Rakesh wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025 18:58
A weird statement IMVHO....
The Mk2 will be ahead of the Mk1A, in every respect.
VIDEO: https://x.com/ANI/status/1974037991187173848 ---> Indian Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh says, "As far as LCA Mk2 is concerned, according to me, LCA Mk2 is sort of an extension of Mk1A. It is a bigger platform with almost,
it's a similar class if I say generation-wise, but it will be able to carry more weapons. It will be able to perform better in terms of range and endurance. It will be able to carry bigger weapons. So that is why that falls very much in our scheme of things..."
Indeed, it reveals the IAF mindset. The way they perceive this aircraft. He is mentally mapping it to Gripen-E vs Gripen-NG (with a *sigh* - because they couldn't hook-up with this much desired aircraft)
Its almost like, we didn't want Tejas-Mk2, but its here - so lets make the best out of this
If the IAF had its way, the entire Tejas series wouldn't exist. If they had applied their minds & actually cared about strategy and MIC, they would have decided whether a follow-on to Mk1 needed to be a single or a twin engined aircraft (i.e. a medium or a heavy aircraft). All this talk about "mix" of heavy-medium-light is just bakwas. When the mood suits them or when they panic, they will load up on 270 Sukhois and 114 Rafales! Suddenly pilot shortage is not an issue, engine availability is not an issue etc
Heck, even AMCA is single-engined and is "Medium" class, like Tejas-Mk2. IMHO, it was a dumbass decision to design an AMCA - it should have been an F22/F-35/J-35 class heavy fighter/bomber because the internal bay nullifies the advantage of being a medium-class fighter. But when we realize that the IAF didn't want *any* domestic fighters, it becomes easy to understand why their planning is so crappy
I am glad all this is forced down their throat