No, this is ridiculous and half hearted attempt by Center to throw the decision making at Courts. Going by triple-talaq process, first step is to bring in the legislation and then have it criminalize it. Then courts would be bound by that.uddu wrote: ↑27 Oct 2025 07:31 https://x.com/arunpudur/status/1982394214014173540
@arunpudur
Supreme Court REFUSES to BAN Child Marriage BAN to all faiths, REJECTING the Centre’s plea to enforce the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA) over personal laws.
Mi Lords are so sacred of STSJ gang. Such a shameful collegium appointees. Time to revamp Judiciary.
Indian Judicial System
Re: Indian Judicial System
Re: Indian Judicial System
100% agreed. And this is why legislations have to be worded correctly. By making laws ambiguous the Central Government is allowing such laws to be interpreted by the judiciary using their own whims and fancy logic. And then sitting and crying is of no use. Central government is handing over the stick to beat itself, to another party who can use it effectively. BJP has every ways and means to introduce a small amendment bill to the parent act and get this sorted out quickly. But seeing Modi & BJP of late, I am not sure whether this would be done.
Re: Indian Judicial System
I share the same concern. Its going to be 12 years of rule, and some of these low-hanging fruits could have huge impact on society, are largely left untouched. Especially religious personal laws. Possibly no action is taken on them because they might come under the ambit of larger debate on Uniform Civil Code. I don't see any legal hurdle in that. In fact, it is probably most pro-secular and pro-democratic idea to being in one common law that enforces applicability on all religious demographics. Other gurus might chime in on what is stopping Modi government to go full throttle on UCC.