Bharat Rakshak

N Balram, Chairman and Managing Director of Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), told CNBC-TV18 that government-backed studies by the Non-ferrous Materials Technology Development Centre (NFTDC) have found 1 kg of Scandium and Strontium in every 15 tons of clay at the Sathupalli and Ramagundam open-cast mines. He added that the supply of these elements from both mines is expected to start in August

While Scandium is used in aircraft components, fuel cells and high-performance sports goods, Strontium has applications in alloys, ferrite ceramic magnets, medicines, vacuum systems, and cathode-ray tubes.

chetak wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 20:59 Rare earth elements found in Telangana coal mines, search expands nationwide: Report





https://www.financialexpress.com/busine ... t-3898014/

chetak wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 20:59 Rare earth elements found in Telangana coal mines, search expands nationwide: Report

N Balram, Chairman and Managing Director of Singareni Collieries Company Limited (SCCL), told CNBC-TV18 that government-backed studies by the Non-ferrous Materials Technology Development Centre (NFTDC) have found 1 kg of Scandium and Strontium in every 15 tons of clay at the Sathupalli and Ramagundam open-cast mines. He added that the supply of these elements from both mines is expected to start in August

While Scandium is used in aircraft components, fuel cells and high-performance sports goods, Strontium has applications in alloys, ferrite ceramic magnets, medicines, vacuum systems, and cathode-ray tubes.

https://www.financialexpress.com/busine ... t-3898014/

drnayar wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 17:36

chetak wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 20:59 Rare earth elements found in Telangana coal mines, search expands nationwide: Report

https://www.financialexpress.com/busine ... t-3898014/

brittanica says : An economically viable source should contain more than 5 percent rare earths, unless they are mined with another product—e.g., zirconium, uranium, or iron—which allows economic recovery of ore bodies with concentrations of as little as 0.5 percent by weight

chetak wrote: ↑03 Jul 2025 22:59 VI@WA


After a petition called Mohandas Gandhi racist, his statue was removed from the University of Ghana

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... ity-ghana/






Can we really blame African black community?

so pujya bhopu's pecking order was:

gora
mullah
hindu
kaala



Weirdly, that is still what congress party follows today



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denzil_Ibbetson

Yayavar wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 04:27 @Vayu A 24 year old clerk, narrowly focused on his own ilk, wrote a prejudiced letter. No doubt about it. He even used AIT to plead equivalence to the Anglos. I am suggesting that the words of the 24 year old rookie clerk do not define him. Are there later statements?

Gandhi suggested to British Viceroy Lord Mountbatten that India’s unity (during partition) might be saved if Jinnah were made PM of India and India’s cabinet was made exclusively Muslim. Mountbatten, taken slightly aback, politely told the Mahatma he would think about it, knowing full well that he wouldn’t!!
- Excerpt from Sam Dalrymple’s ‘Shattered Lands: Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia’

This is while Gandhi kept a small statue of the three wise monkeys representing "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" and preached non-violence to Hindus!!

-Ghana has world’s 10th largest lithium reserves
-Trinidad & Tobago hydrocarbons
-Argentina 2nd largest lithium, 2nd largest shale gas
-Namibia 3rd largest uranium reserves

#India’s PM Modi is visiting all countries in addition to #BRICS2025

A_Gupta wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 17:54 From my blog:

On March 31, 1947, Gandhi suggested to Viceroy Lord Mountbatten that Jinnah and the Muslim League be given the opportunity to form a Cabinet for India, the Congress would not be in the government but would cooperate. Mountbatten was taken aback by this, but this was not a new proposal. It has been proposed in 1940 and 1942, in 1946, and possibly on one other occasion. {If we believe Wali Khan, Gandhi had made such an offer from prison in a letter to Jinnah in 1943, which caused some anxiety to the British that Jinnah might accept.}
…
…
Incidentally, if we believe V.P. Menon, Jinnah was wary of such proposals, because he was afraid that the Congress would genuinely cooperate with the Muslim League and that would put paid to the Pakistan scheme.

