Several comments by Firestarter in X about the option of Rafale for the 114 MRCA order.
https://x.com/Firezstarter1/status/1967 ... c4PCA&s=19
GaN is a band aid for that limited aperture, ECCM improves but cant reverse range-detection adversity. A large PESA on a J20 can outlook the Rafale. Rafale still struggles to see frontal J20. Situation worsens if offboard sensors are used, even if Spectra defeats J20s radar.
It's not API alone. You need access to multiple systems including radar, mission computer, datalinks, structural capability, pylon control units/WIBS etc.
His suggestion,
Increase the IAF capex budget. Buy 2 squadrons of Rafale, 2-3 Su57. Integrate them to IACCS. Deconflict EW, accelerate Mk1A, Mk2, Su30 Upgrades and most importantly AMCA, Netra, engines, EW. Create a national anti-advanced targets/EW/ munitions effort to assist the shooters.
----------------------------------------
Comments by Alpha Defense on Rafale,
https://x.com/alpha_defense/status/1967 ... NS_5Q&s=19
India signed the 36 Rafale deal in 2016. Nine years later, Rafales still lack the X-Guard we paid France to integrate. The perks of imports and our inability to question them.
9 Years

justify that..
There’s no battle here, my friend. My simple point is this: I cannot justify defending a costlier import when key India-specific enhancements remain undelivered even after a decade. Saying this may not be popular, but it’s the truth.
Other than X-Guard is there any other important ISE that remains unfulfilled?
Look at the priorities: China has invested nearly $43 billion in its own engine program. Meanwhile, in India, we are busy defending a $30–40 billion import of 114 French jets, a platform with a decade-long track record of missing subsystems. I’m not insinuating anything; I’m just putting facts on the table.