They are probably using the Bahawalpur PAFB for this. The area is closest to the IB by about 60 Km.

Gagan wrote:Blast from the past:
Zia Ul Haq giving full respect to Z A Bhutto...
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8bEdZGbBsg0/S ... 2Bcunt.jpg
“A Common Destiny”, the first of Aman ki Asha’s series of discussions on issues of strategic importance to India and Pakistan kicks off on Thursday with prominent intellectuals, those who have been close to historical events, and are leaders of thought in their own right.
The event will begin with a day-long closed-door session on April 22, followed by an interaction with invited members of the civil society and the media on April 23. Delegates from India include former foreign secretary Salman Haider, well-known analysts and writers Prem Shankar Jha and Amitabh Mattoo, Admiral (retd) Nayyer and Admiral (retd) Ramu Ramdas.
Jaideep Bose, Editor of The Economic Times, the world’s second largest business paper in English, and Ranjan Roy, the associate editor and the editor Times News Network will also attend the conference.
Bose is also the editor of The Times of India, the world’s largest English language newspaper that is partnering with the Jang Group to take forward the Aman ki Asha peace initiative between India and Pakistan.
Amitabh Mattoo, the former editor of ‘The Telegraph’, has been chairperson of the Centre for International Politics, Organisation and Disarmament at the Jawaharlal Nehru University.’ He has authored 10 books on nuclear issues, foreign policy and international relations, more than 50 research articles (including in leading journals like Survival and Asian Survey).
Prem Shankar Jha has written several books about socio-economic affairs pertaining to India and its neighbours. From serving as Deputy Chief of the Naval Staff till opting for his second career as a leading peace activist and campaigner against nuclear weapons from 1993 to the present, Admiral (retd) Ramdas brings a diverse experience with him.
He is Chairperson Emeritus of the India chapter of the Pakistan-India Peopleís Forum for Peace and Democracy, the largest people-to-people initiative between the two countries. Salman Haider served in the Indian Foreign Service for four decades before associating himself with think tanks in New Delhi and Chandigarh. His publications include Section on Bhutan in ‘External Affairs: Cross-Border Relations’, Roli Books 2003; ‘Afghanistan’, Manohar Publishers 2002; ‘India-Bangladesh’ CRRID 2005.
From Pakistan, Aitzaz Ahsan, Dr Mubashir Hasan, Khurshid Mehmood Kasuri, IA Rehman, Sherry Rehman, Arif Nizami and Shafqat Mahmood will participate in the discussions. The discussions, moderated by Maj-Gen (retd) Mahmud Ali Durrani, will revolve around the question of whether there should be peace between India and Pakistan, the long-term strategic interests of both the countries and how to pursue “A Common Destiny”.
Or the more likely explanation is that the image is a mirror image, a common occurrence in the era when film reels were used to develop pictures.Sanju wrote:In Gagan's post earlier showing Zia stooping to Bhutto, the soldier is saluting with his left hand.
Isn't this usually the case when the soldier has lost his right hand? However, there seems to be a baton sticking out of his right side. So may have lost part of his arm only.
Sanju wrote:In Gagan's post earlier showing Zia stooping to Bhutto, the soldier is saluting with his left hand.
Isn't this usually the case when the soldier has lost his right hand? However, there seems to be a baton sticking out of his right side. So may have lost part of his arm only.
Gagan wrote:That picture was from this blog.
http://low-intensity-conflict-review.blogspot.com/
One might add this blog to the list of the ones to watch out for.
