Indian Judicial System

[shravanp]

https://x.com/arunpudur/status/1982394214014173540
@arunpudur
Supreme Court REFUSES to BAN Child Marriage BAN to all faiths, REJECTING the Centre’s plea to enforce the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA) over personal laws.

Mi Lords are so sacred of STSJ gang. Such a shameful collegium appointees. Time to revamp Judiciary.

No, this is ridiculous and half hearted attempt by Center to throw the decision making at Courts. Going by triple-talaq process, first step is to bring in the legislation and then have it criminalize it. Then courts would be bound by that.

[Sachin]

No, this is ridiculous and half hearted attempt by Center to throw the decision making at Courts. Going by triple-talaq process, first step is to bring in the legislation and then have it criminalize it. Then courts would be bound by that.

100% agreed. And this is why legislations have to be worded correctly. By making laws ambiguous the Central Government is allowing such laws to be interpreted by the judiciary using their own whims and fancy logic. And then sitting and crying is of no use. Central government is handing over the stick to beat itself, to another party who can use it effectively. BJP has every ways and means to introduce a small amendment bill to the parent act and get this sorted out quickly. But seeing Modi & BJP of late, I am not sure whether this would be done.

[shravanp]

I share the same concern. Its going to be 12 years of rule, and some of these low-hanging fruits could have huge impact on society, are largely left untouched. Especially religious personal laws. Possibly no action is taken on them because they might come under the ambit of larger debate on Uniform Civil Code. I don't see any legal hurdle in that. In fact, it is probably most pro-secular and pro-democratic idea to being in one common law that enforces applicability on all religious demographics. Other gurus might chime in on what is stopping Modi government to go full throttle on UCC.

[Vayutuvan]

Other gurus might chime in on what is stopping Modi government to go full throttle on UCC.

In the third term, their MP numbers shrank. They also lost KTK and TG.

[uddu]

https://x.com/RakeshKishore_l/status/19 ... 3349243340
@RakeshKishore_l
This mialord Judge should be suspnded & arrested for behaving like a Islamic J!hadi while being a Judge in India

A Mus!im girl married a Hindu man but Judge now wants Hindu to be arrested & also wants him to convert to Is!am.

Are these judges following Sh@ria

[uddu]

https://x.com/RShivshankar/status/1984133578633175195
@RShivshankar
One day, if they don't get to her first, Nupur Sharma might appear before CJI Kant. At present Sharma is bravely tempting fate to help others fight for justice. (See below).
A fate Justice Kant implied she was “single-handedly responsible for". Result: free run for "STJ" gang.

[uddu]

https://x.com/ArunKrishnan_/status/1984070669529968846
@ArunKrishnan_
Can someone lawyer explain to me why Indira Jaisingh can list that ridiculous case of hers directly in the Supreme Court? Why isn't she required, like all mango citizens, to start from the district level courts and work her way up?

Gazab ka privilege hai bhai.

[Sachin]

Can someone lawyer explain to me why Indira Jaisingh can list that ridiculous case of hers directly in the Supreme Court? Why isn't she required, like all mango citizens, to start from the district level courts and work her way up?

This is done by smart mis-use of Article 32 Constituition of India. This allows a person to directly approach Supreme Court stating that fundamental rights are being violated. Earlier this provision was mainly used for filing writ petitions (Habeous Corpus writ, most of the times). This over a period of time, and with Supreme Court diluting the conditions of locus standi*, enabled people to start the Public Interest Litigation business. The usual members of the Supreme Court lawyer cabal; Kapil Sibal, Indira Jai Singh, Abhishek Manu Singhvi all gets their cases heard at supreme court using the PIL tactic.

*locus standi means the legal position or right of some one to be part of a court proceeding. Usually; the person in some way has to be losing or denied some right or claim. He cannot file cases on behalf of third parties.

[uddu]

https://x.com/realsiff/status/1986978388670882092
@realsiff
Bangalore Court does nothing on the date of first hearing of the criminal case against Nikita Singhania, wife of Atul Subhash.

It says, next date of hearing is 20-Nov-2026. Yes, u heard it right. It's after 1 year & 12 days.

This judiciary makes tall claims of protecting constitution.

[uddu]

https://x.com/KreatelyMedia/status/1986755910765535415
@KreatelyMedia
12 years is not enough

[uddu]

https://x.com/sathyashrii/status/1986622446393585800
@sathyashrii
"Tenant can never become an owner"

[uddu]

https://x.com/ShefVaidya/status/1988226611502870736
@ShefVaidya
Blah blah blah, but when it comes to trying these terrorists, these same judges will give them bail before one can say Ola or Uber!

https://x.com/barandbench/status/1988123738366230997
CJI BR Gavai: We take note of the cowardly incident which happened in Delhi yesterday. We are deeply saddened by the loss of lives which happened due to the tragic car blast yesterday. On behalf of Supreme Court and entire legal and judicial fraternity.. we convey deepest condolences to the family of those who lost loved ones to this devastating tragedy. No words can truly measure the pain of such loss. We hope the collective compassion and solidarity of nation will offer some comfort. We stand in solidarity with bereaved. We reaffirm our commitment to rule of law to ensure justice..

[Sachin]

Bangalore Court does nothing on the date of first hearing of the criminal case against Nikita Singhania, wife of Atul Subhash.

My sample size is limited. But what I have observed is that in divorce cases in India, usually one party would not be very familiar with legal processes where as the other one have the right legal knowledge & contacts and have the overall plan ready. In Atul Subhash's case it was most likely him & his family who were not aware of the legal complexities. He may have been a brilliant B.Tech/BE graduate etc., but that does not mean he is knowledgable in all aspects. The woman and family seems to have got the legal knowledge, clout and money power to get this case dragged on for ever. FYI, the child of the couple also remains with the wife Nikita Singhania and her family. Don't know if this whole marriage was a marriage for convenience; the groom selected based on educational qualification and fat pay check, and the groom agreed for the wife as they could be more affluent and financially better.

[Amber G.]

Sharing..https://x.com/KanwalSibal/status/1989755637023346920.
..Ashok Swain, a Swedish national of Indian origin holding an OCI card is a vicious critic of India . He has been sullying India’s image in the media, including social media for years.

The government rightly cancelled his OCI card . He moved the High Court which restituted his card. This overturning of an executive decision was wrong.

It is for the executive to take a view on the political damage a foreign national, irrespective of whether he is holding an OCI card or not, is doing to India’s reputation and image abroad.

Swain’s plea in moving the court was that he needed to see his ailing mother in India. This is entirely his personal matter and the situation is of his own creation, based on the choices he made as an adult. The Indian state has no obligation to come to his rescue.

He has still not been able to come to India as he has been blacklisted and denied a visa by the government.

Swain has moved the Supreme Court which is questioning the government on its blacklist.

Why should a foreign national sitting in Sweden be able to manipulate our Supreme Court to put pressure on the government on a decision which is entirely in its remit.

The SC should not intrude into such purely executive matters and be a party to weaken the functioning of the executive at the behest of hostile foreign forces.

[S_Madhukar]

Doesn’t the SC have some prioritisation to adhere to where Swine is heard before the backlog of millions of ordinary citizens ? Ridiculous