Cyrano gaaru, it is always hyphenated
anal-cysts

Trump is doing better than 2020 and Harris is behind where Biden was at the same time mid-October 2020. However, the Dem political machine which includes many door-to-door volunteers, taking bus loads of people to the polls and ballot-box stuffing activities will pull them over the edge. This is where money makes the difference. Harris: 276 and Trump: 262.
Biden: 'She's not as strong as me.'
Obama replied: 'I know...that's true...we have time.'
Obama then said to Biden: 'No that's not on' - to which Biden responded: 'Hmm.'
The former president added: 'I think it's important that we can have some time together, we'll take it at value.'
Biden appeared to back his predecessor up, saying: 'Yeah, we'll get there in time.'
Obama then turned away from the camera and said something else to Biden, to which the president responded: 'Uh huh.'
For the first time since 538 published our presidential election forecast for Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, Trump has taken the lead (if a very small one) over Harris. As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance.
She cancelled all rallies today to mug the material for tomorrow's NBC interviewwilliams wrote: ↑22 Oct 2024 23:25 It sounds to me Mylapore Mami is not that interested in opposing either Biden or her high healed donors to show any major policy shift even to the point she may lose here. Me things she just want to settle down with post election riches from them and is not interested in creating undue enmity now. She should be clearly knowing that if she does not declare a plan that is going to contrast with Biden, she is going to lose among the swing voters. But she does not want to do that IMO. So get ready for Trump tariff wars.
Donald Trump, his MAGA followers and Fox News are clinging to the hope that a slew of Republican-sponsored polls — which are allegedly intentionally slanted — will help produce a victory on Nov. 5 by energizing GOP voters who are fading in the enthusiasm battles with the Kamala Harris coalition.
It’s a tough task as the former president talks about genitalia, veers off message and continues to threaten “the enemy within” — his political opponents, the media and others — with prison. Republican leaders have been pleading with Trump to ditch the MAGA authoritarian messaging, but he refuses.
Meanwhile, independent polling indicates that Harris, the Vice President, is running through the finish line and, if the Democrats can get out their vote, is likely to be elected president.
Polling has consistently shown that Harris is building a team of Democrats, Independents and disaffected Republicans (from Bernie Sanders to Liz Cheney); the more voters learn about her, the more they like her; and she has dissolved Trump’s presumed advantage: the economy.
Harris has been ahead in nearly every independent poll released in the past two months, and there are signs that as election day draws near, she will claim most of the undecided and/or soft votes and win.
Here’s why Harris is likely to win:
FAVORABILITY
In accredited polls, voters simply find that Harris is a better candidate. In an AP poll released on Monday, Harris is plus-5 in favorability (51-46%), while Trump is minus-18 (40-58%).
And the favorability carries through the ticket, according to the AP poll: Democratic VP nominee Tim Walz has a plus-4 favorability rating (41-37%), while Trump running mate JD Vance is 15 points underwater (33-48%).
With voting underway or about to begin in dozens of states, campaign analysts believe this is a key factor, and Harris’ strong favorability is convincing voters who are now deciding.
According to an Emerson College poll, “Voters who made their decision on who to support over a month ago break for Trump, 52% to 48%, while voters who made up their mind in the last month or week break for Harris, 60% to 36%. The three percent of voters who said they could still change their mind currently favor Harris, 48% to 43%.”
Harris spent Monday campaigning with Cheney, a former member of the GOP’s House leadership, in three key battleground states.
Cheney, trying to persuade Republican voters to break from Trump, said they could find Harris a better choice — and choose her privately: “I know many Republicans who will vote for Vice President Harris but not be public. Remember, you can vote your conscience and not ever have to say a word to anybody. There will be millions of Republicans who do that on Nov. 5.”
ECONOMY
According to The Associated Press, which is another accredited pollster: “Trump has lost what had been an advantage on the economy, which many voters say is the most important issue this election season.”
When voters were asked by the AP whom they trust on key issues, Harris polled +12 on middle class taxes, +5 on housing costs, +2 on jobs and employment. She also polled +24 on abortion, a key issue that the Democrats have tied to economic freedom for women and families.