Shame .. A university which produced people Like Har Gobind Khorana, Satish Dhawan (ISRO's ex chairman), and Abdus Salam (BTW, all were later disowned by Islamic Pakistan) is reduced to to a typical Paki place.pgbhat wrote:The related video (below) is interesting as well. The English Prof. calls Pakjabi University a giant "madrassah", full of mujahids from rural Pakjab. According to her, the campus hostel is "overcrowded" with them. AoA!!abhishek_sharma wrote:At Top University, a Fight for Pakistan’s Future
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/21/world ... rsity.html![]()
http://video.nytimes.com/video/2010/04/ ... ampus.html
For all of TSP's protestations against USA, this has been TSP's single-minded objectives. Namely, as TSP was being squeezed by US, it was in serious danger of its ability to give India a bloody nose should the latter dare to retaliate to its terrorist provocations. As that analyst, George Friedman, or whoever pointed out, US started realizing that the balance was tilting damgerously in India's favor, and I think with the induction of thugs like Holbrooke & Co, this imbalance is being addressed. Hence you see TSP becoming even more amenable to US diktats and more aggressive towards India. Basically, TSP has gotten US support on the following issues: 1) LET off the table and Mumbai at most a footnote with any trace of TSPA/ISI involvement completely obliterated, 2) Strategic depth in Afganisthan will be allowed, 3) India at best will be a euncuh in Afganisthan to satisfy its H&D and not pull back ignonimously in response to TSP's terror, 4) sophisticated military hardware and humongous economic aid, and 5) India TSP equal equal at the diplomatic level with the ultimate equal equal prize: nuke deal at some point in the not too distant future.Gagan wrote:
Let us all realize one thing. Pakistan will SURVIVE this current imbroglio, battle damaged, but still in one piece.
The US has starting rearming pakistan to India's detriment.
The US is financially supporting Pakistan's economy to prevent it from collapse.
all in all, these are aimed at allowing pakistan to escape the sinkhole it is in currently to live to fight another day.
Why "shame"? It is good for us, imagine if they continued to produce men of calibre there, it would disaster for India. In their incompetence lies our security.Amber G. wrote: Shame .. A university which produced people Like Har Gobind Khorana, Satish Dhawan (ISRO's ex chairman), and Abdus Salam (BTW, all were later disowned by Islamic Pakistan) is reduced to to a typical Paki place.
The article says "three nobel laureates". Who's the third?Amber G. wrote:Shame .. A university which produced people like Har Gobind Khorana and Abdus Salam ...
With the SAARC summit only a week away, and India and Pakistan still unable to agree on talks about talks, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s meeting with his Pakistani counterpart on the sidelines of Thimphu will have the limited but important aim of preventing further deterioration in an already fraught relationship, Indian officials say.
“What we are really looking at is a holding pattern”, a senior official told The Hindu, using the aviation industry phrase for when an aircraft circles around an airport at a fixed altitude awaiting clearance to land. “It is clear that they are not ready to move forward. Nor, quite frankly, are we, until we see some movement on the issues we have raised".
...
...
CRamSCRamS wrote:
1) LET off the table and Mumbai at most a footnote with any trace of TSPA/ISI involvement completely obliterated, 2) Strategic depth in Afganisthan will be allowed, 3) India at best will be a euncuh in Afganisthan to satisfy its H&D and not pull back ignonimously in response to TSP's terror, 4) sophisticated military hardware and humongous economic aid, and 5) India TSP equal equal at the diplomatic level with the ultimate equal equal prize: nuke deal at some point in the not too distant future.
Thus, you can be assured TSP will not rock the boat in the interim, probably giving enough political cover to MMS to make joint love with Pakis in Srinagar after honeymoon in Stockholm, Sweeden.
TSP is winning, and will win big at the denounement of AfPak to live on to fight another day.
The negative connotation reflects Siddharth Varadarajan's & Chindu's views on this subject (or the views that they have been asked to peddle). If you view his earlier op-ed pieces, the same "lets make love" tone is evident. Its worth repeating that Varadarajan is a U.S citizen - given that & the tone of his articles, one can justifiably question his loyalties.Nihat wrote:"Holding pattern" is probably a good thing wrt to TSP, why is being given a negative undertone in the article?
more like a creeper. Ugh. Any pic of zia gives me the creeps.Sanju wrote:A keeper as the Doc says. Thanks!
