Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan (TSP): May 21, 2010

Muppalla · Post by **Muppalla** » 28 May 2010 23:00

Atri wrote:True... Just like Shaiva, Vaishnava and Sikh, Ahmediya is a religion of Indian origin.. They should be declared and accepted as part of Hindu-Conglomerate.

Come on. Why in the world our genes have this fetish towards knee jerk reactions.

kenop · Post by **kenop** » 28 May 2010 23:02

Kerry calls for tight check on non-military aid to 'corrupt' Pak govt

Washington, DC: Worried about the rampant corruption in Pakistan’s government, a top US senator and former Democratic presidential candidate has urged the state department to keep tight control on the $1.45 billion aid that would be handed over to that country this year.
...
"Among the Pakistani population there is already a fear that the funds will merely enrich the corrupt elite," Kerry wrote. "Channeling so much of the money through untested institutions so quickly could serve to confirm these suspicions.”

The only tested insitution is the PA.

kenop · Post by **kenop** » 28 May 2010 23:04

Pakistan govt allocates Rs18,500 million for nuclear projects

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan government will provide Rs18,500 million for nuclear projects, including two controversial new atomic power plants to be built at the Chashma complex with Chinese assistance.

That is the where the K-L money is going to be spent on. It is certainly going to the tarrel than ocean and deeple than mountain fleind.

svinayak · Post by **svinayak** » 28 May 2010 23:06

Muppalla wrote:
Atri wrote:True... Just like Shaiva, Vaishnava and Sikh, Ahmediya is a religion of Indian origin.. They should be declared and accepted as part of Hindu-Conglomerate.
Come on. Why in the world our genes have this fetish towards knee jerk reactions.

There is some merit to it. Their messiah can be converted to Lord Krishna

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 28 May 2010 23:15

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... asts-qs-07
Pakistan send only SDRE looking commandos to ward off hamlawars on Ahmadiya, where are TFTA martial qaumi ghazis?

surinder · Post by **surinder** » 28 May 2010 23:30

Gagan wrote:I don't think it is correct to say that India did them a favour by not demolishing Kadiya.
Sir-ji india is secular, we don't do things like that, but we do ourselves a disfavour by killing people in religious riots.

Most of the temples & gurudwaras in lands that became TSP were destroyed, or plain occupied and put to secular use. Kadiayanis & other RoP had exited Indian Punjab and hence their places could have been dealt in the same fashion. Why it was not, is something I do not know the reason for. I hear that Qdianis are slowly thronging the Village of Qadian (near Amritsar) and the poplation pattern gradually changing there. It is a matte of time before it becomes Qadian/RoP majority.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 28 May 2010 23:49

The entire pattern and population percentages in Punjab are changing. Specially villages are having mosques opening, and more believers attending them. Also there are christian missionaries in Punjab like never before - whoever said that the missionaries only target tribals needs to visit Punjab.

Perhaps it has more to do with the way caste politics is still practiced in Punjab today.

But although there was mayhem in the riots around partition, when things cooled down, rule of law quickly returned to India, while as we've seen in Pakistan, there never was any rule of law there.

SBajwa · Post by **SBajwa** » 29 May 2010 00:15

by Prem
I hear that Qdianis are slowly thronging the Village of Qadian (near Amritsar) and the poplation pattern gradually changing there.

Actually Qadiya constituency is part of Gurdaspur District, Batala Tehsil. It is exactly 10 kms from the city of Batala., Batala lies on the route from Amritsar to Pathankot to Jammu as well as from Jalandhar to Pathankot to Jammu.

Qadiya is 90% non-muslims (Sikhs and Hindus) and about 10% Qadiyani/Ahmadiya Muslims are still living there before 1947. Under BJP the MP was Vinod Khanna (The movie star) and these days under Congress the MP is Tript Rajinder Singh Bajwa (son of Satnam Singh Bajwa who was a minister in Nehru's ministry)., who actually resides at Qadiya. The next door constituency is Kahnuwan (Sri Hargobind pur Sahib)., which is also under Congress MP Partap Singh Bajwa s/o Gurbachan Singh Bajwa.