Trump led by two points on the cost of groceries and gas, and five points on tariffs.
FAKE POLLS
Two new independent national polls released Tuesday reveal Harris’ lead persists: Morning Consult (with no change vs. its last poll) shows Harris up 50-46%, while a Reuters/Ipsos (also no change vs. its last poll), shows Harris ahead, 48-45%.
Still, Many MAGA enthusiasts point to questionable polls and Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction market, whose bettors were giving Trump a 60% chance of winning this week, while Harris’s chances were 40%.
But the Wall Street Journal reported the Polymarket surge “might be a mirage.” The candidates were in a dead heat at the start of October.
According to the Wall Street Journal:
Trump’s gains on Polymarket have cheered his supporters, and they have been followed by the odds shifting in Trump’s favor in other betting markets. Elon Musk flagged Trump’s growing lead on Polymarket to his 200 million X followers on Oct. 6, praising the concept of betting markets. “More accurate than polls, as actual money is on the line,” Musk posted.
But the surge might be a mirage manufactured by a group of four Polymarket accounts that have collectively pumped about $30 million of crypto into bets that Trump will win.
In addition, the Democrats have pointed to a flood of fake GOP polls that are implying that Trump has momentum in the final month. But Democratic analyst Simon Rosenberg, who predicted the arrival of these polls weeks before they appeared, is calling them out — along with sites like FiveThirtyEight, which acknowledges the polls are bad data, but includes them anyway.
“Since late August more than 70 right-aligned polls have been dropped into the polling averages,” Rosenberg writes. “The two states that have been worked the hardest are North Carolina and Pennsylvania. In October of the 27 Presidential polls released in Pennsylvania, 16 are from right-aligned pollsters, a majority. Since Aug. 31, of the 41 Presidential polls released in North Carolina, 21, a majority have home come from right aligned pollsters. At least 31 right-aligned pollsters and sponsoring organizations have released polls in the last 7 weeks.”
North Carolina might be a tell-tale: “Trump and his campaign spending this much time in North Carolina shows they know they are behind in electoral college,” former GOP campaign strategist Matthew Dowd tweeted. “If they are trying this hard to win NC, it means they know they are in trouble.”
Rosenberg added: “This 2024 red wave op is much larger and involves many more actors and polls than the red wave campaign in 2022. It also involves new players — Polymarket, Elon — and feels far more desperate, frenetic, unhinged. Trumpian.”
In 2020, about 158 million voted. Of this the large majority - 100 million - voted early, and only 58 million voted on election day.Harris leads Trump among early voters, 63% to 34%, according to a USA Today/Suffolk University poll of those who have already voted released Monday, though Trump leads 52% to 35% among those who plan to vote on Election Day.
And.. did that worse than even Raga. I would fire all her advisors. She should be going and meeting people in the swing states to get some last minute momentum. This is not the time to give interviews with friendly press. BTW the interviewer was a lot tougher than normal this time. Perhaps they're also smelling the coffee and jumping ship.vijayk wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 02:45She cancelled all rallies today to mug the material for tomorrow's NBC interviewwilliams wrote: ↑22 Oct 2024 23:25 It sounds to me Mylapore Mami is not that interested in opposing either Biden or her high healed donors to show any major policy shift even to the point she may lose here. Me things she just want to settle down with post election riches from them and is not interested in creating undue enmity now. She should be clearly knowing that if she does not declare a plan that is going to contrast with Biden, she is going to lose among the swing voters. But she does not want to do that IMO. So get ready for Trump tariff wars.
KL Ji, those are Democratic talking points and most of them are quite fair. DT is old, has a flawed past, didn't accept the 2020 election results, all those civil and criminal cases, convicted felon etc etc. But you got to agree it is the stupidity of the Democrats that has made him catch up now and is marginally leading all swing state polls. Granted they are polls and are within the margin of error. But he is almost in the verge of winning this and it is the Democrats to blame for it. They botched up by letting Biden win the primaries and then nominated Harris in the last minute. They knew Biden is both unpopular and had physical aging issues. They should have benched him early and should have elected a much better candidate than Kamala.KL Dubey wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 22:58 ^^In order to at least *appear* objective, one should also talk about Trump. As of now, his ability to form coherent/substantive sentences and arguments is about at the level of a middle-schooler (10-14 year old). He seems to have degenerative issues similar to Bhaidanwa. Nothing wrong with that per se (many elders have this issue) - but that's really not president material. He has also not released his medical records.