PU's website, gives Khorana, and Salam ..and search of prize winners lists no one else from PU.anupmisra wrote:The article says "three nobel laureates". Who's the third?Amber G. wrote:Shame .. A university which produced people like Har Gobind Khorana and Abdus Salam ...
Gagan wrote: I don't necessarily see a counter weight as a liability, it has its uses. If it takes away India's complacency and injects a sense of urgency into India's mission, I think it is a bonus that we should utilize.
surinder wrote:Why "shame"? It is good for us, imagine if they continued to produce men of calibre there, it would disaster for India. In their incompetence lies our security.Amber G. wrote: Shame .. A university which produced people Like Har Gobind Khorana, Satish Dhawan (ISRO's ex chairman), and Abdus Salam (BTW, all were later disowned by Islamic Pakistan) is reduced to to a typical Paki place.
A genuine question -- how did it worsen so much this year (say when compared to last year)?Pakistan is expected to announce a series of drastic power-saving measures this week, including a shorter working week and restrictions on wedding celebrations at night, as a severe energy shortfall threatens to set off riots. The blackouts have plagued cities and the countryside for up to 20 hours a day in some places, bringing industry and even farming to a halt.
http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/20 ... _commanderWith rumors circulating about the Swat Taliban's resurgence in the former tourist destination in Pakistan's northwest, Pashtun journalist Daud Khan Khattak profiles the movement's Swat Valley commander, Maulana Fazlullah
Not that I disagree, but do we really need the thorn of Pakistan in our side when we already have China on our northern borders acting as a constant reminder of our need to develop political/economic/military muscle? OTOH I'd venture to say that self-congratulatory measurements of ourselves against Pakistan has the detrimental effect of distracting us from the threat of the greater powers lurking behind Pakistan... which is of course their very intention.Gagan wrote: I don't necessarily see a counter weight as a liability, it has its uses. If it takes away India's complacency and injects a sense of urgency into India's mission, I think it is a bonus that we should utilize.
Simple, CRS. It is the pressure from the US Administration.CRamS wrote:From the tone of Siddartha Vardarajan's article, it seems India is more keen. Question is why?
FTA:abhishek_sharma wrote:Who is the Swat Taliban's commander?
http://afpak.foreignpolicy.com/posts/20 ... _commander
I recall reading that many of those attracted to the TTP in rural areas of NW Pakistan were the landless peasants and serfs, and the landlords were among the first targets of the TTP and the first to leave areas that TTP came to control. Just wondering to what extent Punjab-based militant outfits, including the ones focused on Kashmir, espouse similar land reform/anti-landlord causes. Seems to me that would be an easy avenue to real popularity, power, even revolution, but of course they would then risk losing the backing of their patrons in the PA and government, which represents interests of the landed aristocracy.Like Sufi Muhammad before him, Fazlullah called for social parity, quick justice, the provision of civic facilities, more jobs for Swatis, and the redistribution of property.[xv] The promise of land distribution attracted many followers for Fazlullah's movement in Swat, which started capturing the orchards, farms, and other land of the khans, or local leaders and landowners, who had abandoned the areas from late 2007 to late 2008 after Fazlullah's men carried out several targeted killings against them.
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... or-npt-240WASHINGTON: The Obama administration has refused to mark out India and Pakistan as countries that needed to sign the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, saying instead that since they are “very special friends,” Washington holds daily conversations with them on such issues.
Ellen Tauscher, who as Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security is responsible for the administration’s non-proliferation policies, however, indicated that the United States opposed other nations joining the nuclear club. “The countries that you mentioned are very special friends of the United States. We have conversations with them every day about many different things,” said Secretary Tauscher when asked if Washington would also persuade India and Pakistan to join the NPT.
Anujan wrote: A genuine question -- how did it worsen so much this year (say when compared to last year)?