Check Tript Rajinder Singh Bajwa's pictures at Qadiyani jalsa in 2003
http://www.alfazal.com/gallery2/v/album ... ewsIndex=1

http://www.alislam.org/gallery2/v/album ... 3/album13/

check Partap Singh Bajwa's facebook page

http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=1 ... jwa?v=info

Abhijit · Post by **Abhijit** » 29 May 2010 00:19

There is some merit to it. Their messiah can be converted to Lord Krishna

Here is a piskological thought. We seem to find pakis' obsessive superiority complex (vis-a-vis the kuffar) and an irrational desire to convert the whole world to Islam, despicable and bordering on grotesquely risible. But many among us seem to carry the same thought process. There is an inherent streak of superiority complex among many of us that finds solace in the pipe dream that what was lost to a thousand+ years of mostly one way street out of the fold of Indic faiths (Dharma) (millions of erstwhile Hindus converting to Abrahamic religions through coercion, intimidation, enticement, expediency or dissatisfaction during the last 1300 odd years) can be reversed en masse at some glorious future date. The 'inherently more humane and philosophically superior belief system of our (and their) forefathers' will be found a logical and inevitable way out of the mess that currently prevails. How different is this belief and belief system from the pakis' irrationality and hubris?

ajit_tr · Post by **ajit_tr** » 29 May 2010 00:25

saip wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/fo ... 7_ST_N.htm

See the comments section under this link. Someone called 'Drop Fatboy' has an interesting theory and he supports it with 'statistics'
His argument seems to fit Pakis perfectly!

that comment was first propounded here.may be some brfite is drop fatboy.....

jamwal · Post by **jamwal** » 29 May 2010 01:18

Not really. It's been going around for a long time.

Nandu · Post by **Nandu** » 29 May 2010 01:25

saip wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/fo ... 7_ST_N.htm

See the comments section under this link. Someone called 'Drop Fatboy' has an interesting theory and he supports it with 'statistics'
His argument seems to fit Pakis perfectly!

Yeah, that particular screed with its stats have been making the rounds of US rightwing email circuits for a long time now.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 29 May 2010 05:50

80 militants killed in Orakzai blitz
At least 80 militants were killed and 60 others wounded on Friday after security forces backed by jet fighters carried out a massive operation in Orakzai Agency. According to sources, jet planes pounded militant hideouts located in different parts of Orakzi Agency, killing 80 militants and injuring several others. While eight militant hideouts were also destroyed in the bombings. In addition, security forces also bombed and destroyed 15 explosive-laden vehicle and 15 mules that were in the use of militants.

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... kzai-blitz

Rupesh · Post by **Rupesh** » 29 May 2010 06:00

Prem wrote:
80 militants killed in Orakzai blitz
At least 80 militants were killed and 60 others wounded on Friday after security forces backed by jet fighters carried out a massive operation in Orakzai Agency. According to sources, jet planes pounded militant hideouts located in different parts of Orakzi Agency, killing 80 militants and injuring several others. While eight militant hideouts were also destroyed in the bombings. In addition, security forces also bombed and destroyed 15 explosive-laden vehicle and 15 mules that were in the use of militants.
http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... kzai-blitz

The pious always keep the numbers easy to calculate

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 May 2010 06:03

A_Gupta wrote:Shiv, Raza Habib Raja isn't an alias of yours?
Change some pronouns and this could almost have been written by you.

svinayak · Post by **svinayak** » 29 May 2010 07:01

Abhijit wrote:
There is some merit to it. Their messiah can be converted to Lord Krishna
Here is a piskological thought. We seem to find pakis' obsessive superiority complex (vis-a-vis the kuffar) and an irrational desire to convert the whole world to Islam, despicable and bordering on grotesquely risible. But many among us seem to carry the same thought process. There is an inherent streak of superiority complex among many of us that finds solace in the pipe dream that what was lost to a thousand+ years of mostly one way street out of the fold of Indic faiths (Dharma) (millions of erstwhile Hindus converting to Abrahamic religions through coercion, intimidation, enticement, expediency or dissatisfaction during the last 1300 odd years) can be reversed en masse at some glorious future date. The 'inherently more humane and philosophically superior belief system of our (and their) forefathers' will be found a logical and inevitable way out of the mess that currently prevails. How different is this belief and belief system from the pakis' irrationality and hubris?

If you go back to the earlier times all these people are called lost souls. They have similar belief that everybody else who is not their type will also convert to their creed. The only way is to find a way into the future where at least they can live their life without causing harm to other people.

