The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
I remember on more delta wing, the Gloster Javelin.
Brilliant
I had forgotten that one. If you look back at the post WW2 period Britain produced so many aircrfat - but the Britiesh Aerospace industry no longer comes up with so many designs. Heck the aerospace industry of the entire world produce fewer new designs than the Brits of the US of that era.
Gloster Javelin
Remember the Handle Page Victor bomber that became a refueller by the Falklands war era?
This is the V-series bomber trio - Valiant, Victor and Vulcan
Dassault Etendard - these may still be in service - not sure
Douglas A4 Skyhawk. This was the only other fighter (before the harrier) that the Vikrant could have operated. It is American and i don't think it was offered at all
Grumman Intruder
I post this as a curiosity - the Grumman Panther. This shipborne aircraft was featured in the Korean war film "Bridges at Toko-ri". I was a little boy when I saw it and the movie was already old but I recall repeated scenes of these aircraft trying to bomb some bridges. I remember this movie in the era of PGMs when just one bomb should do the trick. It was years before I discovered what aircraft were featured in the film
Grumman Panther
dinesha wrote:Can we start similar thread/Sticky for land warfare Systems to document Armoured/Artillery vehicles, tanks, self-propelled/towed guns etc.
Very Good Idea.
But let us also continue this thread for transports, helicopter and UAVs
Victor wrote:
Soko G4 Super Galeb trainer of Myanmar Air Force was used to bomb Karen tribes. Now replaced by Chinese Hongdu K8 (same as paki Karakoram) trainer.
There was also an aircrfat called Soko Jastreb. Any pics ?
Douglas A4 Skyhawk. This was the only other fighter (before the harrier) that the Vikrant could have operated. It is American and i don't think it was offered at all
My thinking is different. I think it was offered to India or IN wanted it. But the existing (short stroke) catapult would have to be replaced with another one. UK refused to make the changes to make sure that we buy the Seahawks only.
Fairchild Republic T-46 Eaglet, aka the "Thunder Piglet", was supposed to replace the T-37 "Tweet" but was overweight and had too much drag. It was cancelled in 1987 and that was the end of the Republic name which shut its doors after this. The renamed Fairchild Aerospace went on to design the A-10 Warthog (Thunderbolt II) and later bought Dornier but was itself purchased by M7 Aerospace.
I know there are more, but then, the line is thin between an armed utility heli and a light attack/reconnaissance attack heli. Kindly add the appropriate ones. I am unable to decide what all to include
Kersi D wrote:
It may be for the Lancer program where Israel modified the Romaninan MiG 21s. The IAF MiG 21 modification was done by Russia with the Kopyo radar
Lockheed AH-56 Cheyenne-was developed for deployment in Vietnam but AH-1 Cobra was selected instead. Later the program was used to develop the AH-64 Apache, Never saw service.
When I first saw our own LCH hovering it reminded me of this one (I know they look very different), guess it was them huge canopies.
nachiket wrote:Shiv, those two helicopters look completely different. Perhaps you meant to post another pic?
Nachiket it is easy to say that when you have two photographs in front of you are are already an expert. But when you see one fly by and manage a look at it for just 2 seconds (such as near an airport when you are in a foreign country or in the movies) it is far more difficult to say "Hey that was a Russian Mi 34 and not a Polish SW4". Both helos have enough general similarities for one to need to distinguish finer points. That is what aircraft recognition is all about
If you get a half second peek between clouds it is sometimes difficult to distinguish a Mirage 2000 from an LCA. Anyone who does plane spotting will know what I mean. I am sure you understand that. It is a long process to reach the stage when you can do that from the stage of a golfer in Bangalore looking at a Jaguar taking off from HAL and saying "Look at that Raptor taking off"
Maybe you are right. From a different angle there could be similarities. I could find very few from those two pics.
Totally agree about the Mirage-2000 and LCA part though.
Here are two more that would be difficult to tell apart for the casual observer unless he has trained himself to observe minor differences other than broad shapes. Rotor blade numbers can generally be assesses in a photo - but more difficult in live observation.
nachiket wrote:Maybe you are right. From a different angle there could be similarities. I could find very few from those two pics.
Totally agree about the Mirage-2000 and LCA part though.
Very often in Bangalore - you catch a "flash glimpse" of an LCA (or a Mirage) as it flashes past between a gap in trees or clouds. You have to "photograph" that image in your mind and then ask whether it had any Mirage features or LCA features.
The amazing thing is when a Jaguar is taking off - at some angle it looks just like an HF 24. Only context and prior knowledge would make one know the difference.
nachiket wrote:Shiv, those two helicopters look completely different. Perhaps you meant to post another pic?
Nachiket it is easy to say that when you have two photographs in front of you are are already an expert. But when you see one fly by and manage a look at it for just 2 seconds (such as near an airport when you are in a foreign country or in the movies) it is far more difficult to say "Hey that was a Russian Mi 34 and not a Polish SW4". Both helos have enough general similarities for one to need to distinguish finer points. That is what aircraft recognition is all about
shiv wrote:The amazing thing is when a Jaguar is taking off - at some angle it looks just like an HF 24. Only context and prior knowledge would make one know the difference.
You make a good point. It is true for many mordern fighters too. This one looks like a MiG 29 to a non expert. But it isn't.
Looking up at a high flying F-18 sometimes also looks like an F-16 due to similar overall design. (Not details)
The Percival Jet Prevost...strikingly similar to the HAL Kiran. In fact, I remember reading a book where it was mentioned that the design was bought from Precival. Guru log please confirm...
nikhil_p wrote:The Percival Jet Prevost...strikingly similar to the HAL Kiran. In fact, I remember reading a book where it was mentioned that the design was bought from Precival. Guru log please confirm...
Well blow mw down. I had never noticed the similarity before..
nikhil_p wrote:The Percival Jet Prevost...strikingly similar to the HAL Kiran. In fact, I remember reading a book where it was mentioned that the design was bought from Precival. Guru log please confirm...
Well blow mw down. I had never noticed the similarity before..
Hunting Jet Provost
Kiran
The similarity is amazing.
Me thinks that the Precival Provost became the BAC 167 Strikemaster and it finally evolved into the Hawk. Gurus, please comment / correct.