

The google earth placemark is available here: Click
a. Existence of a part of Osama's sister's body does not mean that she was NOT buriedAnujan wrote:I call shenanigans on "Appropriate Islamic Burial" for OBL. Apparently parts of his sister's body have been preserved till today to get a DNA match. Now why am I having trouble believing that OBL was disposed off *immediately*
suryag wrote:Guys we should buy 6 blackhawks paint it black and station it in our Jalalabad consulate. Then send in indians with their skin lightened and hair blonded into Pakisatan and get the guy we want, looks like that route is free for use
he was always in a paki hideout...since he left Sudan.ShyamSP wrote:They say he lived in that compound for 5 years. He might have lived some Paki hideout before.
Keep your friends close and your enemies outfitted with F-16s
Dubai: The compound in Abbottabad where Osama Bin Laden was killed was once used as a safe house by Pakistan's premier intelligence agency ISI, Gulf News has learnt.
"This area had been used as ISI's safe house, but it was not under their use any more because they keep on changing their locations," a senior intelligence official confided to Gulf News. However, he did not reveal when and for how long it was used by the ISI operatives. Another official cautiously said "it may not be the same house but the same compound or area used by the ISI".
The official also confirmed that the house was rented out by Afghan nationals and is not owned by the government. The house is located just 800 metres away from the Pakistan Military Academy and some former senior military officials live nearby.
Abbottabad is a garrison town located just 50 kilometres north of Islamabad and it is a popular summer resort, originally built by the British during colonial rule. The city houses a number of upscale educational institutions and religious schools as well.
The rumor is that as the helos flew back, some got an itch to eat some Pesahwari naan and tandoori chicken; so they ordered it from the air, swooped down and picked the order up....there were still no signs of Paki jets. The SF are suing GoUSA for the entire operation being no fun and totally anti-climax. In addition, they also picked up some strong Afghani Chai on the way. It is also heard that the reasons Paki jets did not scramble was because their tires lacked enough air to overcome the potholes on the runway. So they ordered this.... and you know donkeys travel slowly onlee.amdavadi wrote:Nukes are with unkil..helos took the nukes once they picked up OBL....![]()
![]()
Pakis are terrorist now the whole word agrees with India.
Messaging or Massaging ?Anujan wrote:Groper's first official statement "Positive messaging about Pakistan rather than finger pointing is the need of the hour"
Makes one wonder about all their vaunted nukes with corps commanders with delgated launch authority etc nonsense.rajanb wrote:Fantastic Press Conference by John Brennan if you guys heard it.
a) Pakistan was informed after the "aircraft" crossed into Afghanistan.
b) Pakistan were in the pocess of scrambling their assets.c) Qaida a wounded tiger, not yet dead. And other affiliates need to be destroyed.
d) Believes that many Pakistanis have co-operated on the war on terror, but Osama had support from other elements.
e) 99.9% confident about it being OBL
f) OBL buried at sea and working on whether they should release pictures.
The rest we all have heard in trickles.
Cheers
Their cricket team captain said much the same thing after he tried to swallow a ball - "Don't ask negative questions".Anujan wrote:Groper's first official statement "Positive messaging about Pakistan rather than finger pointing is the need of the hour"
Looks like a portable something. Isnt a dialysis machine bigger than that?Sam wrote:22 seconds in the video clip is it dialysis (or lota) machine?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13260250
When USA demands that Pakistan returns the remains of the helicopter just in case something remained intact, Pakistanis will say non-state actors took the parts away!prithvi wrote:Pakistani "Troops" carrying the remains of the downed chopper .... the whole thing has a touch of nonchalance associated with it.. which makes it really funny... instead of army troops .. Pakistan wants to display civilians taking care of these sensitive work.. guess they (Pakistani Army and ISI) are desperate to distance themselves from it
The martyr of Abbottabad is no more, and the competing Führer-complexes of his surviving underlings will perhaps now enjoy an exciting free rein. Yet the uniformed and anonymous patrons of that sheltered Abbottabad compound are still very much with us, and Obama's speech will be entirely worthless if he expects us to go on arming and financing the very people who made this trackdown into such a needlessly long, arduous and costly one.
Why did they hire Afridi (or his cousin) to clean up the mess?prithvi wrote:![]()
Their version of BPOanupmisra wrote:Why did they hire Afridi (or his cousin) to clean up the mess?prithvi wrote:![]()
Look at the shoes of the abdul on the far left. Seems he did some "thorough investigation" of the compoundprithvi wrote: Pakistani "Troops" carrying the remains of the downed chopper .... the whole thing has a touch of nonchalance associated with it.. which makes it really funny... instead of army troops .. Pakistan wants to display civilians taking care of these sensitive work.. guess they (Pakistani Army and ISI) are desperate to distance themselves from it
One on the right looks like the "4th" Akmal brother.. who had been missing for a while...Anujan wrote:Look at the shoes of the abdul on the far left. Seems he did some "thorough investigation" of the compoundprithvi wrote: Pakistani "Troops" carrying the remains of the downed chopper .... the whole thing has a touch of nonchalance associated with it.. which makes it really funny... instead of army troops .. Pakistan wants to display civilians taking care of these sensitive work.. guess they (Pakistani Army and ISI) are desperate to distance themselves from it
There has never been a good alternative to dealing with the Pakistanis as a nominal ally. Their perfidy in this matter is something it’s hard to seek vengeance for. It’s not something Republicans would handle better than Democrats, or vice versa. I’ve had serious criticism for some of the Obama administration’s attitudes and methods in dealing with Pakistan, but pinning fault on him for this situation would be unfair.
What do we do? We certainly don’t react in a way that would jeopardize the campaign in Afghanistan. I’m hopeful that Obama won’t. I’d like to think his administration could come up with a more constructive level of engagement with Pakistan, but that’s unlikely. I suspect the administration will downplay the glaring evidence that senior Pakistanis not only knew where bin Laden was but had assigned him his address, and seek to move on. It’s a tough planet.
jarugn wrote:Bin Laden mission violated Pakistan
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... -pakistan/
Mush ... I think u didn't get the memo. there is no trust in either side. I think you are not watching news or reading new paper.“If two organizations [are] conducting an operation against a common enemy, there has to be trust and confidence in each other,” he said.
We know that 400%. We knew you were 400%x400% true when you said you are sure 400% that that Osama is dead.Pakistan is “totally on board” on fighting al Qaeda and Taliban.
Is that a threat to amrika that they will unleash terror?
“A battle has been won, but the war continues,” Mr. Musharraf said, warning that “al Qaeda is still there.
pgbhat wrote:http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/20 ... ghborhood/There has never been a good alternative to dealing with the Pakistanis as a nominal ally. Their perfidy in this matter is something it’s hard to seek vengeance for. It’s not something Republicans would handle better than Democrats, or vice versa. I’ve had serious criticism for some of the Obama administration’s attitudes and methods in dealing with Pakistan, but pinning fault on him for this situation would be unfair.
What do we do? We certainly don’t react in a way that would jeopardize the campaign in Afghanistan. I’m hopeful that Obama won’t. I’d like to think his administration could come up with a more constructive level of engagement with Pakistan, but that’s unlikely. I suspect the administration will downplay the glaring evidence that senior Pakistanis not only knew where bin Laden was but had assigned him his address, and seek to move on. It’s a tough planet.