PS=
Has one noticed that they never ask for rights of the minorities/non muslims in Islamic countries but will always want to thrive in 'free' countries. Do you think it is a superiority complex in their culture.

Sanjay M · Post by **Sanjay M** » 29 May 2010 07:18

Ahmadi Muslims still ostracized by Other Muslims in Pak:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/29/world ... pstan.html

Satya_anveshi · Post by **Satya_anveshi** » 29 May 2010 07:35

Ahmediyas seems to be much like Mormon counterpart of Christians at least what we know of them in US (do they exist only in US?).
It seems like the movement is trying to align Xtians, Muslims, and Jews together (which would seem obvious)...kind of like party poopers is a way from Paki/Arab perspective.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 29 May 2010 09:09

Hunza's Impending Doom
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... llink10-12

Ahmadiya Water exodus from Attabad lake begins

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... gins-zj-01

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 29 May 2010 09:16

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... s-fine-950

Come on in, the water’s fine!
By Irfan Husain Takiyya Ustad

Thus the basis for a settlement does exist, and so does its logic. I (and countless others) have written and spoken at length about the benefits of peaceful coexistence, so I scarcely need to repeat myself. But it is important to underline the fact that extremists in Pakistan most fear a powerful, regional understanding that would pool resources to eradicate this threat. Thus, it is in their interest to provoke tensions between India and Pakistan, as well as between Pakistan and Afghanistan. If the terrorists are convinced that each time there is some movement towards peace, all they need to do to torpedo the process is to launch another attack against an Indian target. Whether there are rogue elements from the Pakistani security establishment involved is irrelevant: nobody in Pakistan who is in a position of authority today would take the risk of dabbling in these dangerous games. What Indians need to understand is that for a variety of reasons, most Pakistanis today are desperate for peace so they can end the existential threat extremism poses.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 29 May 2010 09:24

For Hakeem Shiv Moshai
analysis: Fatal illusions —Salman Tarik Kureshi

In Buddhist mythology, Gautama Buddha was assailed by the demon Mara when meditating under the sacred Bo tree. Mara appeared in the form of a gigantic ruler, mounted on an elephant 150 leagues high. The demon sprouted 1,000 arms, each of which brandished a deadly weapon. The point of the story is that this immense demon Mara was in fact Gautama’s own shadow self, an emanation of his mind, whose name meant ‘Delusion’. And it was necessary for Gautama to confront the immensity of his own delusions before he could see through them to the truth and become the Buddha. Truly, the delusions born from our fantasies and unfulfilled desires are colossal, bigger than ourselves, and capable of consuming us entirely

An image from eight years ago, which I have previously described in these pages, is next. This is of an aging Mohajir father beside the body of his son, killed in Afghanistan and returned dead to Karachi. The face of the old man could have been expected to be a face of rage, or of grief, or even of sad resignation. But, no, this face is expressionless, the eyes tearless. His son is a shaheed (martyr), he says, and should not be mourned. He will now send his remaining sons, one after the other, to their respective trysts with martyrdom. Now, one can accept that the father could believe sufficiently in a cause to be consoled for his son’s death. But it is hard to accept that he could eagerly will a similar destiny on his other sons. More, that this bereaved father is unmoved to any word, sign or expression of grief, is beyond understanding. Grief for the dead is normal. Even animals show it ( Janab , animals are intelligent creatures)lack of sorrow, his ‘absence of affective response’, is pathological.And that is precisely my point. The set of delusions connecting these four ethnically, educationally and socially far apart persons is just that: pathological.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... 2010_pg3_2

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 29 May 2010 09:50

Mohajir, shia, sunni, ahmediya, quadiani, wahabi, salafi, deobandi, Ahl-e-hadis, Tableegi.
(And we are not even talking about Punjabi / Sindhi / Baloch / Mirpuri etc)

And these are only a few of the subsects that the pakistanis have managed to divide muslims in their country into, and they are busy killing each other.

My my, that shit of a country is so phucked!

ajit_tr · Post by **ajit_tr** » 29 May 2010 10:11

Prem wrote:http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... s-fine-950

Come on in, the water’s fine!
]

Ah...pakistan can't effort confrontation with india but it wants peace at at its terms.

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 29 May 2010 11:00

US weighs military option in Pakistan: Report

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 987838.cms

The US military is developing plans for a unilateral attack on the Pakistani Taliban in the event of a successful terrorist strike in the United States that can be traced to them, The Washington Post reports.