The Viceroy recorded in the same note, that per Nehru, “ Mr Gandhi was immensely keen on a unified India, at any immediate cost, for the benefit of the long term future......”.

This Sam Dalrymple - does he mention any of the above?

Yayavar wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 04:27 @Vayu A 24 year old clerk, narrowly focused on his own ilk, wrote a prejudiced letter. No doubt about it. He even used AIT to plead equivalence to the Anglos. I am suggesting that the words of the 24 year old rookie clerk do not define him. Are there later statements?

Vayutuvan wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:45

Yayavar wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 04:27 @Vayu A 24 year old clerk, narrowly focused on his own ilk, wrote a prejudiced letter. No doubt about it. He even used AIT to plead equivalence to the Anglos. I am suggesting that the words of the 24 year old rookie clerk do not define him. Are there later statements?

He was admitted to bar 2 years before in London. He was in Africa in 1893. American Civil War ended in 1865. I read somewhere that Lincoln was one of his role models. Given that he was a lawyer, he would have read enough legal history about slavery. He still held those beliefs when he was 24.

chetak wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 12:57

Yayavar wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 04:27 @Vayu A 24 year old clerk, narrowly focused on his own ilk, wrote a prejudiced letter. No doubt about it. He even used AIT to plead equivalence to the Anglos. I am suggesting that the words of the 24 year old rookie clerk do not define him. Are there later statements?

Yayavar ji,


The point being made is that ghundhy agreed with and endorsed his views, the rest is mere window dressing

He implied that Indians were higher than the kaffirs and lower than the britshits, and ghundhy endorsed those deeply racist views unreservedly

why did he poke his unwanted nose into the khilafat movement and how did that stooopidity help the beleaguered majority who were anyway being oppressed by the jihadis and the britshits. WHO were the ungrateful scum that it did benefit and why was he so keen to do so when he was told by so many of his well wishers to drop the matter and move on

when ghundhy was booted out of the first class compartment in south africa, do you know what he did thereafter. ..... ...

do you know why he is called the "stretcher bearer of the empire" in so many quarters

India existed aeons before ghundy was born, so it did not need a "father", so which country was he the najais father of and the only one birthed during his lifetime was on the eastern and western wings of India

And finally, what are you talking about when the AIT is still being "taught" in India, despite being universally acknowledged as a fraudulent and self serving theory designed by britshit imperialist scum to validate, and vindicate their presence in India and to justify the concept of the superior race and defend their right to over India.

Why did he suddenly move back to India, (or was he transplanted by his venomous and cunning masters with devious and malevolent intent) and how did he so suddenly bloom in the political arena of those days, especially when there were already far better leaders than himself handling the freedom struggle quite well

Ye kis khet ki mooli tha

Ghundhy never differed with this view, neither in his writings nor his public expositions where all he did was glorify the jihadis, and his colonial masters, and constantly demonize the majority. Who was he to agree to Indian soldiers fighting for the britshits in both the world wars, where many many tens of thousands died for a country that wasn't theirs and didn't "have a dog in the fight"

did he even once mention the dead and wounded, the very people he had callously sent out to die, without even asking them if they wanted to go, all for his petty political gains.

Did he get us freedom or did he simply grab the victory that was crafted and carved out by subsash chandra bose and his INA, where the britshits ran scared, petrified of the violence that would have been unleashed on them, had matters gotten out of hand after the Naval mutiny gave them a taste of what was to come if they stayed on

So, what exactly was his role and who benefited most of all.

It certainly wasn't India

It's always the "Cui bono?" analysis which leads you to the truth

Gandhi suggested to British Viceroy Lord Mountbatten that India’s unity (during partition) might be saved if Jinnah were made PM of India and India’s cabinet was made exclusively Muslim. Mountbatten, taken slightly aback, politely told the Mahatma he would think about it, knowing full well that he wouldn’t!!
- Excerpt from Sam Dalrymple’s ‘Shattered Lands: Five Partitions and the Making of Modern Asia’

This is while Gandhi kept a small statue of the three wise monkeys representing "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" and preached non-violence to Hindus!!

And, look where it got us finally: Saddled with a christian constitution in a Hindu Nation