This is correct. Today she cancelled all events for a 2nd day for a scripted CNN town hall. Harris is unable to speak freely and express her thoughts. She gets angry with tough questions. She appears to suffer from drug abuse or bi-polar disorder. On the other hand, Trump is quite lucid and has answered many questions in an open discussion. He did a Lex Friedman interview last month & is doing Joe Rogan on Friday. See Lex's interview below.williams wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 11:31And.. did that worse than even Raga. I would fire all her advisors. She should be going and meeting people in the swing states to get some last minute momentum. This is not the time to give interviews with friendly press. BTW the interviewer was a lot tougher than normal this time. Perhaps they're also smelling the coffee and jumping ship.
In a development with significant implications for the upcoming U.S. presidential election, leaked internal documents from the British nonprofit organization, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), have surfaced.
The documents allegedly reveal a coordinated effort to undermine Elon Musk’s X, formerly Twitter, with the explicit goal to “kill Musk’s Twitter” by pressuring advertisers to withdraw support. These revelations, brought to light by journalists Paul D. Thacker and Matt Taibbi on their Substack ‘The DisInformation Chronicle,’ outline a broader strategy by CCDH, which has strong ties to both the U.K.'s Labour Party and U.S. Democrats, particularly the Biden/Harris administration.
According to the leaked documents, dating back to early 2024, CCDH’s top priority was a campaign titled "Kill Musk’s Twitter" to financially destabilize the platform. This plan, focusing on harassing advertisers, reflects the broader political goals of CCDH’s founder, Morgan McSweeney. McSweeney, a British political operative, played a central role in Labour Party leader Keir Starmer’s rise to power and is now advising U.S. Democrats, including Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz.
The documents raise serious questions about the intersection of nonprofit advocacy and political maneuvering. While CCDH markets itself as an anti-misinformation organization, the leak reveals a more politically motivated agenda. One of its top objectives is to “trigger EU and UK regulatory action” against platforms like Twitter, further blurring the line between its stated mission and its actions. According to IRS regulations, CCDH’s tax-exempt status could be at risk if it is found that its activities primarily aim to influence legislation.
McSweeney's Influence Across the Atlantic
McSweeney’s influence extends beyond his role in the U.K. Labour Party. He also spearheaded the Labour Together initiative, a neoliberal think tank closely aligned with Starmer's government. CCDH has adopted aggressive tactics under McSweeney’s leadership, using accusations of bigotry and misinformation to silence opposition voices on both the Left and Right by pressuring advertisers to cut funding.
One of CCDH’s most notable successes was its campaign against The Canary, a left-leaning U.K. news outlet accused of antisemitism due to its pro-Palestinian stance. CCDH's efforts caused a significant loss of advertising revenue for the site, which critics argue was part of McSweeney’s broader strategy to consolidate power within Labour by marginalizing opponents.
In the U.S., CCDH has been actively engaged in similar efforts, meeting with lawmakers to push for stricter online censorship and platform regulation. The leaked documents show that CCDH held multiple meetings with U.S. legislators, advocating for the adoption of its "STAR framework" — a proposal for an independent digital regulator similar to the European Union’s Digital Services Act. This regulatory push has led to concerns that CCDH’s activities may be more aligned with political censorship than anti-disinformation efforts.
U.S. and U.K. Political Connections
The close relationship between CCDH, Labour Together, and U.S. Democrats has drawn criticism, especially from conservative figures. Trump ally Sebastian Gorka labeled the cooperation between British political operatives and U.S. campaigns as “a bloody outrage,” emphasizing concerns about foreign influence in U.S. elections. McSweeney’s advisory role in the Harris and Walz campaigns has raised questions about the appropriateness of such cross-national political collaborations.