The US has put Pakistan “on a clock” to launch a new intelligence and counterterrorist offensive against the group, which the White House alleges was behind the Times Square bombing attempt, according to the official.

sanjaykumar · Post by **sanjaykumar** » 29 May 2010 11:13

It is only posturing to frighten Pakistan, but if it comes about, India should offer them refueling and reloading facilities in Avantipur.

ajit_tr · Post by **ajit_tr** » 29 May 2010 11:27

abhishek_sharma wrote:US weighs military option in Pakistan: Report

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/worl ... 987838.cms

The US military is developing plans for a unilateral attack on the Pakistani Taliban in the event of a successful terrorist strike in the United States that can be traced to them, The Washington Post reports.

The US has put Pakistan “on a clock” to launch a new intelligence and counterterrorist offensive against the group, which the White House alleges was behind the Times Square bombing attempt, according to the official.

USA is weighing of unilateral strikes option on pakistan in case of succesful terror attack on usa emanating from pakistan.But i think usa is beibg too rude and pushy towards pakistan.There will always be chance that terrorists will try to attack usa in order to disturb peace and relation between the two countries.USA must not allow it to be carried away by emtions in case of terror attacks it must show restrain and keep talking to pakistan on strategic and composite dialogue.usa must understand that pakistan is a nuclear state and there can be dangers of nuclear exchange between the two if usa attacks pakistan pre-emptively.there are chance that pakistan may react with nukes and wipe out lacs of usa forces stationed in gulf and afghanistan.So being a responsible big superpower usa must be paitent enough and must restrain itself unless it can flare nuke exchange in entire middle east wiping out 1/3 rd of its forces

KLNMurthy · Post by **KLNMurthy** » 29 May 2010 11:43

Prem wrote:http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/daw ... s-fine-950

Come on in, the water’s fine!
By Irfan Husain Takiyya Ustad

Thus the basis for a settlement does exist, and so does its logic. I (and countless others) have written and spoken at length about the benefits of peaceful coexistence, so I scarcely need to repeat myself. But it is important to underline the fact that extremists in Pakistan most fear a powerful, regional understanding that would pool resources to eradicate this threat. Thus, it is in their interest to provoke tensions between India and Pakistan, as well as between Pakistan and Afghanistan. If the terrorists are convinced that each time there is some movement towards peace, all they need to do to torpedo the process is to launch another attack against an Indian target. Whether there are rogue elements from the Pakistani security establishment involved is irrelevant: nobody in Pakistan who is in a position of authority today would take the risk of dabbling in these dangerous games. What Indians need to understand is that for a variety of reasons, most Pakistanis today are desperate for peace so they can end the existential threat extremism poses.

here's an email I sent Irfan Hussain in response:
Dear Mr. Hussain,

In your article, you say:
The Pakistan Army would welcome peace, provided it is not on humiliating terms.

I don't mean to be rude, but honestly, I have to ask, what exactly is this mysterious humiliation that the Pakistani army fears and is trying to avoid? You don't say in your article, but forgive me if, based on your army's past record, and nearly everything I read in your media (excepting yourself and a tiny handful of others) makes me think that any possibility of an empowered India, ruled--as your country's founding concept would have it-- by despised kaffirs, is so bitterly unpalatable to the army that is the embodiment of your country, that it would be automatically considered humiliating. Justice would actually require that the Pakistani army should be disbanded as punishment [for] the genocide it perpetrated in Bangladesh. That would be humiliating, I suppose, but then it is not even a remote possibility.

Many years ago, I heard Prof. Hoodbhoy expound on the Pakistani army's attachment to "ghairat" or honor & dignity, and how they would stop at nothing, even causing a nuclear holocaust (this was before 1998 when both India and Pakistan came out of the nuclear closet), to preserve that ghairat. I suppose this is the same fear of humiliation you are hinting at in your article. I came to the conclusion that this honor & dignity of your army is not rooted in justified pride taken in accomplishment through honest and hard work, but actually is a kind of anachronistic feudal twisted self-regard that, in a mostly-bygone era, caused members of upper castes to consider any exhibition of self-assurance or affluence by a low-caste person as a humiliation and an insult. I find it interesting that, in over two decades of following the India-Pakistan imbroglio, I keep hearing Indian leaders from the top on down, constantly proclaiming that a strong and prosperous Pakistan is in India's interests; I never once heard a Pakistani leader or opinion-maker say anything nearly equivalent about a prosperous & strong India being in Pakistan's interest. Can you blame me for concluding that perhaps they can't say this, because they, in fact, find such an eventuality a humiliation and insult, therefore not in their interest?

