattered though.Vayutuvan wrote: ↑02 Aug 2024 05:47Nobody is asking you to provide any advice political or not. Some pan asian implications this and some stats from 2016 is not all that relevant. What is relevant is 2020 primaries and elections. Harris did not get a single delegate during 2020 and 2024. If you don't know there were primary challengers in the dem party. Look up Dean Phillips.
To your point that PIOs can make a difference in swing states is a red-herring. Most of them live in cities and they are democrat voters out of habit. They do not vote on substantive issues, especially the young folks. Older folks are a little bit more discriminating.
You are trying your best to make the posters here believe that it is going to be a walkover for Harris. That is not the case on the ground. democrat leaning MSM is giving that impression which is self goal IMHO. That will only make the GOPers to come out in numbers to vote for Trump.
Democrats do not have vivekam. They are truly donkeys or rather sheeple. They think there is safety in numbers.
Looks like the white boys/girls love jihadis of the world and in the mean time show their smiling well satisfied faces after slurpings goats/chickens and other assorted animals. Mighty pleased that they are showing a finger to India's ruling dispensation. Why hasn't the EAM asked US consul to reduce their staff, they have around 140 of these creatures running around when India sent only around 30 to the US.