McSweeney’s rise within the Labour Party has been marked by his ability to attract wealthy donors and effectively manage fundraising efforts. His promotion to Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff after the resignation of Sue Gray further solidified his position within the party. However, the relationship between McSweeney’s Labour and the Democrats is not just limited to strategy-sharing. Labour staffers have reportedly been canvassing for Harris and Walz in recent months, highlighting the deepening ties between the two political parties.
I don't know what the outcome will be, but if your comments are correct then the USA electorate and its economic/social/mental condition has been worn down enough that they will go with someone like Trump, i.e. vote against their own interests/future for a freebie (crumbs) in fuel/energy prices - even that is uncertain. In a sense it is somewhat the reverse of Bharat voting trends, perhaps reflecting the trends in fortunes of the two countries and the trends in the quality of their people.williams wrote: ↑23 Oct 2024 23:45 For what it is worth, DTs argument on energy policy, border issues and trade makes common sense to Americans and his talking points on those are quite coherent if you watch them in youtube unfiltered by the media. Harris did good in the debate, but something changed after that. Her interviews and speeches seems to be stale in the last few weeks. Same thing happened to HC in 2016. Either she is listening to bad advisers or some part of Democratic leadership is sabotaging her campaign for some unknown reason. Even the press which used to be friendly with her is suddenly highlighting her flaws more than before. Therefore what was locked up for Democrats a year back is quite competitive now.
I do not know how one comes to these conclusions. NaMo - true to his reputation as a class act - salvaged the India-US relations by massaging the ego/vanity of an inferior man (Trump) with various summits/joint rallies/visits. Otherwise, the Trump sarkar was not notable as a "supporter/friend" of Bharat. The USA-funded BIFs set up shop during that period and got fully activated by 2019-2020. India and US had a mini-war on tariffs. US immigration/visa proceedings of Indians tanked to a standstill, strongly affecting the IT industry. Defense trade was paltry (barely $3 bn in four years). The only reason India got assistance from USA in the himalayan border standoff is because we were seen by Trump and Pompeo as a counterweight (i.e. tool) against China.BTW from India POV, it seems republican WH are more friendly than Democratic administration. So if DT wins, it is good for Indian strategic ambitions IMO. If Harris wins, we will have some staleness in the relationship is my hunch.
Two Democratic senators up for election touted their links to Donald Trump last week. Pennsylvania’s Bob Casey released an ad declaring he had “sided with Trump” on trade and tariffs, while an ad from Wisconsin’s Tammy Baldwin boasted that she “got President Trump to back her Made in America bill.”
One conclusion from these ads is that Mr. Trump is in the ascendancy in these states. He might be. But the ads also speak to a hidden dynamic that may hand the Senate to the GOP. Candidates in Arizona, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are fighting for the support of undecided voters. These voters tend to account for between 5% and 10% of states’ electorates, enough to sway the result of a close race. These crucial voters look a lot more like Mr. Trump’s supporters than Kamala Harris’s.
Is it possible that a lot of Pakistani Punjabi illegal migrants are Masquerading as SIkhs in US and Canada- after many of them spell Punjab as Panjab, have cut hairstyles, criminal, speak Punjabi- I have seen JATKA meat test on these guys.
On the face of it, this Directive is in violation of the US constitution Posse Comitatus Act, except that act can be overridden by the Insurrection Act if invoked by POTUS. Should Trump win, there is the real possibility, that in several states, regions or the entire US may be put into martial law. Similarly, if Trump loyal forces attack any local or state election offices, those areas would be placed under martial law. In any case, this Directive allows for considerable mischief by POTUS. Perhaps, a Bangladesh type coup within the US itself.Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation
in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use
of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also
includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation
between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted
based on the specifics of the requested support.
It is possible if they are illegal migrants but not if they came as students, visitor, work visa, business visa as there is always trail (finger prints, dna, etc).
She did and I appreciate her for that.
It is 1400 votes. Not a big deal. However you should read this to understand how primitive is US democracy https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identific ... s_by_state