I am one of those people that believes India is being foolish and courting nuclear attack by pursuing peace with Pakistan. You, on the other hand, apparently think (going by your article) that, irrespective of Pakistan's continued dedication to carrying out terrorist attacks against Indians, India should negotiate and conclude a clandestine peace with Pakistan, pulling the wool over the eyes of its own citizens, because, otherwise, as you would have it (echoing dear old George W. Bush), the terrorists win. But, if, as should be evident to anyone with a smidgen of honesty, Pakistan sees the peace process as using its terrorists as a means of bending India to its will (witness its outright refusal to dismantle the anti-India terrorist apparatus, and your prime minister's open signaling, right after Thimpu, that Pakistan is determined to promote more terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir), it seems to me that, peace under the present circumstances (what does it mean? Endorsing religious supremacism and the ultimate death of the work ethic in Jammu & Kashmir?) would actually be a win for the terrorist tactics of Pakistan.

Permit me to share a personal feeling with you: Ever since 26/11, when I read about one family of victims in particular--the Qureshi family who lost a 6-year old daughter Afreen and the mother was also grievously wounded at Mumbai's CST railway station, I have been haunted--as a father and just a man--by the mental image of a 6-year old girl dying violently and in pain, near her unconscious mother, wondering why her mother is not able to help her. Perhaps she was also thinking, why did that uncle just shoot me and ammi? I know that, with this image in my mind, I would not able to sit and dine, sip tea, and do business with Pakistanis (except insofar as they repudiate their country's role in the murder of Afreen and others, to my satisfaction) without my gorge rising and becoming physically sickened. I suppose it is not for me to judge, but I truly wonder about the mental and emotional processes of Indians who are able to do all of those things--sup and trade with Pakistanis--when Afreen's killing is not properly accounted for, and nothing is done to see to it that future Afreens are protected from the cynical pillaging gangster mentality that drives the Pakistani state.

I am afraid my views would lead to your classing me as a hate-filled Indian right-winger of the sort that fills you with so much consternation. You might be even more alarmed to learn that in Indian circles I am considered something of a soft-headed liberal! I must apologize for my blunt, even harsh tone, which in no way reflects the great regard I have for you; my excuse is that I owe you an honest expression of my feelings on this matter which is of such heartfelt interest to both of us.

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 29 May 2010 11:49

^^ Good job, brother!

KLNMurthy · Post by **KLNMurthy** » 29 May 2010 11:58

Prem wrote:For Hakeem Shiv Moshai
analysis: Fatal illusions —Salman Tarik Kureshi

[

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... 2010_pg3_2

Conformity was imposed on the pluralism prized by Jinnah and a unitary state, belying his crusades for provincial autonomy, was created. In place of our rich and diverse heritage, cultural uniformity was imposed. Ideological formulations were trumpeted, dissent discouraged

This is a hopeless guy; like all other so-called liberal Pakis, his role model is Jinnah, who epitomized elitism, religious supremacism, and disdain for ordinary hard-working people.

sanjaykumar · Post by **sanjaykumar** » 29 May 2010 12:02

I am afraid my views would lead to your classing me as a hate-filled Indian right-winger of the sort that fills you with so much consternation. You might be even more alarmed to learn that in Indian circles I am considered something of a soft-headed liberal!

Well that is the truth of the matter-I personally find Pakistanis odious not because I am an Indian or a Hindu but because I am a liberal. Perhaps you have noticed that I almost always champion the underdog. I am nauseated that the liberals of the west do not call this thug, fascist state for what it is....perhaps it is not polite to kick poor, people no matter how repugnant to civilised values.

abhishek_sharma · Post by **abhishek_sharma** » 29 May 2010 12:55

Dealing With Pakistan

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/29/opinion/29sat1.html

Part of that is the strategic game. Islamabad has long used extremist groups in its never-ending competition with India. Part is a lack of military capability and part political cowardice. While some of Pakistan’s top leaders may “get it,” the public definitely does not.

Congress approved the first $1.5 billion for 2010, but the State Department is still figuring out how to spend it. The projects need to move as quickly as possible. And Pakistani leaders who demand more help, but then cynically disparage the aid, need to change their narrative.

Dilbu · Post by **Dilbu** » 29 May 2010 13:59

KLNMurthy, that is a brilliant letter.

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 29 May 2010 14:08

Groper Gilani back to H&D exercise

PM urges world to give Pakistan civil nuclear technology

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani on Friday urged the international community to provide Pakistan access to civilian nuclear technology for peaceful purposes in a non-discriminator manner.

In his message on Takbeer Day, Gilani said that civil nuclear power technology was an essential part of the national energy security strategy to help meet the country’s growing energy needs for the social and economic development.

The frequency at which this illiterate fool is asking for nuke deal make me wonder if some one told him that nuke deal would be same as groping sherry rehman

Brad Goodman · Post by **Brad Goodman** » 29 May 2010 14:20

now that photo chor Khan is free he is on his self serving H&D exercise

Even 1000 terrorists wont be able to gain control over Pak nukes : A Q Khan

Disgraced Pakistan nuclear scientist Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan has asserted that his country's nuclear assets are so safe that even a thousand terrorists won't be able to gain control over them.

abhijitm · Post by **abhijitm** » 29 May 2010 15:43

Guys did we miss this?? Unbelievable bhookto speach

Bilawal Bhutto speaks in Urdu

Rahul M · Post by **Rahul M** » 29 May 2010 15:50

Brad Goodman wrote: Even 1000 terrorists wont be able to gain control over Pak nukes : A Q Khan

fine, what about 10,000 or 20,000 ? wait, what about 5.5 lakhs ?

Mahendra · Post by **Mahendra** » 29 May 2010 16:13

Rahul M wrote:
Brad Goodman wrote: Even 1000 terrorists wont be able to gain control over Pak nukes : A Q Khan
fine, what about 10,000 or 20,000 ? wait, what about 5.5 lakhs ?

Relax! His audience is the unwashed, inbreeding, malnourished and frothing at the mouth average grass eating Abdul in Pacquistan and the 1000 terrists he is talking about are the blackwater

arun · Post by **arun** » 29 May 2010 16:34

The standard operating practice of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to blame outsiders for Islamic terrorist attacks’s presumably conditioned on the notion that since they perceive Islam as the Religion of peace and Pakistan as an Islamic Republic made up of the “pure” , non-Pakistani’s must have done it, is in evidence.

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s Interior Minister is trying to shift the blame for the attack on the Mosque’s of the minority Ahmadiyya sect of Islam on the Muslim Sabbath of Friday in Lahore onto India:

'Indian role in Lahore attacks not to be ignored'

KLNMurthy · Post by **KLNMurthy** » 29 May 2010 17:23

Brad Goodman wrote:now that photo chor Khan is free he is on his self serving H&D exercise

Even 1000 terrorists wont be able to gain control over Pak nukes : A Q Khan

Disgraced Pakistan nuclear scientist Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan has asserted that his country's nuclear assets are so safe that even a thousand terrorists won't be able to gain control over them.

here's C.M. Naim, a US Professor out of UP, on jang vs. The News:

Let It All Hang Out—In Urdu!

On another occasion last year, Dr. Khan thrilled his Urdu readers with the disclosure: “According to the media, [Barack] Obama had earlier said, ‘Tear down the Ka’ba, for it is the root of every trouble.’” His English readers, however, were denied that excitement.

arun · Post by **arun** » 29 May 2010 17:24

More of the standard operating practice of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan to blame outsiders for Islamic terrorist attacks’s presumably conditioned on the notion that since they perceive Islam as the Religion of peace and Pakistan as an Islamic Republic made up of the “pure” , non-Pakistani’s must have done it, is in evidence.

Qari Zawar Bahadar, Secretary Genereal of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Pakistan Noorani (JUP-N), one of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s religious political parties, sees the attack on the Muslim Sabbath of Friday on the mosques of the minority Ahmadi / Ahmadiyya / Ahmedi sect of Islam in Lahore as a American, Indian and Israeli plot :

Zawar said that the attacks on Ahmedis were a conspiracy launched by international agencies to divert the world’s attention from Muslim protests on the Facebook issue. “American, Indian and Israeli agencies may be involved in these attacks in a bid to increase the propaganda against Muslims,”

Daily Times